Re: [Leaf-devel] Weblet Enhancements

2002-07-01 Thread Erich Titl
Lynn At 04:50 01.07.2002, you wrote: James Sturdevant posted POST support in patch form to the list a while back. I think this will work fine. I would be very interested in that patch. I changed sh-httpd to support a GET with multiple parameters to at least be able to use forms in a still

Re: [Leaf-devel] Weblet Enhancements

2002-07-02 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Charles there is a *=* case which resets the parameter list in sh-httpd, it disables constructs like foo=barbaz=foo I guess parameters without a value would pass fine cheers Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024

Re: [Leaf-devel] sh-httpd weblet web-config

2002-07-02 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 15:33 02.07.2002, you wrote: Responses to multiple e-mails rolled into one... First, a point of order. In my view of the world, there are two major issues currently being discussed: - Modifications to sh-httpd (the actual web server) to enhance it's ability to be used as the front-end

Re: [Leaf-devel] sh-httpd weblet web-config

2002-07-03 Thread Erich Titl
Lynn At 04:11 03.07.2002, you wrote: On Tuesday 02 July 2002 08:33, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: First, a point of order. In my view of the world, there are two major issues currently being discussed: snip I think it would probably help prevent confusion if mods to the web server itself

Re: [Leaf-devel] Weblet Enhancements

2002-07-03 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Charles At 16:36 03.07.2002, you wrote: My understanding is cgi scripts recieving data like the above example via a GET or HEAD request are supposed to refer to the QUERY_STRING variable, which should be properly exported by sh-httpd. - or maybe this explains it? I does indeed,

Re: [Leaf-devel] Perl help

2002-07-17 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Mike in case noone noticed until now.. there was a glitch in the perl script anyway, see the following test luna perl casetest.pl MakefilefoobarDDD All filenames must be completely lowercase except Makefiles. (/) All filenames must be completely lowercase except Makefiles.

Re: [Leaf-devel] korn shell script

2002-07-18 Thread Erich Titl
Kim At 12:12 18.07.2002, you wrote: hi all, Is there anybody who knows wether korn shell scripting is compatible with ash? up to e certain degree, it certainly is Reason I ask is because mij dns registrar has a dynamic subscription type. Which updates your ip by using a korn shell script.

Re: [Leaf-devel] korn shell script

2002-07-18 Thread Erich Titl
Kim At 16:12 18.07.2002, you wrote: Aanhalen Erich Titl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: At this point it is not working. For various reasons. So far I changed the obvious /usr/bin/ksh to /bin/sh on line 1. makes sense I replaced all instances of print with echo. There are a lot of [] in the script

[Leaf-devel] Hello

2002-07-22 Thread Erich Titl
Hello everybody My name is Erich Titl (aka Mega). I have been following the LEAF mailing list for roughly a year now. I started with LEAF because I needed a NAT router/firewall for the holiday apartments which the parents of my girl friend rent out. I had a few old PC's rotting in the corner

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: [leaf-user] Webbased configuration

2002-08-29 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Eric, Lynn, Charles Asking for permission to come aboard. regards Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 --- This sf.net email is

[leaf-devel] Webbased configuration

2002-08-30 Thread Erich Titl
Hi folks Thanks for the hearty welcome I did a bit of a fly by on all the summaries presented lately on the Webbased config subject. I would like to make a few suggestions, not necessarily technical ones because I feel the matter has been well understood. - Could we keep this on leaf-devel,

[Leaf-devel] Webbased configuration

2002-09-01 Thread Erich Titl
Mike you seem to be knowledgeable about the copyright stuff. I am about to paint an entry page for the config stuff and would like to use the LEAF logo for it. Is there a problem? Thanks Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954

[Leaf-devel] trying to install UML

2002-09-03 Thread Erich Titl
Hi all I am trying to build a UML environment according to Jacques/Eric's info. applying the uml patch works fine, but the bering patches are not all appliccable. Should I step back to 2.4.18 or just ignore the Patch diagnostics for the rejected hunks. Thanks Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39

[Leaf-devel] invalid packet length for dhclient

2002-09-10 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Folks I have a thread open on leaf-user, but here I believe it starts being technical enough for a devel thread. Without obvious reason my bering laptop accepts DHCP messages now, NICs are Xircom and D-LINK DFE660+, but my log gets cluttered with the following: Sep 10 13:30:01 firewall

