Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 6/25/2011 8:04 AM, Dale wrote:
We restructured the dependency chain for fortran support,
which includes
a compile test now. The failure can be seen above.
The Problem was in short, USE=fortran was enabled by
default for linux
arches, but people tend to disable it.
William Kenworthy wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 14:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
What I like is the speed it got corrected. People that don't sync often
most likely didn't even know it ever changed.
...
I got bit, on a 6 monthly major update across multiple systems - what
were the odds of
On Saturday 25 June 2011 20:12:00 Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Try euse -I fortran.
If anything besides gcc pops up, you should have one.
Nope.
--
Rgds
Peter
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
Whether many operations are written in Fortran is immaterial. What matters
to me is whether any on my system are. If they aren't, I don't need a
Fortran compiler and I'd rather not waste system
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 10:28:47 schrieb Dale:
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
Whether many operations are written in Fortran is immaterial. What
matters to me is whether any on my system are. If they aren't, I
don't need a
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 10:28:47 schrieb Dale:
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
Whether many operations are written in Fortran is immaterial. What
matters to me is whether any on my
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 15:01:19 schrieb Dale:
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 10:28:47 schrieb Dale:
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
Whether many operations are written in Fortran is immaterial.
What
On 6/26/2011 4:01 PM, Dale wrote:
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 10:28:47 schrieb Dale:
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Try euse -I fortran.
If anything besides gcc pops up, you should have one.
That doesn't appear to work like it should then. I get this:
On 06/24/2011 10:18 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Freitag, 24. Juni 2011, 08:04:43 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 06/24/2011 01:16 AM, Dale wrote:
If it works with fortran turned on, I'd leave it alone. With hindsight,
I should have left well enough alone anyway. It wasn't hurting a
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:29:12 -0500, Dale wrote:
I guess my first post was correct after all. Enable fortran USE flag
and keep things as it was before it got changed. It was working
fine.
Isn't that flag enabled by default? All you have yo do is not disable
it.
You seem to have
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:29:12 -0500, Dale wrote:
I guess my first post was correct after all. Enable fortran USE flag
and keep things as it was before it got changed. It was working
fine.
Isn't that flag enabled by default? All you have yo do is not disable
justin
That make sense?
Dale
:-) :-)
Hi,
as most of you do not like to have fortran enabled by default, we tried
to find a way around. We created a virtual/fortran which should depend
on a working fortran compiler so that only ebuilds which need fortran
compiler will build
On Saturday 25 June 2011 13:46:35 justin wrote:
I wasn't aware that there is no hierarchy in the dependencies in an ebuild
and portage will choose a solution w/o a USE change first. That is the
reason why many of you saw that ifc should be installed, instead of gcc
with USE=fortran. That was
On Saturday 25 June 2011 14:46:35 justin did opine thusly:
justin
That make sense?
Dale
:-) :-)
Hi,
as most of you do not like to have fortran enabled by default, we
tried to find a way around. We created a virtual/fortran which
should depend on a working fortran compiler
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
Whether many operations are written in Fortran is immaterial. What matters
to me is whether any on my system are. If they aren't, I don't need a
Fortran compiler and I'd rather not waste system resources on building one.
Try euse -I
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Feedback from the consumer end of the producer-consumer link :-)
The motivation is fine and well, it didn't quite work out, we call
this a bug.
The only real mistake was trying to slipstream it in without
notification or warning. devs all agree we should never do this,
On Saturday 25 Jun 2011 20:45:58 Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Feedback from the consumer end of the producer-consumer link :-)
The motivation is fine and well, it didn't quite work out, we call
this a bug.
The only real mistake was trying to slipstream it in without
On 6/25/2011 8:04 AM, Dale wrote:
We restructured the dependency chain for fortran support,
which includes
a compile test now. The failure can be seen above.
The Problem was in short, USE=fortran was enabled by
default for linux
arches, but people tend to disable it. Depending on
gcc[fortran]
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 14:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Feedback from the consumer end of the producer-consumer link :-)
The motivation is fine and well, it didn't quite work out, we call
this a bug.
The only real mistake was trying to slipstream it in without
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/24/2011 01:16 AM, Dale wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 17:23:44 Mark Knecht wrote:
When I removed the fortran flag it didn't change anything because (I
suppose) the KDE profile has included it as a default.
So it seems. I've just tried
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 22:47:54 Peter Humphrey did opine thusly:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 20:54:03 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I was seriously considering importing a single seater heli kit,
they are classed
Am Freitag, 24. Juni 2011, 08:04:43 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 06/24/2011 01:16 AM, Dale wrote:
If it works with fortran turned on, I'd leave it alone. With hindsight,
I should have left well enough alone anyway. It wasn't hurting a thing.
