On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Ian Wienand iwien...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/15/2014 11:55 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
Good to hear about epel's availability. But on the Ubuntu/Debian
side - is it possible to add the Qpid project's PPA to the config
project? From a quick 'grep' of the sources
development.
[1]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/amqp10-driver-implementation
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75815/
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115752/
[4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109118/
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:36:46 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 13:24 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 08/27/2014 03:35 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
Hi All,
I believe Juno-3 is our last chance to get this feature [1] included
into olso.messaging.
SNIP!
Hi Ken
environment. Likewise, easier access to this driver by the openstack
developer community will help us find and fix any issues in a timely
manner as adoption of the standard grows.
Please consider this feature to be a part of Juno-3 release.
Thanks,
Ken
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com
On Wed Sep 3 19:23:52 UTC 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sep 3, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Ken Giusti kgiusti at gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm proposing a freeze exception for the oslo.messaging AMQP 1.0
driver:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75815/
SNIP
Thanks,
Ken
Ken,
I think we’re generally
] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-qpid-proton/0.7-0
[3] https://launchpad.net/~qpid
[4] http://qpid.apache.org/download.html
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
On 07/15/2014 10:58:50 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 07/15/2014 07:16 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@gmail.com wrote:
These packages may be obtained via EPEL for Centos/RHEL systems
(qpid-proton-c-devel), and via the Qpid project's PPA [3
on whether or not this is the correct
approach.
thanks!
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
of every queue and every message.
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1338732
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109373/
[2]
https://github.com/noelbk/oslo.messaging/commit/960fc26ff050ca3073ad90eccbef1ca95712e82e
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109143/
--
Ken
configuration. Does this make sense? Are there any
better alternatives?
[0]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/amqp10-driver-implementation
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75815/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110431/
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:25:46 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:54:01AM -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
Greetings,
Apologies for the cross-post: this should be of interest to both infra
and olso.messaging developers.
The blueprint [0] that adds support for version
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:04:41 -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 7/30/2014 11:59 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:25:46 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:54:01AM -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
Greetings,
snip
At this point, there are no integration tests
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:14:51 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-07-30 14:59:09 -0400 (-0400), Ken Giusti wrote:
Thanks Daniel. It was my understanding - which may be wrong - that
having devstack install the 'out of band' packages would only help in
the case of the devstack-based integration
in
sockets being shared across the parent/child processes? Seems
dangerous.
Thoughts?
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1330199
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
that the problem of implicitness re:
os.fork() needs to be clarified at the library level as well.
thanks,
-K
Cheers,
---
Mehdi Abaakouk
mail: sil...@sileht.net
irc: sileht
Le 2014-11-24 20:27, Ken Giusti a écrit :
Hi all,
As far as oslo.messaging is concerned, should it be possible for the
main
+/W4Y9wMUFqlRyGnW1LLwCFYWHpyKlhXKmYSSdKTn5L7Pcvmmfw8d
JzDcMxfKCBnM4mNRzlBqYV4/ysb6FNMUZwu+D1YxCVHmAH2O1/oODujNJFkZ
gSWAmh9kYawJKbbS0Lh7nkOJs1iOnYxG0IQmz61sffg8T2FrpbH4FNWh1/+a
mQhmYWH2L5noJIwncVQSloSRuoSWLj9rfeiTIHjq2ZnTUD5tbXK6S5dTvv4m
4bij
=G9oX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
the qpid:// transport (aka rpc_backend).
I ask because I'm
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmannd...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlowharlo
/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:27 PM Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/20/2015 10:28 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
As promissed: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193804/
Cheers,
You can't deprecate a driver without providing a viable alternative.
Right now, QPID is the only driver
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:47 PM Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-06-19 08:01:46 -0700:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:15 AM Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 18/06/15 16:37 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:15 AM Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 18/06/15 16:37 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-06-18 12:47:21 -0700:
Hello! I know there's been a lot of churn and misunderstanding over the
recent devstack changes, so I
I've already +1'd this patch - timing issues aside - I think this is a Good
Thing from a developer's point of view. Particularly, my own selfish point
of view :) I envision the ability to support multiple different messaging
services via the amqp1 driver. Having to keep devstack updated with an
+1
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:37 AM Victor Stinner wrote:
> +1 for Brant
>
> Victor
>
> Le 24/09/2015 19:12, Doug Hellmann a écrit :
> > Oslo team,
> >
> > I am nominating Brant Knudson for Oslo core.
> >
> > As liaison from the Keystone team Brant has participated in
odel. Thus
> instead of having a multi-personality codebase with hidden features like
> this (say in oslo.messaging) instead it gets its own codebase and API
> that is 'just right' (or more close to being 'right') for it's concept
> (vs trying to stuff it into oslo.messaging).
>
>
> What happened to the ide
age questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Developm
+1
Yay Dmitry!!
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM Oleksii Zamiatin
wrote:
> My big +1 for Dmitry!
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Doug Hellmann
> wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2016-01-28 09:25:56
>> -0600:
>>
Hi,
The 'trace' boolean offered by the AMQP 1.0 driver exposes a debug feature
that is provided by the Proton library. This is specific to the Proton
library - I'm not sure kombu/zmq/etc offer a similar feature.
