cost ... SO
PROBLEM SOLVED !! 73, W2CF
Richard T. Schweizer
377 Canterbury Dr.
Ramsey, NJ 07446
Telephone: (201) 825-4318
From: wn3...@verizon.net
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] LOTW cannot possibly catch up
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:56:42 -0500
Blaming
Remember the days when you mailed in cards to the league and it took
3 months. to process?
I'll take 10 days over that anytime.
It used to take 6 years to get your cards back from Box 88. Now I
see even our Russian friends are on LOTW. And I had my PT0S 160 Qso
confirmed in days.
LOTW even at 20 days is a tremendous tool.
I'm not concerned about 20 days for a confirmation. My concern is
20 days (or more) even before the initial transaction is processed
and I get confirmation that the QSOs are safely in the database.
I'm confident they'll figure this out, it's
All of us on this reflector are painfully aware that LoTW has a
problem, Additionally we all have seen this discussion go on ad
nausium. All of us are concerned about the problem. None of this is new
NEWS. So far I have told you nothing new. The complaining goes on
on, and accomplishes
On 12/15/2012 Donald Greenbaum wrote:
I don't understand the angst over a backlog of processing data during
the end of the year rush. Unless the world really is going to end in
a week like the Mayans predicted.
73
Don
N1DG
Partly because those of us who have been watching have come
Might want to consider creating a filter for the thread? Maybe filter
out any messages with LoTW in the subject field ;)
73, Mike, K2CD
Mike(W5UC) Kathy (K5MWH) wrote:
All of us on this reflector are painfully aware that LoTW has a
problem, Additionally we all have seen this discussion
Every transaction-oriented software system has a performance bottleneck that
limits its throughput. Eliminating that bottleneck -- either by improving
the software or upgrading the hardware -- always reveals the next
bottleneck.
The ARRL has determined that LotW's throughput is limited by the
4:18 PM
To: w...@suddenlink.net
Cc: Dx-Chat
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] LOTW cannot possibly catch up
SO, please let me ask; what do the complainers expect to accomplish
by continuing to kick this horse?
How about getting others involved in *doing something* about the
problem? Since the ARRL
Perhaps this is a fluke, but if not, something is seriously wrong with
the system.
I'm looking at the lotw stats at http://www.arrl.org/logbook-queue-status
2012-12-14 11:02:10 28,382 8,932,232 3,874,028,579 2012-12-04
16:13:53
(9d 18h 48m 17s ago)
2012-12-14 10:02:27
Barry,
The reported backlog is simply the time between upload of the last
processed file and the reporting epoch. It is a backward looking
statistic and not predictive.
If you want predictive, look at the number of QSOs in the queue
- which continues to increase - and apply an value for
Go to the LOTW site and read carefully. There is a discussion that
tells, in part, that new hardware is on order, and is expected to arrive
in 6-8 weeks. THEY ARE WORKING ON IT!!! RELAX!!! Constantly getting
your shorts all in a wad is uncomfortable, and bad for your health. It
raises
Go to the LOTW site and read carefully. There is a discussion that
tells, in part, that new hardware is on order, and is expected to
arrive in 6-8 weeks. THEY ARE WORKING ON IT!!!
That is if you *believe* the claim that the hardware will fix it.
With a very large database, decreases in
On 12/14/2012 11:24 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
Go to the LOTW site and read carefully. There is a discussion that
tells, in part, that new hardware is on order, and is expected to
arrive in 6-8 weeks. THEY ARE WORKING ON IT!!!
That is if you *believe* the claim that the hardware will fix
No Ryan, the League is not a dictatorship.
To answer more generically, and not specifically to you (or just you):
However: If you want change, and are not happy with the current situation with
the Logbook server... kvetching about it on this reflector will not accomplish
anything. And I
That's correct, Ron. You complain about it to your division director,
who will speak on your behalf.