Watch the elog messages. It will tell you at
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:18:23 +0200, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote about
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?:
Am Freitag, 24. Juni 2011, 08:04:43 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 06/24/2011 01:16 AM, Dale wrote:
If it works with fortran turned on, I'd leave it alone
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Freitag, 24. Juni 2011, 08:04:43 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 06/24/2011 01:16 AM, Dale wrote:
If it works with fortran turned on, I'd leave it alone. With hindsight,
I should have left well enough alone anyway. It wasn't hurting a thing.
Watch the
Am Freitag, 24. Juni 2011, 15:00:32 schrieb Dale:
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Freitag, 24. Juni 2011, 08:04:43 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 06/24/2011 01:16 AM, Dale wrote:
If it works with fortran turned on, I'd leave it alone. With
hindsight,
I should have left well enough alone
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
cantor uses R as default backend. R uses fortran. And yes, that's because of
its speed, when it comes to mathematics and numerics.
Michael
I put it back like it was. Heck, if I don't, something else will need
it later on and portage will puke on my
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:52:44 -0500, Dale wrote:
I guess my first post was correct after all. Enable fortran USE flag
and keep things as it was before it got changed. It was working fine.
Isn't that flag enabled by default? All you have yo do is not disable it.
--
Neil Bothwick
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:52:44 -0500, Dale wrote:
I guess my first post was correct after all. Enable fortran USE flag
and keep things as it was before it got changed. It was working fine.
Isn't that flag enabled by default? All you have yo do is not disable it.
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:03:32 -0500, Dale wrote:
So why are you installing it, and all its dependencies, on the one
hand, and complaining about bloat on the other? Surely installing
stuff you don't need is the very definition of bloat.
But it installed stuff either way. Instread of ABD, I
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:03:32 -0500, Dale wrote:
So why are you installing it, and all its dependencies, on the one
hand, and complaining about bloat on the other? Surely installing
stuff you don't need is the very definition of bloat.
But it installed
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:49:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
My question was why are you installing cantor if you don't need it?
Oh, I see. It was pulled in by kde-meta. I know I can have KDE other
ways but it is much easier to emerge kde-meta than to emerge some
huge amount of packages .
If you
* Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [110622 17:40]:
Todd Goodman wrote:
* Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com [110622 14:45]:
When I did that, it complained that cantor was built with no backend.
Did you get the same thing? It said this here:
WARN (postinst)
You have decided to build cantor
* Indi thebeelzebubtrig...@gmail.com [110622 18:59]:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:30:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Then again, I don't fly either. I have told people that if they
see me on a plane, close the lid on my coffin. That's the only
way I would get on a plane.
You haven't lived
* Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk [110622 20:37]:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:55:10 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Helicopters are reserved for those with a death wish
Unless the helicopter is an air ambulance, not that what I was doing to
require an air ambulance in the first place was
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:06:09AM -0400, Todd Goodman wrote:
* Indi thebeelzebubtrig...@gmail.com [110622 18:59]:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:30:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Then again, I don't fly either. I have told people that if they
see me on a plane, close the lid on my coffin. That's
Todd Goodman wrote:
* Neil Bothwickn...@digimed.co.uk [110622 20:37]:
It seemed ironic that a recent training helicopter crash near here
resulted in the survivor being taken off in an air ambulance helicopter.
Though most of those I know of are twin engine turbines so chances are
good
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:49:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
My question was why are you installing cantor if you don't need it?
Oh, I see. It was pulled in by kde-meta. I know I can have KDE other
ways but it is much easier to emerge kde-meta than to emerge some
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:10:34PM -0500, Dale wrote:
I saw a guy on a TV interview once. He said the only way a helicopter
can fly is by brute force. A airplane wants to fly but a helicopter
just wants to crash. He said that can be proven by taking your hands
off the controls. Down
On Thursday 23 June 2011 13:09:53 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:49:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
My question was why are you installing cantor if you don't
need it?
