[osol-discuss] help in clearing the login screen....
Hi All, Am new to Solaris.I have installed open solaris express community edition b66.The installation is successful.While installing i was asked for an alphanumeric username which i entered as pcr123. The login screen also came successfully.But when i enterd the username it didnt accept.It says login incorrect.Also i tried the user name as root.Still the same problem.I didnt enter any password.Anyway i can skip this screen ??? I dont want any username or password. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Equivalent of OBP 'probe-scsi-all' from inside
Dear Kyle, The number of cable connected has nothing to do with the controllers that is visible. Even if you are connected through just one cable, the number of controllers visible will be the same. But it seems like what you are asking for is lun masking. That is seeing just some luns and not seeing some. So if this is what you want to do, than in normal entry level storage arrays we will have to implement it on the client side ( solaris box connected to the array ). Hope this helps. -- Chandan Maddanna This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o
Dear Frank, I use this small script i had written for mounting iso images. hope it helps.. Save the below contents in a file called mountiso.sh #!/usr/bin/bash mkdir $2 lofiadm -a $1 /dev/lofi/1 mount -F hsfs -o ro /dev/lofi/1 $2 echo -e \n\t I have mounted $1 under the folder $2\n\n and then give this script file executable permission form command prompt. # chmod +x ./mountiso.sh and use this script to mount iso images... For example lets say you have an iso image called /opt/testfile1.iso and you want to mount it under /testfilecontents Than use the script as follows : # ./mountiso.sh /opt/testfile1.iso /testfilecontents and you are done, you will have all the contents of the iso visible under /testfilecontents folder. Best Regards, -- Chandan Maddanna This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o
Chandan Thanks for your detailed explanation, but my requirement is a little different from what you have done here, I want to mount an IMG file, not an ISO file, and also I want to specify the mount offset during mounting. Thanks! Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chandan Maddanna Sent: 2007年12月12日 16:50 To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o Dear Frank, I use this small script i had written for mounting iso images. hope it helps.. Save the below contents in a file called mountiso.sh #!/usr/bin/bash mkdir $2 lofiadm -a $1 /dev/lofi/1 mount -F hsfs -o ro /dev/lofi/1 $2 echo -e \n\t I have mounted $1 under the folder $2\n\n and then give this script file executable permission form command prompt. # chmod +x ./mountiso.sh and use this script to mount iso images... For example lets say you have an iso image called /opt/testfile1.iso and you want to mount it under /testfilecontents Than use the script as follows : # ./mountiso.sh /opt/testfile1.iso /testfilecontents and you are done, you will have all the contents of the iso visible under /testfilecontents folder. Best Regards, -- Chandan Maddanna This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o
#!/usr/bin/bash
mkdir $2
lofiadm -a $1 /dev/lofi/1
mount -F hsfs -o ro /dev/lofi/1 $2 echo -e \n\t I have mounted $1 under
the folder $2\n\n
You should realize that lofiadm actually outputs the device used, so
the script can be written so as not to require only /dev/lofi/1
I've attached my scripts which I use for mounting/unmounting lofi volumes.
It detects pcfs, ufs and hsfs filesystem and mounts them; it remembers
the mount and a single lofiumount without arguments will unmount all
you mounted.
I've written these a long time ago, shortly after lofiadm was added,
I think.
Usage is simple:
lofimount file.iso /mnt
lofiumount /mnt
lofimount file.ufs /mnt
etc.
#!/usr/bin/sh
#
# CDDL HEADER START
#
# The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
# Common Development and Distribution License (the License).
# You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
#
# You can obtain a copy of the license at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE
# or http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions
# and limitations under the License.
#
# When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
# file and include the License file at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE.
# If applicable, add the following below this CDDL HEADER, with the
# fields enclosed by brackets [] replaced with your own identifying
# information: Portions Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]
#
# CDDL HEADER END
#
#
# Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
# Use is subject to license terms.
#
# Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
PATH=/usr/sbin:$PATH
export PATH
if [ ! -x /usr/sbin/lofiadm ]
then
echo $0: Only supported on systems with lofiadm (Solaris 8+) 21
exit 1
fi
usage ()
{
echo Usage: $0 [-o options] file dir 12
exit 1
}
options=
while getopts o: c
do
case $c in
o) if [ -n $options ]
then
usage
fi
options=$OPTARG,
;;
*) usage;;
esac
done
shift `expr $OPTIND - 1`
state=/var/run/.lofi-$LOGNAME
if [ $# = 0 ]
then
cat $state
exit
fi
f=$1
dir=$2
if [ ! -f $f -o ! -d $dir ]
then
usage
fi
case $f in
/*) ;;
*) f=`pwd`/$f;;
esac
lofi=`lofiadm -a $f`
if [ $lofi = ]
then
exit 1 # Lofi printed an error
fi
fstyp=`fstyp $lofi`
# Sanity
case $fstyp in
ufs | udf) opt=nosuid; fsck -o p $lofi;;
pcfs) opt=foldcase,hidden;;
hsfs) opt=ro,nosuid;;
*)
echo $0: unexpected filesystem type \$fstyp\ 21
lofiadm -d $lofi
exit 1;;
esac
opt=$options$opt
if [ ! -w $f ]
