Hi,
if somebody wonders why do we have those french guys registering on the wiki:
http://blog.mageekbox.net/?post/2011/07/10/La-r%C3%A9volution-est-en-marche-%21
the author thought that anybody can vote who has wiki account, but
that is corrected now.
however judging from the responses and the
Hello !
Hi,
if somebody wonders why do we have those french guys registering on the wiki:
http://blog.mageekbox.net/?post/2011/07/10/La-r%C3%A9volution-est-en-marche-%21
the author thought that anybody can vote who has wiki account, but
that is corrected now.
All my apologizes for this
Hi!
On 7/11/11 1:23 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
if somebody wonders why do we have those french guys registering on the wiki:
http://blog.mageekbox.net/?post/2011/07/10/La-r%C3%A9volution-est-en-marche-%21
the author thought that anybody can vote who has wiki account, but
that is corrected
hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
I'd say for core features everybody with write access to the core, but then
again,
Everyone with @php.net is what was decided.
not sure about how to formalize that. Note that vote isn't meant to
be the
On 11 July 2011 17:43, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
I'd say for core features everybody with write access to the core, but then
again,
Everyone with @php.net is what was decided.
Was it? The RFC
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:45, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 7/11/11 1:23 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
if somebody wonders why do we have those french guys registering on the
wiki:
about the fix, instead of only registered users, we have to add
group support, so we can add php-src/doc/etc. to it and manually add
external and approved persons. If anyone has time to do it, please go
ahead, code is in SVN.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:56, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:45, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 7/11/11 1:23 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
if
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no accept an account. Thanks.
Creating an account in the wiki, creates an account.
Like I said, the user doesn't have write access to anything unless
someone explicitly gives him write access
It is very hard to detect which php group a person belongs to, our
karma system doesn't work like that.
We can easily detect if an account is an php.net SVN account though.
And the wiki can tell you if a person has write access to that specific page.
Most external users have assigned write
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very hard to detect which php group a person belongs to, our
karma system doesn't work like that.
We can easily detect if an account is an php.net SVN account though.
And the wiki can tell you if a
hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very hard to detect which php group a person belongs to, our
karma system doesn't work like that.
It is somehow easier in the wiki, we have groups afair. Also for the
votes, only svn account is
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:03, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very hard to detect which php group a person belongs to, our
karma system doesn't work like that.
We can easily detect if an account is an php.net SVN account though.
And the wiki can tell you if a person
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:03, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very hard to detect which php group a person belongs to, our
karma system doesn't work like that.
We can easily detect
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:03, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very hard to detect which php group a person
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:48, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:03, Hannes Magnusson
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:48, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Hannes Magnusson
On Jul 11, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:48, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:05, Philip Olson phi...@roshambo.org wrote:
On Jul 11, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:48, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11,
Hi!
On 7/11/11 11:24 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
The current vote still needs to be reviewed manually anyway, so I
really don't understand the need for a quick hack at this time.
Cooperating with the plugin authors on how to implement better checks
there would imo make much more sense.
Is
On 11 July 2011 20:07, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 7/11/11 11:24 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
The current vote still needs to be reviewed manually anyway, so I
really don't understand the need for a quick hack at this time.
Cooperating with the plugin authors on how to
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Peter Cowburn petercowb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 July 2011 20:07, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 7/11/11 11:24 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
The current vote still needs to be reviewed manually anyway, so I
really don't understand the need
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 21:38, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Peter Cowburn petercowb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 July 2011 20:07, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 7/11/11 11:24 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
The current vote still needs
Stas means when we print who has voted, to only print votes by people
in that group so you won't need to manually filter out
not-allowed-to-vote votes.
-Hannes
I see.
if you only need the @php.net usernames, you can use the
https://master.php.net/fetch/allusers.php api with the proper
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 22:13, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
Stas means when we print who has voted, to only print votes by people
in that group so you won't need to manually filter out
not-allowed-to-vote votes.
-Hannes
I see.
if you only need the @php.net usernames, you can use
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 22:13, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
Stas means when we print who has voted, to only print votes by people
in that group so you won't need to manually filter out
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 23:23, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 22:13, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
Stas means when we print who has voted, to only print votes by people
Hi!
On 7/11/11 3:20 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
The idea Stas proposed of leaving the votes untouched and just hide
those specific votes during rendering of the vote results is very
silly to me.
Manually summerizing the votes like has been done in the past on many
RFCs into with karma and
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 00:34, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 7/11/11 3:20 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
The idea Stas proposed of leaving the votes untouched and just hide
those specific votes during rendering of the vote results is very
silly to me.
Manually summerizing
On Jul 11, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 00:34, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 7/11/11 3:20 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
The idea Stas proposed of leaving the votes untouched and just hide
those specific votes during rendering of
Hi!
On 7/11/11 4:24 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
The patch fixed a bug where the voting mechanism was not in sync with the
passed voting RFC. It's closer now to most peoples interpretation of said
RFC. Changing this would, I'm afraid, require changing the RFC which I
suppose means an amendment [with
31 matches
Mail list logo