Oh, I see. It was pulled in by kde-meta. I know I can have KDE
other ways but it is much easier to
On Thursday 23 June 2011 09:09:17 Indi did opine thusly:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:06:09AM -0400, Todd Goodman wrote:
* Indi thebeelzebubtrig...@gmail.com [110622 18:59]:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:30:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Then again, I don't fly either. I have told people that
On Thursday 23 June 2011 01:12:55 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:55:10 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Helicopters are reserved for those with a death wish
Unless the helicopter is an air ambulance, not that what I was doing
to require an air ambulance in the first place
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:45:36 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
If you consider spending a couple of days farting around with
fortran to be much easier... :P
I use sets for this. I want KDE but not all of it, so I have a set
with just the -meta packages I want:
I do similar, except I'm even
On Thursday 23 June 2011 21:35:21 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:45:36 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
If you consider spending a couple of days farting around
with
fortran to be much easier... :P
I use sets for this. I want KDE but not all of it, so I have a
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 18:46:55 Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:54:49 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Use a directory for package.use, it makes it far easier to
manage. All of /etc/portage/package.* are directories here.
I have done that for package.keywords and
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 17:23:44 Mark Knecht wrote:
When I removed the fortran flag it didn't change anything because (I
suppose) the KDE profile has included it as a default.
So it seems. I've just tried USE=-fortran emerge -upDvN world and the only
thing that would be remerged because of
On 6/23/2011 1:04 AM, Dale wrote:
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 6/22/2011 2:35 PM, Dale wrote:
You have decided to build cantor with no backend.
To have this application functional, please do one of below:
# emerge -va1 '='kde-base/cantor-4.6.4 with 'R' USE flag enabled
# emerge -vaDu
On Thursday 23 June 2011 20:54:03 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I was seriously considering importing a single seater heli kit, they
are classed as ultralights and do not need a pilot's license. But
there's an obscure clause in the rules that states ultralights cannot
be flown within 50m of a
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:06:28 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I do similar, except I'm even more of a control freak than you, so
my kde4 set contains onl;y a couple of meta-packages, the rest it
individual packages.
% wc -l /etc/portage/sets/kde4
83 /etc/portage/sets/kde4
Sad, I know
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:27:53 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
So is giving the files sensible names :)
That was what I liked about autounmask, the tree version not the
portage one. It gave them some names at least. Still felt like
looking for a needle in a haystack sometimes tho.
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 23:34:17 Mike Edenfield wrote:
Odds are one of your 1.5quadrillion USE flags is pulling in FORTRAN when
you don't even need it.
It may not be. I have only four USE flags in make.conf, and still I have the
same fortran requirement as Dale.
--
Rgds
Peter
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 17:23:44 Mark Knecht wrote:
When I removed the fortran flag it didn't change anything because (I
suppose) the KDE profile has included it as a default.
So it seems. I've just tried USE=-fortran emerge -upDvN world and the only
thing
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 14:25:21 Indi wrote:
IMO the USE line in make.conf really should only contain the universal
stuff you can't live without, specifying everything else on a per
package basis is what makes it possible to run a system which is at once
full-featured and lean.
My method
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 6/23/2011 1:04 AM, Dale wrote:
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 6/22/2011 2:35 PM, Dale wrote:
You have decided to build cantor with no backend.
To have this application functional, please do one of below:
# emerge -va1 '='kde-base/cantor-4.6.4
On Thursday 23 June 2011 22:47:54 Peter Humphrey did opine thusly:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 20:54:03 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I was seriously considering importing a single seater heli kit,
they are classed as ultralights and do not need a pilot's
license. But there's an obscure clause in the
On Thursday 23 June 2011 22:57:16 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:27:53 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
So is giving the files sensible names :)
That was what I liked about autounmask, the tree version not the
portage one. It gave them some names at least. Still felt like
On Thursday 23 June 2011 23:41:04 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I could just two birds one stone:
http://www.hover-bike.com/
Hmm. I'd like to see one more figure: dBA!
--
Rgds
Peter
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:13:46AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.keywords.
No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords.
No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.mask.
No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.unmask.
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:01:30 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
1) what's the difference between package.keywords and
package.accept_keywords?
The latter is the new name for the former.
--
Neil Bothwick
Last words of a Windows user: = Why does that work now?
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:15:04PM -0500, Dale wrote
Todd Goodman wrote:
My solution is to force -R in make.conf
Let me make a note of that, in make.conf of course. ;-)
Years ago, I changed to starting my USE line with -* and adding what
I needed, either in /etc/make.conf or in
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:18:48 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
My method is to put a USE flag into make.conf if it's described in
use.desc; otherwise it goes into package.use if it's in use.local.desc.
I use that as a general rule too, although there is the situation where a
flag moves from local
On 06/24/2011 01:16 AM, Dale wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 17:23:44 Mark Knecht wrote:
When I removed the fortran flag it didn't change anything because (I
suppose) the KDE profile has included it as a default.