then
opt=$opt,ro
fi
if mount -F $fstyp -o $opt $lofi $dir
then
echo $lofi $dir $f $state
exit 0
else
lofiadm -d $lofi
exit 1
fi
#!/usr/bin/sh
#
# CDDL HEADER START
#
# The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
# Common Development and Distribution License (the License).
# You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
#
# You can obtain a copy of the license at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE
# or http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions
# and limitations under the License.
#
# When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
# file and include the License file at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE.
# If applicable, add the following below this CDDL HEADER, with the
# fields enclosed by brackets [] replaced with your own identifying
# information: Portions Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]
#
# CDDL HEADER END
#
#
# Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
# Use is subject to license terms.
#
# Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
PATH=/usr/sbin:$PATH
export PATH
p=`basename $0`
if [ ! -x /usr/sbin/lofiadm ]
then
echo $p: Only supported on systems with lofiadm (Solaris 8+) 21
exit 1
fi
state=/var/run/.lofi-$LOGNAME
# Nothing to do?
[ -f $state ] || exit 0
if [ $# -gt 1 ]
then
echo Usage: $p [file|dir] 12
exit 1
fi
$state.new
while read lofi dir file
do
if [ -z $1 -o $1 = $dir -o $1 = $file ] umount $dir
then
lofiadm -d $lofi
echo $p: Unmounted $dir ($file)
else
echo $lofi $dir $file $state.new
fi
done $state
mv $state.new $state
if [ -s $state ]
then
exit 1
else
rm -f $state
exit 0
fi
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Laptop testing OpenSolaris (Indiana) on ODM laptops
W. Wayne Liauh wrote: Well, maybe if the Sun licensing meant I got a free one :) Otherwise, that form factor really isn't my cup of tea at all. Cheeri, Calum. Well, we have very different understandings of the term Sun licensing (do you think Sun will allow the Asus EeePCs to use its name as is?) :-) The EeePCs do look faddy on the outside: http://taiwan.cnet.com/digilife/0,289053,20126344,00.htm i.e., until you open the lid (both the LED screen and the OS do not really appeal to professionals). Well, the 8G model almost filled the gap for me. BTW, do you know what kind of Chinese input method does the EeePC supports? I use a pen tablet to enter Chinese text, and as this is only available and run on Windows, that is the only reason I still have a Windows partition in my laptop. -Ghee Everex is coming out with an UMPC with a similar form factor: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS6962839488.html Can't comment on it until I actually look at one. However, I am curious if there is a possibility of a SunRay-type nano-notebook? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] help in clearing the login screen....
I fixed the problem.just a minor issue.Thanx to all This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] installing updates?
On Dec 12, 2007 8:06 AM, Cheng Thao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's say I have build 77 installed but wanted to upgrade to build 79. I'm wondering if we can install updates rather than doing a clean install of a new build? You can run the upgrade program from the installer or use liveupgrade; otherwise, no, not currently. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so. - Robert Orben ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] installing updates?
Let's say I have build 77 installed but wanted to upgrade to build 79. I'm wondering if we can install updates rather than doing a clean install of a new build? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Build 78 ,79
me too. Need WPA2 AES for wpi, included build 78. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Build 78 ,79
Stefan Gaertner wrote: me too. Need WPA2 AES for wpi, included build 78. And I'm waiting to see what CIFS support is like in b78 before I install Samba! R. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Build 78 ,79
Stefan Gaertner wrote: me too. Need WPA2 AES for wpi, included build 78. And I'm waiting to see what CIFS support is like in b78 before I install Samba! Samba is still installed in b78 also. Casper ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Equivalent of OBP 'probe-scsi-all' from inside
Chandan Maddanna wrote: Dear Kyle, The number of cable connected has nothing to do with the controllers that is visible. Not really. It's my understanding that each port a cable could connect to is seen as a seperate controller. Also Controllers with no devices attached are not visible (in /dev/dsk/c*t*d*, etc.) Even if you are connected through just one cable, the number of controllers visible will be the same. When I say 'controllers' I'm talking about FC interface cards in the Server. Maybe I'm using the wrong term? What do you mean by controller? But it seems like what you are asking for is lun masking. That is seeing just some luns and not seeing some. No. I want to know what luns or devices are reachable on the other end of the cable I've plugged into the board in the server. So if this is what you want to do, than in normal entry level storage arrays we will have to implement it on the client side ( solaris box connected to the array ). This isn't connected to an entry level box. The box on the other end is an EMC Symetrix Array. Hope this helps. It's a start. More info; I started with 2 pairs of servers. Each pair of servers had 4 links (2 for each server in the pair) to the same pool of disks (or luns.) So each server in the pair had redundant links to it's set of disks which it shared with the other server in the pair. I want to reduce this to only 1 server (for now,) and give it the right combination of cables from these 2 pairs of servers, so that it will be able to see all the disks from both pools. So I want to plug in each of the 8 cables, and try to determine which of the disks are visible on the other end. If this was scsi, and sparc, I'd use 'probe-scsi-all' from OBP, to see which disks show up on which cables/ports/controllers. What can I use for FC? I discovered 'cfgadm'. And I manged to get it to list the 4 controllers, and 1 disk on each. However the ID of that one disk doesn't look anything like the WWN of the targets I see in /dev/dsk. On top of that why is there is only one disk? I see 18 targets in /dev/dsk, shouldn't I see 18 disks listed mong the 4 controllers? -Kyle -- Chandan Maddanna This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#!/usr/bin/bash
mkdir $2
lofiadm -a $1 /dev/lofi/1
mount -F hsfs -o ro /dev/lofi/1 $2 echo -e \n\t I have mounted $1 under the
folder $2\n\n
You should realize that lofiadm actually outputs the device used, so
the script can be written so as not to require only /dev/lofi/1
I've attached my scripts which I use for mounting/unmounting lofi volumes.