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: Building Bering from source

2002-09-18 Thread Erich Titl
Lynn so many thoughts I hope I can cope guitarlynn wrote the following at 06:34 18.09.2002: So ... the key word in Erich's comment is primitive. If one's ends are simple, LEAF setup requirements probably are too demanding. But complex needs require complex solutions, and that is

Re: [leaf-devel] LINCE Project WP flash disk

2002-10-09 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Boris I know that Mike Noyes was working on the write protectd flash disk. Actually there is such a beast, but it is hard to come by in small quantities. I was lucky to get a sample from SST http://www.sst.com and I am about to analyse the standard set up. If it is the way I believe it is

RE: [leaf-devel] LINCE Project

2002-10-09 Thread Erich Titl
Joey Joey Officer wrote the following at 18:51 09.10.2002: I like the idea of a 'service' mode versus an 'operation' mode. That could be extremely useful. And how hard would that be to wire in. I'd like to contribute on a project like this, but my biggest problem is funding. I am trying to

Re: [leaf-devel] LINCE Project WP flash disk

2002-10-10 Thread Erich Titl
Mike Mike Noyes wrote the following at 14:54 10.10.2002: On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 10:24, Erich Titl wrote: I know that Mike Noyes was working on the write protectd flash disk. Actually there is such a beast, but it is hard to come by in small quantities. I was lucky to get a sample from SST

Re: [leaf-devel] Multimedia Design at 5$ per hour

2002-10-23 Thread Erich Titl
Mike Mike Noyes wrote the following at 22:17 23.10.2002: Erich, Was there something you wanted to make me aware of? I didn't notice any text from you in the message below. too dumb to control my mail client :-( I was wondering if they used an obl at sourceforge Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39

Re: [leaf-devel] syslinux and grsecurity (was: write protected DOM/ADM)

2002-10-21 Thread Erich Titl
Brad I cont recall the actual errot off the top of my head. I was using 1.75 syslinux and it complained about grsecurity. I indend to do some more research on the subject later. Erich At 00:30 22.10.2002, you wrote: One think puzzled me though. You stated: I could not syslinux with my

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering and PXELinux

2002-11-05 Thread Erich Titl
Jacques this is certainly a great thing. At 07:50 05.11.2002, you wrote: Le Jeudi 31 Octobre 2002 19:47, Michael Bonner a écrit : Hi All, I'm running bering on a Soekris net 4501 for my firewall on my home network. I'm not really happy about having my CF card exposed for hacking if

[leaf-devel] scp for bering package backup

2002-11-27 Thread Erich Titl
Hi everybody I hacked the Bering backup scripts so that they allow a backup custom destination of 'scp'. This makes the backup go to /tmp and then subsequently to the host/directory as specified in a few additional entries in /etc/lrp.conf. The following files are affected:

Re: [leaf-devel] bering-uclibc source tree

2002-11-27 Thread Erich Titl
Mike List Mike Noyes wrote the following at 17:28 25.11.2002: Everyone, The bering-uclibc team is making good use of our cvs repository. We now have two release/branch source trees under construction in cvs. Other LEAF release/branch lead developers please take note of these source trees. I'd

Re: [leaf-devel] bering-uclibc source tree

2002-11-27 Thread Erich Titl
Mike At 22:42 27.11.2002, Mike Noyes wrote: On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 12:50, Erich Titl wrote: Mike Noyes wrote the following at 17:28 25.11.2002: The bering-uclibc team is making good use of our cvs repository. We now have two release/branch source trees under construction in cvs. Other LEAF

Re: [leaf-devel] ANN: LEAF Bering-uClibc 1.0-stable

2002-12-08 Thread Erich Titl
Congratulations combining Bering with a small footprint, modern library and is extremely appealing. Thanks for the effort Erich At 17:34 07.12.2002, K.-P. =?iso-8859-15?q?Kirchd=F6rfer?= wrote: LEAF Bering-uClibc 1.0-stable is ready for download at

Re: [leaf-devel] iPKG (package management system)

2003-01-17 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Lynn group 0.6 looks pretty antiquated to me. I believe they are at 0.99 now. Apparently the C-based stuff is the way they go and should the developers decide this is the way to go I think we should stick with the latest releases. regards Erich At 22:43 16.01.2003 -0600, you wrote: On

Re: [leaf-user] Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF in SysAdmin

2003-01-20 Thread Erich Titl
The article and a .pdf copy can be found at wireless.psenicka.ca regards Erich At 22:48 19.01.2003 +0100, you wrote: Saddly, the article is not one of the ones available on-line, but I'm sure everyone here subscribes anyway, right? If not, head over to the sysadmin site, where you can

Re: [leaf-devel] Webconfiguration package.