So it seems. I've just tried USE=-fortran emerge -upDvN
On 06/22/2011 06:55 AM, Dale wrote:
I just did my updates and ran into this:
* Maintainer: s...@gentoo.org
* USE: amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib policykit
userland_GNU
* FEATURES: preserve-libs sandbox
* Please install currently selected gcc version with USE=fortran.
* If
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 06:55 AM, Dale wrote:
I just did my updates and ran into this:
* Maintainer: s...@gentoo.org
* USE: amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib policykit
userland_GNU
* FEATURES: preserve-libs sandbox
* Please install currently selected gcc
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:18:49 -0500, Dale wrote:
To think people wonder why my USE line is so big. I keep having to add
stuff when portage pukes but portage never tells me when one has fell
off the reservation and needs to be removed. sighs Over the years,
it adds up.
That's because
On 06/22/2011 02:18 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 06:55 AM, Dale wrote:
I just did my updates and ran into this:
* Maintainer: s...@gentoo.org
* USE: amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib policykit
userland_GNU
* FEATURES: preserve-libs sandbox
* Please
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 06:18:49AM -0500, Dale wrote:
To think people wonder why my USE line is so big. I keep having to add
stuff when portage pukes but portage never tells me when one has fell
off the reservation and needs to be removed. sighs Over the years,
it adds up.
I'm a
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:18:49 -0500, Dale wrote:
To think people wonder why my USE line is so big. I keep having to add
stuff when portage pukes but portage never tells me when one has fell
off the reservation and needs to be removed. sighs Over the years,
it adds
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 02:18 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 06:55 AM, Dale wrote:
I just did my updates and ran into this:
* Maintainer: s...@gentoo.org
* USE: amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib policykit
userland_GNU
* FEATURES:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:18:49 -0500, Dale wrote:
To think people wonder why my USE line is so big. I keep having to add
stuff when portage pukes but portage never tells me when one has fell
off the
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Well, it appeared to only affect gcc here.
As it should?
c2stable ~ # equery hasuse fortran
* Searching for USE flag fortran ...
[IP-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5:4.4
c2stable ~ #
On 06/22/2011 04:33 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 02:18 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 06:55 AM, Dale wrote:
I just did my updates and ran into this:
[...]
* Please install currently selected gcc version with USE=fortran.
* If you intend to
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:27:11 -0500, Dale wrote:
That's because those are global flags. If you set package-specific
flags in /etc/portage/package.use, eix-test-obsolete will tell you
when entries can be removed.
But when something new comes out, I usually want to add it for all the
Mark Knecht wrote:
If eix-test-obsolete is outputting wy too much there there's an
opportunity there for you to clean things up, if not today then over
time. Once you get it right it outputs almost nothing.
Note that I run stable and then use ~amd64 in package.keywords rather
liberally
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I suppose you got the idea by now ;-) Do you need dev-lang/R? If
not, then emerge -pv --depclean dev-lang/R. Do you need the
package(s) that this brings up? If not, continue --depclean those
until you reach something that has no other dependencies; meaning you
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:27:11 -0500, Dale wrote:
That's because those are global flags. If you set package-specific
flags in /etc/portage/package.use, eix-test-obsolete will tell you
when entries can be removed.
But when something new comes out, I usually
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 10:40:40 Dale did opine thusly:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:27:11 -0500, Dale wrote:
That's because those are global flags. If you set
package-specific flags in /etc/portage/package.use,
eix-test-obsolete will tell you when entries can be
On 06/22/2011 06:35 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I suppose you got the idea by now ;-) Do you need dev-lang/R? If not,
then emerge -pv --depclean dev-lang/R. Do you need the package(s)
that this brings up? If not, continue --depclean those until you reach
something that has no
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:54:49 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Use a directory for package.use, it makes it far easier to
manage. All of /etc/portage/package.* are directories here.
I have done that for package.keywords and unmask. In ways it is
easier but in ways, it is a nightmare.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
I'm on KDE too, and it doesn't need it. Probably because my make.conf
explicitly says -fortran in it.
That's actually the correct statement. When I removed the fortran flag
it didn't change anything because (I suppose)
On 2011-06-22 17:35, Dale wrote:
Well, that leads back to KDE. So, looks like it stays.
R is a mathematical language similar to Matlab/Octave... only
specialized for statistical computing. I assume if something in KDE is
using that it must be optional; check your USE flags.
HTH
Best regards
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 06:35 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I suppose you got the idea by now ;-) Do you need dev-lang/R? If not,
then emerge -pv --depclean dev-lang/R. Do you need the package(s)
that this brings up? If not, continue --depclean those until you reach
On 06/22/2011 07:58 PM, Dale wrote:
[...]