It detects pcfs, ufs and hsfs filesystem and mounts them; it remembers
the mount and a single lofiumount without arguments will unmount all
you mounted.
I've written these a long time ago, shortly after lofiadm was added,
I think.
Usage is simple:
lofimount file.iso /mnt
lofiumount /mnt
lofimount file.ufs /mnt
etc.
That's cool Casper.
I know it needs polishing, but I've attached a script I wrote and placed
in /usr/lib/fs/lofi/mount, so that I could put entries like this in
/etc/vfstab:
/export/Solaris/ISOs/sol-nv-b74-x86-dvd.iso - /export/Solaris/sNV/b74_x
lofi - yes fstype=hsfs
Maybe I can extend it to detect the fstype automatically from your script.
-Kyle
#/bin/ksh
#
#
if [ $1 = -o ]; then
OPTS=$2
shift 2
fi
FILE=$1
MTPT=$2
if [ ${OPTS} != ]; then
SAVE_IFS=${IFS}
IFS=,
set - ${OPTS}
IFS=${SAVE_IFS}
OPTS=
while [ ${1}x != x ]; do
case $1 in
fstype=* )
# Use fancy shell pattern/regexp assignment operation.
TYPE=`echo $1 | sed s/fstype=//`;;
* )
# use new fancy assignment shell operation.
if [ ${OPTS} = ]; then
OPTS=-o $1
else
OPTS=${OPTS},$1
fi;;
esac
shift
done
fi
LOFI=
LOOP=0
if [ -r ${FILE} ]; then
while [ ${LOFI} = -a ${LOOP} -lt 10 ]; do
LOFI=`lofiadm ${FILE} 2/dev/null`
# LOFI=`lofiadm ${FILE}`
if [ ${LOFI} = ]; then
LOFI=`lofiadm -a ${FILE} 2/dev/null`
# LOFI=`lofiadm -a ${FILE}`
fi
if [ ${LOFI} = ]; then
LOOP=`echo ${LOOP} + 1 | bc`
echo Looping(${LOOP}) 12
sleep 1
fi
done
else
echo mount: open: ${FILE}: No such file or directory
fi
#echo FILE:${FILE} 12
#echo MTPT:${MTPT} 12
#echo TYPE:${TYPE} 12
#echo OPTS:${OPTS} 12
#echo LOFI:${LOFI} 12
if [ ${LOFI} = ]; then
echo Aborting! 12
exit 1
fi
echo mount -F ${TYPE} ${OPTS} ${LOFI} ${MTPT} 12
mount -F ${TYPE} ${OPTS} ${LOFI} ${MTPT}
exit $?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Build 78 ,79
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Gaertner wrote: me too. Need WPA2 AES for wpi, included build 78. And I'm waiting to see what CIFS support is like in b78 before I install Samba! Samba is still installed in b78 also. s/install/setup/ :p R. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] CIFS kernel client
Hi, is there already a known timeframe when a CIFS client will be available? Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o
Il Wednesday 12 December 2007 16:29:05 Kyle McDonald ha scritto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#!/usr/bin/bash
mkdir $2
lofiadm -a $1 /dev/lofi/1
mount -F hsfs -o ro /dev/lofi/1 $2 echo -e \n\t I have
mounted $1 under the folder $2\n\n
You should realize that lofiadm actually outputs the device
used, so the script can be written so as not to require only
/dev/lofi/1
I've attached my scripts which I use for mounting/unmounting lofi
volumes.
It detects pcfs, ufs and hsfs filesystem and mounts them; it
remembers the mount and a single lofiumount without arguments
will unmount all you mounted.
I've written these a long time ago, shortly after lofiadm was
added, I think.
Usage is simple:
lofimount file.iso /mnt
lofiumount /mnt
lofimount file.ufs /mnt
etc.
That's cool Casper.
I know it needs polishing, but I've attached a script I wrote and
placed in /usr/lib/fs/lofi/mount, so that I could put entries like
this in /etc/vfstab:
I have a similar (but worse) problem: in linux I need to mount the
individual slices from an image file, thus I need to find the
offsets of the slices.
Unfortunately linux's fdisk can't recognize Sun's slices, but the
kernel can (from raw partitions of course).
According to a file in the linux kernel sources the structure is this:
struct sun_disklabel {
unsigned char info[128]; /* Informative text string
*/
struct sun_vtoc {
__be32 version; /* Layout version */
char volume[8]; /* Volume name */
__be16 nparts; /* Number of partitions */
struct sun_info { /* Partition hdrs, sec
2 */
__be16 id;
__be16 flags;
} infos[8];
__be16 padding; /* Alignment padding */
__be32 bootinfo[3]; /* Info needed by mboot */
__be32 sanity; /* To verify vtoc sanity */
__be32 reserved[10]; /* Free space */
__be32 timestamp[8]; /* Partition timestamp */
} vtoc;
__be32 write_reinstruct; /* sectors to skip, writes */
__be32 read_reinstruct; /* sectors to skip, reads */
unsigned char spare[148]; /* Padding */
__be16 rspeed; /* Disk rotational speed */
__be16 pcylcount; /* Physical cylinder count */
__be16 sparecyl; /* extra sects per cylinder */
__be16 obs1; /* gap1 */
__be16 obs2; /* gap2 */
__be16 ilfact; /* Interleave factor */
__be16 ncyl; /* Data cylinder count */
__be16 nacyl; /* Alt. cylinder count */
__be16 ntrks; /* Tracks per cylinder */
__be16 nsect; /* Sectors per track */
__be16 obs3; /* bhead - Label head offset */
__be16 obs4; /* ppart - Physical Partition */
struct sun_partition {
__be32 start_cylinder;
__be32 num_sectors;
} partitions[8];
__be16 magic; /* Magic number */
__be16 csum; /* Label xor'd checksum */
} * label;
I guess that the partitions[8] identifies the slices, correct?
