If you’ve read about them, Open AI probably has too.
From: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2024 8:32 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] the inequities of uniquity
this is 'unique' only if you exclude Vedic, Buddhist, Taoist, ... thought.
davew
riam On Behalf Of glen
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 11:50 AM
> To: friam@redfish.com
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] the inequities of uniquity
>
> I was arguing with that same friend yesterday at the pub. I
was trying to describe how some of
rom the instruction or
> the curriculum. One choice constrains the next.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Friam On Behalf Of glen
> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 11:50 AM
> > To: friam@redfish.com
> > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] the inequities of uniqui
tter much when shipping
>> > more small, lightweight objects to other customers. It could be the case
>> > for a professor and student too. The attractors come from the
>> > instruction or the curriculum. One choice constrains the next.
>> >
>> >
t;> lightweight objects to other customers. It could be the case for a
>> professor and student too. The attractors come from the instruction or
>> the curriculum. One choice constrains the next.
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Friam On Be
rs. It could be the case for a
> professor and student too. The attractors come from the instruction or
> the curriculum. One choice constrains the next.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Friam On Behalf Of glen
> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 11:50
tudent too. The
attractors come from the instruction or the curriculum. One choice constrains
the next.
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 11:50 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] the inequities of uniquity
I was arguing with that s
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] the inequities of uniquity
I was arguing with that same friend yesterday at the pub. I was trying to
describe how some of us have more cognitive power than others (he's one of
them). Part of it is "free" power, freed up by his upper middle class white
good diet
ately aware that an idea is not novel, I may avoid attractors that agents
that wrongly believe they are "independent" will gravitate toward.
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 7:49 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] the i
independent" will
gravitate toward.
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 7:49 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] the inequities of uniquity
A friend of mine constantly reminds me that language is dynamic, not fixed in
stone f
https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/
Twenty years of Not Even Wrong, an anniversary blog post.
-- rec --
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:48 AM glen wrote:
> [...]
> And "unusual" is even worse. Both tokens require one to describe the
> context, domain, or universe within which the
A friend of mine constantly reminds me that language is dynamic, not fixed in
stone from a billion years ago. So, if you find others consistently using a
term in a way that you think is wrong, then *you* are wrong in what you think.
The older I get, the more difficult it gets.
But
What's wrong with "unusual"? It avoids the problem.
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024, 1:55 PM Steve Smith wrote:
>
> On 3/20/24 12:54 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
>
> Everyday as I am listening to CNN I say, "There are
13 matches
Mail list logo
