Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sunday 12 June 2011 13:12:51 David W Noon wrote: You should see this reply correctly threaded to your message, provided you are not reading the mailing list through Usenet downstream from the bofh.it server. Indeed. Thanks. -- Rgds Peter
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Saturday 04 June 2011 23:22:00 David W Noon wrote: On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:10:02 +0200, Dale wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design: [...] Not a problem. In fact, it is not I (or Indi) who is causing the breakage. [...] I hope all is clear now. This one is also shown as a reply to Indi. Coincidence? -- Rgds Peter
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:06:00 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design: On Saturday 04 June 2011 23:22:00 David W Noon wrote: On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:10:02 +0200, Dale wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design: [...] Not a problem. In fact, it is not I (or Indi) who is causing the breakage. [...] I hope all is clear now. This one is also shown as a reply to Indi. Coincidence? No. These headers, from my message, indicate why: In-Reply-To: h0rbj-6tn...@gated-at.bofh.it References: h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0o3m-1jx...@gated-at.bofh.it h0qrx-61...@gated-at.bofh.it h0rbj-6tn...@gated-at.bofh.it The message id's were still being munged by the rogue NNTP server, so your MUA is attempting to rebuild the thread structure based on Subject: and Date: header lines. It seems Claws on my system and KMail on your system do things differently, so KMail is attaching my reply to Mick's message erroneously, whereas Claws attached it correctly (here) to Mick's message. You should see this reply correctly threaded to your message, provided you are not reading the mailing list through Usenet downstream from the bofh.it server. - -- Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] == dwn...@ntlworld.com (David W Noon) == -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk30rUgACgkQRQ2Fs59Psv8d7QCdHgabWKY7/Ytvdyw2y4oP8pIX DasAn2lBO9OPn8PI74tUtqiGCIq+cVun =ugjt -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: On Saturday 04 June 2011 20:31:35 David W Noon wrote: I'm reading it a bit late because I was doing a full system backup of my own newsserver system (~40 gigs) with the cron jobs all stopped, including the one that pulls messages from news.eternal-september.org. So I was off the air for about 3½ hours today. I'm using Kmail with bog-standard threading and aggregation, and this message is shown as a reply, not to Dale but to Indi; the message that contains this: Thanks for reporting on Thunderbird. When you say mutt has broken threading in the past, can you please be more specific? AFAIK there have been no problems like that in a couple of years. That looks like serious breakage to me. I haven't checked the references headers though, as I'm whizzing through a week's worth of e-mails after time away. It's dealt with days ago. Checked and verified in various MUAs. But thanks. :) -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:59 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi: Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive at times when dealing with IMAP. I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and in all that time became TB never unresponsive. So this point seems to have improved since your testing. That's good to know, thanks. I'm unlikely to switch from mutt (due in part to so many macros and customizations accumulated the last couple of years), but am always keeping an eye out for those I support. Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on thunderbird and see how they do with it... Evolution just sucks, all the time. The only feature that sets is apart is the Exchange support, and it's precisely that which crashes is. We enabled POP/IMAP on Exchange and non-Outlook users use that. Thunderbird - I itried this a while back when KMail-4.5. pissed me off extremely. Capable enough except it does something weird with it's internal indexing - shows there's mail in folder, click the folder and it decides there isn't mail after all. S simple this, but a deal-breaking annoying one. Mutt - my networks guys use this on a dedicated mail server just for them (networks guys really are special) and they have no issues at all. 2 of them are hard-core crazy and choose pine instead. The only problem with pine is finding who is supported and maintaining it lately (as repine) Claws is fast, very fast. I didn't like the way it dealt with mail accounts and enable/disable them quickly and easily. KMail was always the best of the lot for me. It read and composed mail, it had all the features of a pine/mutt and shows it in a GUI. No weird bling-bling (it *could* do HTML mail but you had to jump through a hoop first) and made sensible use of the extra screen space and all the information that could be shown. But in the last year, I don't know so much anymore. KDEPIM has a corporate sponsor which I take to mean works like Outlook. It's two whole minor releases behind KDE and they don't have a incremental feature set they can release for the interim. And then there's that text-search aspect that kills Akonadi. I see room for a KDEPIM fork from the 4.4 codebase in maintenance mode that does not add deep features. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:46:49AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:59 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi: Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive at times when dealing with IMAP. I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and in all that time became TB never unresponsive. So this point seems to have improved since your testing. That's good to know, thanks. I'm unlikely to switch from mutt (due in part to so many macros and customizations accumulated the last couple of years), but am always keeping an eye out for those I support. Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on thunderbird and see how they do with it... Evolution just sucks, all the time. The only feature that sets is apart is the Exchange support, and it's precisely that which crashes is. We enabled POP/IMAP on Exchange and non-Outlook users use that. Thunderbird - I itried this a while back when KMail-4.5. pissed me off extremely. Capable enough except it does something weird with it's internal indexing - shows there's mail in folder, click the folder and it decides there isn't mail after all. S simple this, but a deal-breaking annoying one. Mutt - my networks guys use this on a dedicated mail server just for them (networks guys really are special) and they have no issues at all. 2 of them are hard-core crazy and choose pine instead. The only problem with pine is finding who is supported and maintaining it lately (as repine) Claws is fast, very fast. I didn't like the way it dealt with mail accounts and enable/disable them quickly and easily. KMail was always the best of the lot for me. It read and composed mail, it had all the features of a pine/mutt and shows it in a GUI. No weird bling-bling (it *could* do HTML mail but you had to jump through a hoop first) and made sensible use of the extra screen space and all the information that could be shown. But in the last year, I don't know so much anymore. KDEPIM has a corporate sponsor which I take to mean works like Outlook. It's two whole minor releases behind KDE and they don't have a incremental feature set they can release for the interim. And then there's that text-search aspect that kills Akonadi. I see room for a KDEPIM fork from the 4.4 codebase in maintenance mode that does not add deep features. Thanks, Alan. Of course kmail is out of the question, as it requires a ginormous application framework be built (and rebuilt weekly, it looks like). I got pretty fed up with wasting time fooling with anything qt, to the point it's now officially banished entirely from my systems. That decision alone has saved me hours of extra work updating (and subsquent repairing of the inevitable fallout) per week. For a long time I built vlc with qt4 (it's very convenient when you're exhausted and just want to play a video), but finally got sick of having to rebuild it every time the qt guys change anything (which they seem to do about every two hours). Now I just use nvlc and cvlc instead. Since I started building vlc without qt I go weeks without having to rebuild it. It's too bad, really. Potentially, qt4 and kde could totally rock. I don't suppose the corporate shenanigans with Nokia and Microsoft have helped, either... Of course, I am using ~x86. It might be less hectic on stable... -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:01:22PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Sunday 05 June 2011 06:43:37 Indi wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:46:49AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:59 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi: Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive at times when dealing with IMAP. I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and in all that time became TB never unresponsive. So this point seems to have improved since your testing. That's good to know, thanks. I'm unlikely to switch from mutt (due in part to so many macros and customizations accumulated the last couple of years), but am always keeping an eye out for those I support. Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on thunderbird and see how they do with it... Evolution just sucks, all the time. The only feature that sets is apart is the Exchange support, and it's precisely that which crashes is. We enabled POP/IMAP on Exchange and non-Outlook users use that. Thunderbird - I itried this a while back when KMail-4.5. pissed me off extremely. Capable enough except it does something weird with it's internal indexing - shows there's mail in folder, click the folder and it decides there isn't mail after all. S simple this, but a deal-breaking annoying one. Mutt - my networks guys use this on a dedicated mail server just for them (networks guys really are special) and they have no issues at all. 2 of them are hard-core crazy and choose pine instead. The only problem with pine is finding who is supported and maintaining it lately (as repine) Claws is fast, very fast. I didn't like the way it dealt with mail accounts and enable/disable them quickly and easily. KMail was always the best of the lot for me. It read and composed mail, it had all the features of a pine/mutt and shows it in a GUI. No weird bling-bling (it *could* do HTML mail but you had to jump through a hoop first) and made sensible use of the extra screen space and all the information that could be shown. But in the last year, I don't know so much anymore. KDEPIM has a corporate sponsor which I take to mean works like Outlook. It's two whole minor releases behind KDE and they don't have a incremental feature set they can release for the interim. And then there's that text-search aspect that kills Akonadi. I see room for a KDEPIM fork from the 4.4 codebase in maintenance mode that does not add deep features. Thanks, Alan. Of course kmail is out of the question, as it requires a ginormous application framework be built (and rebuilt weekly, it looks like). I got pretty fed up with wasting time fooling with anything qt, to the point it's now officially banished entirely from my systems. That decision alone has saved me hours of extra work updating (and subsquent repairing of the inevitable fallout) per week. For a long time I built vlc with qt4 (it's very convenient when you're exhausted and just want to play a video), but finally got sick of having to rebuild it every time the qt guys change anything (which they seem to do about every two hours). Now I just use nvlc and cvlc instead. Since I started building vlc without qt I go weeks without having to rebuild it. It's too bad, really. Potentially, qt4 and kde could totally rock. I don't suppose the corporate shenanigans with Nokia and Microsoft have helped, either... Of course, I am using ~x86. It might be less hectic on stable... funny - last qt update did not require any rebuilds. I wish I could get rid of gtk. Now THAT is a mess. -- #163933 Yes, gtk also sucks but I find it far less work far less often than using qt, and I've got a selection of custom themes that help mitigate the ugliness. If I were driven strictly by aesthetic concerns qt and kde4 might be my choices, as they can be extremely pleasant to look at. Heh, reminds me of my ex -- he was very pleasant to look at (and a huge amount of constant maintenance work) as well. ;) -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:43 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: I see room for a KDEPIM fork from the 4.4 codebase in maintenance mode that does not add deep features. Thanks, Alan. Of course kmail is out of the question, as it requires a ginormous application framework be built (and rebuilt weekly, it looks like). I got pretty fed up with wasting time fooling with anything qt, to the point it's now officially banished entirely from my systems. That decision alone has saved me hours of extra work updating (and subsquent repairing of the inevitable fallout) per week. For a long time I built vlc with qt4 (it's very convenient when you're exhausted and just want to play a video), but finally got sick of having to rebuild it every time the qt guys change anything (which they seem to do about every two hours). Now I just use nvlc and cvlc instead. Since I started building vlc without qt I go weeks without having to rebuild it. It's too bad, really. Potentially, qt4 and kde could totally rock. I don't suppose the corporate shenanigans with Nokia and Microsoft have helped, either... Of course, I am using ~x86. It might be less hectic on stable... A victim of release early, release often? :-) It's the price we pay on Gentoo with rolling upgrades - ebuilds for older versions get swept clean so unless you are prepared to maintain code yourself you need to rebuild often. x86 is better, but still not free of it. Binary distros can shield their user from all that (while exposing them to a different set of equally annoying problems...) I don't see a real problem with Qt/Nokia/MS though. I predict a lot of platitudes from that soul-less monstrosity but no real progress. Meanwhile, KDE can fork Qt anytime they feel like it (if they haven't already). Maintenance won't be hard - Qt is mature with a defined roadmap so we can skip the argue about the design for 12 months first step as being already done. I would have like to see Qt running on lots of embedded devides though.. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 12:17:08 Indi wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:01:22PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Sunday 05 June 2011 06:43:37 Indi wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:46:49AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:59 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi: Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive at times when dealing with IMAP. I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and in all that time became TB never unresponsive. So this point seems to have improved since your testing. That's good to know, thanks. I'm unlikely to switch from mutt (due in part to so many macros and customizations accumulated the last couple of years), but am always keeping an eye out for those I support. Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on thunderbird and see how they do with it... Evolution just sucks, all the time. The only feature that sets is apart is the Exchange support, and it's precisely that which crashes is. We enabled POP/IMAP on Exchange and non-Outlook users use that. Thunderbird - I itried this a while back when KMail-4.5. pissed me off extremely. Capable enough except it does something weird with it's internal indexing - shows there's mail in folder, click the folder and it decides there isn't mail after all. S simple this, but a deal-breaking annoying one. Mutt - my networks guys use this on a dedicated mail server just for them (networks guys really are special) and they have no issues at all. 2 of them are hard-core crazy and choose pine instead. The only problem with pine is finding who is supported and maintaining it lately (as repine) Claws is fast, very fast. I didn't like the way it dealt with mail accounts and enable/disable them quickly and easily. KMail was always the best of the lot for me. It read and composed mail, it had all the features of a pine/mutt and shows it in a GUI. No weird bling-bling (it *could* do HTML mail but you had to jump through a hoop first) and made sensible use of the extra screen space and all the information that could be shown. But in the last year, I don't know so much anymore. KDEPIM has a corporate sponsor which I take to mean works like Outlook. It's two whole minor releases behind KDE and they don't have a incremental feature set they can release for the interim. And then there's that text-search aspect that kills Akonadi. I see room for a KDEPIM fork from the 4.4 codebase in maintenance mode that does not add deep features. Thanks, Alan. Of course kmail is out of the question, as it requires a ginormous application framework be built (and rebuilt weekly, it looks like). I got pretty fed up with wasting time fooling with anything qt, to the point it's now officially banished entirely from my systems. That decision alone has saved me hours of extra work updating (and subsquent repairing of the inevitable fallout) per week. For a long time I built vlc with qt4 (it's very convenient when you're exhausted and just want to play a video), but finally got sick of having to rebuild it every time the qt guys change anything (which they seem to do about every two hours). Now I just use nvlc and cvlc instead. Since I started building vlc without qt I go weeks without having to rebuild it. It's too bad, really. Potentially, qt4 and kde could totally rock. I don't suppose the corporate shenanigans with Nokia and Microsoft have helped, either... Of course, I am using ~x86. It might be less hectic on stable... funny - last qt update did not require any rebuilds. I wish I could get rid of gtk. Now THAT is a mess. Yes, gtk also sucks but I find it far less work far less often than using qt, and I've got a selection of custom themes that help mitigate the ugliness. If I were driven strictly by aesthetic concerns qt and kde4 might be my choices, as they can be extremely pleasant to look at. Heh, reminds me of my ex -- he was very pleasant to look at (and a huge amount of constant maintenance work) as well. ;) I think that your problem is that you are running ~arch and this comes with frequent updates. These days I'm running stable and my qt, kde or OOo updates are quite infrequent (like twice a year or may be less). I have to admit though that now the mutt can work as a multi-function client I am tempted to reinstall it and give it a another go ... -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: A victim of release early, release