moin babysco,
if you're on linux, you could use the LADSPA plugin 'Multiband EQ
(1197/mbeq)'. Check if it's installed with:
$ listplugins | grep mbeq
Instantiate it in Pd with [plugin~ mbeq]. Send it 'control #N VAL'
messages, where N is an integer between 1 and 16 (inclusive), and VAL is
a
hmm.. generally this could be a good idea, but message sending is most useful
when initialising a number of receives ie:
[loadbang]
|
|; init-1 6 /
|; init-2 symbol foo |
|; init-3 -2 \
which is far more elegant than the the trigger/send replacement, especially
with
hi babsyco,
please only send your question to pd-list@iem.at
i am using hml_shelf, in pdmtl abstractions it's fx.eq~
http://wiki.dataflow.ws/PdMtlAbstractions
it's 3 bands, but i think it's very easy to modify. might be wrong.
pat
___
I am not proposing to limit the use of dollar args in message boxes
for dynamic sends, that is a very useful feature. The example you give
here, though, is an example of a shortcut for typing, there is no
other benefit that I can see.
And at the risk of sounding pedantic, I am going to
--- On Fri, 3/20/09, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org wrote:
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org
Subject: Re: [PD] style guide idea: [send foo] versus [; foo(
To: dmotd dm...@gmx.net
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Friday, March 20, 2009, 5:25 PM
I am not proposing to limit the use of
Also note that some objects, e.g. [qlist], positively depend on the
message sending style. My students who wanted to use them have often
wondered why we hadn't covered the two ways of sending more in depth.
Can you explain with an example? I don't understand why you must use
message boxes
Hallo,
Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote:
So in order to have my students understand [qlist] and its files, they
have found it very useful to know about the message system in message
boxes... it makes the message system in Pd on the whole a lot more
understandable and less
Hi,
after creating a structure (object) with append, is it possible to delete
it? Or just better hide it with 0 on the drawing objects?
(the patch is only to display data, not to be used by the user)
João
--
Friedenstr. 58
10249 Berlin (Deutschland)
Tel +49 30 42020091 | Mob +49 162
On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Matt Barber wrote:
hmm.. generally this could be a good idea, but message sending is
most useful
when initialising a number of receives ie:
[loadbang]
|
|; init-1 6 /
|; init-2 symbol foo |
|; init-3 -2 \
which is far more elegant than the the
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I am not proposing to limit the use of dollar args in message boxes for
dynamic sends, that is a very useful feature. The example you give here,
though, is an example of a shortcut for typing, there is no other
benefit that I can see.
Of course it would be nice to do the projects regardless of funding,
but in reality they just won't get the same attention to detail and
thoroughness. I don't have a job except through grants like this..
I'm still all for making apython libpd module... but who knows when
summer rolls around and
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Frank Barknecht wrote:
For example I'd rather start with making people properly left-align
their patches and avoid crossing patch cords
well, I do my best to reduce the number of crossings, but if I have to
avoid crossings completely, I'll just avoid Pd...
Pd doesn't
I don't think it's possible to delete a ds object unless selecting it with the
mouse (or maybe with the mouse msg).
Notice that if you turn off drawing instructions by using an inlet to
[filledcurve], for example, all other visible data structures will flash off
and on again. I think that's
Ok, I'd like to propose a patch-off.
What's the cleanest, clearest way to present adsr.pd from the audio tutorials?
I choose this patch because there are lots of crossed wires, plus one has to
leave space for the explanatory comments of the patch.
Here are two versions I could think of.
I don't think it's possible to delete a ds object unless selecting it
with the mouse (or maybe with the mouse msg).
I thought so as well. so a better choice might be to hide it.
Notice that if you turn off drawing instructions by using an inlet to
[filledcurve], for example, all other
Hello
I am looking for a version of pd- extended for 64 bit. Does something
exist yet?
At my job we just some Nvidia Quadro plex with 8 video outputs, but the
machine is 64 bit.
Also any tips on running ubuntu with one of these Nvidia monster cards
[Quadro Plex] woudl be greatly appreciated
Hmm - there shouldn't be any difference between sigmund~'s env output and
that of env~. What latform are you on? Perhaps I should check this out.
cheers
Miller
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:51:44AM -0700, Oded Ben-Tal wrote:
should the output of:
[sigmund~ env]
be the same (or very
ah, now I know. it never happened to me, because I never used enough to
make them visible. that's a nice example patch.
btw, in order to control the display of the individual elements I used -v
in the definitions of the base struct (that gets taken by the array). that
allows for individual
sorry, forgot to ask: and there's also no way of deleting an array without
deleting the whole window with clear, is there?
ah, now I know. it never happened to me, because I never used enough to
make them visible. that's a nice example patch.
btw, in order to control the display of the
On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/20/09, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org wrote:
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org
Subject: Re: [PD] style guide idea: [send foo] versus [; foo(
To: dmotd dm...@gmx.net
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Friday, March 20,
--- On Sat, 3/21/09, João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com wrote:
From: João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [PD] data-structures short questions
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com, PD-List pd-list@iem.at
Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 2:37 AM
sorry, forgot to ask: and there's
On Mar 20, 2009, at 6:28 PM, Matt Barber wrote:
Also note that some objects, e.g. [qlist], positively depend on the
message sending style. My students who wanted to use them have
often
wondered why we hadn't covered the two ways of sending more in
depth.
Can you explain with an example?
On Mar 11, 2009, at 8:42 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Steffen Juul wrote:
On 10/03/2009, at 18.11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
(...) and the green/white toggle from [pddp/dsp].
I quite strongly think [cvn]'s tricks should be avoided in help
patches, especially those default for vanilla
Ah, ok, I get it, the text in the msg boxes is basically the same as the
text in the qlist file. That makes sense, and in the context of [qlist] I
think it makes sense to teach about [; foo( sends. But I don't think that
[qlist] is an essential object, especially for newbies. I am not
--- On Sat, 3/21/09, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org wrote:
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org
Subject: Re: [PD] style guide idea: [send foo] versus [; foo(
To: jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: dmotd dm...@gmx.net, pd-list@iem.at
Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 2:48 AM
On Mar 20, 2009,
I likey! Although, it would be nice to include [outlet~]s on the bottom to
pass through to recording devices.
~Kyle
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.orgwrote:
On Mar 11, 2009, at 8:42 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Steffen Juul wrote:
On 10/03/2009, at
26 matches
Mail list logo