(did I dream that they were 16? )
Please, correct me if Iìm wrong.
Thanks,
Nico
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS kernel client
On Dec 12, 2007 12:54 PM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, is there already a known timeframe when a CIFS client will be available? Jörg there is one already, a beta http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/smbfs/downloads/Beta2/ nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS kernel client
Yep, and we've been making frequent code drops available over the last few months. We're feature-complete according to the requirements set forth, and are plowing through the remaining bugs. Not many left! We've penciled in build 84 as our target, pending final bug and test cycles. Download the code, see how it works for you, and share any issues or feedback. There's a lot more that needs to be done with it following the initial delivery. Regards, Don Traub Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote: On Dec 12, 2007 12:54 PM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, is there already a known timeframe when a CIFS client will be available? Jörg there is one already, a beta http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/smbfs/downloads/Beta2/ nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org -- http://www.sun.com/solaris *Don Traub* Senior Engineering Manager, Solaris Storage Software *Sun Microsystems, Inc.* 500 Eldorado Blvd., MS UBRM05-171 Broomfield, CO. 80021 Phone x41860/303-547-3537 Cell 303-888-0683 Fax 303-272-7736 Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sun.com/solaris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o
Thanks frank, yes, you can use standard img format also, BUt i donno about the mount offset thng. Also Caspers script is more better one. so you can use that too. ALso if you get to know about the offset usage, Kindly share with me. Thanks and Warm Regards, -- Chandan Maddanna On Dec 12, 2007 2:39 PM, Zhang, Frank F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chandan Thanks for your detailed explanation, but my requirement is a little different from what you have done here, I want to mount an IMG file, not an ISO file, and also I want to specify the mount offset during mounting. Thanks! Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chandan Maddanna Sent: 2007年12月12日 16:50 To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o Dear Frank, I use this small script i had written for mounting iso images. hope it helps.. Save the below contents in a file called mountiso.sh #!/usr/bin/bash mkdir $2 lofiadm -a $1 /dev/lofi/1 mount -F hsfs -o ro /dev/lofi/1 $2 echo -e \n\t I have mounted $1 under the folder $2\n\n and then give this script file executable permission form command prompt. # chmod +x ./mountiso.sh and use this script to mount iso images... For example lets say you have an iso image called /opt/testfile1.iso and you want to mount it under /testfilecontents Than use the script as follows : # ./mountiso.sh /opt/testfile1.iso /testfilecontents and you are done, you will have all the contents of the iso visible under /testfilecontents folder. Best Regards, -- Chandan Maddanna This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS kernel client
Don Traub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, and we've been making frequent code drops available over the last few months. We're feature-complete according to the requirements set forth, and are plowing through the remaining bugs. Not many left! We've penciled in build 84 as our target, pending final bug and test cycles. Download the code, see how it works for you, and share any issues or feedback. There's a lot more that needs to be done with it following the initial delivery. I installed it and after I did a reboot, the /dev/nsmb was present. I cannot see an export list and I cannot mount filesystems from a netap server. smbutil view //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Password: smbutil: session setup phase failed: syserr = Zugriff verweigert smbutil: could not login to server FILESRV: syserr = Zugriff verweigert mount -F smbfs //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/br /tmp/dir Password: mount: session setup phase failed: syserr = Zugriff verweigert Any idea? Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS kernel client
Joerg Schilling wrote: Don Traub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, and we've been making frequent code drops available over the last few months. We're feature-complete according to the requirements set forth, and are plowing through the remaining bugs. Not many left! We've penciled in build 84 as our target, pending final bug and test cycles. Download the code, see how it works for you, and share any issues or feedback. There's a lot more that needs to be done with it following the initial delivery. I installed it and after I did a reboot, the /dev/nsmb was present. I cannot see an export list and I cannot mount filesystems from a netap server. smbutil view //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Password: smbutil: session setup phase failed: syserr = Zugriff verweigert smbutil: could not login to server FILESRV: syserr = Zugriff verweigert mount -F smbfs //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/br /tmp/dir Password: mount: session setup phase failed: syserr = Zugriff verweigert Any idea? Try smbutil view -A //filesrv to see if anonymous share listing works better. After that, we'd need to figure out authentication; a snoop would help a lot there. Rob T ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS kernel client
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: smbutil view //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Password: smbutil: session setup phase failed: syserr = Zugriff verweigert smbutil: could not login to server FILESRV: syserr = Zugriff verweigert mount -F smbfs //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/br /tmp/dir Password: mount: session setup phase failed: syserr = Zugriff verweigert Any idea? Try smbutil view -A //filesrv to see if anonymous share listing works better. After that, we'd need to figure out authentication; a snoop would help a lot there. Thank you, this gives a list of shares. ShareType Comment --- ... nfsv4festplatte NFSV4 Test - keep off 25 shares listed from 28 available Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS kernel client
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try smbutil view -A //filesrv to see if anonymous share listing works better. After that, we'd need to figure out authentication; a snoop would help a lot there. Maybe this new error helps: mount -F smbfs //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/u /tmp/dir mount: session setup phase failed: syserr = Zugriff verweigert mount: main(lookup): bad keychain entry Password: mount: session setup phase failed: syserr = Zugriff verweigert This happens after I did a smbutil login Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] SXDE based on b77?