often? :-) Yes, definitely. One of these days I'll switch back to stable, just haven't been willing to bite that bullet quite yet. At least it's helped me temper my obsessive tendencies a bit -- I only update on Saturday now. :) It's the price we pay on Gentoo with rolling upgrades - ebuilds for older versions get swept clean so unless you are prepared to maintain code yourself you need to rebuild often. x86 is better, but still not free of it. Binary distros can shield their user from all that (while exposing them to a different set of equally annoying problems...) I find binary distros really tough to love. Probably a lot of gentoo users do... I don't see a real problem with Qt/Nokia/MS though. I predict a lot of platitudes from that soul-less monstrosity but no real progress. Meanwhile, KDE can fork Qt anytime they feel like it (if they haven't already). Maintenance won't be hard - Qt is mature with a defined roadmap so we can skip the argue about the design for 12 months first step as being already done. I hope they do fork it, and that they succeed. Probably I've come across as harsh and judgemental about kde4/qt, but in fact if they ever can get to the point of being as reliable and stable as kde3 was I'd be very happy to put users on it. Heck, I'd be deliriously happy to have a reliable option besides xfce for them. I would have like to see Qt running on lots of embedded devides though.. It certainly has a *lot* of potential for embedded. E17 also looks quite interesting, if it ever gets finished. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:17 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: If I were driven strictly by aesthetic concerns qt and kde4 might be my choices, as they can be extremely pleasant to look at. Heh, reminds me of my ex -- he was very pleasant to look at (and a huge amount of constant maintenance work) as well. ;) You owe me a cup of coffee. The one I had is now dripping down the screen onto the keyboard... Actually, you owe me two, it wasn't just any old cup of coffee, it was proudly made with immense difficulty by a cute 9 year old girl (my daughter) :-) -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:41:42PM +0100, Mick wrote: On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 12:17:08 Indi wrote: If I were driven strictly by aesthetic concerns qt and kde4 might be my choices, as they can be extremely pleasant to look at. Heh, reminds me of my ex -- he was very pleasant to look at (and a huge amount of constant maintenance work) as well. ;) I think that your problem is that you are running ~arch and this comes with frequent updates. These days I'm running stable and my qt, kde or OOo updates are quite infrequent (like twice a year or may be less). Twice a year or less, *really*? Had no idea the difference between stable and testing was that huge... Of course the reason I'm running testing is that typically, when I install there are inevitably two or three things I can't live without that don't work in stable so I start with the ACCEPT_KEYWORDS fiddling, and eventually that snowballs into a level of complexity which frustrates me and then I just end up putting ~x86 in make.conf. Anyway, I do use some gtk stuff as well as wmaker and fluxbox and those work (mostly) fine without having to be constantly fooled with. Sometimes gtk or vte breaks and I have to resort to urxvt instead of my beloved terminator while fixing things, but that's acceptably infrequent. I have to admit though that now the mutt can work as a multi-function client I am tempted to reinstall it and give it a another go ... Can't beat mutt, at least if you're keyboard-oriented. Nothing else comes close. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:57 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: A victim of release early, release often? :-) Yes, definitely. One of these days I'll switch back to stable, just haven't been willing to bite that bullet quite yet. At least it's helped me temper my obsessive tendencies a bit -- I only update on Saturday now. :) Have you ever made that switch before? It's not worth trying, far easier to re-install and retain your data. Someone here tried it a few months back and did succeed, but the cost! Find first blocker, follow it down the rabbit hole, resolve all nodes on the gigantic tree you just built, emerge. Rinse and repeat with next visible blocker. Do this many times. At least glibc issue won't be as big a factor as it was for that fellow. IIRC he had to go from 2.10 to 2.7, today it's only 2.13 back to 2.12 -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 02:23:50PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 13:17 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: If I were driven strictly by aesthetic concerns qt and kde4 might be my choices, as they can be extremely pleasant to look at. Heh, reminds me of my ex -- he was very pleasant to look at (and a huge amount of constant maintenance work) as well. ;) You owe me a cup of coffee. The one I had is now dripping down the screen onto the keyboard... Actually, you owe me two, it wasn't just any old cup of coffee, it was proudly made with immense difficulty by a cute 9 year old girl (my daughter) :-) Eeek, sorry! :) -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 02:31:21PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 13:57 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: A victim of release early, release often? :-) Yes, definitely. One of these days I'll switch back to stable, just haven't been willing to bite that bullet quite yet. At least it's helped me temper my obsessive tendencies a bit -- I only update on Saturday now. :) Have you ever made that switch before? It's not worth trying, far easier to re-install and retain your data. Someone here tried it a few months back and did succeed, but the cost! Find first blocker, follow it down the rabbit hole, resolve all nodes on the gigantic tree you just built, emerge. Rinse and repeat with next visible blocker. Do this many times. At least glibc issue won't be as big a factor as it was for that fellow. IIRC he had to go from 2.10 to 2.7, today it's only 2.13 back to 2.12 Yes, probably I'm unlikely to do it... Never did actually switch from testing to stable, it's always the other way around. Every now and then I'll delete the ~ and type emerge -vauND world, it always looks like a fracking nightmare... In fact, testing branch is remarkable good and more stable than most distro's stable branch. The gentoo devs are truly magnificent at their job. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:44 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: Yes, probably I'm unlikely to do it... Never did actually switch from testing to stable, it's always the other way around. Every now and then I'll delete the ~ and type emerge -vauND world, it always looks like a fracking nightmare... In fact, testing branch is remarkable good and more stable than most distro's stable branch. The gentoo devs are truly magnificent at their job. IIRC the approved way to do it is set arch to stable then just leave it alone for 6 months letting packages catch up. Keep an eye out for security bugs but otherwise do nothing. After a while emerge world will show a list that looks like it will complete without too much difficulty. Of course this just glosses over (aka completely ignores) deal-breakers like opecrc not moved to stable yet (no longer the case fortunately) -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 03:11:04PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 14:44 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: Yes, probably I'm unlikely to do it... Never did actually switch from testing to stable, it's always the other way around. Every now and then I'll delete the ~ and type emerge -vauND world, it always looks like a fracking nightmare... In fact, testing branch is remarkable good and more stable than most distro's stable branch. The gentoo devs are truly magnificent at their job. IIRC the approved way to do it is set arch to stable then just leave it alone for 6 months letting packages catch up. Keep an eye out for security bugs but otherwise do nothing. After a while emerge world will show a list that looks like it will complete without too much difficulty. That makes sense. Of course this just glosses over (aka completely ignores) deal-breakers like opecrc not moved to stable yet (no longer the case fortunately) Well, mostly I'm happy with testing. But having learned quite a bit since installing, it's an interesting question whether I'd now be able to use stable without having to mix a bunch of testing stuff to get everything working to my spec. But it's an awful lot of work to go through if I'm only going to end up back in my current position again... When I upgrade the laptop and have to do a fresh install we'll find out, maybe this fall. I do hate changing machines, but using a single core Pentium M is starting to become a bit of a disadvantage in a few ways... -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On 2011-06-04 5:10 PM, Indi wrote: Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive at times when dealing with IMAP. It happens in mutt as well, but pretty rarely and mutt can be killed and started fresh in an instant, unlike many others. My experiences with evolution, kmail, thunderbird, and opera were dreadful! Been using Thunderbird with 15+ IMAP accounts (different servers, one local, others remote) for many moons, and never had anything like what you describe... but that is on Windows (at work, that's what we use), so maybe it is different on linux...
