From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to get rid of that PID: Terminated stuff ?
Add a line to the top:
trap 'exit' 0 2 5 15
Thks. It does it. So final script should be:
#!/bin/sh
trap 'exit' 0 2 5 15
echo -n
while : ; do
echo -e -n \b
echo -n \\
sleep 1
echo -e
Well i have all binaries needed for a root lrp compiled succesfully
against
uClib 0.9.8 . I did this a while ago to build a uClibc based version, and
i
can of course provide the source code or the patches . this includes:
Cool!
gtcommandline ( just a small c hack to get rid of the all seds
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Mike Sensney wrote:
At 12:00 PM 1/23/2002 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Unfortunately ticker_1.0 compiled under uClibc weighs in at 57396 bytes
(stripped). That's probably quite a bit more than its worth.
I'd definately agree to that! If it can't be shrunk
On 1/23/02 at 9:31 AM, Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At the expense of readability, this can probalby be done
with simple ash string manipulation, if the only thing
sed's used for is extracting parameters from the kernel
command line...
CMDLINE=`cat /proc/cmdline`
Am Montag, 21. Januar 2002 16:54 schrieb Ewald Wasscher:
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Let's start with a wish list, then folks can start working on
whatever pieces interest them.
Good idea!
- Boot-strap code modified to use features available in unpatched
kernel (ie no more
KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
snip
Anyway, I could think of a core that boots without glibc and loads
glibc 2.0.7 for floppy releases and glibc whatever for CD, HD et
al...
I think supporting 3 different c-libraries at a time will cause lots of
problems for users, and for the developers
Anyway, I could think of a core that boots without glibc and loads
glibc 2.0.7 for floppy releases and glibc whatever for CD, HD et
al...
I think supporting 3 different c-libraries at a time will cause lots of
problems for users, and for the developers supporting them. I'd prefer
to drop
Luis.F.Correia wrote:
Anyway, I could think of a core that boots without glibc and loads
glibc 2.0.7 for floppy releases and glibc whatever for CD, HD et
al...
I think supporting 3 different c-libraries at a time will cause lots of
problems for users, and for the developers supporting them.
Anyway, I could think of a core that boots without glibc and loads
glibc 2.0.7 for floppy releases and glibc whatever for CD, HD et
al...
I think supporting 3 different c-libraries at a time will cause lots of
problems for users, and for the developers supporting them. I'd prefer
to drop
See below.
At 07:11 PM 1/22/02 +0100, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
Luis.F.Correia wrote:
[...]
If we drop support for the ancient glibc-2.0.7, will we still able to
use the floppy versions?
That will become a bit more difficult. I don't have any exact numbers,
but I estimate that glibc 2.2.x will
Comments below:
Luis.F.Correia wrote:
Anyway, I could think of a core that boots without glibc and loads
glibc 2.0.7 for floppy releases and glibc whatever for CD, HD et
al...
I think supporting 3 different c-libraries at a time will
cause lots of
problems for users, and for the
And to raise another old issue:
Will we work with a cvs repository?
I think this is a must. If we're ever going to get out of the one man
distribution era, we need an effective way to replicate build environments,
and propogate updates. CVS was made to do exactly this.
The big question is
Hello all; due to reported mailing-list problems, please CC, as done,
to me.
And forgive, if I confuse private mail with list-mail... thanks.
Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2002 19:18 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler:
Anyway, I could think of a core that boots without glibc and
loads glibc 2.0.7 for
At 2002-01-22 12:36 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
And to raise another old issue:
Will we work with a cvs repository?
I think this is a must. If we're ever going to get out of the one man
distribution era, we need an effective way to replicate build
environments, and propogate
Luis.F.Correia wrote:
That will become a bit more difficult. I don't have any exact
numbers, but I estimate that glibc 2.2.x will take around
225-250 kb more diskspace than glibc 2.0.7.
For Oxygen-1.8.0 (the current release):
libc.lrp takes 522285 bytes on the floppy.
libc-2.1.3.so
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
snip
My intentions for the next major release is to go to geographic names,
reflecting locations near me (ie small towns in North-East Kansas: Auburn,
Dover, Grantville, Perry, Lecompton...all places I bicycle to), but I'm open
to other ideas. There may also be an
My intentions for the next major release is to go to geographic names,
reflecting locations near me (ie small towns in North-East Kansas:
Auburn,
Dover, Grantville, Perry, Lecompton...all places I bicycle to), but I'm
open
to other ideas. There may also be an intermediate set of experimental
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Let's start with a wish list, then folks can start working on whatever
pieces interest them.
Good idea!
Any nifty way we can use the PHP website to keep the wish-list dynamic and
updatable by many people?
Some kind of WikiWiki perhaps? If Mike doesn't come up
At 2002-01-21 09:37 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Let's start with a wish list, then folks can start working on whatever
pieces interest them.
Any nifty way we can use the PHP website to keep the wish-list dynamic and
updatable by many people?
Charles,
Yes, for our project developers
Jack Coates wrote:
gods are always good firewall names, what with the whole gateway between
dead and living, heaven/hell thing. Thoth, Janus, Pluto, etc. Of course
if one's tastes are more mundane there's always St. Louis (Gateway to
the West), Panama (Gateway to the Pacific), or Vickie
On Sunday 20 January 2002 11:13, Jacques Nilo wrote:
Was not it CERBERE (I am not sure of the English spelling) the dog
who was keeping the entry of Hell ?
Jacques
hehe, maybe the Dante series..
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn
guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 06:13:01PM +0100, Jacques Nilo wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
Was not it CERBERE (I am not sure of the English spelling) the dog who was
keeping the entry of Hell ?
Well i know it as cerberus (the latin name ??), but please have a look at:
At 2002-01-18 21:51 +0100, Jacques Nilo wrote:
With the help of Eric Wolzak I have updated my LEAF 2.4.x / Shorewall
based distro.
Jacques,
Do you have a name for your LEAF release. I can add it to our files area,
if you give me a name and version. e.g. Oxygen 1.8, Dachstein 1.0.2,
23 matches
Mail list logo
