David Betten wrote:
Try increasing your index CI size. Sometimes when the keys are very unique
you get a situation where the index CI can't hold enough pointers for an
entire data CA. That might be causing the CA splits.
I was thinking about it, but the key doesn't seem to be poorly
sorry, yes i meant COBOL pseudo-text. So basically when I have pseudo-text,
the replacing option works well. I want to do the same when the copybook
does not have any pseudo-text.
thanks,
Amlan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
-- snip --
1. Ontop for EMEA customers: I think ontop is dead in EMEA. IBM
consistently refused to use ontop to look at a dump, always demanding the
dump to be ftp'd in. That was (and still is) a nuisance. A colleague then
wrote a program that allows us to ftp directly to IBM (don't ask me how),
I usually just use ISHELL for USS data manipulation. Can that work
in an ISHELL environment. If so how.
Not the way I was talking about. The locale is an LE setting and
is mostly used with unix programs.
ISPF has a nice DISPLAY command which allows you to change the
code page used to display
On 12/3/07, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I usually just use ISHELL for USS data manipulation. Can that work
in an ISHELL environment. If so how.
Not the way I was talking about. The locale is an LE setting and
is mostly used with unix programs.
ISPF has a nice DISPLAY
For SADMP, I would still aim to mirror all DASD and have separate volumes
prepared for SADMP usage on the primary and SADMP usage on the secondary
side. Set up separate procedures for starting it depending on whether you
are running on the primary or on the secondary DASD (you always need to be
RS,
Can you provide the LISTCAT output please.
--
Mike Poil
Java z/OS Level 3 Service
IBM United Kingdom Limited, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN
Internal: 246824 External: +44
We are facing following problem with some Scratch tapes
Please help up.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RETURN CODE 8 REASON CODE 51
THE MODULE THAT DETECTED THE ERROR IS IGDIDMUS
SMS MODULE TRACE BACK - IDMUS IDMSU IDM00 SSIRT
SYMPTOM RECORD CREATED, PROBLEM ID IS IGD00042
IGD330I ERROR OCCURRED
Sorry, Jim, for the confusion. Let me try to fix that.
- By default, the shell and utilities expect text to be encoded
in code page IBM-1047 (CP1047 for short).
- Text entered/viewed in a TSO/ISPF session (this includes ISHELL
and OEDIT) is encoded with the host code page setup in your
Michael Poil wrote:
RS,
Can you provide the LISTCAT output please.
Michael, please find output below.
I played with Index CISZ 1.5 - 18kB. I always get 3 CA splits.
I also played with CA freespace: 0-15 % gives 3 CA splits, 30-50% - 4 CA
splits, 60% - 5 CA splits.
DEF CL
Hello -
Anyone aware of being able to use DFDSS to COPY Volumes that are OFFLINE?
I have looked but have not found anything yet to indicate that
support exists for doing that.
Thanks much in advance.
Ken
Kenneth R. Barkhau
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
You cannot call for scratch volume by specific-volser. If you are attempting
write new data to a new tape; it should be without a volser and just select
the next scratch volume. If you are attempting to read or mod data onto an
existing tape; the tape has been scratched (why?) inside the robot. In
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 10:24:07 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
...
ICSF cannot be active if CPACF is disabled, according to ICSF doco.
I'm also led to believe that CPACF is a prerequisite to
enabling
You still aren't using COBOL terminology correctly, but that doesn't really
matter. I have posted code that will support some applications doing
partial word replacement while others do not.
However, if you want to do partial word replacement - when the copy members
are NOT correctly set up (and
You are absolutely right, but this issue keeps coming up because the
behaviour of the compiler in this instance isn't exactly 'intuitive'. I'll
bet that 9 out of 10 programmers who read the manual come away with the
impression that COPY REPLACING is a string replacement function and are very
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Cole
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 4:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
As Ralph Johnson noted in his post to the FLEX-ES listserv,
At 12/1/2007 11:34 AM, David Day wrote:
Yes, there actions are anti-competitive. But, isn't that part of
being in business. You do what you can to help yourself,
Certainly true. And when companies succeed too much in this strategy
they become monopolistic, then the pressures to reduce price
On 12/3/07, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- You can change the shell side and tell it to work with the CP
of your 3270 emulator, i.e. change the locale by setting environment
variable LC_ALL.
