Re: [gentoo-user] why multiple versions of java-config, automake, and autoconf?

2007-06-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/9/07, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Kent Fredric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, but you see, in half the cases there is not a /complete/ incompatibility. PHP4-5 migration is not an entirely big switch, the biggest problem IIRC in the 4-5 change is the way it handles classes,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Zachary Grafton
On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote: In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really. If you think there's a

Re: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition

2007-06-09 Thread Florian Philipp
Am Samstag 09 Juni 2007 02:25 schrieb Albert Hopkins: On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 19:01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri Jun 8 16:38 , Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: Yeah, that's me, I do exactly the same until you issue the cp command where I do: $cd /mnt/oldstuff tar cvjpf

Re: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition

2007-06-09 Thread Vladimir Rusinov
On 6/8/07, Aleksey Kunitskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it safe to move my linux system by using: #cp -rp /mnt/old_part /mnt/new_part and approriate changes in grub.conf/fstab on new system location ? cp -ax / /mnt/newroot cp -ax /dev/ /mnt/newroot Is always works for mine. Second line

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/9/07, Zachary Grafton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote: In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: b.n. [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/9/07, b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kent Fredric ha scritto: On 6/8/07, b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ( probably releated to it being a generally harder distro to use that *cough* ewwbuntu *cough* unlinspired *cough* or *cough* deadrat *cough* ) OT: Ubuntu distros (Kubuntu,

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Firefox's Connecting

2007-06-09 Thread Mick
On Friday 08 June 2007 19:24, Markus Schönhaber wrote: Grant wrote: Can anyone tell me what Firefox is doing when it says it is Connecting to a particular website? My site is periodically hanging at that point, and I'd like to track down the problem. Is it just waiting for apache2's

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Dale
Kent Fredric wrote: On 6/9/07, Zachary Grafton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote: In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander

[gentoo-user] sun-jdk dependencies questions

2007-06-09 Thread Marko Kocić
Why does sun-jdk needs gcc-3.3.6 and and libstdc++-3.3? As I understand sun-jdk-1.6.0.01 is a binary package, and java works just fine if downloaded and installed from Sun site, without portage. Since I don't have enough disk spac fro another gcc, is it possible to somehow let portage handle

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil

2007-06-09 Thread Mick
On Friday 08 June 2007 23:34, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: On Friday 08 June 2007, Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Ubuntu distros (Kubuntu, expecially) are really, really shiny and slick pieces of software. I just installed Kubuntu 7.04 at work

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/9/07, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kent Fredric wrote: On 6/9/07, Zachary Grafton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: Maybe someone should submit a bug report http://www.xkcd.com/c258.html I tried . Critical bug, but was

Re: [gentoo-user] sun-jdk dependencies questions

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 09 June 2007 11:46:52 Marko Kocić wrote: Why does sun-jdk needs gcc-3.3.6 and and libstdc++-3.3? As I understand sun-jdk-1.6.0.01 is a binary package, and java works just fine if downloaded and installed from Sun site, without portage. Since I don't have enough disk spac fro

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil

2007-06-09 Thread b.n.
Mick ha scritto: b)Upgrades I ran apt-get upgrade and dist-upgrade to upgrade to feisty and ended up having to reinstall, because the end product was unbootable. There were no warnings, no messages, no suggestions as to what config files might have needed editing (don't you just love

Re: [gentoo-user] why multiple versions of java-config, automake, and autoconf?

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 08 June 2007 14:46:54 Enrico Weigelt wrote: Well, they still are different versions under the same packages from the same projects. Evolutionarily yes, technically no ;-P They're in fact very diffrent, but provide an very similar (almost the same) functionality. The problem is:

Re: [gentoo-user] why multiple versions of java-config, automake, and autoconf?

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 09 June 2007 08:44:23 Kent Fredric wrote: %=sys-devel/automake-1.9 %=sys-devel/automake-1.9 %=sys-devel/automake-1.9 Why that syntax ? Well , we have a dilemour, if we were to change the way package atoms were named, it  would break /craploads/ of the stuff already available

Re: [gentoo-user] how to move windows partition to be begining of hard?

2007-06-09 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 13:05, Randy Barlow wrote: gpgkeys: key ED2A35C5A17F791F not found on keyserver Platoali wrote: I have a box that has a 4GB fat32 partition in the middle of hard. I want to move this partition to the end or begining of hard, so I can create bigger partitions.

Re: [gentoo-user] sun-jdk dependencies questions

2007-06-09 Thread Marko Kocić
Thanks for the clarification. The reason is as you say that dev-java/sun-jdk:1.6 is a binary package that isn't ABI compatible with libstdc++.so.6 (from gcc-4.x). And as we don't have the source we cannot fix that with revdep-rebuild. But I'm already running sun-jdk on my machine that I

Re: [gentoo-user] sun-jdk dependencies questions

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 09 June 2007 13:02:00 Marko Kocić wrote: Thanks for the clarification. The reason is as you say that dev-java/sun-jdk:1.6 is a binary package that isn't ABI compatible with libstdc++.so.6 (from gcc-4.x). And as we don't have the source we cannot fix that with revdep-rebuild.