2003-01-31 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Eric and list first thanks for the wakeup call... Some time ago I was leaning a bit out of the window by believing I would have lots of time for the config package, the truth is, I didn't. I tried to build a little working example of a small configuration issue (just the keyboad

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-07 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Guys At 10:01 06.02.2003 -0600, you wrote: On Wednesday 05 February 2003 03:36 pm, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Duly noted. Where does the responsibility of the 'check' and 'restart' lie? This would seem to be the respnsibility of the back-end (save-script), on first glance. Would a

Re: [leaf-devel] Generating Lists for package description

2003-03-12 Thread Erich Titl
Alex At 11:03 12.03.2003 +0100, you wrote: I think a package description and indexes are essential to get most of the new package repository. I am willing to work on this. Package description file proposal (thread) http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg04808.html I based my script on

[leaf-devel] Test, please disregard

2003-03-30 Thread Erich Titl
EOT THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop

Re: [leaf-devel] DocBook auto-build update

2003-06-19 Thread Erich Titl
Mike At 15:45 18.06.2003 -0700, you wrote: Everyone, I may have gone overboard. I'm starting to combine all of our guides into a single master collection. I'm going to do something similar with our howtos tomorrow. Going overboard at daytime is roughly 50% survival chance, at night it is close

Re: [leaf-devel] DocBook auto-build update

2003-06-19 Thread Erich Titl
Mike Mike Noyes wrote the following at 14:16 19.06.2003: On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 01:55, Erich Titl wrote: I may have gone overboard. I'm starting to combine all of our guides into a single master collection. I'm going to do something similar with our howtos tomorrow. Going overboard at daytime

Re: [leaf-devel] remote package install

2003-06-19 Thread Erich Titl
Jacques I believe this could be done with etherboot too, but would it cover PCMCIA cards? I would not suggest to rewrite linuxrc. thanks Erich Jacques Nilo wrote the following at 22:28 19.06.2003: Apart from rewriting the /linuxrc script (already fairly messy) a simple solution for people

[leaf-devel] Re: remote Package install

2003-06-19 Thread Erich Titl
Lynn Lynn Avants wrote the following at 22:30 19.06.2003: On Thursday 19 June 2003 02:27 pm, Erich Titl wrote: [...] This would IMHO not touch much in the existing init set up except of course the system would run in another init level. No, no I didn't mean switch init systems

Re: [leaf-devel] Re: remote Package install

2003-06-20 Thread Erich Titl
Lynn At 20:05 19.06.2003 -0500, you wrote: On Thursday 19 June 2003 05:43 pm, Erich Titl wrote: [...] I will, I am just doubtful on the pxeboot side when it comes to PCMCIA NIC's, here is a link I found for etherboot http://etherboot.sourceforge.net/doc/html/devman-6.html I also looked

Re: [leaf-devel] remote package install

2003-06-20 Thread Erich Titl
Nathan Nathan Angelacos wrote the following at 18:58 20.06.2003: Jacques I believe this could be done with etherboot too, but would it cover PCMCIA cards? I would not suggest to rewrite linuxrc. Erich, Just a question, we're thinking of doing just that (rewrite linuxrc) to make a more

Re: [leaf-devel] remote package install

2003-06-21 Thread Erich Titl
Jorn Jørn Eriksen wrote the following at 14:54 21.06.2003: Eric said: At least not for what I want to do, you are aiming a lot higher. My goal would be to provide a non NIC dependent solution for loading a small storage device (floppy) and still have the flexibility to load any number of