Having done so, the compiler now accepts the same encoding as you
are using in
I've seen when an INDEX CI gets full (can not put any more compressed keys
into the INDEX), a CA SPLIT can occur. Since the sequence set can not hold
the new key, the CA must be split.
Try loading your dataset and run an IDCAMS EXAMINE. EXAMINE has been
updated in the past few years to give you
Just a short note to give some Wiki news.
1. We are over 75 users on the Wiki team - this is very exciting. I hope
you all will contribute much in the next year.
2. Michael and Roland contributed to an excellent article on CORBA tuning.
Check it out at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth R Barkhau
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 7:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DFDSS and Copy of Offline Volumes
Hello -
Anyone aware of being able to use DFDSS to COPY
Ken,
We use FDR from Innovation to do full volume dumps of offline volumes.
We are using it along with EMC/Timefinder for our offsite DR backups.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth R Barkhau
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 7:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DFDSS and
Larry Crilley wrote:
I've seen when an INDEX CI gets full (can not put any more compressed keys
into the INDEX), a CA SPLIT can occur. Since the sequence set can not hold
the new key, the CA must be split.
Try loading your dataset and run an IDCAMS EXAMINE. EXAMINE has been
updated in the
On 1 Dec 2007 08:35:19 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Day) wrote:
Your statement vis-a-vis growth to consolidation is probably dead on,
but the reason IBM does not want PSI in this ball game has to do with
commodity pricing vs. specialty pricing. Exodus from MVS started almost 20
years
I'm going to give the 3390-27 a try, on at least on my largest system.
I'm hoping to replace 64 3390-3s.
If you do go to -27 disks, please make sure that the DASD string(s) for your
new SPOOL volumes are defined with enough PAV aliases available so that you
don't get I/O performance issues.
Ted,
It was several years ago, and even though CICS was starting to move
processing to other TCBs, the vast majority of the work was run under
the main TCB. In our case, we were running several other applications
on the box so we made good use of the multiple CPUs. The main point I
was trying
I can think of 2 posible causes,
you do not have sufficient space in the INDEX component for any new CI's
therefore
1. any new records, have to go to a new CA ie CA split
2. the more CA's you have (ie increase free space for the CA which means the
data is loaded across more CA's) the more CA's
I'm by far not a Java expert, but I'd say yes, this will work.
Should work even if Java is not started from a shell but via
JZOS (or is there a shell behind this, too?).
Anyway, it is my understanding that a) the application needs to
actively provide locale support and b) the language
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 11:07:06 -0600, Joel C. Ewing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..
I notice your table doesn't mention the ¬ encoding differences
between
IBM-1140 and IBM-1047, but perhaps that character wasn't relevant
in the
context of that discussion.
...
Once again, the character seen in your
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 08:25:08 -0500, Gray, Larry - Larry A wrote:
Thanks for the test. I was hoping to get by without part of the
SMPPTFIN. One of the elements is nearly 7GB in size, and I was wanting
to not have to create a zFS that large. Since they document that the
zFS is supposed to be
(in my best Seinfeld voice)...
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-) Seriously... any reason
why suddenly so many IBM-MAINers are working on it at the same time?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group
Peter,
Make sure that functions you called are really available on CPACF. Some encode functions *do requre* coprocessors (or CCF). The same could apply to the keys - if the keys are intended to be safe - generated within coprocessor and encrypted with MK, and written to CKDS.
HTH
--
Radoslaw
RS,
Maybe it is the effect of Sequential Insert Strategy as used by REPRO?
This works differently to Normal Insert Strategy when you perform a
random write.
Regards.
Mike
--
Mike
Hi all,
We have a question being sent to IBM concerning this, but I thought I'd try
to get a leg up and see if anyone else here has been down this road before
me.