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 13:28:40 Indi wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:41:42PM +0100, Mick wrote: On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 12:17:08 Indi wrote: If I were driven strictly by aesthetic concerns qt and kde4 might be my choices, as they can be extremely pleasant to look at. Heh, reminds me of my ex -- he was very pleasant to look at (and a huge amount of constant maintenance work) as well. ;) I think that your problem is that you are running ~arch and this comes with frequent updates. These days I'm running stable and my qt, kde or OOo updates are quite infrequent (like twice a year or may be less). Twice a year or less, *really*? OK, I lied: # genlop kmail * kde-base/kmail Sat Dec 18 16:46:54 2010 kde-base/kmail-4.4.7 Fri Jan 14 11:41:39 2011 kde-base/kmail-4.4.8 Sat Jan 29 10:51:11 2011 kde-base/kmail-4.4.9 Wed May 11 16:02:50 2011 kde-base/kmail-4.4.11.1 although you could argue from Jan 11 to May 11 is close to six months. The more mature kde4 becomes the fewer updates we should see. Ah! Hold on: # genlop konqueror * kde-base/konqueror Sat Dec 18 16:22:22 2010 kde-base/konqueror-4.4.5 Wed May 11 17:02:05 2011 kde-base/konqueror-4.6.2 That's more like it! :) Had no idea the difference between stable and testing was that huge... Of course the reason I'm running testing is that typically, when I install there are inevitably two or three things I can't live without that don't work in stable so I start with the ACCEPT_KEYWORDS fiddling, and eventually that snowballs into a level of complexity which frustrates me and then I just end up putting ~x86 in make.conf. Most people do the same (unmasking stuff) typically to sort out driver problems, but not necessarily go the full ~arch way. I unmask particular packages when I need to and then leave them well alone until portage catches up with those versions. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 16:43:34 Tanstaafl wrote: On 2011-06-04 5:10 PM, Indi wrote: Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive at times when dealing with IMAP. It happens in mutt as well, but pretty rarely and mutt can be killed and started fresh in an instant, unlike many others. My experiences with evolution, kmail, thunderbird, and opera were dreadful! Been using Thunderbird with 15+ IMAP accounts (different servers, one local, others remote) for many moons, and never had anything like what you describe... but that is on Windows (at work, that's what we use), so maybe it is different on linux... Yep! It's more stable. O_O -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 14:50:00 Indi wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 03:11:04PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 14:44 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: Yes, probably I'm unlikely to do it... Never did actually switch from testing to stable, it's always the other way around. Every now and then I'll delete the ~ and type emerge -vauND world, it always looks like a fracking nightmare... In fact, testing branch is remarkable good and more stable than most distro's stable branch. The gentoo devs are truly magnificent at their job. IIRC the approved way to do it is set arch to stable then just leave it alone for 6 months letting packages catch up. Keep an eye out for security bugs but otherwise do nothing. After a while emerge world will show a list that looks like it will complete without too much difficulty. That makes sense. Last time I did it I waited for about 2 months. As Alan said it was a pig to get through all the blockers and what not, but I eventually got there in the end. The big disappointment was that once in stable, I would find every few weeks that (some) bugs I had reported under ~arch were now being introduced into the stable branch! Arrrgh! However, big breakages which would occur occasionally in testing were history and have been able to run stable without regretting it ever since. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 15:11:04 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
IIRC the approved way to do it is set arch to stable then just leave it
alone for 6 months letting packages catch up. Keep an eye out for
security bugs but otherwise do nothing. After a while emerge world will
show a list that looks like it will complete without too much
difficulty.
Alternatively, run something like
emerge -ep world | awk '/^\[ebuild/ {print ~$4}'
/etc/portage/package.accept_keywords/stabilise
Then let the system work itself back to stable as stable catches up with
your current packages.
--
Neil Bothwick
Mosquito - designed to make houseflies look better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 19:59:59 David W Noon wrote: On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 01:10:02 +0200, Dale wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design: [snip] Oh, so when it gets broken, I need to find the message before that to see where it got messed up. Sorry to use the technical term messed up but it fits rather well. lol Okay, this is my second follow-up to this message, and things are becoming much clearer in my mind and somewhat more complicated in reality. The message to which I am replying has the following header lines: Message-ID: h088g-8n...@gated-at.bofh.it X-Original-Message-ID: 4deab868.6040...@gmail.com My first reply has these two header lines, the first of which should be part of the thread formation process used by a good MUA: References: h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0nu6-po...@gated-at.bofh.it h0o3m-1jx...@gated-at.bofh.it X-Original-References: gzysg-h5...@gated-at.bofh.it h07vy-7fk...@gated-at.bofh.it h07vy-7fk...@gated-at.bofh.it h07vy-7fk...@gated-at.bofh.it h07vy-7fk...@gated-at.bofh.it h07vy-7fk...@gated-at.bofh.it h07vy-7fk...@gated-at.bofh.it h07vy-7fk...@gated-at.bofh.it gzysg-h5...@gated-at.bofh.it h07vy-7fk...@gated-at.bofh.it h07vy-7fk...@gated-at.bofh.it h07vy-7fk...@gated-at.bofh.it h088g-8n...@gated-at.bofh.it The X-Original-References: line has the correct message id as the last one in the list. This absolutely correct, which means that Claws-Mail is doing the right thing. The References: line has some really weird replacements for the ones that were originally in the message I submitted. Unless list messages are being assigned different message id's for different distribution mechanisms (SMTP/POP3 and NNTP), this means the list server is broken. This would be a third, and more pernicious, source of thread breakage. In my previous reply to this message, I changed the Subject: line slightly: I removed the Was OT: website design tail. This caused the thread to break in my MUA too. In turn, this implies that Claws was wallpapering over the crack by rejoining the thread using Subject: and Date: headers to put the messages into chronological sequence within Subject: text grouping. I suspect other MUAs are doing the same, which is why the problem is not perceived more widely. I now need to change my subscription details so that I receive messages by email, as well as through Usenet. This will then tell me if message id's are the same across delivery mechanisms or different. Are we all confused enough for this weekend? ... :-) Ha, ha! I'm more than others it seems! Also have a look at gmane. Some of your responses (and Indi's) are broken. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
David W Noon wrote: Are we all confused enough for this weekend? ... :-) Ya'll lost me long ago. What exactly is past confusion anyway? I think that is where I am now. Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:30:01 +0200, Mick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design: On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 19:59:59 David W Noon wrote: [snip] Are we all confused enough for this weekend? ... :-) Ha, ha! I'm more than others it seems! It has been a knotty problem. Also have a look at gmane. Some of your responses (and Indi's) are broken. Indi and I both use the same NNTP server to poll the list, so we both get the same munged message id's. -- Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* dwn...@ntlworld.com (David W Noon) *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Saturday 04 Jun 2011 04:27:03 Dale wrote: Stroller wrote: On 4 June 2011, at 02:33, Dale wrote: … What I would like to know is why some threads get broken up? My mail client here follows these conversations as threads. For some reason, recently the threads are getting broken as if someone started a fresh one. I'm sure this is not intentional and may not be avoidable but it makes it difficult to follow the conversation. Is the same happening for others or is it just picking on me? Blimey! I'm so glad you mentioned it. Having recently moved to a new mail client (major version) I assumed it was just me that was experiencing this problem. Stroller. Nope, it's not just you. I suspect it is some mobile phone or something that is doing it and that the user(s) don't even know it is happening. I just know it makes things hard to follow. Sort of like top posters. They can't change it but it is still annoying as heck. ;-) The thread Cleaning redundant configuration files is the worst. I just went back and looked. David W Noon is usually where it starts. David, what you got going on there my friend? You using a mobile device or something? ;-) Just curious. Now watch him not read this message. lol Dale :-) :-) Are you sure it is DW Noon? His mail client seems legit: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) PS. I haven't noticed the broken threads you mention here (using Kmail). Can you please point me to a thread/message where the break occurs? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:35 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Mick did opine thusly: On Saturday 04 Jun 2011 04:27:03 Dale wrote: Stroller wrote: On 4 June 2011, at 02:33, Dale wrote: … What I would like to know is why some threads get broken up? My mail client here follows these conversations as threads. For some reason, recently the threads are getting broken as if someone started a fresh one. I'm sure this is not intentional and may not be avoidable but it makes it difficult to follow the conversation. Is the same happening for others or is it just picking on me? Blimey! I'm so glad you mentioned it. Having recently moved to a new mail client (major version) I assumed it was just me that was experiencing this problem. Stroller. Nope, it's not just you. I suspect it is some mobile phone or something that is doing it and that the user(s) don't even know it is happening. I just know it makes things hard to follow. Sort of like top posters. They can't change it but it is still annoying as heck. ;-) The thread Cleaning redundant configuration files is the worst. I just went back and looked. David W Noon is usually where it starts. David, what you got going on there my friend? You using a mobile device or something? ;-) Just curious. Now watch him not read this message. lol Dale :-) :-) Are you sure it is DW Noon? His mail client seems legit: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) PS. I haven't noticed the broken threads you mention here (using Kmail). Can you please point me to a thread/message where the break occurs? Latest kmail seems to be trying to be clever with displaying mails. Try this: View - Message List - Aggregation and set it to Current Activity, Threaded most of the broken threads will seem to be broken by Indi. Now change it to Standard Mailing List and threading mostly goes back to being normal. I don't think the broken threads are anyone's mailer, I think it's kmail doing Aggregation based on today/not today first. Check the description notes in View - Message List - Aggregation - Configure... -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Am Sat, 4 Jun 2011 09:35:32 +0100 schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com: On Saturday 04 Jun 2011 04:27:03 Dale wrote: Stroller wrote: On 4 June 2011, at 02:33, Dale wrote: … [...] Are you sure it is DW Noon? His mail client seems legit: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) PS. I haven't noticed the broken threads you mention here (using Kmail). Can you please point me to a thread/message where the break occurs? I noticed it with DW Noon, too, although it also happened with Indi. I'm using Claws-Mail myself. -- Marc Joliet -- People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don't - Bjarne Stroustrup signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:10:01PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: most of the broken threads will seem to be broken by Indi. Now change it to Standard Mailing List and threading mostly goes back to being normal. I don't think the broken threads are anyone's mailer, I think it's kmail doing Aggregation based on today/not today first. Check the description notes in View - Message List - Aggregation - Configure... Could it have anything to do with the fact that I read this list from the usenet group, rather than the list itself? Could that cause an inconsistency in headers that might break threading, perhaps? I was assuming the usenet group would give equal functionality without having to receive all that mail, but if it breaks threading I'll switch back to mail. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Am 04.06.2011 12:37, schrieb Marc Joliet: I noticed it with DW Noon, too, although it also happened with Indi. I'm using Claws-Mail myself. I have Thunderbird and see this breakings too, it is really annoing. Greetings Sebastian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Am 04.06.2011 14:03, schrieb Indi: Could it have anything to do with the fact that I read this list from the usenet group, rather than the list itself? Could that cause an inconsistency in headers that might break threading, perhaps? Your References: Header looks very strange, I think the gateway changes it and so the mail clients get confused. Greetings Sebastian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 02:30:02PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: Am 04.06.2011 14:03, schrieb Indi: Could it have anything to do with the fact that I read this list from the usenet group, rather than the list itself? Could that cause an inconsistency in headers that might break threading, perhaps? Your References: Header looks very strange, I think the gateway changes it and so the mail clients get confused. Thanks Sebastian, and Alan and everyone else for bringing it up. Guess the usenet group is intended as merely an archive, so I'll make the appropriate arrangments right now. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Sebastian Beßler wrote: Am 04.06.2011 12:37, schrieb Marc Joliet: I noticed it with DW Noon, too, although it also happened with Indi. I'm using Claws-Mail myself. I have Thunderbird and see this breakings too, it is really annoing. Greetings Sebastian I'm using Seamonkey for my email. It does appear that it happens with Indi to tho. This thread is now broken up into a few discussions as well. No clue what order things are supposed to be in so just replying as I get to them. lol Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:05:24AM -0500, Dale wrote: I'm using Seamonkey for my email. It does appear that it happens with Indi to tho. This thread is now broken up into a few discussions as well. No clue what order things are supposed to be in so just replying as I get to them. lol Hopefully this one is better, as it's a reply to the email rather than to the mail2news gateway. Sorry for any inconvenience, and maybe that issue should be in a FAQ on the usenet group and mentioned in the list page now that we know? :) -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:05:24AM -0500, Dale wrote: I'm using Seamonkey for my email. It does appear that it happens with Indi to tho. This thread is now broken up into a few discussions as well. No clue what order things are supposed to be in so just replying as I get to them. lol Hopefully this one is better, as it's a reply to the email rather than to the mail2news gateway. Sorry for any inconvenience, and maybe that issue should be in a FAQ on the usenet group and mentioned in the list page now that we know? :) That one was inline with the rest. Yeppie !! :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Dale wrote: Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:05:24AM -0500, Dale wrote: I'm using Seamonkey for my email. It does appear that it happens with Indi to tho. This thread is now broken up into a few discussions as well. No clue what order things are supposed to be in so just replying as I get to them. lol Hopefully this one is better, as it's a reply to the email rather than to the mail2news gateway. Sorry for any inconvenience, and maybe that issue should be in a FAQ on the usenet group and mentioned in the list page now that we know? :) That one was inline with the rest. Yeppie !! Thanks for the confirmation, and for mentioning it in the first place. I couldn't tell of course, because they all looked fine on usenet and there was no local email to compare the view. It's a bit embarrassing to be the threadbreaker, but at least it wasn't my fault. :P -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Dale wrote: That one was inline with the rest. Yeppie !! Thanks for the confirmation, and for mentioning it in the first place. I couldn't tell of course, because they all looked fine on usenet and there was no local email to compare the view. It's a bit embarrassing to be the threadbreaker, but at least it wasn't my fault. :P I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using won't let them reply any other way. I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. I just know this is going to happen again. One reason I mentioned it was because I had recompiled Seamonkey and it started about that time. I wanted to find out if it was a Seamonkey bug or what. Now we know. We are back to normal again. :-) Then again, I never was normal anyway. ;-) Dale :-) :-)
RE: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
-original message- Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design From: Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com Date: 2011-06-04 21:54 Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Dale wrote: That one was inline with the rest. Yeppie !! Thanks for the confirmation, and for mentioning it in the first place. I couldn't tell of course, because they all looked fine on usenet and there was no local email to compare the view. It's a bit embarrassing to be the threadbreaker, but at least it wasn't my fault. :P Sometimes our hands are forced by situation beyond our control ;) I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using won't let them reply any other way. Now you're ribbing me :P That said, yeah Gmail's Java Mobile client sucks when it comes to top-posting: Click Reply (or, in my case, choose 'Reply' from the menu), and I'm given an *empty* textbox to write my reply, which *will* be top-posted. And I totally have no say in that. (And it sucks royally that midway through writing a reply, I'd forget what exactly was written in the email I'm replying through, necessitating a 'Save Draft', back to reading the email, then 'Resume Draft'). But now I've pulled my emails to my E72-1's native email client, and I can now properly bottom-post, with a caveat: I have to manually insert the '' to indicate the quoted original email. Oh well. I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. I just know this is going to happen again. It depends on the mail-to-usenet gateway, methinks. We are back to normal again. :-) Then again, I never was normal anyway. ;-) We're using Gentoo, so we all can't be normal ;) Rgds, -- FdS Pandu E Poluan ~ IT Optimizer ~ Sent from Nokia E72-1