Re: [leaf-devel] remote package install

2003-06-21 Thread Erich Titl
James JamesSturdevant wrote the following at 15:47 21.06.2003: At 12:32 AM 6/21/03 +0200, Erich Titl wrote: Any comments on why you wouldn't suggest rewritting linuxrc? For 2 reasons 1) the existing linuxrc works for the actual LEAF releases and appears to be reliable 2) laziness, I do

Re: [leaf-devel] Linux Router Project Dead

2003-06-23 Thread Erich Titl
Hi could someone please inform the newbies like me a bit more detailed about the political mishap at Dave C.'s site. I was always wondering a bit about his comments in the code but wrote it off as jokes of someone in night mode. Thanks Erich K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote the following at 20:17

Re: [leaf-devel] Linux Router Project Dead

2003-06-23 Thread Erich Titl
Mike and Ray Thanks for the info, I think I got the gist and please excuse if I was nosy. I just happened not to be on either list those days and feel it is a shame that someone with Dave C.'s talent seems to go down the drain, his political opinion notwithstanding. Thanks Erich THINK

Re: [leaf-devel] [off topic] Auto generating docs

2003-06-25 Thread Erich Titl
Lynn At 22:19 17.06.2003 -0500, Lynn Avants wrote: ... As I have now (finally) finished the dial-in server and proxy-arp howto's, I can attest that 'xxe' is a killer app for Docbook format. It doesn't require XML knowledge (though xhtml knowledge could be helpful, but not necessary). The app even

[leaf-devel] remote package install

2003-06-29 Thread Erich Titl
is an example using wget to download the additional packages. Originally I used scp but this is just a bit too big to fit on a small floppy. # # Extensions for the rload function # please modify to suit your needs # copyleft 2003 Erich Titl [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Guide Collection

2003-07-02 Thread Erich Titl
Mike At 07:27 02.07.2003 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: Also, I'm working on pdf generation. Saxon and Java are available on the SF shell, but I'm having a hard time locating fop.jar. What are you using to build the .xsl file? Maybe you want to have a look at XSLFast. We are using it with

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF configuration process/frontend

2003-07-16 Thread Erich Titl
Mohan At 07:50 17.07.2003 +0530, S Mohan wrote: I was going thro' the LEAF documentation and in many places, syslinux.cfg needs to be edited. I've a suggestion to make this more user friendly. Can we not convert this process and integrate it into the configuration menu under system -option 2. We

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF configuration process/frontend

2003-07-16 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 06:49 16.07.2003 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Erich Titl wrote: Mohan At 07:50 17.07.2003 +0530, S Mohan wrote: I was going thro' the LEAF documentation and in many places, syslinux.cfg needs to be edited. I've a suggestion to make this more user friendly. Can we not convert

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF configuration process/frontend

2003-07-17 Thread Erich Titl
Eric At 15:27 17.07.2003 +0200, eric wolzak wrote: Hello Mohan, Erich, Charles and other The early package system can be changed ofcourse, but don't forget that the syslinux.cfg brings more information than just what packages to load. It defines the boot and Package load medium. System size

RE: [leaf-devel] LEAF configuration process/frontend

2003-07-17 Thread Erich Titl
Mohan At 19:04 18.07.2003, S Mohan wrote: I was looking at making configuration easy. That was the reason to suggest editing lrpkg.cfg from the LEAF system menu and the backup process saving this file. However, to make sure root, etc and other mandatory packages are not removed by mistake

RE: [leaf-devel] LEAF configuration process/frontend

2003-07-19 Thread Erich Titl
Mohan you may want to have a look at the rload stuff if did lately. It uses the exixting lrp.conf file for the purpose of loading packages over the net. This runs long after linuxrc has finished and does not require hacks in the existing system.

[leaf-devel] LEAF Platform

2003-07-22 Thread Erich Titl
Hi everybody I am just about to port Bering to a new embedded piece of hardware, except for a few keyboard errors quite successfully. I believe this platform could be very interesting for anyone contemplating a distribution of a standardized HW platform. Here is the link.

