Re: [EXTERNAL] [mssms] Database compatibility

2017-03-21 Thread Spengler, Jeff
Take a look at this KB. https://support.microsoft.com/en-nz/help/3196320/sql-query-times-out-or-console-slow-on-certain-configuration-manager-database-queries SQL Server version Supported compatibility level values Recommended compatibility level for ConfigMgr SQL Server 2016 130, 120, 110,

[mssms] Database compatibility

2017-03-21 Thread Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
CM1610 SQL 2014 My SQL Dba just came over and mentioned that my SCCM databases are in 2008 compatibility mode. She asked if it would be ok to change that, and I said I don't know. WSUS is installed on this server as well. Are there any requirements for compatibility mode? Also, I was told

[mssms] Insomnia issues after implementing power management

2017-03-21 Thread Corkill, Daniel
We're trialling ConfigMgr power management and I'm seeing ~19% of those machines on the insomnia report due to rdbss. This article here http://dalestech.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/rdbss-process-insomnia-preventing.html says to use the group policy setting "Allow automatic sleep with open network

Re: [mssms] UEFI transfering

2017-03-21 Thread Adam Juelich
You do not NEED to move to UEFI at this point. You DO however if you want to leverage things like Device Guard and Credential Guard. That is up to your organization to decide. If some of those secure things aren't a priority or necessity I would start leveraging UEFI for newer machines and

RE: [EXTERNAL] [mssms] Database compatibility

2017-03-21 Thread Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
So, my CM_ database ended up being correct. The ones that are not, are ReportServer, the report server temp, and the SUSDB. Worth changing? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 12:55 PM To:

[mssms] Testing....

2017-03-21 Thread Magnus Tveten
Missing my SCCM e-mails... some how dropped off the list... Magnus Tveten _ The information transmitted in this message and its attachments (if any) is intended only for the person or entity

Re: [mssms] RE: Rights needed for image creation

2017-03-21 Thread Adam Juelich
Are you trying to have them import computers into the 'All Systems' Collection? If so, can't do itit's a built-in Collection that you can't mess with, for good reason. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Schultz, Michael A < michael.schu...@providence.org> wrote: > What does the adminui

Re: [EXTERNAL] [mssms] Database compatibility

2017-03-21 Thread Jason Wallace
Yes, I have been there and getting this right is like night and day. From a user experience perspective you'll see really horrible Software Center performance From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com on behalf of Spengler, Jeff

RE: [mssms] UEFI transfering

2017-03-21 Thread Chris Barnes
I would disagree with that. If you are undertaking a Windows 10 deployment, you should be doing everything in your power to get to UEFI, and turning on Credential Guard. (And using LAPS). Those two items will provide you with protection against Pass the Hash / Pass the Ticket attacks, which

[mssms] Rights needed for image creation

2017-03-21 Thread Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
I'm trying to setup a couple of guys from our Helpdesk to be able to create our Win10 image within SCCM (1610). I've given them the Operating Systems Deployment Manager role, put the All Systems collection, and Default Security Scope. They're telling me that when they try to manually import a

[mssms] RE: Rights needed for image creation

2017-03-21 Thread Schultz, Michael A
What does the adminui log on their machine say the error is? Michael Schultz Client Systems Engineering, SCCM Engineer Information Systems Providence Health & Services michael.schu...@providence.org From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

Re: [mssms] UEFI transfering

2017-03-21 Thread Adam Juelich
Again, I think it depends on the organization and protocols in place. But yes, you're correct. LAPS doesn't require UEFI so that is a moot point. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Chris Barnes < chris.bar...@coretekservices.com> wrote: > I would disagree with that. If you are undertaking a

[mssms] USMT Hard-Link not cleaning all information in REGEDIT

2017-03-21 Thread Kevin Ray
Hi All, When i'm trying to image a machine using hard link(USMT Capture Locally by using Links instead of by copying Files)..Still I can able to see old OS Image related registry information Under (*HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion)*. also i want to understand how