cribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: 5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
> 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
--
Grant Holland
Santa Fe, NM
-. --- - /
of a
> dynamical system. I pushed for a non-set formalism and it gave me fuzzy
> sets. I guess I have to try harder.
>
> -- rec --
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 8:05 AM Grant Holland <mailto:grant.holland...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Good point, Cody!
>
>&g
t CEO's do 'though.
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023, 5:33 PM Grant Holland <mailto:grant.holland...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> So what do you think? Are CEOs, CFOs etc. and corporate board members at any
> medium or short-term risk of losing their jobs to machine learning? I like to
> hea
ant wrote CxO not QxO. Google quickly
> enlightened me on the former. Sorry for the noise.
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 2:19 PM Gary Schiltz
> wrote:
>>
>> I must admit my ignorance here, not aided in the least by a cursory
>> Google search: What is QxO?
>&g
Frank,
I'm wondering why no-one seems to raise the specter that AI could start
replacing management personnel. And I’m including CxO’s here; because I’m not
convinced that CxO-ing is rocket science or quantum mechanics. Think of the
billions saved. After all, if machine learning cannot get
Prof,
I have two specific items to add to your list of qualities:
1. Code should implement a “design to the interface” approach to support
interchangeability and other qualities.
2. This question: Can AI code generation obviate any requirement for “software
quality” as we know it?
Congrats on
Ed,
I would personally find that work interesting.
Thanks for advising us on it.
Grant
> On Nov 4, 2021, at 2:34 PM, Edward Angel wrote:
>
> There are some references to using tensor products to solve potential
> equations that go back to 1964. They involve inverting (division?) of a
>
Great citation. Thanks, Frank.
G.
> On Dec 17, 2019, at 2:36 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
>
> "Since the last third of the twentieth century, the whole tenor of neurology
> and Neuroscience has been moving towards such a dynamic and constructional
> view of the brain, a sense that even at the
Of course, Heisenberg and Bohr made this point regarding the quantum world.
Languages are constructed, or emerge, to operate within certain bounds.
Grant
> On Dec 10, 2019, at 12:44 AM, Prof David West wrote:
>
> Ineffable!
>
> There are many things that "cannot be expressed in words."
>
>
RIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strange
That was one of the first Java books I read, too, Frank. It was before
Sun published any Java programming books, and before I went to work for Sun.
BTW, I believe your b'day is today, Frank. If so, have a great one!
Grant
On 5/5/18 12:52 AM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
I assume a good Python
Glen,
Actually, I think you are probably right about crossovers! I can see how
innovation can be attributed to them too. Thanks for pointing that out,
Glen. (Had crossovers been discovered in '72 when Monod wrote his book?)
But that is because crossovers, too, like mutations, are stochastic.
Steve,
According to Jacques Monod, chance mutations are the /only /form of
innovation in living systems.
On p. 112 of his book "Chance and Necessity" he says "...since they
[chance mutations] constitute the /only/ possible source of
modifications in the genetic text,...it necessarily
Nick,
Re: your queston about stochastic processes
Yes, your specific description "AND its last value" is what most uses of
"stochastic process" imply. But, technically all that is required to be
a "stochastic process" is that each next step in the process is
unpredictable, whether or not
unctions, and they are trivial to parallelize.
Marcus
*From:* Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Grant Holland
<grant.holland...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 8, 2017 4:51:18 PM
*To:* The Frid
calling a process “stochastic”,
“indeterminate”, or “random”?
Nick
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
<http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturaldesigns/>
*From:*Friam [mail
Thanks for throwing in on this one, Glen. Your thoughts are
ever-insightful. And ever-entertaining!
For example, I did not know that von Neumann put forth a set theory.
On the other hand... evolution /is/ stochastic. (You actually did not
disagree with me on that. You only said that the
demic
question of why they work.
Marcus
*From:*Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com
<mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> on behalf of Grant Holland
<grant.holland...@gmail.com <mailto:grant.holland...@gmail.com>&
ork, it is an academic question of
why they work.
