RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-19 Thread Boswell Tim
with ketchup. -Original Message- From: Warren Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 November 2001 14:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive I got an email too. Forcing their employees to watch friends is like training them to format 360K floppies

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-19 Thread Clark, Steve
-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive *monitoring* being the operative word...keeping an eye on things, but not getting involved, except to contact persistent critics of their product. Come on CA, we all know you're watchingdefend yourselves!! Tim Do not meddle

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-18 Thread Warren Walker
Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 16, 2001 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive I think he's going through the archives, he contacted me too. -Original Message- From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-17 Thread Don Ely
I think he's going through the archives, he contacted me too. -Original Message- From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Was that Michael Duncan? Yup. Contacted you too

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Karen Palmer
This morning I had an email from CA wanting my phone number to address my concerns. It appears that they are listening. However, it is too late for them to win us back as a customer. Our purchase orders have been issued for Backup Exec software for our new servers. My experience with CA has

Re: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Tiffany Ernest
: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: CA becoming more responsive The fact that someone called you is impressive. It's a big maybe, though, that we will go back to them. But I think not. Because of their ARCServe product, our disaster

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Stephen J. Norton
LMAO! Really, I'm speechless, and that doesn't happen to often. -Original Message- From: Tiffany Ernest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: CA becoming more responsive Well, for what it is worth, I also got

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Erik Sojka
-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: CA becoming more responsive Well, for what it is worth, I also got a call. Not from a techie or a VP, someone in Marketing. I expressed similar concerns, non-English speaking (writing) tech support, the fact that their solution to everything is re

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
Is that a Friends reference? Computer Associates is desperate. I predict layoffs. William -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive How *YOU* doin

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Arnold, Jamie
Buy a TV. Joey, from friends. Typical greeting to female types. How *YOU* doin'? sigh J -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Briggs, Bruce
LMAO -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive What is this TV of which you speak? Seriously, if it had something resembling acting or maybe

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Bob Peitzke
: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive The fact that someone called you is impressive. It's a big maybe, though, that we will go back to them. But I think not. Because of their ARCServe product, our disaster recovery became

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Don Ely
Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Buy a TV. Joey, from friends. Typical greeting to female types. How *YOU* doin'? sigh J -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Bob Peitzke
responsive Was that Michael Duncan? Isn't it amazing what they'll do when sales start dropping? William -Original Message- From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: CA becoming more responsive Hi, all

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Was that Michael Duncan? Yup. Contacted you too, I presume. Seems like a step in the right direction. :o) Bob -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
Then they'd have to take you to the ER ...where of course another copy is sitting on the counter. W -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Nope

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Toni, Randy
Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive LOL! Me: Hello, Tech Support? I installed ArcServe on my Exchange box and now it has a Blue Screen of Death on it. Chandler Vhing: Could your box be any more f*cked? -Original Message- From: Tiffany Ernest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
And as I told Mr Duncan: they're three years too late. William -Original Message- From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Actually, Mr. Duncan told me they are working

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-16 Thread Arnold, Jamie
Right next to the only Gateway machines sold to business in months. running for cover -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Then they'd

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
Was that Michael Duncan? Isn't it amazing what they'll do when sales start dropping? William -Original Message- From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: CA becoming more responsive Hi, all, Thought

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-15 Thread Stephen J. Norton
renders their efforts all but useless. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Was that Michael Duncan? Isn't it amazing what they'll do when

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-15 Thread DOT
: CA becoming more responsive Hi, all, Thought I'd share with you my notes on this (surprising) new contact i just had with the Computer Associates VP of Technical Support. Though I had been a vocal critic of CA's tech support in the past, even back when I was an SE, I thought I

RE: CA becoming more responsive

2001-11-15 Thread Sanborn, John
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: CA becoming more responsive The fact that someone called you is impressive. It's a big maybe, though, that we will go back to them. But I think not. Because of their ARCServe