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote: I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using won't let them reply any other way. I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. As soon as Alan said it was me, I thought of the difference between usenet and email headers and that mail2news gateway. It actually shouldn't be hard to workaround, but having already worked around a couple of other issues with it I'm ready to just use the email like normal folks and be done fooling with it. :) I just know this is going to happen again. It always will, due to lack of completeness and/or accuracy in various MUAs' conformity to standards. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Am 04.06.2011 16:54, schrieb Dale: I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. I just know this is going to happen again. I don't think that there is something that can be done, because the server changes the headers of the mails. That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using usenet References: gzhrq-5lz...@gated-at.bofh.it gzhlc-5n...@gated-at.bofh.it gzj0b-84...@gated-at.bofh.it gzvl7-3y...@gated-at.bofh.it That is what his headers look now References: gziwt-5u...@gated-at.bofh.it 61a321c6-5d7c-49ce-b87b-3e4180958...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk 4de9a607.6070...@gmail.com 201106040935.43431.michaelkintz...@gmail.com 20110604123702.45f10...@marcec.huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de 4dea1f3d.3070...@darkmetatron.de 4dea2d94.4070...@gmail.com 20110604131539.ga11...@gaurahari.merseine.nu 4dea3fc1.3090...@gmail.com The References-header is what most readers use to sort mails into threads. Greetings Sebastian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: I don't think that there is something that can be done, because the server changes the headers of the mails. That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using usenet References: gzhrq-5lz...@gated-at.bofh.it gzhlc-5n...@gated-at.bofh.it gzj0b-84...@gated-at.bofh.it gzvl7-3y...@gated-at.bofh.it That is what his headers look now References: gziwt-5u...@gated-at.bofh.it 61a321c6-5d7c-49ce-b87b-3e4180958...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk 4de9a607.6070...@gmail.com 201106040935.43431.michaelkintz...@gmail.com 20110604123702.45f10...@marcec.huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de 4dea1f3d.3070...@darkmetatron.de 4dea2d94.4070...@gmail.com 20110604131539.ga11...@gaurahari.merseine.nu 4dea3fc1.3090...@gmail.com The References-header is what most readers use to sort mails into threads. Well I could be wrong but do believe the MUA wll write the Xref or References headers according to what the server has on the original message. If the original header info exists anywhere in the message sent by the mail2news gateway it should be possible to write a macro to make mutt retrieve that information and rewrite the headers to the proper default. I'm just a bit tired of fiddling with it right now, but maybe I'll look into it later... -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using usenet References: gzhrq-5lz...@gated-at.bofh.it gzhlc-5n...@gated-at.bofh.it gzj0b-84...@gated-at.bofh.it gzvl7-3y...@gated-at.bofh.it Can't believe I never noticed that Bastard Operator From Hell reference in those headers, lol... -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:38:38AM -0400, Indi wrote: Well I could be wrong but do believe the MUA wll write the Xref or References headers according to what the server has on the original message. If the original header info exists anywhere in the message sent by the mail2news gateway it should be possible to write a macro to make mutt retrieve that information and rewrite the headers to the proper default. I'm just a bit tired of fiddling with it right now, but maybe I'll look into it later... Actually, now that I pay attention the workaround would be easy. The mail2news gateway rewrites the References header but it preserves the original in a X-Original-Message-ID header. So using the info from X-Original-Message-ID in the References field should make it work. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:50:03PM +0200, Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: I don't think that there is something that can be done, because the server changes the headers of the mails. That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using usenet References: gzhrq-5lz...@gated-at.bofh.it gzhlc-5n...@gated-at.bofh.it gzj0b-84...@gated-at.bofh.it gzvl7-3y...@gated-at.bofh.it That is what his headers look now References: gziwt-5u...@gated-at.bofh.it 61a321c6-5d7c-49ce-b87b-3e4180958...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk 4de9a607.6070...@gmail.com 201106040935.43431.michaelkintz...@gmail.com 20110604123702.45f10...@marcec.huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de 4dea1f3d.3070...@darkmetatron.de 4dea2d94.4070...@gmail.com 20110604131539.ga11...@gaurahari.merseine.nu 4dea3fc1.3090...@gmail.com The References-header is what most readers use to sort mails into threads. Well I could be wrong but do believe the MUA wll write the Xref or References headers according to what the server has on the original message. If the original header info exists anywhere in the message sent by the mail2news gateway it should be possible to write a macro to make mutt retrieve that information and rewrite the headers to the proper default. I'm just a bit tired of fiddling with it right now, but maybe I'll look into it later... This is just a test to see if threading works with the mail2news gateway when the X-Original-Message-ID header data is used to replace the In-Reply-To header's data (as it comes up using the mail2news gateway, of course). -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote: I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using won't let them reply any other way. I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. As soon as Alan said it was me, I thought of the difference between usenet and email headers and that mail2news gateway. It actually shouldn't be hard to workaround, but having already worked around a couple of other issues with it I'm ready to just use the email like normal folks and be done fooling with it. :) FWIW, If I set kmail to display just routine ordinary threaded mail there's a lot less thread breakage. It's not all gone, but it is considerably less. Setting kmail to display threads based on activity - whatever the blazes that is - breaks things wholesale. I haven't managed to narrow it down at all so I have no idea what the algorithm is. Looks like there's more to this than just usernet-mail gateway brokenness -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote: I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using won't let them reply any other way. I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. As soon as Alan said it was me, I thought of the difference between usenet and email headers and that mail2news gateway. It actually shouldn't be hard to workaround, but having already worked around a couple of other issues with it I'm ready to just use the email like normal folks and be done fooling with it. :) FWIW, If I set kmail to display just routine ordinary threaded mail there's a lot less thread breakage. It's not all gone, but it is considerably less. Setting kmail to display threads based on activity - whatever the blazes that is - breaks things wholesale. I haven't managed to narrow it down at all so I have no idea what the algorithm is. Looks like there's more to this than just usernet-mail gateway brokenness I'd switch if *mutt* was breaking threading for other people, but I'm pretty sure it isn't. Now kmail and the other pointy-clicky-html-loving apps, *those* I don't trust... Tried 'em, found 'em wanting. ;) It would be good to hear from more people running different MUAs, but IMO mutt is the Gold Standard and is almost certaily doing what it's supposed to do. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On 6/4/2011 11:43 AM, Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote: I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using won't let them reply any other way. I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. As soon as Alan said it was me, I thought of the difference between usenet and email headers and that mail2news gateway. It actually shouldn't be hard to workaround, but having already worked around a couple of other issues with it I'm ready to just use the email like normal folks and be done fooling with it. :) FWIW, If I set kmail to display just routine ordinary threaded mail there's a lot less thread breakage. It's not all gone, but it is considerably less. Setting kmail to display threads based on activity - whatever the blazes that is - breaks things wholesale. I haven't managed to narrow it down at all so I have no idea what the algorithm is. Looks like there's more to this than just usernet-mail gateway brokenness I'd switch if *mutt* was breaking threading for other people, but I'm pretty sure it isn't. Now kmail and the other pointy-clicky-html-loving apps, *those* I don't trust... Tried 'em, found 'em wanting. ;) It would be good to hear from more people running different MUAs, but IMO mutt is the Gold Standard and is almost certaily doing what it's supposed to do. Whatever you're using is breaking threading in Thunderbird and I can't think of anyone else lately I've had the problem with. Also mutt has broken threading in the past and even between different versions of itself... so calling it a gold standard may be an overstatement. kashani
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:59:52AM -0700, kashani wrote: On 6/4/2011 11:43 AM, Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote: I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using won't let them reply any other way. I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. As soon as Alan said it was me, I thought of the difference between usenet and email headers and that mail2news gateway. It actually shouldn't be hard to workaround, but having already worked around a couple of other issues with it I'm ready to just use the email like normal folks and be done fooling with it. :) FWIW, If I set kmail to display just routine ordinary threaded mail there's a lot less thread breakage. It's not all gone, but it is considerably less. Setting kmail to display threads based on activity - whatever the blazes that is - breaks things wholesale. I haven't managed to narrow it down at all so I have no idea what the algorithm is. Looks like there's more to this than just usernet-mail gateway brokenness I'd switch if *mutt* was breaking threading for other people, but I'm pretty sure it isn't. Now kmail and the other pointy-clicky-html-loving apps, *those* I don't trust... Tried 'em, found 'em wanting. ;) It would be good to hear from more people running different MUAs, but IMO mutt is the Gold Standard and is almost certaily doing what it's supposed to do. Whatever you're using is breaking threading in Thunderbird and I can't think of anyone else lately I've had the problem with. Also mutt has broken threading in the past and even between different versions of itself... so calling it a gold standard may be an overstatement. Thanks for reporting on Thunderbird. When you say mutt has broken threading in the past, can you please be more specific? AFAIK there have been no problems like that in a couple of years. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 05:40:01 +0200, Dale wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design: The thread Cleaning redundant configuration files is the worst. I just went back and looked. David W Noon is usually where it starts. David, what you got going on there my friend? You using a mobile device or something? ;-) Just curious. I am using Claws-Mail under Xfce on a desktop system. However, I am polling this mailing list as a newsgroup through the eternal-september NNTP server in Germany. This server sometimes modifies the Message-ID: line in the headers, so that the References: line in my follow-up has a different message id from the one that you are seeing in the messages to which I reply. This happens only sporadically, at least as I read the list -- but then it would, as the message id's I see are the ones eternal-september likes. Exactly why the eternal-september server changes the Message-ID: line is not immediately obvious. I suspect some mail and news readers generate Message-ID's that are not RFC-compliant and eternal-september corrects the problem, BICBW. Now watch him not read this message. lol I'm reading it a bit late because I was doing a full system backup of my own newsserver system (~40 gigs) with the cron jobs all stopped, including the one that pulls messages from news.eternal-september.org. So I was off the air for about 3½ hours today. -- Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* dwn...@ntlworld.com (David W Noon) *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Saturday 04 June 2011 11:59:52 kashani wrote: On 6/4/2011 11:43 AM, Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote: I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using won't let them reply any other way. I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. As soon as Alan said it was me, I thought of the difference between usenet and email headers and that mail2news gateway. It actually shouldn't be hard to workaround, but having already worked around a couple of other issues with it I'm ready to just use the email like normal folks and be done fooling with it. :) FWIW, If I set kmail to display just routine ordinary threaded mail there's a lot less thread breakage. It's not all gone, but it is considerably less. Setting kmail to display threads based on activity - whatever the blazes that is - breaks things wholesale. I haven't managed to narrow it down at all so I have no idea what the algorithm is. Looks like there's more to this than just usernet-mail gateway brokenness I'd switch if *mutt* was breaking threading for other people, but I'm pretty sure it isn't. Now kmail and the other pointy-clicky-html-loving apps, *those* I don't trust... Tried 'em, found 'em wanting. ;) It would be good to hear from more people running different MUAs, but IMO mutt is the Gold Standard and is almost certaily doing what it's supposed to do. Whatever you're using is breaking threading in Thunderbird and I can't think of anyone else lately I've had the problem with. Also mutt has broken threading in the past and even between different versions of itself... so calling it a gold standard may be an overstatement. it is golden brown, runny and smelly. Some call it 'gold'. -- #163933
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:38:52PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Saturday 04 June 2011 11:59:52 kashani wrote: On 6/4/2011 11:43 AM, Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote: I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using won't let them reply any other way. I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. As soon as Alan said it was me, I thought of the difference between usenet and email headers and that mail2news gateway. It actually shouldn't be hard to workaround, but having already worked around a couple of other issues with it I'm ready to just use the email like normal folks and be done fooling with it. :) FWIW, If I set kmail to display just routine ordinary threaded mail there's a lot less thread breakage. It's not all gone, but it is considerably less. Setting kmail to display threads based on activity - whatever the blazes that is - breaks things wholesale. I haven't managed to narrow it down at all so I have no idea what the algorithm is. Looks like there's more to this than just usernet-mail gateway brokenness I'd switch if *mutt* was breaking threading for other people, but I'm pretty sure it isn't. Now kmail and the other pointy-clicky-html-loving apps, *those* I don't trust... Tried 'em, found 'em wanting. ;) It would be good to hear from more people running different MUAs, but IMO mutt is the Gold Standard and is almost certaily doing what it's supposed to do. Whatever you're using is breaking threading in Thunderbird and I can't think of anyone else lately I've had the problem with. Also mutt has broken threading in the past and even between different versions of itself... so calling it a gold standard may be an overstatement. it is golden brown, runny and smelly. Some call it 'gold'. I hate the way you beat around the bush. Just tell us how you *really* feel, dammit! ;) -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
David W Noon wrote: On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 05:40:01 +0200, Dale wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design: The thread Cleaning redundant configuration files is the worst. I just went back and looked. David W Noon is usually where it starts. David, what you got going on there my friend? You using a mobile device or something? ;-) Just curious. I am using Claws-Mail under Xfce on a desktop system. However, I am polling this mailing list as a newsgroup through the eternal-september NNTP server in Germany. This server sometimes modifies the Message-ID: line in the headers, so that the References: line in my follow-up has a different message id from the one that you are seeing in the messages to which I reply. This happens only sporadically, at least as I read the list -- but then it would, as the message id's I see are the ones eternal-september likes. Exactly why the eternal-september server changes the Message-ID: line is not immediately obvious. I suspect some mail and news readers generate Message-ID's that are not RFC-compliant and eternal-september corrects the problem, BICBW. Now watch him not read this message. lol I'm reading it a bit late because I was doing a full system backup of my own newsserver system (~40 gigs) with the cron jobs all stopped, including the one that pulls messages from news.eternal-september.org. So I was off the air for about 3½ hours today. Well, something works now. This is threaded as it should be. So, whatever you are doing, keep doing it that away. lol I don't want you to think I was upset or anything. I just went back and noticed you was one of the ones that it was breaking the threads on. I was sort of figuring you were using a mobile device or something that was breaking it and it was not you choosing to break it. Someone noticed it was also doing the same with someone else's replies as well. I figured it was something about the senders equipment or maybe it was just me. That's why I asked and was trying to figure out why this was happening. Better late than never. lol Glad you got you backups done, I hope you never need them. ;-) Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Saturday 04 June 2011 15:46:49 Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:38:52PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Saturday 04 June 2011 11:59:52 kashani wrote: On 6/4/2011 11:43 AM, Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did opine thusly: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote: I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using won't let them reply any other way. I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using. As soon as Alan said it was me, I thought of the difference between usenet and email headers and that mail2news gateway. It actually shouldn't be hard to workaround, but having already worked around a couple of other issues with it I'm ready to just use the email like normal folks and be done fooling with it. :) FWIW, If I set kmail to display just routine ordinary threaded mail there's a lot less thread breakage. It's not all gone, but it is considerably less. Setting kmail to display threads based on activity - whatever the blazes that is - breaks things wholesale. I haven't managed to narrow it down at all so I have no idea what the algorithm is. Looks like there's more to this than just usernet-mail gateway brokenness I'd switch if *mutt* was breaking threading for other people, but I'm pretty sure it isn't. Now kmail and the other pointy-clicky-html-loving apps, *those* I don't trust... Tried 'em, found 'em wanting. ;) It would be good to hear from more people running different MUAs, but IMO mutt is the Gold Standard and is almost certaily doing what it's supposed to do. Whatever you're using is breaking threading in Thunderbird and I can't think of anyone else lately I've had the problem with. Also mutt has broken threading in the past and even between different versions of itself... so calling it a gold standard may be an overstatement. it is golden brown, runny and smelly. Some call it 'gold'. I hate the way you beat around the bush. Just tell us how you *really* feel, dammit! ;) diplomatic mode I have a slightly adverse general opinion about the mail client called 'mutt'. I am not saying that this is the fault of its devs nor do I suggesst that there is anything wrong with its users. /diplomatic mode Pine is slightly less gruesome.. Old kmail rocked. It even did well with threads where the thread id was mangled - threading by subject was an option. Haven't looked into the options with the kmail beta I am using at the moment. I am glad that it is more or less stable. -- #163933