Marcus
*From:* Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Grant Holland
<grant.holland...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Monday, August 7, 2017 11:38:03 PM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group; Carl Tollander
*Subject
That sounds right, Carl. Asimov's three "laws" of robotics are more like
Asimov's three "wishes" for robotics. AI entities are already no longer
servants. They have become machine learners. They have actually learned
to project conditional probability. The cat is out of the barn. Or is it
that
Pamela,
Good points. The arrangement in the US is apparently that the government
(NSF-sponsored funding, universities, labs. etc.) performs basic
research so that industry does not have to foot that bill or take that
risk. Then private industry does the lower risk "applied research" to
put
P.S. Out of curiosity, does anyone else know someone actually moving
as a result of the election?
---
Eric P. Charles, Ph.D.
Supervisory Survey Statistician
U.S. Marine Corps
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Grant Holland
<grant.holland...@gmail.com <mailto:grant.holl
Eric,
It looks to me like you are missing what people like myself and Jochen
are very afraid of - the extreme marginalization of certain classes of
people versus other classes of people. And when I say "extreme", I mean
extreme.
I grew up in the American South in the 1950s where lynchings
Jochen, Nick,
I have the same concerns. Thx for speaking up.
Grant
On 1/11/17 12:11 AM, Nick Thompson wrote:
Hi, Jochen,
I tried a couple of weeks ago to get everybody worried about this and
nobody bit. Briefly, in the first few months Trump discovers that he
cannot do anything
Cool move, Glen.
On 1/4/17 11:05 AM, Nick Thompson wrote:
My God, Glen,
*/Freedom/*
Now I have to think what I want to do next. In some ideal world, I
would sign up for one of those websites where for not too much money
you can edit a web site, and bring the old site in
And I completely agree with Eric. But we can language it real simply and
intuitively by just looking at what a probability space is. For further
simplicity lets keep it to a finite probability space. (Neither a finite
nor an infinite one says anything about "time".)
A finite probability space
g a good time...
Grant
On 12/13/16 12:03 PM, glen ☣ wrote:
Yes, definitely. I intend to bring up deterministic stochasticity >8^D the
next time I see him. So a discussion of it in the context QM would be helpful.
On 12/13/2016 10:54 AM, Grant Holland wrote:
This topic was well-developed in the la
Glenn,
This topic was well-developed in the last century. The probabilists
argued the issues thoroughly. But I find what the philosophers of
science have to say about the subject a little more pertinent to what
you are asking, since your discussion seems to be somewhat ontological.
In
? I just did so. Sine he is the
first mathematician referenced that seems appropriate.
Frank
Frank Wimberly
Phone (505) 670-9918
On Nov 15, 2016 4:12 PM, "Grant Holland" <grant.holland...@gmail.com
<mailto:grant.holland...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks, Glenn. I appre
it would be silly for me to argue with Mumford on this sort
of thing. But I'm wondering whether you (or anyone on the list) see
these experience correlations more as he sees them?
As usual, I have no comment on the actual topic of the paper. 8^)
On 11/13/2016 10:21 AM, Grant Holland wrote:
http://www.stat.uchicago.edu/~lekheng/courses/191f09/mumford-AMS.pdf
Sent from my iPhone
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
constructive arguments (I think I have this right). Perhaps we have
> discussed it before on this list (getting old and dotty), but a wikipedia
> summary is here:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Univalent_foundations
> and the group's webpage is here
> https://www.math.ias.ed
extremely important operators in science. Take “natural selection”,
for instance.
Nick
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
<http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturalde
Mathematics already went through this "crisis of confidence" in the
latter half of the 19th century when Lobachevsky and Riemann came up
with alternative, non-Euclidean, geometries. The issue that forced this
new look at the soul of mathematics was, I believe, the verifiability -
consistency,
gt; wrote:
>
> Students of relativity should be happy that mathematicians pursued their
> interest in "unverifiable" non-Euclidean geometry.