There are sample programs in several languages using ICSF callable functions
in the ICSF Appl. Pgmr's Guide (Appendix D). I have
Mike Bell wrote:
I can think of 2 posible causes,
you do not have sufficient space in the INDEX component for any new CI's
therefore
1. any new records, have to go to a new CA ie CA split
2. the more CA's you have (ie increase free space for the CA which means the
data is loaded across more
-Original Message-
From: Mark Zelden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 11:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Crypto Related Posts
(in my best Seinfeld voice)...
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-) Seriously... any
reason why
RS,
Just remembered a VSAM gottcha. After initial load yit is better to
ALTER the dataset to use FSPC(0 0) if you are using Sequential Insert
Strategy so as to reduce the potential for CA splits.
-Original Message-
From: R.S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 11:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL
program?
Peter,
Make sure that functions you called are really available on CPACF. Some
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
(in my best Seinfeld voice)...
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-)
Seriously... any reason why suddenly so many IBM-MAINers are
working on it at the same time?
Probably just
While improvements to tools and delivery mechanisms are always to be wished
for, I'd like to Beckham this thread back toward a suggestion made recently
by Kurt Quackenbush. If you tell IBM what you already have, you'll get just
what you need.
If you wanted to fill out your classic literature
RS,
CA free space is not normally irrelevant . If you are performing random
writes it is very generally useful to have some, and CI free space is less
useful as the overhead of a CI split is very small compared to a CA split.
The only time when free space is not useful is if you are only
In our case it's the PCI (Payment Card Industry) i.e. VISA requiring
protection of card numbers that is driving our interest (as well as the
large $$$ penalties for not complying.
Alan
-Original Message-
(in my best Seinfeld voice)...
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-)
Radoslaw,
Have you tried loading the data in reverse key order? (10, 9, 8, 7, etc)
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: KSDS CA split, no CI
I don't think so, from what I recall, free space is only reserved during an
initial load (maybe mass inserts too?)
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Michael PoilSent: Mon
12/3/2007 12:05 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split
RS,Just remembered a VSAM
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jack Kelly
snip
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-)
Seriously... any reason
why suddenly so many IBM-MAINers are working on it at the same
time?
unsnip
I would assume that a lot of us are
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:33:12 -0800, Skip Robinson wrote:
by Kurt Quackenbush. If you tell IBM what you already have, you'll get just
what you need.
Of course, this applies to PTFs more than to FUNCTIONs.
Either 'inventory' mechanism for ordering maintenance works very well. I'm
not sure that
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:56:55 -0600, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-) Seriously... any
reason
why suddenly so many IBM-MAINers are working on it at the same
time?
...
Judging from the responses so far, this is must be coincidence plus
John, I agree. When I was with HDS a few of us went to school on it because we
had several installations like the Fed that demanded encryption support and
that was many years ago. Raymond Noal was the main encryption guy for us, and
he responds to this list so perhaps Ray can also shed some
snip
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-) Seriously... any
reason
why suddenly so many IBM-MAINers are working on it at the same
time?
unsnip
I would assume that a lot of us are in the same boat, ie like Unix was,
crypto is something that has slowly crept into our lives and is
This relates to my previous question about Parallel Sysplex. I'm trying
to read the books quickly to get a Power Point presentation ready.
IIRC, the VTAMs can talk to each other via XCF instead of/in addition to
CTCs if they are all in the same sysplex. Correct?
Second question: a Basic Sysplex
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick O'Keefe) writes:
We've been moving towards secure data transmissions with business
partners (with testing starting in about a week)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kopischke, David G.) writes:
From what I understand, we just use canned processes to extract
SMF, load databases and create reports. But since we don't use VM
at home and have no experience with it, maybe we're just not
understanding where this data is in that environment
Mea culpa for overlooking the distinction between 'product' (CBPDO) and
service orders. While service can be tailored to your install base, there's
no way for the order mechanism to guess what use you intend to make of a
product. I went through this a while back with XML, which was not only huge
The mainframe has stood its ground - despite potshots from the camps of
widely distributed technology. Now recent studies confirm that the
resurgence of the mainframe is based on what we knew all along: Its
continued value and longevity as the ultimate IT asset. Don't let your
management be swayed
1. Yes, VTAM will talk across the 'sysplex' CF structures in a parallel
sysplex. We discovered this early on more or less by accident. You also
have the option of 'VTAM generics' via a separate CF structure.
