On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Derek D. Martin wrote:
UW seems to like to write temporary copies of mailboxes to /tmp. We ran
into a problem where it would fill up /tmp and barf, causing a variety
of weird problems.
I am aware of that particular issue, but this does not appear to be it.
/tmp has
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
Is there ever a case where RPM will know about something *not* installed
via RPM?
I've heard rumor that it will discover shared library files at locations
pointed to by /etc/ld.so.conf, but I have never confirmed this. I suspect
the rumor is bogus,
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
So instead of revoking the key that was sitting in the key server
databases, I submitted a second key. And you guessed it -- because I
hadn't really used the key, I've forgotten the passphrase. As a result,
I can't revoke the key.
You are pretty
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
So instead of revoking the key that was sitting in the key server
databases, I submitted a second key. And you guessed it -- because I
hadn't really used the key, I've forgotten the passphrase. As a result,
I can't revoke the key.
It may be
I guess what we are all saying is that using RPM or any package manager is
like using a checkbook balancing program. If you are diligent and thorough
in it's use, it can provide great rewards. If you aren't, it is pretty
worthless.
Rich Cloutier
President, C*O
SYSTEM SUPPORT SERVICES
Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are pretty much out of luck, then. The whole point behind things like
PGP is that they aim to provide unbreakable encryption. If you lose your
passphrase, you effectively become an attacker. If they made it easy for
you, they would make it
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Rich C wrote:
I guess what we are all saying is that using RPM or any package manager
is like using a checkbook balancing program. If you are diligent and
thorough in it's use, it can provide great rewards. If you aren't, it is
pretty worthless.
I wouldn't go that far.
On 28 Dec 2001, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
This is all pretty much false.
Paul has lost the passphrase that protects his cryptographic keys.
He's *does* have the cryptographic keys though.
Er, um, oh yeah... embarrassed look I am confusing the strength of the
keys with the strength of the
Hi All,
i appologize if this question has been asked many times in the past, i need to have a
basic Dumb terminal run a telnet session at boot and the second part of the question
is about changing terminal colors ? i basically need the Box to boot into a telnet
session and from there they
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Robert W. Fowler III wrote:
i appologize if this question has been asked many times in the past, i
need to have a basic Dumb terminal run a telnet session at boot
Easiest way would be to replace the getty line for the first virtual
console in /etc/inittab with a program
Hi, all. Just some stuff I thought I'd share, as I don't recall seeing
any mention of it. I've been using (or attempting to use) Evolution, on
and off, for just over a year now. A year ago, you were lucky if it got
past the splash screen. Now? It's gotten good.
Granted, the GUI-hating
I agree that Evolution has come a long way. It's getting good and it fills a nice
niche for those people who feel they can't live without OutLook.
However, I was surprised to see that 1.0 didn't support IMAPS. To me, that killed
it right there...
--
Regards, | Need help with
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greater NH Linux Users' Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: rpm question
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Rich C wrote:
I guess what we are all saying is that using RPM or any package manager
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rich C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: rpm question
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Rich C wrote:
For example, what if you try to install a new slick version of some
Window manager that
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 02:34:52PM -0500, Rich C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as you manage your libraries, tools, and all lower level utilities,
daemons, and programs with RPM too. For example, what if you try to install
a new slick version of some Window manager that requires XFree86
On Fri, 2001-12-28 at 13:47, Randy Edwards wrote:
I agree that Evolution has come a long way. It's getting good and it fills a
nice niche for those people who feel they can't live without OutLook.
However, I was surprised to see that 1.0 didn't support IMAPS. To me, that
killed it
I think he really does mean IMAPS. It's IMAP over SSL, I believe. But,
I do seem to remember that when I first tried out 1.0 (I'm still sticking
with mutt for most of my mail reading/sending), I was able to use IMAPS.
Maybe it's because I got my prebuilt rpms from Red Hat's rawhide and I did
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rich C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: rpm question
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Rich C wrote:
My point is there is WAY more than just the managed packages that need
to be managed.
Ah -- hadn't been aware of that particular permutation of an acronym;
gotta hit them books. Anyway, since I'm unfamiliar with IMAPS, I'm
(obviously) not an authority on it, but on the stock 1.0 (a-la Ximian)
Receiving Mail tab, when IMAP is selected, there's a Use secure
connection (SSL)
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, your auto-signature is hosed. I get a few lines of binary garbage
at the end of your message, after your nominal signature ends.
Yah, his message was transmitted thus:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE:
Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
\
However, I was surprised to see that 1.0 didn't support IMAPS. To me, that
killed it right there...
Assuming you mean IMAP, it supports it just fine; two of my inboxes are
IMAP, and I have no problems whatsoever.
I believe that he ment IMAPS, which is IMAP over
Maybe he should contact the FBI:
SECTION III - CYBER INTELLIGENCE
FBI MAGIC LANTERN -- According to media reporting, the FBI recently was
forced to reveal another part of its Cyber-Knight project, an effort by
the Bureau to monitor Internet communications. The new FBI program,
called Magic
22 matches
Mail list logo