But there's nothing wrong with discussing it here, IMO. Maybe they DO
read things here... I work in web technology for a living, and you
know what? Sometimes I do go searching the web for things
OK, great idea, and then what? If we believe that the present IT dept
isn't being truthful with us, why should we expect that our 'insisting
will change anything?
Quite sometime ago I suggested to my director that LoTW be shut down for
as long as necessary to achieve a long term solution.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jim Abercrombie 4...@prtcnet.com wrote:
I have a new computer after the old one crashed and I lost all my data that
wasn't backed up. Registered for LoTW again and was successful. Sent Don
Sumner at ARRL HQ an email commending Mike for making the LoTW a
FYI, an upload I made on 4 NOV was just processed this afternoon.
Barry W2UP
---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to
imail...@njdxa.org
In the message body put either
unsubscribe dx-chat
or
Their server admins ran out of chewing gum and the bailing wire is still on
back-order.
- pjd
-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Jairam
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:39 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] LoTW down?
Looks
I submitted my LOTW credits on-line Saturday and we had Memorial day yesterday.
My LOTW were accepted and confirmed when I looked
about 1PM today, Tuesday.
Fast turn around!!
Jim N4JA
---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.
Well, Jim, I think it is great service by ARRL's computer system.
Also, may be the explanation for high and permanent unemployment. Sorry
abt my comment.
73 Lou KE1F
On 5/29/2012 1:28 PM, JIM Abercrombie wrote:
I submitted my LOTW credits on-line Saturday and we had Memorial day
Did anyone work TI5/K2PLF ? When I received confirmation from LOTW , The
entity was listed as United States of America. The zone was # 7.
I'll try to email ARRL and let them know.
73,
Mark..K2AU
That may be an error in the certificate... that is to say, the wrong entity was
put in when the certificate was applied for.
So while the error is showing in LotW, this may be more of a case of GIGO
73
On 02/29/12, Mark Horowitz wrote:
Did anyone work TI5/K2PLF ? When I received
When I received confirmation from LOTW , The entity was listed as
United States of America. The zone was # 7.
This probably means that K2PLF requested a certificate for the United
States or possibly signed the TI5/K2LPF logs with a US certificate
and the correct station location. I do not
@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] -LOTW
However, at $2.00 per card there is not a lot of
net profit in direct cards after printing and postage. An SASE
to/from an in country manager is a net loss to the DXpedition.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
What you say makes perfect sense-.Add the cost
From another reflector :
Meldingstekst
Yesterday, having got E51MAN LOTW confirmations, I submitted a LOTW-only
DXCC update, the first since Oct 2010.
This morning my LOTW totals have been updated.
Fantastic, well done to NC1L team.
--
73
Alan 5B4AHJ-5B50J-P3J
N7OU is to be commended for
On 12/21/2011 5:56 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
Oh yes Rag, you've made more than a few points. But let's stick to
the important one...
I am positive that the ST0R logs will be on Logbook of the World at
some point. I'm not going to spend time combing their web site to
find out when
22.12.2011 13:39
To: wn3...@verizon.net
Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] -LOTW
On 12/21/2011 5:56 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
Oh yes Rag, you've made more than a few points. But let's stick to
the important one...
I am positive that the ST0R logs will be on Logbook of the World
guess their next move should be requesting free
LoTW confirmations at ARRL.
73's Boris E73Y
-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org on behalf of Mike(W5UC)
Sent: čet 22.12.2011 13:39
To: wn3...@verizon.net
Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] -LOTW
On 12/21/2011 5:56 PM, Ron
I think a few general comments on use of Logbook of the World are in order.Of course, first and foremost, this is my opinion only, YMMV.And by no means is this a criticism of LotW. I am very much in favor of the entire concept. If I have any gripe at all, it would be more of a lament that more
However, at $2.00 per card there is not a lot of
net profit in direct cards after printing and postage. An SASE
to/from an in country manager is a net loss to the DXpedition.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
What you say makes perfect sense-.Add the cost for the deserving
and it becomes obvious that
-Chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] -LOTW
However, at $2.00 per card there is not a lot of
net profit in direct cards after printing and postage. An SASE
to/from an in country manager is a net loss to the DXpedition.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
What you say makes perfect sense-.Add the cost
I have to comment on a couple of these:
On 12/22/11, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net wrote:
Oh, heck Rag, that's easy.