Re: [gentoo-user] sun-jdk dependencies questions

2007-06-09 Thread Marko Kocić
On 6/9/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I'm already running sun-jdk on my machine that I manually downloaded and installed from the sun site, although I don't have libstdc++ installed. One thing I don't understand is why do I need libstdc++ when using portage version? Do

Re: [gentoo-user] sun-jdk dependencies questions

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 09 June 2007 14:06:59 Marko Kocić wrote: occasionally crashes. If you meant 1.4 or 1.5 then they simply don't seem to use the c++ standard library... I don't know the difference between Sun and gentoo packaging. Maybe Sun is statically linking that ABI stuff. Right. If you

Re: [gentoo-user] sun-jdk dependencies questions

2007-06-09 Thread Marko Kocić
Ok, thanks for the explanation. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Dale
Kent Fredric wrote: On 6/9/07, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me guess, Jakub closed it? LOL Can I also assume he decided to stay? I read he was leaving a while back. Dale :-) :-) :-) Lemme be perfectly clear here. Jakub does a very good job of what he does, and gentoo IMO

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: I didn't but I didn't want him to leave either. Dale :-) :-) :-) That should read as I didn't _say anything_ but I didn't want him to leave either. It was to late to be posting much of anything. o_O Dale :-) :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: updating ati-drivers

2007-06-09 Thread Francisco Rivas
Hi all.. I follow this steps : 1.- download the ati driver of the page 2.- change you level to init 3 3.- add the execution perimission to ati driver (#chmod +x ati) 4.- Execute the ati driver installation (#./atidri...) 5.- aticonfig --initial 6.- change you level to init 5 7.- startx (not

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Firefox's Connecting

2007-06-09 Thread Grant
Can anyone tell me what Firefox is doing when it says it is Connecting to a particular website? My site is periodically hanging at that point, and I'd like to track down the problem. Is it just waiting for apache2's first response to the HTTP request? No, Firefox is propably waiting

Re: [gentoo-user] cvs server config error

2007-06-09 Thread Alex Schuster
Arnau Bria writes: looking for this errror in google I got : http://gentoo-wiki.com/Talk:HOWTO_CVS_Server which says that I must enable server use flag to prevent this error, but this flag does not exist for cvs (http://www.gentoo.org/dyn/use-index.xml) Um, it does. Look again :) Another

[gentoo-user] Re: how to move windows partition to be begining of hard?

2007-06-09 Thread Platoali
On Shanbe 19 Khordad 1386 14:25, Mick wrote: On Tuesday 05 June 2007 13:05, Randy Barlow wrote: gpgkeys: key ED2A35C5A17F791F not found on keyserver Platoali wrote: I have a box that has a 4GB fat32 partition in the middle of hard. I want to move this partition to the end or

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Firefox's Connecting

2007-06-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/10/07, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone tell me what Firefox is doing when it says it is Connecting to a particular website? My site is periodically hanging at that point, and I'd like to track down the problem. Is it just waiting for apache2's first response to the

Re: [gentoo-user] Courier-imap - can't connect

2007-06-09 Thread kashani
Johannes Skov Frandsen wrote: I have tried setting thunderbird to use the following info: imap: home.mindfield.dk user: joe When I try to access my inbox Thunderbird asks for password (a good thing of course) and I supply my linux account password. This is where the trouble starts

Re: [gentoo-user] cvs server config error

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 08 June 2007 12:20:55 Arnau Bria wrote: which says that I must enable server use flag to prevent this error, but this flag does not exist for cvs It exists for =dev-util/cvs-1.12.12-r3. dev-util/cvs-1.12.12-r4 was made stable in April. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description:

[gentoo-user] gcc-3.3.6 and the pentium-m flag

2007-06-09 Thread Randy Barlow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am trying to install virtualbox to play with it (any other non-masked virtualization tools besides Xen and qemu that you might recommend me trying out?) and it wants to pull in gcc-3.3.6. That's fine, but I am using the -march=pentium-m flag on my

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-3.3.6 and the pentium-m flag

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 09 June 2007 18:39:29 Randy Barlow wrote: I am trying to install virtualbox to play with it (any other non-masked virtualization tools besides Xen and qemu that you might recommend me trying out?) and it wants to pull in gcc-3.3.6. That's fine, but I am using the -march=pentium-m

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-3.3.6 and the pentium-m flag

2007-06-09 Thread Naga Toro
On Saturday 09 June 2007 18.48.34 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: On Saturday 09 June 2007 18:39:29 Randy Barlow wrote: I am trying to install virtualbox to play with it (any other non-masked virtualization tools besides Xen and qemu that you might recommend me trying out?) and it wants to pull

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-3.3.6 and the pentium-m flag