[leaf-devel] userland sources for Bering

2003-07-23 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Folks I am about to test an embedded platform for Bering. This Platform does not have a keyboard controller, the standard reboot does not work. According to information on the net this is due to the fact that normally reboot is using the keyboard controllers reset function. Jacques, could

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Platform

2003-07-23 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Michael At 17:50 23.07.2003, Michael D. Schleif wrote: Also sprach Erich Titl (Tue 22 Jul 02003 at 07:29:23PM +0200): No, no, Zarathustra is not a relative.. Hi everybody I am just about to port Bering to a new embedded piece of hardware, except for a few keyboard errors quite

RE: [leaf-devel] LEAF Platform

2003-07-24 Thread Erich Titl
Mohan At 14:07 24.07.2003, S Mohan wrote: I'm not sure if this will work or is an alias to init. Have you tried init 6 explicitly on command line. This is what is invoked by trapping ctrl-alt-del from keyboard controller I guess. true, and this is what it does at the end: echo -n Rebooting...

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Platform

2003-07-25 Thread Erich Titl
Charles At 06:41 25.07.2003 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: ...oops! Forgot to send to the list. Erich Titl wrote: If anyone has a deeper insight what exactly this system call will do please holler. I can't help much, but you might want to ask on the busybox list. There are frequent

[leaf-devel] Bering Kernel 2.4.20 recompile

2003-07-31 Thread Erich Titl
Hi everybody could anyone please enlighten me, I am recompiling the Bering kernel and I am getting these messages which make me wonder if by any chance in the config from Jacques' site there creeps some UML stuff. uml_netjig.c:73: pcap.h: No such file or directory make[4]: *** [uml_netjig.o]

Re: [leaf-devel] Re: leaf-devel] Bering development system.

2003-08-07 Thread Erich Titl
Greg At 23:15 06.08.2003 -0700, Greg Morgan wrote: S Mohan wrote: I think you will drive yourself nutty trying to compile on the RH box directly. Please read http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html. I stopped banging my head against the wall once I understood this article. The

[leaf-devel] Watchdog daemon on Bering

2003-09-09 Thread Erich Titl
Hi In order to get the reboot running on the SC1100 Geode Processor I am using the watchdog reboot mechanism. I have not found a way to tell the watchdog to use a different polling interval, e.g. it seems that it ignores the /etc/watchdog.conf file. Could anyone please comment on that.

[leaf-devel] pcengines wrap hardware and reboot

2003-09-10 Thread Erich Titl
Jaqcues, KaPeKa and everyone, hello OK, I got the driver for the pcengines wrap hardware running and can successfully reboot the system without the need of a keyboard controller. It requires a few quirks to Bering which I would like your comments on. I do not think this is too much of a

Re: [leaf-devel] [list repost] pcengines wrap hardware and reboot

2003-09-10 Thread Erich Titl
Hi kp K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote the following at 22:59 10.09.2003: Erich; I do not understand what changes you like to see in mainstream release? Kernel: -Make softdog a module -Add support for the wd1100 driver as a module and one could make /etc/init.d/watchdog to recognize the module

[leaf-devel] Re: pcengines WRAP/ embedded LEAF without kbd

2003-09-12 Thread Erich Titl
Hi The work on the pcengines hardware still had another, rather cosmetic problem, which is now solved by a patch to pc_keyb.c and the config files. At startup linux tries to identify the PS2 keyboard which, if the controller is missing, fails miserably by writing a few hundred controller

[leaf-devel] support for pcengines hardware

2003-09-30 Thread Erich Titl
Hi folks Some time ago I posted a request to include support for the pcengines wrap board here. Unfortunately there has not been much of an echo. Could the Bering crews please tell me if they would consider to include the necessary modules and mods into the base line. Basically there are 2

Re: [leaf-devel] support for pcengines hardware

2003-09-30 Thread Erich Titl
Eric thanks for replying. At 12:24 30.09.2003 +0200, Eric Spakman wrote: Hello Erich, I took a look at the driver source, but it looks like it also need a /dev/wd entry to function. Where did you take the driver from, I posted the new driver at the end of my development cycle. Unless you took

Re: [leaf-devel] support for pcengines hardware

2003-09-30 Thread Erich Titl
Eric let me try cover your last 2 messages in one Let me see if I get your proposal right: -compile a new kernel with softdog and wd1100 as modules right -load one of the drivers somewhere in the boot process (and store them in one of the lrps) I believe we identified modules.lrp as the best