Some people don't have computers in their shack. or even their home. May be
hard to believe, but it's true (I know quite a few right here in my town).
So Logbook
PM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] -LOTW
I have made my point. Others have made the same point. Pressure is building.
Note that T32C uploaded to LoTW within six weeks, not months!
73 rag la5he
http://tinyurl.com/c6g6g4k
http://de.visittelemark.com/
or
http
Anyone else getting a fatal error message from the Logbook of the World
server?
I keep getting the following response:
Fatal error: initializeLOTWDB: -709 - CONNECT: (protocol error):
General database error [initializeLOTWDB: -709 - CONNECT: (protocol
error)]
This is happening in a web
Happens frequently.. will be back (I get same message) 73, Gary K7ZD
On 11/24/2011 12:03 PM, d...@optonline.net wrote:
Anyone else getting a fatal error message from the Logbook of the
World server?
I keep getting the following response:
Fatal error: initializeLOTWDB: -709 - CONNECT:
not get attention as fast as
it normally would.
Not to worry, though.
73, ron w3wn
-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of
d...@optonline.net
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 2:03 PM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] LoTW Servers Down?
Anyone
...@optonline.net ; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] LoTW Servers Down?
I was logged in to the server earlier this morning without a problem.
But I've seen the same thing from time to time. Not usually a big deal.
Server may have hiccupped, there may be too many users logged
of short term overload.
73, Bob W1YRC
-Original Message- From: Ron Notarius W3WN Sent: Thursday,
November 24, 2011 2:44 PM To: d...@optonline.net ; dx-chat@njdxa.orgSubject:
RE: [DX-CHAT] LoTW Servers Down?
I was logged in to the server earlier this morning without a problem
: Thursday, November 24, 2011 7:24 PM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] LoTW Servers Down?
Ditto here. I was logged in about 6AM, no problem.
Just logged in again a few minutes ago at 00:20 UTC with no trouble.
Let's hope it was just a case of short term overload.
73, Bob W1YRC
as
it normally would.
Not to worry, though.
73, ron w3wn
-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of
d...@optonline.net
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 2:03 PM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] LoTW Servers Down?
Anyone else getting
Working fine here.
73,
Gerry VE6LB/VA6XDX
DXCC, VUCC, WAS Card Checker-Southern Alberta
VE/VA6 QSL Bureau Team
(403) 251-0384
ve...@telus.net
http://www.qsl.net/ve6lb/
From: Ryan Jairam
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 8:25 PM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] LoTW Servers Down
It must be coming and going because I have not been been able to log on all day
long.
AE5B
---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to
imail...@njdxa.org
In the message body put either
unsubscribe
My thanks to the many who responded to my question of a site that lists LOTW
user's. HB9BZA seems to be pretty universal and it should satisfy my needs.
Thanks again and a Merry Xmas to all.
John Owens - N7TK
---
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:25 PM, jcowe...@comcast.net wrote:
My thanks to the many who responded to my question of a site that lists LOTW
user's. HB9BZA seems to be pretty universal and it should satisfy my needs.
Thanks again and a Merry Xmas to all.
And the actual link is..
I am at the top of the honor roll on phone and mixed. I thought it was high
time I became a real dx-er and work them on CW. I have worked all the dx I
have been able to find who use LOTW and I have worked well over 100. I have 93
LOTW CW contacts confirmed and 6 QSL's in the box for a total
]
http://www.qsl.net/ve6lb/
- Original Message - From: Tom Wylie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DX-CHAT dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 1:22 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] LOTW
Sometime back somebody posted a message about how to retrieve logs
from LOTW by sending them
some form
Sometime back somebody posted a message about how to retrieve logs from
LOTW by sending them
some form of request - I cant remember...