2. CTCs are not required in a parallel sysplex, but every discussion I've
ever seen on
Is there any doc comparing performance of crypto functions using
the encryption hardware vs the same functions using software?
I've seen a paper showing the performance of both CPACF and CEX2
based on block sizes (very big differences) but not compared to
with software-only. I've also seen a
Hopefully IBM has taken notice and has some of their crypto people
viewing these threads and respond - hopefully as well as DFSORT personnel
The IBM crypto expert is Ernie Nachtigal (Canada).
I don't believe he monitors this forum.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
the VTAMs can talk to each other via XCF instead of/in addition to CTCs if
they are all in the same sysplex. Correct?
IIRC, VTAM only uses CTC's and not XCF.
Second question: a Basic Sysplex connects with CTCs. Do I need CTCs in a
Parallel Sysplex or does the CF entirely replace the CTCs?
You
1.- I ran Sync command but there is no change.
2.- I ran Prof command with next output:
CHAR(0) LINE(0)PROMPT INTERCOM NOPAUSE NOMSGID NOMODE NOWTPMSG
NORECO
VER PREFIX(ATAMAYO) PLANGUAGE(ENU) SLANGUAGE(ENU)
VARSTORAGE(LOW)
DEFAULT LINE/CHARACTER DELETE CHARACTERS IN EFFECT FOR THIS
Angel,
If you have access to both the old and new systems, please issue:
D IKJTSO,SEND
Review the displays for differences. If there are no (zero) differences then
you might want to see whether the old system was using one (or more) of the
IKJEESnn or IKJVSNXn system exits. (They
On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Chase, John wrote:
---SNIP---
If IBM's crypto development lab has a Frank Yaeger clone, I've not
seen anything from him/her on the list yet. Or maybe I have, but
failed
to recognize her/him (maybe s/he
Because cryptography is export controlled, CPACF activation (Feature 3863)
was the way to verify that the CPU owner is allowed to use crypto based on
that control. CPACF activation provides the authority if you will, to then
also
add CEX2's.
Yes, I am now back monitoring
Ernest
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:07:07 +, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
IIRC, VTAM only uses CTC's and not XCF.
...
VTAM dynamic XCF support went in about 2.7 or 2.8.
(I could be thinking TCP/IP support. VTAM's support may have
been earlier.) If you already had APPN support you
CPACF is only accessible via ASM programs. The samples in the ICSF manual,
using API's that start with CSNB or CSF all require the CEX2.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Ernest Nachtigall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 3:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL
program?
CPACF is only accessible via ASM programs. The samples in the ICSF
Is it possible to install a GRS between two LPAR of only one machine using ICF?
Thanks
Alvaro.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:53:10 -0600, Ernest Nachtigall wrote:
Yes, I am now back monitoring
Thanks. Naturally I can hardly help wondering whether
you (re)appeared so suddenly by enormous coincidence
or whether some daemon monitors this list to notify you
of any use of your name?
And I have
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:19:28 -0500, Farley, Peter x23353
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ernest Nachtigall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 3:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:58:53 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any doc comparing performance of crypto functions using
the encryption hardware vs the same functions using software?
I've seen a paper showing the performance of both CPACF and CEX2
based on block sizes (very
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:31:47 -0600, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:53:10 -0600, Ernest Nachtigall wrote:
Yes, I am now back monitoring
Thanks. Naturally I can hardly help wondering whether
you (re)appeared so suddenly by enormous coincidence
or whether some
And I have long wondered: SYS1.SAMPLIB(CSFTEST) exists on some of our
systems, but not others. This seems to be random, not correlated with OS
release (although it's available on our 1.9 system).
