Hi,
Am I the only one for whom the page is hidden behind an
annoying sign up overlay?
axel
Le 2013-09-09 05:12, Shava Nerad a
écrit :
As far as I am concerned it is not. I might have posted the
link if you had not brought it to our attention. Thank you.
On
Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:36
On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 11:23:30 +0200
Axel Simon axelsi...@axelsimon.net wrote:
Hi,
Am I the only one for whom the page is hidden behind an
annoying sign up overlay?
axel
Nope, I got that too. You can remove it with the developer
tools/firebug. A bit disappointing that they go all HEY
Which can be dismissed with a click normally...
--
Al Billings
http://makehacklearn.org
On Monday, September 9, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Axel Simon wrote:
Hi,
Am I the only one for whom the page is hidden behind an annoying “sign up”
overlay?
axel
Le 2013-09-09 05:12, Shava Nerad a
On other sites, yes - that's what I'm used to.
But on this site I didn't see anything that even remotely resembles
anything approximating a close button; Clicking besides the popup
won't do anything either.
--
Liberationtech is a public list whose archives are searchable on Google.
Violations
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 12:50:49PM +0200, phryk wrote:
http://cryptome.org/2013/09/nsa-cowboy.htm
9 September 2013
The Cowboy of the NSA Keith Alexander
Wired -- my old employer -- did publish a NSA story recently,
concentrating on Ft. Meade's new-ish offensive push. But I'm not sure
it was really a profile in the classic sense.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Joseph Mornin jos...@mornin.org wrote:
Wired also did a profile:
Guys:
I know the registration wall can be a bit of a pain. Asa reader, I'm
not nuts about them, either. But these measures really are important
to FP's long-term financial health.
Anyway, in the future, let me see if I can get links I post to Libtech
white-listed, so you guys don't have to go
On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 11:23:30 +0200
Axel Simon axelsi...@axelsimon.net wrote:
Am I the only one for whom the page is hidden behind an
annoying sign up overlay?
If you disable javascript for the site there is no overlay. If you
selectively block javascript from anything not fp.com, the overlay
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:15:02AM -0400, liberationt...@lewman.us wrote:
On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 11:23:30 +0200
Axel Simon axelsi...@axelsimon.net wrote:
Am I the only one for whom the page is hidden behind an
annoying sign up overlay?
If you disable javascript for the site there is no
Have fun tilting that windmill, Mr. Quixote.
Like it or not, to fully use websites at this point, you generally need things
like Javascript and CSS. The reason that most folks, even security folks like
the ones I work with, don't run with NoScript on all the time is that it breaks
the net as
Hello,
I saw this article on The Guardian[1] and it mentioned a librarian who
posted a sign that looked like this:
http://www.librarian.net/pics/antipat4.gif and would remove it if visited
by the FBI. So a naive question comes to mind: If I operated an internet
service, and I posted a thing that
On 9 Sep 2013, at 17:29, Scott Arciszewski kobrasre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I saw this article on The Guardian[1] and it mentioned a librarian who posted
a sign that looked like this: http://www.librarian.net/pics/antipat4.gif and
would remove it if visited by the FBI. So a naive
On 09/07/2013 02:46 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 12:26:22PM -0400, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Hi Eugen,
When Bruce Schneier made the call for people to come forward
and describe being asked to degrade standards or build backdoors
I don't think this is what he meant.
Bruce
Presumably, if this type of approach became widely adopted, it would be
a useful service for an independent group to monitor the status of these
notices and periodically publish a report of which companies had removed
their notice.
On 09/09/2013 12:52 PM, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
Forgot the URL:
I wonder if there's a false analogy here. Hypothetically, the
librarian's sign could fall down (maybe the wind blew it over) whereas a
notice on a site would have to be removed via coding. There would be
little other explanation, even in the case where one does not
affirmatively renew the dead
It may be outside the mainstream, but so is our interest in-- and understanding
of-- security and privacy issues. nbsp;Judging by the millions who download
these tools, I am not alone in wanting to block scripts and tracking.