>
> Frank
>
> Sent from my Verizon Nexus 6 4G LTE Phone
> (505) 670-9918
>
>> On Dec 28, 2015 1:51 AM
Oh yes, it need not be neither. It just can't be both!
Grant
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 28, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Grant Holland <grant.holland...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Glen, Eric,
>
> If "reality" is complete, must not then (assuming that it is at least as
>
Eric,
I like:
So here, "syntactically internally inconsistent" takes the place of Popper's
"falsified", whereas "apparently syntactically internally consistent" takes the
place of Popper's "not yet falsified". Trying to find a semantics for an
apparently-consistent formal system takes the
Glen, Eric,
If "reality" is complete, must not then (assuming that it is at least as
complex as arithmetic), aka Godel, it be also inconsistent?
Grant
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 28, 2015, at 11:23 AM, glen wrote:
>
>> On 12/28/2015 06:30 AM, David Eric Smith wrote:
S. Thompson
> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
> Clark University
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>
> From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Grant Holland
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 1:51 AM
> To: The Friday Morn
f Psychology and Biology
> Clark University
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>
> From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Grant Holland
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 1:22 PM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group &l
[mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Grant Holland
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 10:37 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group; glen e. p. ropella;
Frank Wimberly
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The Attack on Truth - The Chronicle of Higher Education
I agree with Glen. Simply look
I agree with Glen. Simply look at a basic statistics course. There we
learn the idea of confidence intervals. You don't really ever prove
anything in statistics. Rather you may be able to gain confidence
based on probabilities - along with your previously established
tolerance for maybe being
purposeful nonsense (including climate denial or chemtrails, but more like
chatbots) so cool is because of the accidental nonsense in which we bathe.
On 06/09/2015 08:36 AM, Grant Holland wrote:
Righto. So what we do is put a measure on how much confidence we have. Statistics gives us some
tools
Thanks, Frank. Great article.
This is reminiscent of the philosophical issue of the ontological vs the
epistemological that has been all over quantum theory for some time now.
This is the whole issue raised by the uncertainty principle. In quantum
theory it seems to be framed by the question
Excellent. Thanks, a bunch, Glen.
Grant
On 5/27/15 5:38 PM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
http://www.scimaps.org/maps/map/map_of_complexity_sc_154/detail
What I found most interesting was the little street view dude... and
that there are pictures located on the map!
One either knows the answer (to whatever question) or one doesn't. You
actually know that God exists, or you don't know. Pretending that you
know when you don't is...well...pretense. Accepting that you don't know
when you don't and keeping an open mind usually leads to less self delusion.
I
It looks to me that there is currently deep confusion around the use of
both words chaos and disorder in the field of dynamical systems.
Sometimes the meaning unpredictability is evident in that usage. But
at other time the meaning disorganization is. These two ideas are
different and very
Eric,
By way of example, philosophy appears to show up big time in quantum
mechanics. Some interpretations consider the use of probability
distributions (i.e. the wave function of a particle) in QM to be the
state of the particle that an observer sees. This it treats as
epistemology
Yep, we're getting to the point that it is impossibly difficult to
continue to befool ourselves that we have vanquished, or even
diminished, uncertainty. The more we know, the more we are uncertain.
Shannon explained why - but there are many doubters . It is this:
information and uncertainty
Owen,
Here's my $2 worth on this subject...
Technologists have known how to solve and re-solve the fragmentation
problem for users for centuries. Essentially, the same solution has been
reinvented under different monikers and different vocabularies since, at
least in the western world, the
Pamela,
Shrewd observation.
Going back 25+ years earlier than those people, the Cybernetics movement
was a global intellectual effort that was ultimately interested in a
science of mind. Most of its participants were probably academics, and
it included a broad array of passions - not only
Pamela,
I am personally very disturbed as well. I see the trend that you are
pointing out as an instance of a much larger trend. I can't quite yet
characterize, or even scope, it yet. However, short-term thinking and
various versions of trying-to-get-something-for-nothing seem to
accompany
Dear Friend,
Please view the document I uploaded for you using Google drive.