Anybody here have any info?
Tom
GM4FDM
--
So I met the bloke who invented crosswords today. I can't remember his
name, it's P something T something R.
---
On the VE7CC network, if you are a member of LOTW, there is a plus sign in
front of your call. Also, there is a LOTW checker that says yes or no to
show if you are a member. I have emailed VE7CC and the HB9 who keeps the list,
but neiher have answered as to why I am not listed and have
Jim:
I am pretty sure that VE7CC does not maintain the list, and relys on the HB9BZA
list as the source. I think the VE7CC website mentions this down in the notes.
I wrote HB9BZA about not being on his list with my new call, even though my log
for that call has been in LOTW for quite a while.
I emailed my LOTW log file to HB4BZA. I hope it solves the problem of not
being listed.
Jim N4JA
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
What a surprise to find QSOs with :
TJ3FR
9Q1EK
J5UTM
V5/DJ4SO
VK9DNX
on my LoTW account waiting to be credited.
I really wish more stations would use LoTW.
I admit it is a pain to use it. Perhaps level of security is a over
kill, but.LoTW is a very easy way to get credit for contacts..
I have been thinking (it happens...) and I am going to upload
the 9Q1EK and 9Q1TB logs to LoTW. I have there before the
logs for my own calls and also ZK1EQL and CU2/SM7EQL.
There is a reason (beside busted calls which often happens
due to the QRN in Kinshasa): I have worked almost all the DX
Does anyone know how long it takes for the credit to appear after applying via
LoTW ?
Also it appears the ARRL has waived the 2nd submission fee for the same year if
by LoTW.
Thanks ARRL/DXCC Desk !
73,
Carl K8AV
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
Anyone getting the Internal Server Error when uploading to the site? I've
been getting this all weekend.
vy 73,
Nick W9UM
When the people fear the government it's called tyranny, when the
government fears the people it's called freedom.
Thomas Paine
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback,
At 05:44 PM 06/03/2007, nick cominos wrote:
Anyone getting the Internal Server Error when uploading to the
site? I've been getting this all weekend.
Dunno about that, but I've been trying to e-mail someone with an
arrl.org (i.e. staff) address and it's bounced all day today (was
working FB
I upload to LoTW just this morning. Seems OK now also.
GL,
Garth, KW4MM
- Original Message -
From: nick cominos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 4:44 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] LoTW
Anyone getting the Internal Server Error when uploading to the site
I don't know how ARRL can afford LoTW and its present and furure storage.
It will turn out, money wise, to be an albatross around the Leagues
neck$
I'm told all monies go into the operating fund. Is this what the
membership wants? I don't think so.
Wait an see.
Lee
I'm not sure that LOTW would have any issues with storage, or hosting.
Last I checked, there were 128 million contacts in their database. Let's say
that each contact took up 2000 characters of storage. That works out to about
256 gigabytes of storage; Hard disks that hold that are about $90 at
Disk space is amazingly cheap. You can store a ton of text info in a very
affordable disk.
John K5MO
PS: Long live paper QSLs...
At 02:17 AM 4/28/2007, Lee Wical wrote:
I don't know how ARRL can afford LoTW and its present and furure storage.
It will turn out, money wise, to be an
At 09:33 AM 04/27/2007, Bob Schenck, N2OO wrote:
The fairest way to do things is the way it is currently being done.
LoTW is voluntary and it should always be such.
Many reasons.
There will always be people who paper log.
There will always be DXpeditions that paper log.
There will always be
On top of everything that has been said, there is no mention of the overhead
that any DXpedition faces if immediately uploading logs to LoTW and that is
busted calls. The upkeep to unsnarl this would be immense. I for one don't
want that hassle so I NEVER upload logs for at least a year if
Thanks to HB9BZA here's a site for anyone to find
out what stations use Lotw. Take a look, you may find that DX confirmation you
need.
http://www.hb9bza.net/lotw/
73,
Tom, KE1JF
I have just uploaded my old callsign to my account at LOTW. It has
acknowledged some 5200 new entries, but the overall total has not changed.
Do these logs need to be merged and if so, how?? Thanks
Tom N4TJ
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a
Got it figured out thanks to Wayne Mills. Thanks to all for the replies
Tom N4TJ
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
.
73, ron w3wn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Tom Johnson
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 8:00 PM
To: Chat
Subject: [DX-CHAT] LOTW second callsign
I am trying to sign up for LOTW. So far, I have gotten N4TJ ok, but wish to
add my pre 1977
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 9:37 PM
To: DX Chat Reflector
Subject: [DX-CHAT] LotW Certificate
Anyone in the group request an additional Logbook of the World certificate
(specifically for an additional call) lately?
I'm a little puzzled. When I renewed mine last year, the server automation
I seem to have lost the link to LOTW and want to renew my certificate. Would
somebody forward me the URL?
Thanks
N4TJ
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector
Thanks, I found it
N4TJ
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
It sure takes a long time for LOTW to process a qso file. I uploaded my .tq8
file with one qso for 4O6DX several hours ago, but I am still waiting for
the qso to appear in my LOTW account
de Ken W3JJ
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a
--- Kenneth Sobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sure takes a long time for LOTW to process a qso file. I uploaded my .tq8
file with one qso for 4O6DX several hours ago, but I am still waiting for
the qso to appear in my LOTW account
Ken, it's a queue. Maybe a number of people did the same
-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 10:21 AM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] LOTW processing time
It sure takes a long time for LOTW to process a qso file. I uploaded my
.tq8 file with one qso for 4O6DX several hours ago, but I am still waiting
for the qso to appear in my LOTW account
de Ken W3JJ
Thanks to all who replied.
The problem was that i did not delete my old certificate when i renewed.
Maybe this is my mistake, but I think that TQSL should be smart enough to
use the latest certificate.
de Ken W3JJ
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To
N7EF=20
=20
You forgot to mention it would cost more. Don't get me wrong I like QSL
cards. =20
=20
I've worked all countries and have them all confirmed on the current =
list.
If all of a sudden there was a new DXCC Country I would send for a
traditional paper QSL card to put one on the wall
How great would it be if I logged on to DXA, looking at my QSO's (greenies).
DXA asks if I want my QSO's uploaded to LOTW for (let's say) 1 dollar per QSO.
Enter your creditcard nr. etc.
Wim
Citeren Bernie McClenny, W3UR [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
N7EF=20
=20
You forgot to mention it
Bernie - W3UR,
Thanks for your comments and also the challenge you
threw out the the group.
What if the ARRL were to Meet You Half-Way?
If the first 25 QSO's confirmed in LOTW for the basic
WAS award were gratis for X amount of time, perhaps
that would be a good incentive to get the DX logs
I've been having trouble getting to the log-on window at LoTW since late
this am...anybody else? 73/dx
steve, k8wk
*
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector
Steve,
The server definitely appears to be down.
Larry W2LJ
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
This is what i copied from the site The basic fee for a QSL record
issued for award credit will be $ 0.25 (USD 0.25). Quantity
discounts will apply depending on number of credits purchased.
Credits can be purchased according to the following table. Credits
may be purchased at any time and in
There's an old business axiom that applies here:
QUALITY - TIME - COST
You can have only two of the three simultaneously.
73, Steve WB6RSE
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT
I would agree. LOTW is a complete pain the the backside and involves
jumping through a phethora of hurdles. All this for a hobby? What a
waste of effort. Frankly if I wish to do a DXCC update, it's easier
(and more pleasure) to meet a field checker such as G4BWP for a beer or
two in a nice
I don't see how you guys afford to upload your logs to LOTW it seems to
me just another way for ARRL to get money
Rick
Ron Notarius wrote:
As I recall, during the development of LotW, the ARRL planned all along to
permit other organizations to interface with the system. So I think it's
Hello dx-chat,
Saturday, January 22, 2005 rkenwood wrote to dx-chat@njdxa.org:
I don't see how you guys afford to upload your logs to LOTW it seems to
me just another way for ARRL to get money
Rick
In my case (and actually all other cases) it's a way to save MY money.
And I'm not
Rkenwood wrote:
I don't see how you guys afford to upload your logs to LOTW
it seems to me just another way for ARRL to get money
It costs nothing to upload logs to Logbook of the World.
If you use the confirmations generated to apply for one of the
DXCC awards, the confirmation
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtpout03-04.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.71] by
e-government.com
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A9FAD48400C0; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:51:54 -0500
Received: (qmail 17148 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2005 05:52:58 -
Received:
a break for doing something
pretty much not just right, but what they were asked to do? Sheesh.
73
- Original Message -
From: rkenwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11:52 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] lotw
I don't see how you guys afford to upload
FYI, there is a LoTW reflector on Yahoo!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW/
73 - Jim AD1C
=
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ad1c.com
PGP Fingerprint: D8E2 3D78 339F A7F1 8C13 1193 B5D1 4FB6 79D1 70DC
[:dx-chat:]
I have watched a fellow ham and computer expert labor to insert my logs
into
LoTW. As someone who does not know what that ham is doing, I can still
observe the great number of careful steps he has had to take and he
knows what he is doing. He has put in about 8 hours so far and
I am at 99/1253, or right at 8%. A large percentage
of mine are from 160 meters where I'm trying to make WAS.
At 12:21 AM 4/19/2004 -0400, you wrote:
just
wondering how everyone else is doing with getting qsls on lotw.
yeah, i know it's early. yeah, i know they don't count yet.
is there any
I have 838 confirmed out of 14,872 QSOs in
LOTW. That works out to about 5.6%.
73,
Dave, WØVX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 11:21
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DX-CHAT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] lotw
results?
Did you guys get stats too on CW vs
SSB on your percents confirmed on LoTW.
I have only 3% on abt 6300 SSB qsos.
tnx
Al
W4ABW
thanks guys. i guess i'm right in there in the average as far as returns. put in 30,000 qsos, little over half were contest logs easily converted from ct files. the others keyed from paper logs. have to get up the strength to enter another 20 years of wb2vft, all on paper.
the one interesting
just wondering how everyone else is doing with getting qsls on lotw. yeah, i know it's early. yeah, i know they don't count yet.
is there any concerted effort from clubs or other organizations outside the US to get day-to-day logs converted and uploaded?
my stats:
30,754 qsos logged to lotw
I uploaded my CQWW-SSB log from the weekend and already have two
contest QSOs confirmed. That's fast!
Bob, N7XY
--
Bob Nielsen, N7XY n7xy (at) n7xy.net
Bainbridge Island, WA http://www.n7xy.net
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
This technicallymay notbe DX, but it involves a DX log:-)
I'm not a satellite operator, so don't really know what LoTW is expecting. I've uploaded the 3B6RF logs, but receivederrorsfor all of the satellite Qs. The log has CW or SSB as the mode, and SAT as the band. LoTW doesn't like that.
About 2 weeks ago I sent to ARRL using their procedure to get a certificate
for my submissions to LOTW. I have had no response to my initial
submission.
Should I re-submit or wait longer.
I have had no e-mail in response.
73 de tom
gm4fdm
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
, May 27, 2003 10:29 AM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] LoTW
I will have no problem uploading Cabrillo files generated by CT into LoTW.
I use DXLOG for contacts other than contest QSOs. DXLOG is in dBase III
format. DXLOG predates and does not support the Cabrillo or ADIF formats.
I have been advised
Anyone hear anything recently about the current status of Logbook of the
World?
I've recently heard, through the grapevine, allegations that the project has
become bogged down by, shall we say, those in a position to do so, thus
making things more complicated.
Sure hope this isn't the case.
98 matches
Mail list logo