I just downloaded the DVD for SXCR build 77. It appears to include SXDE as well. Is this SXDE 9/07? It's a bit confusing because, from the SXDE web pages, I can download an SXDE 9/07 DVD, OR I can download an SXCR build 70b DVD. Only, they are the same DVD. Different download web pages in SDLC, but the download in both cases consists of 3 files which are named the same and are the same sizes. Now, more confusion. With the build 77 DVD I just downloaded, when I select SXDE from the grub boot menu, it boots a build 77 kernel. Is this going to install a build 77 based SXDE? Or is it using the the build 77 kernel during the install but I will actually end up with a build 70b based SXDE 9/07? Just trying to sort out the spaghetti. Thanks, Mark -- Georgia: Why am I not doing what they're doing? Rube: Because you're doing what you're doing. When it's time for you to do something else you'll do that. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] installing updates?
I've upgraded fine using one of two methods. 1) Start the installation from the new CD, at some point you'll be asked if you want to do an initial install or upgrade. Choose upgrade. This still takes roughly the same amount of time as a full install. On one of my machines this meant over an hour downtime. 2) Use LiveUpgrade. This requires an alternative boot partition, but it allows you to upgrade while the system is live. You only need to do a reboot at the end. The nice thing is that if you find something broken you can go back to the previous install. Gary This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] SXDE 9/07 install fails immediately
I am trying to install SXDE 9/07 in a vmware 6.x vm. After stepping through the installation GUI, when I click the last button to begin the install, the GUI comes back immediately with an installation failed error message, *but* the installer is actually still running in teh background. My disk and the dvd drive are still spinning and you can see installf in the ps output. Anyone else seeing this? -- Georgia: Why am I not doing what they're doing? Rube: Because you're doing what you're doing. When it's time for you to do something else you'll do that. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE based on b77?
All SXCE releases contain the SXDE installer (and I believe the extra tools), they just haven't gone through the same extended test cycles respins with fixes that SXDE releases do. If you choose the SXDE installer, you'll get build 77 installed SXDE-style, but with all the newer bits not in the SXDE 9/07 release (which was build 70b). -Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering Mark Drummond wrote: I just downloaded the DVD for SXCR build 77. It appears to include SXDE as well. Is this SXDE 9/07? It's a bit confusing because, from the SXDE web pages, I can download an SXDE 9/07 DVD, OR I can download an SXCR build 70b DVD. Only, they are the same DVD. Different download web pages in SDLC, but the download in both cases consists of 3 files which are named the same and are the same sizes. Now, more confusion. With the build 77 DVD I just downloaded, when I select SXDE from the grub boot menu, it boots a build 77 kernel. Is this going to install a build 77 based SXDE? Or is it using the the build 77 kernel during the install but I will actually end up with a build 70b based SXDE 9/07? Just trying to sort out the spaghetti. Thanks, Mark -- Georgia: Why am I not doing what they're doing? Rube: Because you're doing what you're doing. When it's time for you to do something else you'll do that. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PulseAudio
Here's a list of features I pulled off Pulse Audio's website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulseAudio The main PulseAudio features include: * Per-application volume controls [1] OSS already does that. * An extensible plugin architecture with support for loadable modules. If you look at http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/Modules - they are talking about Pulse audio functionality being implemented as modules - similar to GStreamer. OSS is multiplatform and already has a lot of features that they talk about. * Compatibility with many popular audio applications. OSS is 100% in coverage. Pulse talks about many popular apps. * Support for multiple audio sources and sinks. OSS has virtual mixer and input multiplexer built in. * Low-latency operation and support for latency measurement. Can't get lower than the driver in kernel. * A zero-copy memory architecture for processor resource efficiency. No copy needed for OSS apps. You write your buffers directly to the driver. * A command-line interface with scripting capabilities. OSS also has command line apps and also provide PhP/Perl scripting and support in Java. * A sound daemon with command line reconfiguration capabilities. Pulse is a replacement for ESD and nothing more. With OSS v4 you don't need a mixing daemon because OSS gives you virtual devices for mixing directly. Pulse has network features but I really don't know who would use it. Network audio is now redefined to be VOIP. Pulse audio doesn't support any kind of X Windows protocol or VoiceXML or VoiceHTML so really I don't know what the benefits of their network architecture are. * Built-in sample conversion and resampling capabilities. OSS has superior Sample Rate convertors...infact you can control the quality (high quality vs fast processing) * The ability to combine multiple sound cards into one. This usually never works because each card's crystal freqs and latencies will prevent the application from outputting audio in a phase lock...which means after a while output from one sound card will drift. * The ability to synchronize multiple playback streams. OSS does this as well.we have a Remux driver that allows you to take 4 output streams and create a 5.1 surround stream. 4Front is going to make GStreamer talk directly to OSS and we've already contracted the Gstreamer developers to do this work. Part of the deliverables will be 1) a Gstreamer configuration panel to configure audio devices 2) a Gnome volume panel that exposes all OSS mixer elements - hopefully it will look nicer than ossxmix that comes with OSS. 3) Direct interaction between GStreamer and OSS drivers and no need for any intermediate mixing daemons like Pulse audio or ESD or whatever else. 4) Support for 7.1 multichannel and rates upto 192Khz, 24bit. However there is no problem in having Pulse Audio sit on top of OSS if there is some Pulse Audio app that isn't supporting OSS (I can't imagine there being any such app). Look at the mixing technology within Pulse Audio and then compare it to what we've done in Open Sound: http://manuals.opensound.com/sources/grc3.c.html regards Dev This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] ipfilter and tcp timeouts - painful
HI All, I'm running 25 Opensolaris boxes in my business and since we put in a new firewall all of our connections (remotely) to the OpenSolaris boxes disconnection after 1 minute of inactivity. If there is activity, it does not disconnect. We can't change firewall, unfortunately. But I was hoping there was some way to send keep-alives via the IPfilter (or something) else to keep my inactive sessions alive. It's causing us a major problem, so I'm stuck. Is there anyway on OpenSolaris you know of to keep connections to the server alive? Thank you for the help. Anne ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] onnv_79 : Bad kernel fault at addr=0xcf0a7334
warning : long email follows -- onv_79 builds fine : $ cat log/log.2007-12-12/mail_msg Nightly distributed build started: Tue Dec 11 23:19:27 EST 2007 Nightly distributed build completed: Wed Dec 12 17:55:13 EST 2007 Total build time real18:35:46 Nightly argument issues Warning: the N option (do not run protocmp) is set; it probably shouldn't be Build environment /usr/bin/uname SunOS aequitas 5.11 gazelle i86pc i386 i86pc /opt/onbld/bin/nightly ./opensolaris.sh nightly.sh version 1.118 2007/10/29 /opt/SUNWspro/bin/dmake dmake: Sun Distributed Make 7.7 2005/10/13 number of concurrent jobs = 4 32-bit compiler /opt/onbld/bin/i386/cw -_cc cw version 1.22 primary: /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc cc: Sun C 5.8 Patch 121016-05 2007/01/10 shadow: /usr/sfw/bin/gcc gcc (GCC) 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-20050802) 64-bit compiler /opt/onbld/bin/i386/cw -_cc cw version 1.22 primary: /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc cc: Sun C 5.8 Patch 121016-05 2007/01/10 shadow: /usr/sfw/bin/gcc gcc (GCC) 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-20050802) /usr/java/bin/javac java full version 1.6.0_01-b06 /usr/ccs/bin/as as: Sun Compiler Common 12 SunOS_i386 snv_64 04/30/2007 /usr/ccs/bin/ld ld: Software Generation Utilities - Solaris Link Editors: 5.11-1.608 Build project: default Build taskid: 97 Build version gazelle Make clobber ERRORS Make tools clobber ERRORS Tools build errors SCCS Noise (DEBUG) Build errors (DEBUG) Build warnings (DEBUG) Elapsed build time (DEBUG) real 15:22:33.3 user 10:29:00.0 sys 2:41:08.4 Build noise differences (DEBUG) Check ELF runtime attributes Diff ELF runtime attributes (since last build) 'dmake lint' of src ERRORS Elapsed time of 'dmake lint' of src real 2:34:31.7 user 1:46:40.0 sys 27:03.7 lint warnings src lint noise differences src cstyle/hdrchk errors Find core files Impact on file permissions BFU seems fine : $ su - Password: Dec 12 19:08:48 aequitas su: 'su root' succeeded for LOGIN on /dev/console Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 gazelle Dec. 05, 2007 SunOS Internal Development: dclarke 2007-12-05 [gazelle] bfu'ed from /export/gazelle/archives/i386/nightly on 2007-12-05 Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_70b October 2007 # cd /export/gazelle # ls -lap archives/i386/nightly total 646656 drwxr-xr-x 2 dclarke csw 1024 Dec 12 15:06 ./ drwxr-xr-x 3 dclarke csw 512 Dec 12 15:03 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw71034 Dec 12 15:06 conflict_resolution.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw 82015400 Dec 12 15:04 generic.kernel -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw 25745808 Dec 12 15:04 generic.lib -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw 5242768 Dec 12 15:04 generic.root -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw 1351680 Dec 12 15:03 generic.sbin -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw 198610948 Dec 12 15:05 generic.usr -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw 1402880 Dec 12 15:05 i86pc.boot -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw 8156160 Dec 12 15:04 i86pc.root -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw 1658880 Dec 12 15:04 i86pc.usr -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw 6087680 Dec 12 15:04 i86xpv.root -rw-r--r-- 1 dclarke csw 471040 Dec 12 15:05 i86xpv.usr # PATH=/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/onbld/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin # export PATH # FASTFS=/opt/onbld/bin/`uname -p`/fastfs;export FASTFS # BFULD=/opt/onbld/bin/`uname -p`/bfuld;export BFULD # GZIPBIN=/usr/bin/gzip;export GZIPBIN # env BFULD=/opt/onbld/bin/i386/bfuld COLUMNS=80 EDITOR=/usr/xpg4/bin/vi FASTFS=/opt/onbld/bin/i386/fastfs GZIPBIN=/usr/bin/gzip HOME=/ HZ=100 LANG=C LC_ALL=C LINES=24 LOGNAME=root MAIL=/var/mail/root PATH=/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/onbld/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin SHELL=/sbin/sh TERM=vt100 TZ=Canada/Eastern # /opt/onbld/bin/bfu /export/gazelle/archives/i386/nightly Copying /opt/onbld/bin/bfu to /tmp/bfu.822882 Executing /tmp/bfu.822882 /export/gazelle/archives/i386/nightly Loading /export/gazelle/archives/i386/nightly on / Creating bfu execution environment ... /tmp/bfu.822882[2742]: /net/onnv.eng/export/gate/public/bin/acr: cannot open chmod: WARNING: can't access /tmp/bfubin/acr Verifying archives ... Performing basic sanity checks ... /etc/svc/repository.db: passed integrity check Disabling kernel module unloading ... moddebug: 0 = 0x2 Dec 12 19:11:42 aequitas genunix: ce: unable to resolve dependency, Dec 12 19:11:42 aequitas genunix: cannot load module 'misc/laggr' Unmounting /lib/libc.so.1 ... Disabling sendmail temporarily ... Disabling remote logins ... Disabling syslog temporarily ... Killing httpd ... Disabling fmd temporarily ... Killing nscd ... Turning on delayed i/o ... Filesystem Mode /safe /usr safe Saving