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: diplomatic mode I have a slightly adverse general opinion about the mail client called 'mutt'. I am not saying that this is the fault of its devs nor do I suggesst that there is anything wrong with its users. /diplomatic mode Pine is slightly less gruesome.. Old kmail rocked. It even did well with threads where the thread id was mangled - threading by subject was an option. Haven't looked into the options with the kmail beta I am using at the moment. I am glad that it is more or less stable. Pine is nowhere near being an acceptable mutt replacement, it just isn't powerful or versatile enough. It's been a few years, but I did test a *lot* of MUAs. What the mutt devs say is true: all MUAs suck, but mutt sucks the least. Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive at times when dealing with IMAP. It happens in mutt as well, but pretty rarely and mutt can be killed and started fresh in an instant, unlike many others. My experiences with evolution, kmail, thunderbird, and opera were dreadful! Sylpheed (claws-mail, or whatever they call it now) was pretty acceptable, and I used that for quite awhile before switching to mutt. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi: Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive at times when dealing with IMAP. I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and in all that time became TB never unresponsive. So this point seems to have improved since your testing. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi: Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive at times when dealing with IMAP. I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and in all that time became TB never unresponsive. So this point seems to have improved since your testing. That's good to know, thanks. I'm unlikely to switch from mutt (due in part to so many macros and customizations accumulated the last couple of years), but am always keeping an eye out for those I support. Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on thunderbird and see how they do with it... -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:10:02 +0200, Dale wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design: [snip] Well, something works now. This is threaded as it should be. So, whatever you are doing, keep doing it that away. lol I don't want you to think I was upset or anything. I just went back and noticed you was one of the ones that it was breaking the threads on. Not a problem. In fact, it is not I (or Indi) who is causing the breakage. A little further investigation has shown that the Message-ID: line of all message posted through the Gentoo list server is rewritten, regardless of its initial value. This is why correctly posted messages have the Bastard Operator From Hell designation: the domain name of Gentoo's list server is bofh.it. This also means that those who read this list's messages via email will always see a valid Message-ID: line. Now, one other possible cause of message id mismatch is people posting directly to Usenet as well as through the list server. All NNTP servers should have the newsgroup that is a reflection of this mailing list marked as no posting allowed; certainly news.eternal-september.org is configured that way. However, if a misposted message gets through from another Usenet-registered NNTP server, I will see it with the alternate Message-ID: line, not the one generated by the Gentoo list server. It is messages such as this that cause the breakage in threads when somebody (anybody) reading through an NNTP server posts a follow-up to such a message. So, when you see a breakage in a message thread, it is the message that is the tail-end of the original thread that is causing the breakage, not the message that apparently starts the new thread. I hope all is clear now. -- Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* dwn...@ntlworld.com (David W Noon) *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Saturday 04 Jun 2011 22:59:32 Indi wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi: Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive at times when dealing with IMAP. I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and in all that time became TB never unresponsive. So this point seems to have improved since your testing. That's good to know, thanks. I'm unlikely to switch from mutt (due in part to so many macros and customizations accumulated the last couple of years), but am always keeping an eye out for those I support. Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on thunderbird and see how they do with it... When KDE4 came out I seriously thought of ditching KDE apps and Kmail is the one I use on a daily basis. I looked at other alternatives for a while and ended up coming back to Kmail, despite the need to install KDE4. Kmail version 1.13.7 is very stable for me and does more than what I need from a mail client. More importantly, it does things the way I expect them to do it. ;-) I have looked at mutt some time ago, but then I would also need to install fetchmail and smtp and what not, instead of a single desktop application. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
David W Noon wrote: Not a problem. In fact, it is not I (or Indi) who is causing the breakage. A little further investigation has shown that the Message-ID: line of all message posted through the Gentoo list server is rewritten, regardless of its initial value. This is why correctly posted messages have the Bastard Operator From Hell designation: the domain name of Gentoo's list server is bofh.it. This also means that those who read this list's messages via email will always see a valid Message-ID: line. Now, one other possible cause of message id mismatch is people posting directly to Usenet as well as through the list server. All NNTP servers should have the newsgroup that is a reflection of this mailing list marked as no posting allowed; certainly news.eternal-september.org is configured that way. However, if a misposted message gets through from another Usenet-registered NNTP server, I will see it with the alternate Message-ID: line, not the one generated by the Gentoo list server. It is messages such as this that cause the breakage in threads when somebody (anybody) reading through an NNTP server posts a follow-up to such a message. So, when you see a breakage in a message thread, it is the message that is the tail-end of the original thread that is causing the breakage, not the message that apparently starts the new thread. I hope all is clear now. Oh, so when it gets broken, I need to find the message before that to see where it got messed up. Sorry to use the technical term messed up but it fits rather well. lol Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:57:44PM -0500, Dale wrote: David W Noon wrote: Not a problem. In fact, it is not I (or Indi) who is causing the breakage. A little further investigation has shown that the Message-ID: line of all message posted through the Gentoo list server is rewritten, regardless of its initial value. This is why correctly posted messages have the Bastard Operator From Hell designation: the domain name of Gentoo's list server is bofh.it. This also means that those who read this list's messages via email will always see a valid Message-ID: line. Now, one other possible cause of message id mismatch is people posting directly to Usenet as well as through the list server. All NNTP servers should have the newsgroup that is a reflection of this mailing list marked as no posting allowed; certainly news.eternal-september.org is configured that way. However, if a misposted message gets through from another Usenet-registered NNTP server, I will see it with the alternate Message-ID: line, not the one generated by the Gentoo list server. It is messages such as this that cause the breakage in threads when somebody (anybody) reading through an NNTP server posts a follow-up to such a message. So, when you see a breakage in a message thread, it is the message that is the tail-end of the original thread that is causing the breakage, not the message that apparently starts the new thread. I hope all is clear now. Oh, so when it gets broken, I need to find the message before that to see where it got messed up. Sorry to use the technical term messed up but it fits rather well. lol I don't think that's quite accurate, but the problem is the MID on usenet does not match the MID used for the mailing list. So if you blame the MID then you could say it was the message I replied to giving my MUA bad information that broke the thread. I tend to see it as I inadvertantly broke the thread due to the mail2news gateway breaking with email conventions -- no actually, due to my inattention (because the workaround is trivial, it just never occurred to me that I needed to watch for that). -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Mick wrote: I have looked at mutt some time ago, but then I would also need to install fetchmail and smtp and what not, instead of a single desktop application. Actually you can build mutt with the smtp, imap, and pop flags and use mutt's built-in support. It's been working fine for ages, though some purists sneer at breaking the do one thing only and do it well paradigm. I say unless they're running plan9 they've no right to sneer. ;) -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Stroller wrote: On 4 June 2011, at 02:33, Dale wrote: … What I would like to know is why some threads get broken up? My mail client here follows these conversations as threads. For some reason, recently the threads are getting broken as if someone started a fresh one. I'm sure this is not intentional and may not be avoidable but it makes it difficult to follow the conversation. Is the same happening for others or is it just picking on me? Blimey! I'm so glad you mentioned it. Having recently moved to a new mail client (major version) I assumed it was just me that was experiencing this problem. Stroller. Nope, it's not just you. I suspect it is some mobile phone or something that is doing it and that the user(s) don't even know it is happening. I just know it makes things hard to follow. Sort of like top posters. They can't change it but it is still annoying as heck. ;-) The thread Cleaning redundant configuration files is the worst. I just went back and looked. David W Noon is usually where it starts. David, what you got going on there my friend? You using a mobile device or something? ;-) Just curious. Now watch him not read this message. lol Dale :-) :-)
