Re: [LyX/master] Update fr.po for beta

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Sure, he does it for branch, but I guess it's up to Scott to do the same > > for master. > > I could do it if I knew how, but it's still cvs stuff I guess. > > I don't know either how to do that. Maybe Richard can tell us the > necessary commands. If you have svn

Who knows about inputMethodEvent and input methods in general?

I am currently working on some secret summer project (well, more like not ready that secret), and I am wondering about GuiWorkarea::inputMethodEvent. In particular, I do not understand why it could be allowed to draw on screen, especially since we are not ain a paint event. In order to have

Re: Automatic setting TEXINPUTS environment for lyx provided files

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > I implemented it now in cmake build. At first, everything seemed to work. > Reconfiguring lyx... > Load examples/chessgame.lyx > --> The selected document class Chess requires external files ... > Pdf creation is OK though. >

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

Le 16/07/2017 à 21:34, Kornel Benko a écrit : If not now, then probably never. There is no optimal start, except at start of a project. Not necessarily. We do not have much spare time to do it right, and this kind of thing needs to be correct on first run. We can discuss this in the 2.4

Re: [LyX/master] Copy documentation of new features of Additional.lyx in de, es, fr and ja documentation files as change tracking and remove chnage tracking in Additional.lyx

Am Sonntag, 16. Juli 2017 um 16:56:48, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Sonntag, 16. Juli 2017 um 04:16:22, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:23:33PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:34:53PM +0200, jpc wrote: > > >

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

Le 16/07/2017 à 21:24, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:04:11PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I do not think that minted in itself is relevant here. My point is that shell-escape should be treated in the needauth framework. This is also my point. I will not accept

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

On 16 July 2017 at 21:15, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/07/2017 à 20:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> "no debate" is good, but we want even more than that. We want a few more >> "yes let's go for it!" before we impose a new style. I think we got >> support from

Re: dash patch for stable

Le 14/06/2017 à 20:08, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : OK. So we are stuck. I want to come to a decision before beta1. I'm not sure what to suggest. I get the feeling that we've had enough discussion and further discussion will not lead to a unanimous agreement. In this case, I suppose we need to

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

On 16 July 2017 at 21:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/07/2017 à 21:34, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >> If not now, then probably never. There is no optimal start, except >> at start of a project. >> > > Not necessarily. We do not have much spare time to do it right, and

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

Le 16/07/2017 à 22:02, Christian Ridderström a écrit : Indeed, my original message was about doing things that had a moderate price tag attached to them. Imposing a style is IMO too expensive for us at this point. I'm definitely not looking to impose a new style and I'm spending

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

Hi Scott, Sorry for the delay. I was very busy over the past two weeks. Le 05/07/2017 à 06:54, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 02:36:49PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: Le 27/06/2017 à 23:45, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit : needauth was a urgently needed mitigation of the security

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

Le 17/07/2017 à 00:49, Christian Ridderström a écrit : On 5 July 2017 at 06:59, Scott Kostyshak > wrote: Dear all, This is an important topic since it involves security. I'd appreciate it if you spent some time on understanding the issue.

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

Le 05/07/2017 à 06:54, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 02:37:41PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: Le 27/06/2017 à 21:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Where I think there is disagreement is on whether we take a paternalistic approach of "are you sure you know what you're doing? Think

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

Le 15/07/2017 à 19:06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 15/07/2017 à 18:55, Christian Ridderström a écrit : In my opinion, if we don't reach consensus easily on formatting issues, we should at least for now refrain from using a .clang-format. This is probably what is going to take too much

Re: [LyX/master] Fix uninitialized members outfd and infd

Le 06/07/2017 à 14:55, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 06/07/2017 à 14:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : commit 02c9d2e67c16400588dfb103df284121520912a0 Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: Thu Jul 6 14:46:03 2017 +0200 Fix uninitialized members outfd and infd

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 07:53:29PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 15/07/2017 à 19:28, Christian Ridderström a écrit : > > I hope we can at least see if a debate is necessary, we might get lucky. > > Perhaps the current source code is mainly consistent, in which case we > > could align to

Re: [LyX/master] Update fr.po for beta

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 04:33:57PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Sure, he does it for branch, but I guess it's up to Scott to do the same > > > for master. > > > I could do it if I knew how, but it's still cvs stuff I guess. > > > > I don't know either how to do that.

