Re: [FRIAM] On Apple Podcasts: Solving Tornadoes: Woke Meteorology

2023-09-07 Thread Steve Smith
Fascinating (to me) how water (the H20 molecule, it's phases, mechanical modes, radiative coupling, chemistry, aggregate thermodynamics, etc) is central to such a widely distributed space-time regime of morpho and teleodynamic phenomena spanning (sub)cellular to organism to super-organism

Re: [FRIAM] Science Fiction Books

2023-09-07 Thread cody dooderson
I asked ChatGPT if it dreamed and it said that it didn't. However, is adversarial training of neural networks much different than dreaming? A new class from MITX showed up in my email today. It is called *Minds and Machines: An introduction to philosophy of mind, exploring consciousness, reality,

Re: [FRIAM] Science Fiction Books

2023-09-07 Thread Steve Smith
Great observations as usual Glen...   I have lapsed into *listening* to almost all long-form writing, whether fiction or non  and it definitely distorts (torts?) my perception/conception of the material/subject/message.   A corollary to McLuhan's Medium/Message duality?  I find the

Re: [FRIAM] On Apple Podcasts: Solving Tornadoes: Woke Meteorology

2023-09-07 Thread Roger Critchlow
Anyone who needs to call "woke" to make a scientific argument has lost my ear. An attention seeking proto-populist weatherman. The electrostatics of individual water molecules, that the hydrogens have some positive charge and the lone pairs of oxygen have some negative charge (which is actually

Re: [FRIAM] Science Fiction Books

2023-09-07 Thread glen
Both keyboards and pencils are part of our extended phenotype and play (multiple) roles in interoception, including the induction of inter-subjectivity. I've forgotten who it is, but there's someone on this list who *listens* to our posts, rather than reads them. I tried that with a blog post

Re: [FRIAM] On Apple Podcasts: Solving Tornadoes: Woke Meteorology

2023-09-07 Thread Nicholas Thompson
thanks Pieter for giving a hear. He almost certainly is a crack pot (he has an "only I can fix it" thing going) but is he wrong about everything? He makes a big deal about the special properties of water molecules. He argues that these are created not by the geometric properties of the molecule