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 09 June 2007 18:59:02 Naga Toro wrote: [2 good sugestions] or emerge libstdc++-v3 Hah, I just assumed it was one of those few packages (like qemu-softmmu) that actually needed to be compiled with gcc-3.x. But indeed according to the ebuilds it's just need the right ABI for

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 09 June 2007 15:11:48 Dale wrote: I think replacing him with a bot thing was going to cause a lot of trouble.  I read that was their plan at least. The bot doesn't replace him. It shows suggestions for who the right assignee would be based on metadata.xml for the package in

[gentoo-user] OT - Question about glsa-check

2007-06-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
The last several times I've run glsa-check, it's recommended that I emerge a package that portage claims is already installed on my system: camille ~ # glsa-check -t all This system is affected by the following GLSAs: 200705-03 camille ~ # glsa-check -p 200705-03 Checking GLSA 200705-03 The

Re: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition

2007-06-09 Thread Tim Allingham
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:52 +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: Hi, On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 02:43:23 +1000 Tim Allingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I generally prefer to do this with dd, from a remote environment dd if=/dev/source partition of=/dev/destination partition Remote Environment

Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Question about glsa-check

2007-06-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/10/07, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The last several times I've run glsa-check, it's recommended that I emerge a package that portage claims is already installed on my system: camille ~ # glsa-check -t all This system is affected by the following GLSAs: 200705-03 camille ~ #

Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Question about glsa-check [SOLVED]

2007-06-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
--- Kent Fredric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/10/07, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The last several times I've run glsa-check, it's recommended that I emerge a package that portage claims is already installed on my system: camille ~ # glsa-check -t all This system is

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Firefox's Connecting

2007-06-09 Thread Grant
Can anyone tell me what Firefox is doing when it says it is Connecting to a particular website? My site is periodically hanging at that point, and I'd like to track down the problem. Is it just waiting for apache2's first response to the HTTP request? No, Firefox is

Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Question about glsa-check

2007-06-09 Thread Alex Schuster
Kent Fredric writes: On 6/10/07, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The last several times I've run glsa-check, it's recommended that I emerge a package that portage claims is already installed on my system: [...] Its possible ( somehow ) you have dupe/stale tomcats lying around.

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Firefox's Connecting

2007-06-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/10/07, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone tell me what Firefox is doing when it says it is Connecting to a particular website? My site is periodically hanging at that point, and I'd like to track down the problem. Is it just waiting for apache2's first response

Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Question about glsa-check

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 09 June 2007 21:50:14 Alex Schuster wrote: You tried   emerge -C www-servers/tomcat-5.5.22 just to ensure this?, cos it looks like glsa-check sees 5.0.27 somewhere ^^; Any idea how this can happen? Aborted emerges or what? But shouldn't emerge clean, or auto-clean which

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Firefox's Connecting

2007-06-09 Thread Grant
Can anyone tell me what Firefox is doing when it says it is Connecting to a particular website? My site is periodically hanging at that point, and I'd like to track down the problem. Is it just waiting for apache2's first response to the HTTP request? No,

Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Question about glsa-check

2007-06-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/10/07, Alex Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kent Fredric writes: On 6/10/07, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The last several times I've run glsa-check, it's recommended that I emerge a package that portage claims is already installed on my system: [...] Its possible (

[gentoo-user] The Gentoo-User mailing list

2007-06-09 Thread burlingk
Who would I contact with suggestions or concerns about the mailing list?

Re: [gentoo-user] The Gentoo-User mailing list

2007-06-09 Thread Karl Haines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Who would I contact with suggestions or concerns about the mailing list? I don't quite know what you mean by this, but maybe you'd have better luck getting an answer in #gentoo on IRC. - -- Karl Haines (615)686-5043

Re: [gentoo-user] The Gentoo-User mailing list

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 10 June 2007 00:46:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Who would I contact with suggestions or concerns about the mailing list? You'd file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org with Gentoo Infrastructure as Product and Mailing Lists as Component... -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description:

[gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-06-09 Thread Regis Decamps
Florian Philipp wrote: Am Dienstag 15 Mai 2007 02:45 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think that once my internet access becomes functional (even then it will just be .edu, .org, .gov, and .mil sites), I will see how well the gmane page loads for me. :) I will use it to read the messages, and

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-06-09 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Regis Decamps Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 8:03 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question Florian Philipp wrote: Am Dienstag 15 Mai 2007 02:45 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Dale
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: On Saturday 09 June 2007 15:11:48 Dale wrote: I think replacing him with a bot thing was going to cause a lot of trouble. I read that was their plan at least. The bot doesn't replace him. It shows suggestions for who the right assignee would be based on

[gentoo-user] X server won't load

2007-06-09 Thread Andrey Vul
I rebooted into my 2.6.22-rc3-rsdl1.0-hrt2 kernel and the X server crashes (reminds me of Beryl on Ubuntu, but this time, there is a blank black screen and no mouse). The problem is, my laptop has no serial port, and therefore, I can't dmesg after starting X. Because my keyboard has gone belly-up