Re: [leaf-devel] support for pcengines hardware

2003-10-01 Thread Erich Titl
Eric At 21:29 30.09.2003 +0200, Eric Spakman wrote: Erich, -load one of the drivers somewhere in the boot process (and store them in one of the lrps) I believe we identified modules.lrp as the best place, but then ... see below That always imply a change in the base line, because the

Re: [leaf-devel] support for pcengines hardware

2003-10-05 Thread Erich Titl
Erich Eric Spakman wrote the following at 15:13 02.10.2003: Erich, Funny, what compiler version are you using? GCC-2.95, but I compiled it from within VMware. I will try a recompile with a real computer. I compile on a 'real' computer, although not with its native compiler. Here are my

Re: [leaf-devel] support for pcengines hardware

2003-10-05 Thread Erich Titl
Eric Eric Spakman wrote the following at 19:44 05.10.2003: Erich, It's indeed a little weird and I never saw it before (maybe I just didn't notice it before) Anyway, I have a kernel, modules.lrp and updated /etc/init.d/hwclock. hwclock ?? watchdog The kernel and modules.lrp can be used with

Re: [leaf-devel] support for pcengines hardware

2003-10-09 Thread Erich Titl
Eric At 07:55 09.10.2003 +, you wrote: Hi Erich, ... Will let you know when I know the right answers. Ok thanks. I talked to the other Bering-uClibc developers, if the tests with wd1100 support go well for standard hardware and it wors for you with pcengines, expect the wd1100 kernel

Re: [leaf-devel] leaf-project.org domain renewal

2003-10-11 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 21:16 11.10.2003, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Mike Noyes wrote: Everyone, Our domain will expire in Feb. I was wondering how we should handle renewal. Steven paid for our first two years. Registrar Name: Register.com Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com Registrar Homepage:

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering Crew looks for expansion

2003-12-18 Thread Erich Titl
Eric At 23:31 17.12.2003 +0100, Eric Wolzak wrote: Hello everybody, As you might know , Jacques has stopped, and gave the rudder to me. My plans with Bering are. 1. update kernel to 2.4.23. 2. update packages 3 revise the documentation and make some improvements. 4 create a basic webinterface.

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering Crew looks for expansion

2003-12-22 Thread Erich Titl
Eric I read some of the other posts, these are interesting times for the LEAF community. Having a structured approach for new Bering (glibc or uClibc) releases sounds very appealing. It will be interesting to see how such a project will evolve from a management position. At 23:47 19.12.2003

[leaf-devel] RE: [leaf-user] ip_conntrack_ftp -find: /proc/19764 No such file or directory

2003-12-29 Thread Erich Titl
Alex (crossposting to leaf-devel) At 08:29 29.12.2003 +0100, Alex Rhomberg wrote: Hello. I'm runnig Bering 1.2 with 3 NIC's and wireless access on DMZ. Since I put third NIC I noticed message on boot: ip_conntrack_ftp -find: /proc/19764 No such file or directory Using

RE: [leaf-devel] RE: [leaf-user] ip_conntrack_ftp -find: /proc/19764 No such file or directory

2003-12-29 Thread Erich Titl
Alex At 15:11 29.12.2003 +0100, Alex Rhomberg wrote: ... It starts its search at /, which is probably fine to detect all sorts of modules in the directory tree. This obviously is the part that produces the original error message. Not looking everywhere for modules might break some setups

RE: [leaf-devel] Project Description Goals

2004-01-18 Thread Erich Titl
Alex At 10:34 16.01.2004 +0100, Alex Rhomberg wrote: Mike wrote: A Linux Embedded Appliance Framework delivered in easy-to-use branches. Specific branches target a variety of environments. Anything from enterprise networks and Internet service providers to small office/home

Re: [leaf-devel] package format/structure

2004-02-10 Thread Erich Titl
Martin At 22:08 10.02.2004, Martin Hejl wrote: ..The last one caught my eye - since one of the things LEAF surely is lacking is a mechanism for updating packages (I guess the recent discussion about Smoothwall made that clear too). Unfortunately, luau doesn't seem like an option to us (at

Re: [leaf-devel] package format/structure

2004-02-11 Thread Erich Titl
Martin At 22:49 10.02.2004 +0100, Martin Hejl wrote: It would (and hopefully will) be - but unless I completely misunderstood what they're working on, it doesn't adress all the aspects of updating packages (and I don't think it should either). So yes, the new config system should make things

Re: [leaf-devel] package format/structure

2004-02-15 Thread Erich Titl
Eric At 19:16 13.02.2004 +0100, Eric Spakman wrote: ... This isn't always a solution. Some programs change config structures from time to time, changing keywords or config file names. Having them split can give strange problems. True, like I said, it's the ultimate challenge. A mature product

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel 2.4.24 + superfreeswan anybody?

2004-02-24 Thread Erich Titl
Jaime At 12:59 24.02.2004 +0100, Jaime Nebrera Herrera wrote: Hi all, We are completelly stuck in this task. We are trying to get NAT Traversal (or superfreesawn) on newer kernels (after 2.4.20) without any luck, as it gives an error during compilation. What error, please Erich THINK

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel 2.4.24 + superfreeswan anybody?

2004-02-24 Thread Erich Titl
Jaime At 14:53 24.02.2004 +0100, Jaime Nebrera Herrera wrote: Hi, First of all, we have used gcc 3.2.3 and glibc 2.3.2, superfreeswan 1.99.8 on a Gentoo 1.4 system. We have downloaded a vanilla 2.4.24 kernel, applied the patches and compiled. This is the error we get: * You are

Re: [leaf-devel] FreeS/WAN news

2004-03-02 Thread Erich Titl
Tom At 19:08 01.03.2004 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Mike Noyes wrote: Everyone, Here is some relevant news. Can someone take a look at packaging KAME? http://www.freeswan.org/ending_letter.html After more than five years of active development, the FreeS/WAN

Re: [leaf-devel] Re: [Shorewall-users] Feature request for shorewall.lrp

2004-03-05 Thread Erich Titl
At 08:49 05.03.2004 +0100, franco segna wrote: Alex Rhomberg wrote: snip Shouldn't it be /etc/shorewall/ rather? I prefer my config in /etc - Alex snip I agree with Etienne's considerations and with Alex' preferred location. To simplify update and field testing procedures, wouldn't be

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-14 Thread Erich Titl
At 16:36 14.03.2004 -0600, you wrote: re: mounting various partitions in /linuxrc I have been thinking more about this issue, and have come to the following conclusion (mantra). Repeat after me: ... linuxrc IS NOT init ... ... linuxrc IS NOT init ... ... linuxrc IS NOT init ... true, true

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-16 Thread Erich Titl
Charles At 06:11 16.03.2004 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Eric Spakman wrote: Hello Charles, Files like mount.boot, boot.fstype and /dev/boot are removed (which is great btw), but they are used in some of the lrcfg/lrpkg scripts AFAIK. So maybe some of these scripts needs some changes too.

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-16 Thread Erich Titl
At 10:29 16.03.2004 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Erich Titl wrote: snip 3) Ignore the problem with manually adding packages once the system is up and running. :) or insert backuptype NONE if not specified at lrpkg -i I looked into linuxrc myself and found that it does not use lrpkg

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-17 Thread Erich Titl
Eric At 09:35 17.03.2004 +, Eric Spakman wrote: Erich, Charles, Also note that I don't believe the POSIXness scripts (lrpkg included) are available currently in the initial ramdisk, but are in root.lrp. True, but then why. It certainly is not that big. Because they were never

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-17 Thread Erich Titl
Eric At 19:18 17.03.2004, Eric Spakman wrote: Hello Erich, .. That doesn't really change the case and makes things even more inflexible. You need some code to uncompress and install the package manager. It doesn't matter if you use a compressed fs or a tar.gz (lrp) file. The problem is that

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-17 Thread Erich Titl
At 17:53 17.03.2004, you wrote: Hello Erich, ... That's only partial possible, at least a few few packages need to be installed in the linuxrc script (etc.lrp, config.lrp, ..) to make it work. So there needs to be some code in the initrd package to install those packages. Well I believe

Re: [leaf-devel] Multiple OpenSSL Vulnerabilities

2004-03-18 Thread Erich Titl
Juan what glibc will you be based on ? Thanks Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-19 Thread Erich Titl
Charles At 16:31 18.03.2004 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: .. Any idea why the FILESYSTEMS variable is behaving oddly? Just a shot in the dark, define FILESYSTEMS on top of the loop. HTH Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC

Re: [leaf-devel] Almost Write Protected Hard Disk

2004-03-21 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 12:10 21.03.2004 +, The Meddler wrote: I have an old laptop which has a floppy and two pcmcia slots that I wanted to use for LRP. It doesn't like 168k disks very much and I liked the speed of booting off a hard disk, but I was not so keen on the fact that the HD is writable. I came up

Re: [leaf-devel] Almost Write Protected Hard Disk

2004-03-22 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 16:35 22.03.2004 +, you wrote: Erich Titl wrote: Personally I doubt it. Reading and building an ISO filesystem is rather trivial and should your LEAF box ever be compromised replacing the ISO file is easy. I would rather just remove the modules for IDE support from memory at the end

Re: [leaf-devel] Multiple OpenSSL Vulnerabilities

2004-03-22 Thread Erich Titl
At 17:02 22.03.2004 +0100, Juan Jesus Prieto wrote: Hi erich, El Lun 22 Mar 2004 14:44, escribiste: Juan I built a dynamically linked sshd, it seems to be considerably smaller than your package, requires a few support packages though. It works in my Bering 1.2 environment. Here are the

Re: [leaf-devel] Almost Write Protected Hard Disk

2004-03-22 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 19:38 22.03.2004, you wrote: Erich Titl wrote: You might even make insmod only available at boot time. Then getting access to your harware becomes quite a challenge. Hmm... that's food for thought. It would be easier to configure as well. I could use an admin floppy to load insmod and disk

Re: [leaf-devel] Almost Write Protected Hard Disk

2004-03-23 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 18:38 22.03.2004 +, The Meddler wrote: Erich Titl wrote: You might even make insmod only available at boot time. Then getting access to your harware becomes quite a challenge. Hmm... that's food for thought. It would be easier to configure as well. I could use an admin floppy to load

[leaf-devel] Bering startup flaw

2004-04-01 Thread Erich Titl
Hi everybody I have observed erratic startup behaviour with Bering possibly related to DHCP. Network interfaces are started by the ifup -a command in /etc/init.d/networking. Ifup is a binary I have not been able to find the source for, maybe someone can point me to a link Nevertheless, it

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering startup flaw

2004-04-02 Thread Erich Titl
Mike At 23:46 01.04.2004 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 23:21, Erich Titl wrote: Network interfaces are started by the ifup -a command in /etc/init.d/networking. Ifup is a binary I have not been able to find the source for, maybe someone can point me to a link ifupdown

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering startup flaw

2004-04-02 Thread Erich Titl
Mike At 00:17 02.04.2004 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 00:09, Erich Titl wrote: At 23:46 01.04.2004 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 23:21, Erich Titl wrote: Network interfaces are started by the ifup -a command in /etc/init.d/networking. Ifup is a binary I

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering startup flaw

2004-04-06 Thread Erich Titl
Ewald At 09:33 06.04.2004 +0200, Ewald Wasscher wrote: On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 11:28, Erich Titl wrote: Thanks, found it and got all puzzled by the thousands of ways people find to make their code difficult to use. I admit, the sheer mention of G. Knuth in the programming/documentation method

[leaf-devel] Re: [leaf-user] OT: UPX v1.11

2004-04-06 Thread Erich Titl
At 06:29 06.04.2004 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Vic Berdin wrote: Hi, I've been searching for a downloadable source of the said upx version. An attemp to log to cvs using: cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/upx login fails. Any help/link/e-mail attachment with complete (tgz/bz2)

[leaf-devel] problem compiling openswan userland on slink (for Bering)

2004-04-07 Thread Erich Titl
Hi I am trying to compile the opsec userland code for openswan 1.0.1 within an slink chrooted environment. Basically I am missing a few type declarations. here is my compile command, do not be fooled by the freeswan directory name make KERNELSRC=/src/2.4.24/linux \

Re: [leaf-devel] Feature Request: Shorewall 2.0 LocalConfDir

2004-04-13 Thread Erich Titl
Tom At 18:31 10.04.2004, Tom Eastep wrote: Tom Eastep wrote: Stijn Jonker wrote: It works fine here after a small modification in firewall on line 5757: Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions... Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf...

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >