Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg, as far as I can tell you need medical attention.
Please, from now on do not annoy me with unwanted e-mail containing
advertisements of cdrtools or information about the attacks against you.
You ddid by accident remove cdrtools instead of the
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg, as far as I can tell you need medical attention.
Please, from now on do not annoy me with unwanted e-mail containing
advertisements of cdrtools or information about the attacks against
you.
* Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg, as far as I can tell you need medical attention.
Please, from now on do not annoy me with unwanted e-mail containing
advertisements of cdrtools or information about the attacks against you.
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01.07.08 10:50]:
There _is_ an evil conspiracy at least on Suse. Suse told me that they cannot
use unmodified original software and they need to modify my software.
But that's not an evil conspiracy against you, that's the normal policy
of SuSe: they
brullo nulla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FAQ (I assume you're talking about
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html ) only contain
basic information on your side, almost without a single reference that
shows me the actual full text of the email exchanges etc. supporting
what you
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's not asking different things.
Quotes from his mail:
- When you changed the license. For what reason. Explain, please, why
there is no problem to mix GPL with CDDL (for me personally it is the
most interesting part)
Now, if you want to be taken seriously,
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have written the program prog-a.c and published it on your site
under the GNU GPL.
I have _independently_ written the prog-b.c.
Nex, I've found your program and liked it. I decide that your prog-a.c
and my prog-b.c serve a common purpose and they
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:30:11 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have written the program prog-a.c and published it on your site
under the GNU GPL.
I have _independently_ written the prog-b.c.
Nex, I've found your program and
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you come up with a claim that is _completely_ unrelated to
cdrtools?
Claim!? I was merely asking a question.
Completely unrelated!? How about this:
I recommend you to first inform yourself before asking in a way that just
verifies that you
Joerg, as far as I can tell you need medical attention.
Please, from now on do not annoy me with unwanted e-mail containing
advertisements of cdrtools or information about the attacks against you.
I'm done with you and your product.
==
localhost
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:47:31 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
You should carefully check the history to understand that most of the
changes are speudo changes (like adding a space and later removing it
again).
I beg to
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Iliev ha scritto:
How about if you remake your site and explain everything there. What
happened (chronologically and in detail) and provide evidence. Remake it
to be clear with simple sentences and easy for finding the information.
Then provide means
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:00:39 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Iliev ha scritto:
How about if you remake your site and explain everything there.
What happened (chronologically and in detail) and provide
evidence. Remake it to be
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:00:39 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Iliev ha scritto:
How about if you remake your site and explain everything there.
What happened
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually you can figure out which are the most FAQ from this thread, but
let me help you for the start. Please, publish detailed information
for the following events in chronological order:
Please explain why you don't read the FAQ?
All your questions
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually you can figure out which are the most FAQ from this thread, but
let me help you for the start. Please, publish detailed information
for the following events in
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 09:46:41PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I've just read your outdated page
It is not outdated. Since more than a year, there is no visible development
in cdrkit.
Not visible to you. cdrkit-1.1.8 at http://cdrkit.org/releases/ is
dated 25.05.2008. It would be prudent
Heiko Nock wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 09:46:41PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I've just read your outdated page
It is not outdated. Since more than a year, there is no visible development
in cdrkit.
Not visible to you. cdrkit-1.1.8 at http://cdrkit.org/releases/ is
dated 25.05.2008.
Matt Harrison wrote:
Heiko Nock wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 09:46:41PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I've just read your outdated page
It is not outdated. Since more than a year, there is no visible
development
in cdrkit.
Not visible to you. cdrkit-1.1.8 at http://cdrkit.org/releases/
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:01:59 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
What people with english mothertonge believe is a courtesy, is
usually seen as a underlying attack by Germans. Try to just be
direct and there will be less missunderstanding.
I'll be as direct as
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be as direct as possible. Please, do the same.
I've read your site but I could not find the info I'm looking for.
Please, quote the following two lines and provide the relevant text
under each of them.
Line 1: Why do you
Joerg Schilling ha scritto:
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be as direct as possible. Please, do the same.
I've read your site but I could not find the info I'm looking for.
Please, quote the following two lines and provide the relevant text
under each of them.
Matt Harrison ha scritto:
I think it would be in everyone's best interests if we let this thread
die now, I've been reading this thread for the past 2 or 3 days and
frankly, it doesn't seem to be bringing anything of use to the ML.
I don't want to get involved or takes anyone's side, but maybe
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:25:16 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
Why do you start a new round and why are you now asking for completely
different things?
I'm not asking different things. The question about the licenses is
the most important for me and I've asked that same
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:13:51 +0200
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Harrison ha scritto:
I think it would be in everyone's best interests if we let this
thread die now, I've been reading this thread for the past 2 or 3
days and frankly, it doesn't seem to be bringing anything of use to
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
I am trying to ignore the attacks from the people behind cdrkit and I
hope that people realize that progress is only in the official
project. I however need to inform people correctly when I see
incorrect claims on my projects.
»Q« [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just read your outdated page
It is not outdated. Since more than a year, there is no visible development
in cdrkit. So I asume that they did not add new bugs.
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html. Where you listed
specific bugs, I see they
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:46:41 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
»Q« [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just read your outdated page
It is not outdated. Since more than a year, there is no visible
development in cdrkit. So I asume that they did not add new bugs.
Actually it's
Daniel Iliev schrieb:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:46:41 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
»Q« [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just read your outdated page
It is not outdated. Since more than a year, there is no visible
development in cdrkit. So I asume that they did not add new
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:14:24 +0200
Daniel Pielmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Iliev schrieb:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:46:41 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
»Q« [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just read your outdated page
It is not outdated. Since more than a
Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. It is my mistake. I admit it and I apologize.
Then it appears that Joerg is spreading FUD about the cdrkit project.
I do not spread FUD.
You should carefully check the history to understand that most of the changes
are speudo changes (like adding a
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:46:41 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
»Q« [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just read your outdated page
It is not outdated. Since more than a year, there is no visible
development in cdrkit. So I asume that they did not add new bugs.
cdrkit
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:47:31 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
You should carefully check the history to understand that most of the
changes are speudo changes (like adding a space and later removing it
again).
I beg to differ. I don't have any reason to do anything at
Daniel Iliev ha scritto:
How about if you remake your site and explain everything there. What
happened (chronologically and in detail) and provide evidence. Remake it
to be clear with simple sentences and easy for finding the information.
Then provide means (as web forum, mailing list etc) for
34 matches
Mail list logo