Mine never had fortran in it at all. I still don't really know what
fortran is.
It's a programming language. You know, C, C++, stuff like that. Except
that it's a zombie-relict from the 1950's that refuses to die because
people still programming in
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:54:49 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Use a directory for package.use, it makes it far easier to
manage. All of /etc/portage/package.* are directories here.
I have done that for package.keywords and unmask. In ways it is
easier but in
* Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de [110622 11:53]:
On 06/22/2011 06:35 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I suppose you got the idea by now ;-) Do you need dev-lang/R? If not,
then emerge -pv --depclean dev-lang/R. Do you need the package(s)
that this brings up? If not, continue
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 07:58 PM, Dale wrote:
[...]
Mine never had fortran in it at all. I still don't really know what
fortran is.
It's a programming language. You know, C, C++, stuff like that.
Except that it's a zombie-relict from the 1950's that refuses to die
because
Todd Goodman wrote:
Well, I don't have fortran use enabled
mail-proxy ~ # euse -i fortran
global use flags (searching: fortran)
[- ] fortran - Adds support for fortran (formerly f77)
local use flags (searching: fortran)
Dale wrote:
Todd Goodman wrote:
Well, I don't have fortran use enabled
mail-proxy ~ # euse -i fortran
global use flags (searching: fortran)
[- ] fortran - Adds support for fortran (formerly f77)
local use flags (searching:
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 13:13:03 Dale did opine thusly:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 07:58 PM, Dale wrote:
[...]
Mine never had fortran in it at all. I still don't really know
what fortran is.
It's a programming language. You know, C, C++, stuff like that.
Except that
* Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [110622 14:45]:
Dale wrote:
Todd Goodman wrote:
Well, I don't have fortran use enabled
mail-proxy ~ # euse -i fortran
global use flags (searching: fortran)
[- ] fortran - Adds support for
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
SNIP
I'm on KDE too, and it doesn't need it. Probably because my make.conf
explicitly says -fortran in it.
For kicks I decided to give -fortran a try. I find it interesting that
with Fortran installed using either
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 13:13:03 Dale did opine thusly:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 07:58 PM, Dale wrote:
[...]
Mine never had fortran in it at all. I still don't really know
what fortran is.
It's a programming language. You
Todd Goodman wrote:
* Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com [110622 14:45]:
When I did that, it complained that cantor was built with no backend.
Did you get the same thing? It said this here:
WARN (postinst)
You have decided to build cantor with no backend.
To have this application functional,
On 06/22/2011 12:13 AM, justin wrote:
I found the culprit. It should be fixed now, so please resync later
today and everything is normal again.
justin
Hi justin. Just want to say thanks for being a gentoo dev, and even
bigger thanks for taking time to check in with us here in the gentoo
Mark Knecht wrote:
For kicks I decided to give -fortran a try. I find it interesting that
with Fortran installed using either the fortran flag in package.use,
or just not setting the flag at all, I apparently do not need the c++
libraries that I do need when I choose -fortran. However it seems
On 6/22/2011 9:33 AM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/22/2011 02:18 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Uninstall sci-libs/blas-reference I guess. And probably whatever
depends on it. Please do an emerge -pv --depclean blas-reference and
post the output so we can see what's
walt wrote:
On 06/22/2011 12:13 AM, justin wrote:
I found the culprit. It should be fixed now, so please resync later
today and everything is normal again.
justin
Hi justin. Just want to say thanks for being a gentoo dev, and even
bigger thanks for taking time to check in with us
On 6/22/2011 11:35 AM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I suppose you got the idea by now ;-) Do you need dev-lang/R? If
not, then emerge -pv --depclean dev-lang/R. Do you need the
package(s) that this brings up? If not, continue --depclean those
until you reach something that has no
On 6/22/2011 2:35 PM, Dale wrote:
When I did that, it complained that cantor was built with no backend.
Did you get the same thing? It said this here:
WARN (postinst)
You have decided to build cantor with no backend.
To have this application functional, please do one of below:
#
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:30:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Then again, I don't fly either. I have told people that if they
see me on a plane, close the lid on my coffin. That's the only
way I would get on a plane.
You haven't lived until you've been up in a small, underpowered
ultralight or
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 18:44:00 Indi did opine thusly:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:30:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Then again, I don't fly either. I have told people that if they
see me on a plane, close the lid on my coffin. That's the only
way I would get on a plane.
You haven't lived
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