Re: [osol-discuss] onnv_79 : Bad kernel fault at addr=0xcf0a7334
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:03:03PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: cd75dadc unix:die+105 (e, cd75db88, cf0a73) cd75db74 unix:trap+13d1 (cd75db88, cf0a7334,) cd75db88 unix:cmntrap+10b (cd6e01b0, cd6e,) cd75dbe8 unix:kstat_delete+c (cf0a7270) cd75dc04 ii:iidetach+84 (ca4625c8, 0) Known bug (6581192). You can't see it on bugs.opensolaris.org, but it was fixed in build 73 - unfortunately your BFU won't upgrade the relevant bits, so you'll need to install again... A simple workaround is rem_drv ii regards john ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] onnv_79 : Bad kernel fault at addr=0xcf0a7334
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:03:03PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: cd75dadc unix:die+105 (e, cd75db88, cf0a73) cd75db74 unix:trap+13d1 (cd75db88, cf0a7334,) cd75db88 unix:cmntrap+10b (cd6e01b0, cd6e,) cd75dbe8 unix:kstat_delete+c (cf0a7270) cd75dc04 ii:iidetach+84 (ca4625c8, 0) Known bug (6581192). You can't see it on bugs.opensolaris.org ermmm .. boo hoo for b.o.o but at least it isn't anything unknown, which is a good thing. and Thank you for pointing this out for me. I will say that everything seems to be working fine after the reboot. , but it was fixed in build 73 - unfortunately your BFU won't upgrade the relevant bits, so you'll need to install again... A simple workaround is rem_drv ii That is an easy fix. Thank you again. I will watch for the release of snv_78 and perhaps install that. Dennis ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ipfilter and tcp timeouts - painful
Hello David Thanks for the code. Unfortunately, it doesn't work as it is. It just continually pings forever, and it interferes with the command line by always showing 64 bytes from ip.domain.com: icmp forever. Thus, the user can't type anything. Any others ideas I've love to hear about them. Thank you! Anne -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 6:25 PM To: Anne Moore Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] ipfilter and tcp timeouts - painful Annew, Anne Moore wrote: HI All, I'm running 25 Opensolaris boxes in my business and since we put in a new firewall all of our connections (remotely) to the OpenSolaris boxes disconnection after 1 minute of inactivity. If there is activity, it does not disconnect. We can't change firewall, unfortunately. But I was hoping there was some way to send keep-alives via the IPfilter (or something) else to keep my inactive sessions alive. It's causing us a major problem, so I'm stuck. Is there anyway on OpenSolaris you know of to keep connections to the server alive? #!/bin/sh while [ 1 ]; ping some.ip.com; sleep 60; do # end of script DSL ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ipfilter and tcp timeouts - painful
Hello Anne, SSH has a setting (man sshd_config) for sending keep alive packets. Search for TCPKeepAlive Thanks, -Tim Anne Moore wrote: Hello David Thanks for the code. Unfortunately, it doesn't work as it is. It just continually pings forever, and it interferes with the command line by always showing 64 bytes from ip.domain.com: icmp forever. Thus, the user can't type anything. Any others ideas I've love to hear about them. Thank you! Anne -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 6:25 PM To: Anne Moore Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] ipfilter and tcp timeouts - painful Annew, Anne Moore wrote: HI All, I'm running 25 Opensolaris boxes in my business and since we put in a new firewall all of our connections (remotely) to the OpenSolaris boxes disconnection after 1 minute of inactivity. If there is activity, it does not disconnect. We can't change firewall, unfortunately. But I was hoping there was some way to send keep-alives via the IPfilter (or something) else to keep my inactive sessions alive. It's causing us a major problem, so I'm stuck. Is there anyway on OpenSolaris you know of to keep connections to the server alive? #!/bin/sh while [ 1 ]; ping some.ip.com; sleep 60; do # end of script DSL ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Finding external USB disks
What are the approaches to finding what external USB disks are currently connected? I'm starting on backup scripts, and I need to check which volumes are present before I figure out what to back up to them. I suppose I could just try all the ones that I know about and see which are there (the list is small enough this is actually feasible), but it's inelegant. (On Solaris Nevada, currently build 76 I think). The external USB backup disks in question have ZFS filesystems on them, which may make a difference in finding them perhaps? I've glanced at Tim Foster's autobackup and related scripts, and they're all about being triggered by the plug connection being made; which is not what I need. I don't actually want to start the big backup when I plug in (or power on) the drive in the evening, it's supposed to wait until late (to avoid competition with users). (His autosnapshot script may be just what I need for that part, though.) -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Finding external USB disks
On 12/13/07, David Dyer-Bennet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the approaches to finding what external USB disks are currently connected? I'm starting on backup scripts, and I need to check which volumes are present before I figure out what to back up to them. I suppose I could just try all the ones that I know about and see which are there (the list is small enough this is actually feasible), but it's inelegant. (On Solaris Nevada, currently build 76 I think). The external USB backup disks in question have ZFS filesystems on them, which may make a difference in finding them perhaps? I've glanced at Tim Foster's autobackup and related scripts, and they're all about being triggered by the plug connection being made; which is not what I need. I don't actually want to start the big backup when I plug in (or power on) the drive in the evening, it's supposed to wait until late (to avoid competition with users). (His autosnapshot script may be just what I need for that part, though.) You can try 'rmformat' to see all removable media connected. Also try 'dmesg' after connecting the device. ~Anil ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Finding external USB disks