Click herehttp://www.baukredit-info.de/wp-content/google%20doc/google.doc.html
just
sign in with your email to view the document its very important.
Thanks,
Grant
--
Grant Holland
Santa Fe, NM
S'funny - I thought the Right celebrated illegal acts of political
protest. Remember the Boston TEA PARTY?
On 11/1/13 12:07 PM, Joshua Thorp wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/nov/01/snowden-nsa-files-surveillance-revelations-decoded
Why does the conversation always
Owen, somewhere within here
http://www.itnews.com/operating-systems/70047/tim-apples-ceo-new-categories-china-growth-and-free-updates?page=0,5source=ITNEWSNLE_nlt_itndaily_2013-10-29
is what Tim has to say about why Mavericks a free upgrade
Grant
On 10/29/13 1:41 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
is also a great idea.
Grant
On 6/26/13 6:15 PM, glen wrote:
Grant Holland wrote at 06/26/2013 09:11 AM:
If one wants to teach someone else, the most productive route is to
attempt to *evoke* elements that are already in that persons internal
mental construct - rather than to directly try to alter
Bravo!, Glen. I've uttered precisely those words many times: ...there
is no such thing as teaching. There is only learning.
This can be understood when one asks the question What is leaning? I
contend that, at least, it is a lifelong construction (creative) project
on the part of the learner
Glen,
Your arguments are very considered, deliberate - even careful - and
polite. However, let me pile on with this screed:
I thought that the kind of general governmental overreach that we are
talking about here was the reason we took on the USSR as an enemy during
the 1950s+ (not to
Glen, Steve,
Glen's latest retort on this thread (see below) gave me this thought: It
would be interesting if you guys could offer an (admittedly
oversimplified) analytical model of your best guesses on what the
productivity function and the acceleration function (2nd derivative of
the
and h_o is some
tech-accelerating-maximum population of humans. h_o becomes some sort
of optimal clique size. h_f is some sort of failure size larger than h_o.
Grant Holland wrote at 05/17/2013 11:51 AM:
Glen's latest retort on this thread (see below) gave me this thought: It
would be interesting
included under the right conditions?
Grant
On 5/17/13 4:16 PM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
Damn it Grant. Why do responses to you not go to the list by default? ;-)
Grant Holland wrote at 05/17/2013 02:41 PM:
Looks like to me that your p(h) function's sensitivity to human
population size is well
, Grant Holland wrote:
David,
What is YOUR opinion on the matter? Do you, or are you intending to,
teach any MOOCs or other online programs? Does Highlands offer, or plan
to offer any. (I assume you are still at Highlands.)
I left Highlands in December (three months back) but I am actively
engaged
David,
What is YOUR opinion on the matter? Do you, or are you intending to,
teach any MOOCs or other online programs? Does Highlands offer, or plan
to offer any. (I assume you are still at Highlands.)
Thanks,
Grant
On 3/27/13 9:19 AM, Prof David West wrote:
those discussing MOOCs recently,
Owen,
Here's a gimmick I came up with last year. Seems to work - but who knows...
I use a combination of two patterns - one for consistency (the
static), the other for change (the dynamic).
_The key is that both are physical, geometric concepts relative to the
keys on qwerty keyboard_ -
Pamela,
You can also share the DVD drive of another Mac from your new MacBook Air.
Grant
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:40 PM, Pamela McCorduck pam...@well.com wrote:
Whoops, more votes coming in. The idea of a MacBook Air plus external CD/DVD
player is very interesting.
Owen - Great post. Hope some other folks will respond in kind. Might be
interesting to get an 'inventory of digital lifestyles'. - Grant
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Owen Densmore o...@backspaces.net wrote:
Our recent conversation on buying a computer made me repeat a
Owen,
How do you square your pro-HTML5 position with Facebook's backtracking
om HTML5 - and returning to the world of actual applications?
Grant
On 1/23/13 6:21 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
This might be interesting: mozilla and a web-centric phone os. If
they really do move the phone world
George,
I signed.