I'll save my security researchers using social media (outside of
Forgot the URL:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/sep/09/nsa-sabotage-dead-mans-switch
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Scott Arciszewski kobrasre...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I saw this article on The Guardian[1] and it mentioned a librarian who
posted a sign that looked like this:
gt;gt;Like it or not, to fully use websites at this point, you generally need
things like Javascript and CSS.
I disagree. nbsp;Not only do I want the protection from .js vulnerabilites and
tracking when I browse, I just want the text. nbsp;Not a bunch of useless
social media buttons and
That is genius.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Case Black casebl...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a more subtle variant to this idea...
Regularly state (put up a sign) that you HAVE in fact received an
NSL...with the public understanding that it must be a lie (there's no law
against falsely
You are awesome,clever, and full of tricks. :) Should I credit you with
this?
yrs,
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Case Black casebl...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a more subtle variant to this idea...
Regularly state (put up a sign) that you HAVE in fact received an
NSL...with the public
That, and civil disobedience á la Lavabit.
/P
On 09 September, 2013 - Matt Johnson wrote:
All of the sneaky signs, email headers and web page badges assume the
FBI, or whoever the adversary is are incompetent or inept. That does
not see like a safe assumption to me. The only prudent
I absolutely agree with your point...cleverness alone doesn't go very far
against ruthless adversaries.
To paraphrase a prior post that's quite relevant to this discussion:
...the members of this list are uniquely qualified to influence that
policy debate in terms of shaping both hard and soft
All of the sneaky signs, email headers and web page badges assume the
FBI, or whoever the adversary is are incompetent or inept. That does
not see like a safe assumption to me. The only prudent approach is to
assume your adversary is intelligent and competent.
My guess is that the only defense
I suggest your use of the net is well outside the mainstream, even amongst
security folks. Some of us actually use social networking, for example, or
don't want ugly, half broken websites simply because we fear a JavaScript zero
day.
Al
--
Al Billings
http://makehacklearn.org
On Monday,
On 09/09/2013 03:40 PM, Case Black wrote:
There's a more subtle variant to this idea...
Regularly state (put up a sign) that you HAVE in fact received an
NSL...with the public understanding that it must be a lie (there's no
law against falsely making such a claim...yet!).
When actually
On 09/09/2013 12:50 PM, Al Billings wrote:
Have fun tilting that windmill, Mr. Quixote.
Like it or not, to fully use websites at this point, you generally
need things like Javascript and CSS. The reason that most folks, even
security folks like the ones I work with, don't run with NoScript on
I clicked, I got the article no problem,
I read the article and enjoyed it with the sick fascination we tend to read
these things. Odd to think of FP as sort of tabloid celebrity profile of
the monsters of the field, eh? ;)
I reposted it on G+ with the comment:
===
*Foreign Policy frames
Oh yes, but it's funny as hell. There's something to be said for that in
times like this.
Mouse, meet owl.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Case Black casebl...@gmail.com wrote:
I absolutely agree with your point...cleverness alone doesn't go very far
against ruthless adversaries.
To
There's a more subtle variant to this idea...
Regularly state (put up a sign) that you HAVE in fact received an
NSL...with the public understanding that it must be a lie (there's no law
against falsely making such a claim...yet!).
When actually served with an NSL, you would now be bound by law
I'm kind of surprised FP's javascript is the main topic of discussion around
this article. Thank you FP and Shane Harris for this very informative article!
Second that. This is why we regularly tweet FP content because the FP
is one of the best sources for liberationtech-like news out there.
I'm writing to pass along some news from Germany - where national
elections will take place later this month.
Last Saturday, 10,000 (maybe 15,000) people took to the streets of
Berlin to demonstrate for Freedom Not Fear. This marks the third (and
largest) anti surveillance demonstration the city
Follow the money.
--
Liberationtech is a public list whose archives are searchable on Google.
Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
Just stumbled across this post and thought it might be of interest to
some on the list.
In a nutshell, Cryptogeddon is an online cyber security war game. The
game consists of various missions, each of which challenges the
participant to apply infosec tools to solve technology puzzles – an
online
33 matches
Mail list logo
