You know, I'm not quite sure why I didn't simply decide to use Gmail from
the start. I use it for my main address these days, and love having
everything available wherever I go. I've already wanted several times to ask
a question as it occurred to me at work, and couldn't, as I'd downloaded the
Gary,
I also have problems with the mail servers (from sourceforge that is).
For some reason, most of my mails I write through Thunderbird arrive
with a normal delay but last Sunday I wrote an email (Re on How do I
calculate leadscrew push/pull forces? but that mail only arrived 2 days
later.
On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
[snip]
Only printing the message once solves that problem, but it means that
you really don't know how often you are getting a delay. But DON'T
think just because you get it only once that it is happening only once.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:55:07AM -0400, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
It's hard to tell what the ideal base period is. Stepconf is probably
choosing something that will work for whatever scaling and max
velocities you've chosen. I don't know if it takes PWM
period/resolution into account
John Kasunich wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
In re the rtapi and unexpected realtime delay issues, I experimented some
this
afternoon with my base thread which was set at 78000ns when I started,
reducing it to 38000ns for the last test, running most of the stuff in the
nc_files dir to test,
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
(I actually
traced a large, periodic RT bump to kjournald on one setup)...
Yow, how do you fix that?
Jon
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R)
Jon Elson wrote:
[snip]
Yes. There is a HAL pin that reports the total number of these
errors, motion.servo.overruns, but it seems to need a debug
level to be set to export that pin. Do you know what that debug
level is?
I don't think there's any specific debug level for the pin to
Jeff Epler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:55:07AM -0400, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
It's hard to tell what the ideal base period is. Stepconf is probably
choosing something that will work for whatever scaling and max
velocities you've chosen. I don't know if it takes PWM
Jon Elson wrote:
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
(I actually
traced a large, periodic RT bump to kjournald on one setup)...
Yow, how do you fix that?
I used ext2 on those systems, which doesn't do journaling. They're
headless and flash-disk based, so I just changed them to mount /
On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
Jon Elson wrote:
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
(I actually
traced a large, periodic RT bump to kjournald on one setup)...
Yow, how do you fix that?
I used ext2 on those systems, which doesn't do journaling. They're
headless and flash-disk
On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Jon Elson wrote:
John Kasunich wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
In re the rtapi and unexpected realtime delay issues, I experimented some
this afternoon with my base thread which was set at 78000ns when I
started, reducing it to 38000ns for the last test, running most of
Gene Heskett wrote:
[snip]
Yes. There is a HAL pin that reports the total number of these
errors, motion.servo.overruns, but it seems to need a debug
level to be set to export that pin. Do you know what that debug
level is?
Thanks,
Jon
And that would explain why I see zero there,
On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
[snip]
Yes. There is a HAL pin that reports the total number of these
errors, motion.servo.overruns, but it seems to need a debug
level to be set to export that pin. Do you know what that debug
level is?
Thanks,
Jon
It sounds like you're having the opposite problem, able to send through
Thunderbird, and not the web service. At any rate, I'm much more interested
in joining the real festivities in this group, and learning EMC a lot
better, so now that I have Gmail up and working, I'm going to leave
well-enough
I set up an account for this list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - through my host,
but couldn't reply to the confirmation email from Thunderbird on Linux at
home. It would send, and go into my outbox, but nothing would ever come of
it. I had to click through to the site (from Thunderbird), and confirm it
Gary,
Some band width providers will block socket 25 as a measure to cut down on
spam. When you receive mail, that goes through another service (POP3 is the
most common) which is on a different port (110 for POP). This can explain
why you are able to receive, but not send. The way to test this is
On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Gary Fixler wrote:
I set up an account for this list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - through my host,
but couldn't reply to the confirmation email from Thunderbird on Linux at
home. It would send, and go into my outbox, but nothing would ever come of
it. I had to click through to
Gene Heskett wrote:
In re the rtapi and unexpected realtime delay issues, I experimented some
this
afternoon with my base thread which was set at 78000ns when I started,
reducing it to 38000ns for the last test, running most of the stuff in the
nc_files dir to test, and never did see
On Tuesday 18 March 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
In re the rtapi and unexpected realtime delay issues, I experimented some
this afternoon with my base thread which was set at 78000ns when I
started, reducing it to 38000ns for the last test, running most of the
stuff in the
Gene Heskett wrote:
[snip]
Only printing the message once solves that problem, but it means that
you really don't know how often you are getting a delay. But DON'T
think just because you get it only once that it is happening only once.
Regards,
John Kasunich
Hummm, much food for
20 matches
Mail list logo