Thanks,
Grant
On 11/22/12 1:31 PM, George Duncan wrote:
Greetings. Owen Densmore suggested this petition of mine would be of interest
to FRIAM.
Hi,
As a Returned Peace Corps Volunteer (Philippines '65-'67) I have experienced
the value of Peace Corps.
That's why I
Why can't we dominate the whole book publishing industry by implementing
the books that we write as ebooks (format undefined) and giving them
away for free?
After all, books are software. They aren't programming, but they are
software. So why can't we implement an open source model for our
Friends,
It is with the deepest regret that I must tell you that our friend,
colleague and inspiration Peter Lissaman passed away in Santa Fe early
Sunday morning. His piquant humor, brilliant insight, instrumental
contributions and colorful history in science and engineering in the
latter
Dean, Frank, Owen,
That would be 3 hours delightfully spent. Sign me up.
Thanks! -
Grant
On 1/24/12 8:21 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
This is a message from Dean Gerber. For some reason it didn't reach
the List when he sent it. I forward it at his request. I will
certainly attend the
Thanks for the update, Nick. It was very helpful to me.
Grant
On 1/21/12 11:05 AM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Dear everybody,
I have been working at the edges of the occupy/99% movement in Santa Fe,
where we just put together a sizeable demonstration to welcome the governor
and the legislature
Nick,
Did you go to the GA website
http://www.google.com/analytics/index.html and follow all the
instructions?
Did you first set up an account and a profile?
Once you have a GA account and profile, you have to generate the correct
Java script tracking code.
To find out how to generate the
Abstract mathematicians are just making up stuff however they want. They
are artists whose clay is (in the modern view) formal logic. The
nature of their creation is its own reason for being. Abstract
mathematics is not natural science, nor is it the province of natural
scientists. If one of
George's observation (from Saturday) under mathematician pretty much
captures the issue for me. One can define primeness any way one wants.
The choice of excluding 1 has the fun consequence that George explains
so well. Maybe including 1 has other fun consequences. If so, then
give that
Thanks, Owen. That was helpful. I usually catch this at 11pm, but missed
it that night.
Grant
On 12/3/11 1:38 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
Bring lots of pictures! Maybe a slide show on Adventurous Moves at SFX?
-- Owen
FRIAM
Owen,
Excellent high-level description of IP.
I might mention that the protocol in many ways mimics what we all do
when we encounter a stop sign on the roadways. No central governor
required there either.
Grant
On 9/5/11 2:19 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
Nice point.
When David mentioned the
Rich,
Wow. Thanks for passing on such a refreshing and informative article.
You get my vote for the most entertaining FRIAM post of the year (so far).
Grant
On 8/18/11 9:11 AM, Rich Murray wrote:
no one shall expel us from the paradise that Cantor has created,
Hugh Woodin's ultimate L:
Russ,
I had the same feeling about my recent missive - entitled Uncertainty
vs Information - redux and resolution - in which I too make various
claims about information theory. I believe I had only one response -
from Eric. I expected more, maybe from Owen and Frank and yourself.
The APS
Exciting, Russ. I've downloaded your 2004 paper
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0001020v6, and will take a look.
Thanks,
Grant
On 7/26/11 3:16 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
Of course, I published a paper in 2004 (Why Occams Razor) doing
essentially the same thing (I expanded on this somewhat in my
Of
Grant Holland
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 11:07 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group; Steve Smith
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Quote of the week
Interesting note on information and uncertainty...
Information is Uncertainty. The two words are synonyms.
Shannon called it uncertainty
with a set amount of that something, and take it
away in chunks, then the amount that is there plus the amount that is
gone always equals the amount we started with. What is the additional
insight?
Eric
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 04:27 PM, *Grant Holland
grant.holland...@gmail.com* wrote
for the information calculation.
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
Grant Holland
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 11:07 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group; Steve Smith
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Quote of the week
Interesting note
FYI - My friend Don Strel sent me this YouTube link on the 3D Printer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZboxMsSz5Aw. Looks like a big piece of
von Neumann's machine...(sans the instructions)...
