Quite frankly most of us have been in this business long enough to know
there is NO perfect system. Each system is suited for different things.
I believe we on this list are trying on daily to determine what the best
uses of linux on 390/Z hardware are. There will be and have been
failures, but
Greetings;
I noticed that the May 2002 stream includes changes for gcc,
glibc and binutils. In the dark recesses of my memory I recall
that the last time I tried to update these three components
my system became inoperable because of a change in the format
of the object modules. Probably also
See: http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-06-03-009-26-NW-DP-PB;
Germany is on the verge of giving IBM a major public sector computer
contract
- and dealing a blow to software giant Microsoft in the process.
According to the Wall Street Journal, IBM will shortly announce a deal
which
Pat,
Had the same problem just after the April 30 code drop.
I re-downloaded from Developerworks on May 14, and
that problem (as well as a few others) disappeared.
I'm up and running on 2.4.17.
Thanks for the reply, however, I downloaded again and found that
I had the latest versions of the
As frequently happens, I stumbled over something interesting while following
various hyperlinks from Neale's posting about IBM's Linux contract in
Germany.
It turns out that Sistina Software has made its Global File System (GFS)
package non-free software. This apparently happened back in August
My company is a subscriber of the Giga Information Group. One of my
co-workers just forwarded me a new paper by David Mastrobattista with the
above title. Distribution of the document is restricted to only
subscribers, so I can't post it on linuxvm.org, but if you or your company
has a
Is there a linux/390 based tn3270 client? Shipped with SLES7?
Phil Tully
Does anyone have any experiences with the Sharp Zaurus 5500 PDA? Anything
you
can pass on? There are varying reports as to whether the Voyager CF/VGA card
can be used to provide connection to VGA devices.
The device uses Linux 2.4.x as its operating system on a StrongARM CPU. It
has a JVM,
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/7814/
is the official web page for x3270
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 13:35, Philip J. Tully wrote:
Is there a linux/390 based tn3270 client? Shipped with SLES7?
Phil Tully
--
-
Michael Martin
Phil,
Yes, SuSE ships x3270.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Philip J. Tully [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linux based tn3270 client
Is there a linux/390 based tn3270 client? Shipped with SLES7?
Phil Tully
Have you looked at x3270? I use it. It will run as an X app, in a
console, or as a curses based app.
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/7814/
Chris Zimmerman
Philip J. Tully wrote:
Is there a linux/390 based tn3270 client? Shipped with SLES7?
Phil Tully
I have recently installed Oracle Developer's Edition on SuSE Linux/390.
When I try to start the Intelligent Agent, I get the following error.
Mon Jun 3 11:59:43 EDT 2002
Certain conflicts were resolved during discovery
Please consult
At 16:21 03-06-02, Dennis Wicks wrote:
Anyway, is there any danger of this happening with these changes?
You probably refer to moving from Linux-2.2.16 to Linux-2.4. This
was painful because the ELF magic number changed along the way
and that got you in a catch-22 situation.
That's not normally
How the heck do you back up Linux with LVM under VM???
Well, you don't. Would you try to back up a running z/OS system from VM?
You'll either need to take down or otherwise quiesce your Linux/390 systems
and run DDR's from VM (or that other system, z/OS) or find a native
Linux/390 backup
I am trying to set up REXEC to run on a Linux for S/390 machine. I'll
stipulate to all of the commentary about security... It seems that any
client that tries to connect is getting hung. I tried from Linux on Intel
and Windows NT, they both just sit after entering the password.
In the
Then we started to load Oracle tables and started to get a few I/O
errors.
Could you post the actual errors? I can't read the IO subsystem error
messages but there are others on this list who can.
My question is, has anyone else seen this and is there an explanation?
The Compatible Disk
Hi Kevin,
If you want a simple (and free) scheduler for VM I'll be happy to send you
a little REXX EXEC that will do what you need. You'll need the WAKEUP
MODULE which formerly was a part of the separately licensed CMS Utilities
Feature (CUF), but if you are running z/VM 4 I understand it is
Argghhh...
OK. I seem to have solved my own problem. Actually Jeff Barnard solved it
for me this morning, but after he gave me the solution I switched the machine
I was testing on and completely forgot to implement his solution on the new
machine... duh!
The solution was to add the host
- Original Message -
From: Rich Smrcina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: REXEC hang
Argghhh...
OK. I seem to have solved my own problem. Actually Jeff Barnard solved
it
for me this morning, but after he gave me the solution I
Rich,
Try running inetd with the -d debug option and see what, if any,
information comes out. Or, since the process that is failing is not really
inetd, I wonder if putting something (possibly silly) like strace -f -F
/usr/sbin/tcpd in.rexecd in /etc/inetd.conf would generate anything
I ran into the same thing recently. I have entries in my /etc/hosts file
for a number of clients(X , Y and Z). This now works!!!
You suggested that DNS would have worked fine too.I have my Linux
machine pointing to a WINS/DNS server on NT. I can resolve the host names
for machines X, Y
The lead-in at Linux Today is kind of bizarre, because the link to the
complete story is not to the Wall Street Journal, but BBC News at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_2023000/2023127.stm. The
article also talks as thought the announcement has already been made (which
is
Rob,
When you do the reverse lookup, i.e., nslookup 123.45.67.89 for X, Y, and
Z, do you get the hostname back?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Rob Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 6:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: REXEC hang
I ran into the
On 04.06.2002 at 08:05:14, Rob Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can resolve the host names for machines X, Y and Z but still needed to add
X, Y and Z to /etc/hosts.
DNS should definitely work (I *never* modify /etc/hosts for anything but the
machine's own address). Remember that TCP
The abstract of the paper on Giga's public section states Proceed with
extreme caution when evaluating performance benchmarks that span different
computing platforms. We highly recommend clients monitor production
workloads and use their own real-world data whenever possible to gain the
The site is updated to, but not through, May 31st.
Mark Post
DNS entries worked fine for me, once I got the inetd.conf syntax worked out,
my VSE machines (which have DNS entries, not host entries) worked fine.
All of the inetd.conf entries explicitly use the syntax:
service : address
with spaces around the colon characters. So I had to specify:
#2 How the heck do you back up Linux with LVM under VM??? All my tape
devices are allocated to Z/OS and since there really isn't any scheduler
or
tape mgmt system on VM, I would like to run the backups from Z/OS.
Hi Kevin,
The ability to do this very thing is a critical success factor for our
28 matches
Mail list logo