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

Le 05/07/2017 à 06:59, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Dear all, This is an important topic since it involves security. I'd appreciate it if you spent some time on understanding the issue. Since this seems to be blocking for beta, I will risk a (cautious) foot on the minefield. It does not seems

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

Le 16/07/2017 à 20:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : "no debate" is good, but we want even more than that. We want a few more "yes let's go for it!" before we impose a new style. I think we got support from Kornel, but we would want more to go forward. There are other costs to changing many lines

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

Le 16/07/2017 à 22:48, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : Agreed. OTOH, I do not want to have support for minted that require to hardcode stuff outside of the Listings inset. This is a false problem. For me, minted support could stay as it is now. Who needs it can read the fine manual and take all

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

On 16 July 2017 at 22:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What I mean is that my absolute priority these days is to have 2.3.0 out. Fully understood. > The cleanups I proposed where chosen to have a minimal effect on release > date. Anything that requires too much thinking

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On 17 July 2017 at 00:57, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:49:05AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > > > > Enrico argued that there are other (equally) dangerous converters already > > in LyX. Then that's something to address. Does it have to be for this

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:04:11PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > I do not think that minted in itself is relevant here. My point is that > shell-escape should be treated in the needauth framework. This is also my point. I will not accept anything that is valid only for minted. If minted

Re: [LyX/master] Update fr.po for beta

Le 16/07/2017 à 20:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I don't have svn commit privileges. Also, I don't actually know how to use svn. Do you want svn privileges? Do you want to learn some y2k technology that is not needed anymore? ;) Seriously, it is less mind-damaging than git, but for this

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

Am Sonntag, 16. Juli 2017 um 21:15:42, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 16/07/2017 à 20:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > "no debate" is good, but we want even more than that. We want a few more > > "yes let's go for it!" before we impose a new style. I think we got > >

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:35:43PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/07/2017 à 21:24, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:04:11PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > > > I do not think that minted in itself is relevant here. My point is that > > >

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:49:05AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > > Enrico argued that there are other (equally) dangerous converters already > in LyX. Then that's something to address. Does it have to be for this > release? If that's something to discuss, I can't say. Are many users >

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

On 17 July 2017 at 00:48, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Dear Christian, > > I see that the operated obfuscation of issues is working with you. > Dear Enrico, Don't worry, all is not lost and any operation obfuscation has not yet succeeded in invading Sweden. I still know that I

Re: Automatic setting TEXINPUTS environment for lyx provided files

Am Sonntag, 16. Juli 2017 um 20:14:21, schrieb Enrico Forestieri > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > I implemented it now in cmake build. At first, everything seemed to work. > > Reconfiguring lyx... > > Load examples/chessgame.lyx > > -->

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 10:57:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/07/2017 à 22:48, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > > > Agreed. OTOH, I do not want to have support for minted that require to > > > hardcode stuff outside of the Listings inset. > > > > This is a false problem. For me,

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On 5 July 2017 at 06:59, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear all, > > This is an important topic since it involves security. I'd appreciate it > if you spent some time on understanding the issue. > > I see three options for what to do about the minted + shell-escape > issue: > > 1.

Re: Cleanup before 2.3.0?

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:10:31AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > On 16 July 2017 at 22:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > What I mean is that my absolute priority these days is to have 2.3.0 out. > > > Fully understood. > > > > The cleanups I proposed where

Re: [LyX/master] Copy documentation of new features of Additional.lyx in de, es, fr and ja documentation files as change tracking and remove chnage tracking in Additional.lyx

Am Sonntag, 16. Juli 2017 um 04:16:22, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:23:33PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:34:53PM +0200, jpc wrote: > > > commit c9f398d7c516f9e9f3df71e74231a87e639180b9 > > > Author: jpc > >

Re: [LyX/master] Copy documentation of new features of Additional.lyx in de, es, fr and ja documentation files as change tracking and remove chnage tracking in Additional.lyx

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:23:33PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:34:53PM +0200, jpc wrote: > > commit c9f398d7c516f9e9f3df71e74231a87e639180b9 > > Author: jpc > > Date: Wed Jul 12 22:31:30 2017 +0200 > > > >Copy documentation of new features