In our shop it's available in 1.7. 1.8 and 1.9.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 05:43:41 -0500, David Cole wrote:
As Ralph Johnson noted in his post to the FLEX-ES listserv, Interesting!
http://www.sys-con.com/read/468626.htm
IBM's intransigence in its so called negotiations with FSI, its
belligerence with PSI, its bullying of T3 and its total shunning
Just a reminder that the next Linux on System z Live Virtual Class is
Tuesday, Dec 4th at 11:00 AM ET.
There is no charge to participate in these technical education sessions.
Date: Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Time: 11:00 AM ET U.S. Canada / 5:00 PM GMT
Duration: 75 minutes
Topic:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:46:59 -0600, Ernest Nachtigall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much for joining the discussion. I'm afaid you're
going to be swamped with questions for a while.
... Fo CPACF, is is a single OP code so beats
software routines thousands to one (TDES ASM routine has
Thanks for your responses.
I have access to the old system in other LPAR and the displays of the
command D IKJTSO,SEND are exactly the same, there is no differences. But in
the LPAR with z/OS 1.7 works and in LPAR with z/OS 1.8 doesn't work the
automatic notification.
2007/12/3, Tom Schmidt
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/03/2007
01:38:46 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kopischke, David G.) writes:
From what I understand, we just use canned processes to extract
SMF, load databases and create reports. But since we don't use VM
at home and have no
Angel,
Are there any messages in the SYSLOG at the point in time where a batch job
would normally execute the NOTIFY?
Regards,
Ulrich Krueger
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Angel Tamayo
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 15:02
Angel,
And did you then check for the system exits that I mentioned?
--
Tom Schmidt
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:02:00 -0500, Angel Tamayo wrote:
Thanks for your responses.
I have access to the old system in other LPAR and the displays of the
command D IKJTSO,SEND are exactly the same, there is no
Pam C wrote on 04/12/2007 08:32:02 AM:
(By the way, we have given Centra the requirement to provide a
non-Windows-centric client to connect to these sessions)
Thank you Pamela ... ;-}
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
I assume you want to create a Coupling Facility in the machine also. What
you want to do is very feasible. I suggest you look at the ICP CHPID
definitions also.
I have this running with 8 MVS systems connected to a single CF inside a
single machine. Works quite well.
And I do not want any
On Dec 3, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Clark F Morris wrote:
On 3 Dec 2007 05:54:20 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
You are absolutely right, but this issue keeps coming up because the
behaviour of the compiler in this instance isn't exactly
'intuitive'. I'll
bet that 9 out of 10
On 3 Dec 2007 05:54:20 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
You are absolutely right, but this issue keeps coming up because the
behaviour of the compiler in this instance isn't exactly 'intuitive'. I'll
bet that 9 out of 10 programmers who read the manual come away with the
impression
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:26:15 +1000, Shane Ginnane wrote:
Pam C wrote on 04/12/2007 08:32:02 AM:
(By the way, we have given Centra the requirement to provide a
non-Windows-centric client to connect to these sessions)
Thank you Pamela ... ;-}
Thank you. Are they considering VNC? Clients
On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
Mea culpa for overlooking the distinction between 'product' (CBPDO)
and
service orders. While service can be tailored to your install base,
there's
no way for the order mechanism to guess what use you intend to make
of a
product. I went
There are 13 EBCDIC characters that vary across EBCDIC character
map codepages but that must always be defined when using locale
settings; here are some sample mappings:
character string: [ ] { } ! \ ^ ~ ` $ | @ #
EBCDIC 1140: BA BB C0 D0 5A E0 B0 A1 79 5B 4F 7C 7B
EBCDIC
Dear Russell Witt,
Thanks for your information.
Regards,
On 12/3/07, Russell Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You cannot call for scratch volume by specific-volser. If you are
attempting
write new data to a new tape; it should be without a volser and just
select
the next scratch volume. If
90 matches
Mail list logo