On Dec 13, 2007 12:35 AM, David Dyer-Bennet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the approaches to finding what external USB disks are currently connected? I'm starting on backup scripts, and I need to check which volumes are present before I figure out what to back up to them. I suppose I could just try all the ones that I know about and see which are there (the list is small enough this is actually feasible), but it's inelegant. (On Solaris Nevada, currently build 76 I think). The external USB backup disks in question have ZFS filesystems on them, which may make a difference in finding them perhaps? I've glanced at Tim Foster's autobackup and related scripts, and they're all about being triggered by the plug connection being made; which is not what I need. I don't actually want to start the big backup when I plug in (or power on) the drive in the evening, it's supposed to wait until late (to avoid competition with users). (His autosnapshot script may be just what I need for that part, though.) there is cfgadm i guess, check cfgadm_usb(1M) nacho ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ipfilter and tcp timeouts - painful
Yes, I have that SSH setting already in place. However, all the other connections (SQL, ORACLE, LDAP, etc.), all close after 1 minutes of inactivity. That's why I'm trying to get this script working for all those other programs and connections to the server... Thank you anyway though. If you have any other ideas I'd love to hear them! Anne -Original Message- From: Tim Spriggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 10:42 PM To: Anne Moore Cc: 'David Lloyd'; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] ipfilter and tcp timeouts - painful Hello Anne, SSH has a setting (man sshd_config) for sending keep alive packets. Search for TCPKeepAlive Thanks, -Tim Anne Moore wrote: Hello David Thanks for the code. Unfortunately, it doesn't work as it is. It just continually pings forever, and it interferes with the command line by always showing 64 bytes from ip.domain.com: icmp forever. Thus, the user can't type anything. Any others ideas I've love to hear about them. Thank you! Anne -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 6:25 PM To: Anne Moore Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] ipfilter and tcp timeouts - painful Annew, Anne Moore wrote: HI All, I'm running 25 Opensolaris boxes in my business and since we put in a new firewall all of our connections (remotely) to the OpenSolaris boxes disconnection after 1 minute of inactivity. If there is activity, it does not disconnect. We can't change firewall, unfortunately. But I was hoping there was some way to send keep-alives via the IPfilter (or something) else to keep my inactive sessions alive. It's causing us a major problem, so I'm stuck. Is there anyway on OpenSolaris you know of to keep connections to the server alive? #!/bin/sh while [ 1 ]; ping some.ip.com; sleep 60; do # end of script DSL ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] How can I install the CIFS service to a Core Group Solaris 10 install?
I'm trying to build a simple Solaris 10 file server using ZFS + CIFS... That means I don't need X Windows or anything like that, etc. During the Solaris 10 installation I chose the Core Group for the installation so that it doesn't install all of the extra software associated with the other installation groups. How do I go about installing the CIFS service? I've read the page here: http://opensolaris.org/os/project/cifs-server/gettingstarted.html ...and when I run svcadm enable -r smb/server it gives me an error about the service not being found or something like that... (sorry I'm not at the server) How do I go about installing just the core CIFS service/software so I can share my ZFS file systems via CIFS? Thanks, John This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Finding external USB disks
Anil Gulecha wrote: On 12/13/07, David Dyer-Bennet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the approaches to finding what external USB disks are currently connected? You can try 'rmformat' to see all removable media connected. Ah, that's looking useful. Thanks also to those who pointed out cfgadm. Now, what's that Label reported by rmformat? It's unknown in all the examples I have to try. Is this something I can set with rmformat or fdisk or something? So that I could recognize the volumes by a string I applied to it myself? Or are there serial numbers accessible on USB hard drives that I can get access to? That would be a unique identifier for each drive, and I could store those and use those to recognize which ones were mounted. Also try 'dmesg' after connecting the device. That last doesn't fit my model, I'm looking to check for the presence of various devices in a script run in cron, so the device may not have been connected *recently*. -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ipfilter and tcp timeouts - painful
This should set it to 30 seconds: ndd set /dev/tcp tcp_keepalive_interval 3 This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] DESKTOP BACKGROUND - View from the moon
I saw this background: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/cool_desktop_backgrounds and of course in that thread NOBODY shows a link to the .png/.jpg I am in the same boat as the 1st guy in that post. Does someone have just that file? Or a compressed collection of the included backgrounds for that build? I don't have them in mine and it would be really nice if someone could provide a link or something that gets me at least the one shown above. Let me know. [EMAIL PROTECTED] THANKS IN ADVANCE!! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
