On 17 February 2010 00:12, Volker Armin Hemmann
you want dependency nightmare?
openoffice depends on libwpd
libwpd depends on libgsf
libgsf pulls gconf in.
I don't need wordperfect, I don't want gnome. No way to get rid of that crap.
I know. :-(
Even basic libs are pulling in tons of
- Original Message
From: Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com
I also happen to own a couple of old PCs which I try to keep lean and I don't
mind the odd double declutching to change gears. Now, I understand the
development philosophy of KDE4 since this was very well explained, but that
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
openoffice depends on libwpd
libwpd depends on libgsf
libgsf pulls gconf in.
Hm. I actually have OO (non-binary version) installed althoughI dislike
bloat... However, I don't have gconf installed (USE: -gnome, globally in
make.conf). I run stable so that, of
On Mittwoch 17 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
openoffice depends on libwpd
libwpd depends on libgsf
libgsf pulls gconf in.
Hm. I actually have OO (non-binary version) installed althoughI dislike
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
openoffice depends on libwpd
libwpd depends on libgsf
libgsf pulls gconf in.
Hm. I actually have OO (non-binary version) installed althoughI dislike
bloat... However, I don't have gconf
Dale wrote:
What did you use in place of k3b? Is it a GUI or command line?
cdrecord. I also have installed, but I haven't used it yet, XFburn...
Best regards
Peter K
On Sunday 14 February 2010 12:40:59 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 14 February 2010 13:02:48 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I highly recommend drivers to gain the skill of driving a vehicle
crash-style without a clutch. Comes in useful sometimes.
:-)
the point was not stick but
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 01:21:22 Mick wrote:
However, the point has been well made by many. KDE4 is not KDE3.x and
with KDE4 you get the full enchilada because that's what the developers
have produced. Since I do not have the ability (or time) to fork KDE4
into my own flavour I will
On Mittwoch 17 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 14 February 2010 12:40:59 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 14 February 2010 13:02:48 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I highly recommend drivers to gain the skill of driving a vehicle
crash-style without a clutch. Comes in useful sometimes.
On Sonntag 14 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 13 February 2010 14:07:05 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I agree with the concept that people who don't want KDE dependancies,
e.g. dbus, shouldn't use KDE apps. Therefore, I avoid amarok,
kaffeine, kplayer, etc. What got
On Sunday 14 February 2010 13:02:48 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I highly recommend drivers to gain the skill of driving a vehicle
crash-style without a clutch. Comes in useful sometimes.
:-)
the point was not stick but unsyncronized ;)
I know. I just felt like tossing sounding in
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Samstag 13 Februar 2010, Walter Dnes wrote:
#except that dsbus is not a KDE application. Just grep to portage tree for
apps that use dbus.
The result might be a bit shocking.
Btw, do you have a car? But certainly you
On 13 Feb 2010, at 15:42, Dale wrote:
...
Btw, do you have a car? But certainly you drive stick.
Unsyncronized. Because
everything else is 'bloat'. ...
P. S. I also drive a stick. I don't like the repair rates or costs
on automatic transmissions.
Except your manual gearbox probably
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 13 Feb 2010, at 15:42, Dale wrote:
...
Btw, do you have a car? But certainly you drive stick.
Unsyncronized. Because
everything else is 'bloat'. ...
P. S. I also drive a stick. I don't like the repair rates or costs
On Saturday 13 February 2010 14:07:05 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I agree with the concept that people who don't want KDE dependancies,
e.g. dbus, shouldn't use KDE apps. Therefore, I avoid amarok, kaffeine,
kplayer, etc. What got me started in this thread was the fact that what
had
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:37:53PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
You have been corrected on this point so many times I now think you
are just a stupid ass.
It is not slow.
You are the only one saying that. People who do use Nepomuk say that
it is not slow and does not hog resources (initial
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:37:53PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
You have been corrected on this point so many times I now think you
are just a stupid ass.
It is not slow.
You are the only one saying that. People who do use
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 6:31 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
OK, after reading several articles from the given starting point, I now
understand why semantic-desktop wastes so much cpu, memory, and
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another
desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 years).
yeah good luck with that. Because
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Walter Dnes wrote:
Seriously guys, you start sounding like luddites. Is new, must be bad.
Correction, is fat, bloated, and slow, must be bad. I wonder if
Microsoft's anti-linux strategy is to have its agents infiltrate the
linux developer community, and
On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another
desktop manager (even after being my
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
On Donnerstag 11 Februar
On Thursday 11 February 2010 16:32:02 Dale wrote:
Can you nice the thing too? That would work. I set emerge to 5 and I
can't even tell that emerge is running most of the time. There may be
times when I can but it is rare.
I just don't get this thing that indexing is a resource hog. I
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 16:32:02 Dale wrote:
Can you nice the thing too? That would work. I set emerge to 5 and I
can't even tell that emerge is running most of the time. There may be
times when I can but it is
Am Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:18:42 +
schrieb Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote:
IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find
another desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7
years).
It's so mandatory
On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
Am Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:18:42 +
schrieb Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote:
IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find
another desktop manager (even after
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter
On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 11
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:43:36 +0100, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
If you do not want a piece of software, why should you install it?
Installing and not using it instead of not installing it at all, is the
wrong way and (to my opinion) it is defintely not the Gentoo way.
Clearly it is not
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2010 01:49:18 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
Am Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:18:42 +
schrieb Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote:
IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop
Hello list,
when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
kdelibs compiled with USE=semantic-desktop and cannot be told to not
use it. But I do not like the idea of semantic desktop and I will not
install it. But I really like kmail as my mail client, so I give it a
last
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
Hello list,
when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
kdelibs compiled with USE=semantic-desktop and cannot be told to not
use it. But I do not like the idea of semantic desktop and I will not
install it.
you
Am Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 schrieb Christian Apeltauer:
Hello list,
when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
kdelibs compiled with USE=semantic-desktop and cannot be told to not
use it. But I do not like the idea of semantic desktop and I will not
install it.
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
Hello list,
when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
kdelibs compiled with USE=semantic-desktop and cannot be told to not
use it. But I do not like the
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
Hello list,
when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
kdelibs compiled with USE=semantic-desktop and
On Feb 10, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
Hello list,
when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
Hello list,
when I
On Feb 10, 2010, at 6:31 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
OK, after reading several articles from the given starting point, I now
understand why semantic-desktop wastes so much cpu, memory, and storage
(really, if you organize your data
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote:
IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another
desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 years).
It's so mandatory it takes a whole mouse click to turn it off :(
--
Neil Bothwick
Old hitchhikers
On 11 Feb 2010, at 01:14, Roy Wright wrote:
...
because to 'organize it properly' you would need a huge directory
tree plus
symlinks plus explaining notes to even simulate a small token of
the stuff
'semantic desktop' can do for you..
Haven't had a problem organizing my data in 25 years
43 matches
Mail list logo