As Xuanzhou points out, this debug tool merely prints to stdout a summary
of each
RK_AZia?dl=0
>
> --
> ChangBo Guo(gcb)
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
tho, sorry.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Cheran
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://li
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Ian Wells <ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk> wrote:
> On 1 September 2016 at 06:52, Ken Giusti <kgiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ian Wells <ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> > I have opinions a
gt;> approach is most definitely to create a new and more fitting set of oslo
>> interfaces for communication patterns, and then to encourage people to move
>> to the new ones from the old. (Whether RabbitMQ is involved is neither
>> here nor there, as this is really a question of Oslo APIs, not their
&g
derstood failure scenarios defined by the API.
[1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/zmq_driver.html
[2] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/AMQP1.0.html
> __
> OpenStack Development Ma
ists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List
nt Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
(and laughs :) you've provided in the past year.
> -Josh
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/c
__
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
ack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
As far as an oslo.messaging server is concerned, the order of operations is:
server.start()
# do stuff until ready to stop the server...
server.stop()
server.wait()
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (n
Oop - didn't reply all
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ken Giusti <kgiu...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][barbican][sahara] start RPC service
before launcher wait?
To: Adam Spiers <aspi...@suse.com>
Hi Adam,
I t
> Do we know that?
> > > >
> > > > I have also left some comments in the doc.
> > > >
> > > > Paul-Andre
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original Messag
eanup tag to each for good measure.
The original list included a few items that as best I can tell were not
tagged as deprecated via debtcollector until Pike. IIUC we can't remove
those in Queens, correct?
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
Just a head's up: this is an additional session to continue the
discussion from Weds
etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS_Forum_Oslo.Messaging_driver_recommendations
thanks,
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com
e, removal in Rocky.
thanks,
[1]
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS_Forum_Oslo.Messaging_driver_recommendations
(~ line 80)
[2] https://github.com/pika/pika
[3] https://github.com/celery/kombu
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...
- please
feel free to contribute, question, and criticize :)
thanks,
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
>
>> Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the
>> different message bus...
>>
>
> That was a particularly u
fferent messaging loads, failure conditions, etc.
[0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fog_Edge_Massively_Distributed_Clouds
>
> Thanks,
> Ilya
>
> 2017-06-21 15:23 GMT+02:00 Ken Giusti <kgiu...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Andy and I have taken
;>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/15/2017 01:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2017-05-15
>>>>>> 14:27:36 -0400:
>>>>>>>
https://www.rabbitmq.com/tutorials/tutorial-six-python.html.
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Adam Spiers <aspi...@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> Thanks a lot for the analysis, and sorry for the slow reply!
> Comments inline...
>
> Ken Giusti <kgiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > I think th
aunchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1555845
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358359/
[4] https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.messaging/latest/reference/server.html
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Developme
-05-16_05_19_06_332
>> [3]
>> https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.messaging/tree/.zuul.yaml?h=stable/queens#n250
>> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572193/2/.zuul.yaml
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing Lis
/openstack/oslo.messaging/tree/.zuul.yaml?h=stable/queens#n250
[4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572193/2/.zuul.yaml
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
or details.
I've started patches for a couple of projects, but if anyone is
willing to help out please use the epad so we don't step on each
other's toes.
thanks,
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Ma
st (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack D
/dims
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/open
ions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Maili
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
+1
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
_
> YAML-based sample config with (ideally) information about all the
>> options available to set in a project. It should be possible to compare
>> the options set in the config file with the ones listed in the sample
>> config and raise warnings for any that don't exist.
>
Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote:
> I can’t see
>
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vQpaSSm7Amk9q4sBEAUi_IpyJ4l07qd3t5T_BPZkdLWfYbtSpSmF7obSB1qRGA65wjiiq2Sb7H2ylJo/pub?start=false=false=3000=id.p
>
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Ken Giusti <kgiu...
#n116
[1] https://github.com/r1chardj0n3s/pip-check-reqs
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
/oslo.messaging/latest/contributor/supported-messaging-drivers.html
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
.html
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536960/
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
ing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
till be in favour of having some extra
> time to prove that with thorough testing.
>
> @Ben, including the executor via setup.cfg also looks OK to me. I see no
> issues with this approach.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Renat Akhmerov
> @Nokia
> On 18 Oct 2018, 23:35 +0700,
side ? What will you advice ?
>
>
> [1] http://paste.openstack.org/show/733766/
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http:
,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
> __________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org
openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openst
__
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensta
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:30 PM Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Ken Giusti writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:56 AM Doug Hellmann
> wrote:
> >
> >> Matthew Thode writes:
> >>
> >> > On 18-10-09 11:12:30, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >> >&
chpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1792977
> > It's definitely edge cases that we'd be catching here (if any), so I'm
> > personally fine with assuming it will just work. But I wanted to pose the
> > question to the list, as we agreed this isn't only an ironic problem.
>
> Yes, definitely. I
://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1712399+status:open
Our goal is to land the removal next week.
thanks
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
74 matches
Mail list logo