Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:59:22 -0600
From: Steve Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Felix Khling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] savage-2-0-0 test notes
I tested it with a fresh copy from the trunk (effective tuesday),
and
have the same problems.
Here
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:13:44 +0100
Marco Strack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Tuxracer is still fine. But blender didn't change. The screen is clean
but all fonts are corrupted. It seems to me that the fonts in blender
are also gl, but that's just an assumption.
The font corruption
Alex
Regards,
Felix
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:59:22 -0600
From: Steve Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Felix Khling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] savage-2-0-0 test notes
I tested it with a fresh copy from the trunk (effective
]
To: Felix Khling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] savage-2-0-0 test notes
I tested it with a fresh copy from the trunk (effective tuesday),
and
have the same problems.
Here are some PNG's of the results from drawpix:
16 bit display, drawing to back buffer:
http
PROTECTED]
To: Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] savage-2-0-0 test notes
I tested it with a fresh copy from the trunk (effective tuesday), and
have the same problems.
Here are some PNG's of the results from drawpix:
16 bit display, drawing to back buffer:
http://69.5.151.193
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:23:16 -0700
Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
[snip]
I don't have tuxracer handy - I'll have to download it later. Do you
happen to know which fog mode is used, and if the GL_FOG_HINT is set?
I don't know which fog mode it uses. The
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:23:16 -0700
Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
[snip]
I don't have tuxracer handy - I'll have to download it later. Do you
happen to know which fog mode is used, and if the GL_FOG_HINT is set?
I don't know which fog mode it
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:18:53 -0600
Steve Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
If the span stuff is all that's needed then it should be working.
Incidentally I tested the drawpix demo yesterday. It worked ok as long
as it drew to the back buffer. Drawing to the front buffer
Gregory Davis wrote:
On Sunday 22 February 2004 03:15 pm, Steve Holland wrote:
I downloaded and tested the savage-2-0-0 branch yesterday. This is
on an IBM ThinkPad T23 with a SuperSavage IX/C SDR. It works really
well! Congratulations and thanks, guys!
A few notes (savage-2-0-0 branch 2/21/04):
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:56:29 -0700
Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Davis wrote:
[snip]
Greg Davis
In the savage driver, after the calls to
_swrast_allow_pixel/vertex_fog(), put in corresponding calls to
_tnl_allow_pixel/vertex_fog() and see what happens.
I just tried this.
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:33:16 +0100
Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:56:29 -0700
Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Davis wrote:
[snip]
Greg Davis
In the savage driver, after the calls to
_swrast_allow_pixel/vertex_fog(), put in corresponding
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:33:16 +0100
Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:56:29 -0700
Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Davis wrote:
[snip]
Greg Davis
In the savage driver, after the calls to
_swrast_allow_pixel/vertex_fog(), put in
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:01:39PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:33:16 +0100
Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:56:29 -0700
Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Davis wrote:
[snip]
Greg Davis
In the
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:01:39 -0700
Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:33:16 +0100
Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:56:29 -0700
Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Davis wrote:
[snip]
Greg
I downloaded and tested the savage-2-0-0 branch yesterday. This is
on an IBM ThinkPad T23 with a SuperSavage IX/C SDR. It works really
well! Congratulations and thanks, guys!
A few notes (savage-2-0-0 branch 2/21/04):
- tuxracer runs great!
- glDrawPixels doesn't seem to work (may be
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:15:30 -0600
Steve Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded and tested the savage-2-0-0 branch yesterday. This is
on an IBM ThinkPad T23 with a SuperSavage IX/C SDR. It works really
well! Congratulations and thanks, guys!
A few notes (savage-2-0-0 branch
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:58:25AM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote:
Hmm, the driver lacks the *pixel.[ch] files that for instance the mga
driver has. The r128 driver seems to have some pixel drawing stuff in
r128_span.[ch].
span files have the software stuff and pixel files have some AGP
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:16:07 +0200
Ville Syrjälä [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:58:25AM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote:
Hmm, the driver lacks the *pixel.[ch] files that for instance the mga
driver has. The r128 driver seems to have some pixel drawing stuff in
On Sunday 22 February 2004 03:15 pm, Steve Holland wrote:
I downloaded and tested the savage-2-0-0 branch yesterday. This is
on an IBM ThinkPad T23 with a SuperSavage IX/C SDR. It works really
well! Congratulations and thanks, guys!
A few notes (savage-2-0-0 branch 2/21/04):
- tuxracer
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:38:34PM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote:
span files have the software stuff and pixel files have some AGP
glReadPixels() stuff but I think it's disabled (maybe broken?). The span
stuff is straightforward to add because there are some templates.
If the span stuff is
20 matches
Mail list logo