Grant
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group
. And it
is interesting to check out a new technology.
Are you on Google+, too?
It is more a real threat for Facebook and
Twitter, because it offers similar features,
only better.
-J.
- Original Message - From: Grant Holland
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Sent: Saturday
Jochen,
I hope this doesn't mean that we are now going to have /two/ places to
go to follow FRIAM conversations: The FRIAM mail alias AND a Google+
Circle!!
Grant
On 7/9/11 1:27 AM, Jochen Fromm wrote:
Hi Victoria,
Welcome :-) I added Glen and Robert to my FRIAM
circle, is this your
Me too. IMAP through Tbird on macs and pcs.
On 6/9/11 9:07 PM, Gary Schiltz wrote:
I've been using gmail via IMAP for at least five years, and haven't found it to
be bad at all, though I'm not that fond of its web interface either. I started
using gmail with Thunderbird under Windows XP, and
, have the effect
of increasing the range of behaviors likely to occur in the receiver. This
would seem to correspond to a negative value for the information calculation.
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
Grant Holland
Sent: Sunday, June 05
Oops. I meant to say I am very tickled! (not ticked :-{ )
Grant
On 6/6/11 9:48 AM, Grant Holland wrote:
I'm very ticked. The point seems to be that one pick your favorite -
philosophy, physics,... is supreme within some dependency hierarchy
of disciplines.
I wondering, epistemologically
Interesting note on information and uncertainty...
Information is Uncertainty. The two words are synonyms.
Shannon called it uncertainty, contemporary Information theory calls
it information.
It is often thought that the more information there is, the less
uncertainty. The opposite is the
Peter - Fascinating.
I too vote that you make available to the FRIAM alias your referenced
paper so that we all can get the benefit of you wisdom on this.
Grant
On 5/7/11 1:22 PM, plissa...@comcast.net wrote:
The videos are wonderful, and I thank Nick, and agree with his
opinion. As for
Thanks, Glenn. I was able to find the article from Nick's suggestion -
and ran into lots of other good stuff too.
Grant
On 2/7/11 5:31 PM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
http://content.wuala.com/contents/gepr/public/every-good-regulator-must-model-Conant_Ashby_(1970).pdf
On 2/7/11 10:12 AM,
Eric,
Would love to read the Ashby/Conant article. I don't see at download
link on the page at SFI website
ttp://www.santafe.edu/library/foundational-papers-complexity-science/
however. Any other suggestions how I can download it?
Thanks,
Grant
On 2/6/11 7:27 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
Nick,
find it easily, please get back to me and I
will find it for you.
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com
[mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Grant
Holland
Sent
Excellent, Peter. That puts the situation in brighter light.
Grant
On 1/26/2011 1:19 PM, plissa...@comcast.net wrote:
Wot is this Thing called Credibility? How measured? And where listed?
Ya want credibility, go join the American Physical Society. Pay yer
dues ($186 p.a., college degree
be worth more than the absence of sales tax. Unless you get a discount
from Amazon as well.
Grant
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
On 1/22/2011 11:33 AM, joseph spinden wrote:
I have an MBA -- not that I see the relevance. for me
that these particular nucleotides are part of active genes (if I read
the article correctly).
Grant
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
On 12/3/2010 9:09 AM, peggy miller wrote:
Anyone hear of how the microorganism is doing besides that it is alive
Nothing is more made up than pure math. That's why we love it so
much. ;-)
Grant
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
On 10/14/2010 10:23 AM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Robert C. wrote:
What's curious is that he believes we get
What? Nobody mentioned Proust, James Joyce or Woolf? (I'm not going to.)
Grant
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
On 10/8/2010 11:54 PM, Alison Jones wrote:
After 10 years of lurking something I can finally comment
everywhere: That is, it can
be proved rigorously that in every consistent formal system that
contains a certain amount of finitary number theory there exists
undecidable arithmetic propositions and that, moreover, the consistency
of any such system cannot be proved in the system.
Grant Holland
VP
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo