Simpler more archaic solution to film advance. I'd compare a high end AF
camera to a manual one as the difference between a revolver and an assault
rifle or sub-machine gun.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Hi,
I need some expertise to determine whether I shall return a MX or a FA 35/2
(or both?) to focusing adjustment. Let me try to explain the problem:
During my recent vacation I put the FA 35 on the MX to do some late evening
b/w shooting. During this I noticed that it was impossible to focus
Yes, I do.
A Canon G-III QL17 ismy rangefinder of choice.
Also, the 4x5. Just upgraded lenses from a mid-50s Schneider Symmar 135/4.7 to a
mid-70s Schneider Xenar 150/4.5. Multi-coated. Looking forward to some shooting this
week-end. Going with the son on a drive down into the W. Va.
Forget listening and get realistic. If you could look at the mechanism
itself with the camera disassembled you will find that the lever that starts
the winder can't move the film until a bail gets tripped by the end of the
shutter closing mechanism.
Lots of reasons for shaking that mi9ght cause
After many weeks of work and even more weeks of procrastination and even
*more* weeks of not having enough time to work on it...
The Pentax Spotmatic service manual PDF is nearing completion. The exploded
diagrams are all done. I have finished the scanning and OCR (and manual
OCR corrections) on
This is correct. Pentax models that have aperture priority have been
stepless since the days of the first ES camera.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of PAUL STENQUIST
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 7:58 AM
To: Pentax List
I'm probably going to regret it but...
I'm a packrat and have kept all PDML digests from #1193 (06/28/2001) to
current.
I'm half-heartedly considering making a routine to turn each into an
HTML page but if anyone needs a back-digest that's been lost I can suppy
it.
-- John
-
This message is from
You'd think that would be the case, all I know is that my tests with E-6
film turned out great, perfect fill lighting.
DG
At 11:38 PM 10/19/01 -0400, you wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, dick graham wrote:
repeating. Simply put your camera in manual mode and set the exposure for
the ambient
You need a more modern flash with an AF spotbeam projector as an aid.
AF240FT, AF330FTZ, or AF500FTZ. Or one of the newer ones made for the MZ-S.
The problem with using an AF280T is that you lose some of the modern
functionality that the camera can provide in flash modes. Pentax decided to
not
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Any of you all use equipment other than
Pentax at times?
I use Olympus mju:2 (Stylus Epic) quite Often. I also own Canonet
GIII-QL17 rangefinder and russian made Zenit 11 SLR and Ljubitel MF TLR.
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Hi Erik ...
Don't blame yourself too much. Many new, electronic cameras can't
handle high humidity or temperature extremes.
Erik Nordin wrote:
First, my MZ-3 stopped working in the
rain forest. It was obviously partly
my own fault, since I didn't protect it
sufficiently. After one day
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Tom,
I have thought about doing that also, but have never been brave enough to
try. Even though I scan all the time, I have felt that the time to deal
with an entire wedding would be just too much. You would really need to
have full roll batch scanning with
A few months ago Phototechnique or 35mm Photo ( one of those magazines)
listed their version of the top 25 cameras of all time. Included in the 25
was the Pentax Spotmatic. Why you may ask did they include it. Because,
they said, it was the life support system for those marvelous Super
Hello,
I am new to PDML. I own a Pentax K1000. Besides being able to use a release cord for
long exposures, what other accessories are available for use with this type of camera.
I enjoy very much your postings to PDML. I hope I can contribute my share too but I
am limited to only topics
Hi Juan ...
If I recall, you have the same version of the 'cron as I (the one just
before the current version with the built-in hood), and I've not noticed
any similar problems. I suppose if you shot the scene at a certain angle
relative to the light source the chances of this happening would be
I read this and the other comments deniging the MX. Most MX were bought by
very serious photographers who used them heavily unlike most ME, ME Super
cameras which spent the last twenty years in a sock drawer. I had two MX
bought in 78, and 80 which I used ten years, five of them
Finally found a relatively easy way to post some photos to the net.
With all the talk lately about scanning BW I thought I'd give it a try.
Here's an example that was taken with my father's old Agfa Super Solina on
Tmax 400. I scanned it using Vuescan into PS 6.0. The only manipulation
done
Kiev 60 ( 5 lenses)
Minolta Maxxum 9 (all my pro lenses are for this)
Minolta Maxxum 700si (2) (backups or alternate films)
Minolta RD-175 (digital 35mm body) (have to practice till a newer
Pentax/Minolta body comes out)
Fuji MX-1200 (pocket digital)
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
It amazes me how people who buy a worn out 20 plus year old camera are
sure those cameras were junk to start with.
Well, 20 years ago I was almost ready for nursery school, so I can't speak
to that. :) All I can really say is that I've seen a lot
On 22 Oct 2001, at 14:52, Erik Nordin wrote:
First, my MZ-3 stopped working in the rain forest. It was obviously partly
my own fault, since I didn't protect it sufficiently. After one day of
trekking it just died. No response whatsoever, no info on the display
either. It didn't help to
If you want a specific shutter speed it is not that difficult to get: overexposure is
over 1/500 and shake warning is under 1/30 - so watch when one of those illuminates
and adjust aperture the required number of stops. I tested one a couple of years back
for the Finnish magazine and the lens
On Monday, October 22, 2001, at 12:39 AM, William Robb wrote:
How about pink? You could have a genuine Pentax MX Barbie.
The Barbie camera must also be fitted with giant silver flowers, or
people will recognize it as a fake.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
I read this and the other comments deniging the MX. Most MX were bought
by
very serious photographers who used them heavily unlike most ME, ME Super
cameras which spent the last twenty years in a sock drawer. I had two MX
bought in 78, and 80 which I used ten years, five
I have an Efina that I'll sometimes throw into my suitcase when I'm going somewhere
new on a business trip. If I see something I'd like to explore more, I can return
with my ZX-5n and gear. My younger son has been experimenting with the Efina and BW
APS film with good results. I'm thinking
News in AP regarding the Pentax Digital. Scrapping launch of Pentax 6 MP
digital slr in favour of lower-end digital k mount slr more along the
lines of the Canon D30 and Fuji S1. First appearance will probably be
next year's PMA. Full story soon - It'll take me a few minutes to type it
all
What he needs is a real pro camera with real dust seals and gaskets like a
Nikon F5, EOS-1v, or Maxxum 9. While not waterproof because of the film back
it's tough for dirt or water to work their way in while the back is closed.
That can't be said for a Pentax manual body or ZX/MZ body (possibly
Also remember in photography the important thing is the shot itself not what
equipment you have to use to get it.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAUL STENQUIST writes:
As far as I've been able to determine, they're all exactly the same.
Some have bette plastic storage boxes. This seems to be the determining
element.
Some CD readers won't read some CD technologies. For example, I can make a
video CD that will play on my DVD
To an extent you're correct, although perhaps a well-sealed mechanical
camera, that doesn't rely as much upon electronics, might afford even
better results in a humid environment.
Kent Gittings wrote:
What he needs is a real pro camera with real dust seals and gaskets like a
Nikon F5,
Looks like a really clean F* 300mm F4.5 is on eBay. Buy It Now price is
$575, which isn't bad for a clean example:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=128810
--Mark
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
From Amateur Photographer (27 Oct):
'Pentax set to scrap plan for flagship digital launch'
'Pentax is likely to shelve plans to launch a 6 MP flagship digital
camera in favour of a 'lower-end' SLR to be unveiled next year.
'Pentax UK's John Dickins admitted that Pentax wants to move away from
Does anyone think that someone from Pentax reads this list!!!???
Can I place my order right now?
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
www.macads.co.uk
-
This
I know this is way off topic, but I'd appreciate any pointers from someone
who's been there...
My girlfriend and I are probably (70%) relocating to Paris for 2+ years
starting in January. Our respective companies are handling the work visas,
her co. is picking up the moving bill, we just
I have a Minolta 16 QT that I've used in the past. I just need to get film
for it which is a nightmare.
Christian Skofteland
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Chris;
Which K-series body provides a full mechanical shutter speed range (1sec -
1/1000 ) DOF preview, interchangeable focusing screens and a decent
motor/winder?
I just bought an MX on ebay for half of what I normally see them go for.
I'll let you know how it is when i get it later this week.
So we go from 6MP release this year to 3MP first glimpse next year (and
probably released 2003!). This is not good Pentax!!
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 October 2001 16:52
To: Pentax List
Subject: Pentax Digital NEWS! Part one
News in AP
Interesting
I guess it makes sense. Up to now. digital photography has never really
been about quality.
I find the Fuji Super CCD technology somewhat of a joke. You can't end up
with more raw material than you start with.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Nagaraj,
I can only vouch for Amateur Photgrapher. I'm only interested in the news
bits, biographies and book reviews, although the reviews are pretty good,
I only give them a glance really. Nice competition results pics, a few
wannabees getting their stuff onto a page, the odd camera club
Rob Brigham wrote:
So we go from 6MP release this year to 3MP first glimpse next year (and
probably released 2003!). This is not good Pentax!!
Plus the ccd is probably not full-frame.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Alternatively, use a faster lens. The Tamron 28-200 is an f4 - f5.6 or
something like that isn't it? When shooting in low light try an f2.8 or
faster lens. My 28-70 f2.8 allows me to shoot in relatively low light
with no hunting on my MZ-S.
Cheers, Mike.
Kent Gittings wrote:
You
This might be a good thing!! a decent d30 class
digital SLR may get more K-mount development going.
--- tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Brigham wrote:
So we go from 6MP release this year to 3MP first
glimpse next year (and
probably released 2003!). This is not good
Pentax!!
Plus
My concern is if you are going to do no better than the competition, and
they are more entrenched, how are you going to compete. The motto We're no
worse than the rest comes to mind.
A full frame CCD was, IMHO, one of the big differences between the Pentax
and a D30 or D1. Pentax may be able
Bruce wrote:
My concern is if you are going to do no better than the competition, and
they are more entrenched, how are you going to compete. The motto We're
no
worse than the rest comes to mind.
Agreed. I guess all they want to do is have some offering, no matter what.
A full frame CCD
Good point but if Pentax does We're no worse than the
rest but it costs less ( we hope ).
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My concern is if you are going to do no better than
the competition, and
they are more entrenched, how are you going to
compete. The motto We're no
worse than
The big advantage to a full frame CCD is that our existing wide angle lenses
will remain as such. Nothing quite so exciting as having your 20mm behave
like it was a 35mm. So, if I have to buy some new lenses (I like wides),
then why buy Pentax. It seems to me, that lens compatibility with my
Thanks to all who responded to my original posting regarding lighting on a
budget!
To show my ignorance I'll admit that I didn't realize you could use an
on-camera electronic flash as an off-camera flash so I come back to you
with a question of whether this is possible or not with my current
aimcompute wrote:
Bruce wrote:
Probably a dumb question, but I'll ask it anyway.
I think I understand that a perceived advantage to using a full frame CCD
was that the CCD captures the entire scene entering the camera thru the
lens. Is this correct?
Nope, The full CCD means that your
The 'magnification' factor is one of the reasons I have not truly
looked at a digital SLR. I have started to enjoy wide angle shooting and
would not relish having to get a 17mm to get a 25mm. And I have heard of
the problems with distortion with the 17mms. People have corrected this
Does anyone have an opinion on these tests (in which Pentax faired mediocre)
or the testing methods?
The link below requires pasting two sections:
http://server2039.virtualave.net/canadar2/LensTests/
LensTestIndex007.htm#f1.2
I know tests are just tests and all that...
Rob
Mike,
Have you tried the new Epson Color Life paper? It's a semigloss that also
is supposedly quite archivable.
Bill, KG4LOV
JCO wrote:
What else are you guys using?
I currently use an ME Super with a 50/1.4 M, Tri-X developed in D-76 1+1,
and a Carl Zeiss S-Orthoplanar 60mm f/4
Robert Wetmore wrote:
Does mounting a multicoated filter
actually reduce lens flare,
No
or does it just minimize the flare
that would have been added by the
filter itself?
Yes
would adding an SMC filter improve
performance on non-SMC lenses in regard to flare?
No
(Only the
Shel Belinkoff asked:
Do other quality digital cameras offer FF CCD that can be
used with the lenses from their SLRs?
No - all current digital SLRs built around 35mm bodies have
sensors smaller than full frame. This gives a focal length
multiplier for all lenses - somewhere between 1.3
Funny you should mention it. I was just reading an interview with Annie
Leibovitz (http://fototapeta.art.pl/fti-ale.html) in which she mentions a
bonus of motor drives that had never occured to me. If your left eyed; like
I am, you dont have to move your face away from the camera to advance the
Mark,
If you can cancel your order with Ritz you might want to check the following
address http://www.netphotostore.com/index.php?expand=2256
Ritz's price is $279 for the flash with NetPhoto offering it at $209. It's
still order it and we'll ship it to you when it comes in but it is about
$70
Cotty wrote:
News in AP regarding the Pentax Digital. Scrapping launch of Pentax 6 MP
digital slr in favour of lower-end digital k mount slr more along the
lines of the Canon D30 and Fuji S1. First appearance will probably be
next year's PMA.
And then in another post:
Does anyone think
Nope, adding anoter air/glass interface won't reduce overall
flare of any lens that I know of. Better to use a larger deeper
lens hood. Compendium hoods, like those used on medium format
cameras are probably the best.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Robert Wetmore [mailto:[EMAIL
Bruce Dayton wrote:
The big advantage to a full frame CCD is that our existing wide angle lenses
will remain as such. Nothing quite so exciting as having your 20mm behave
like it was a 35mm. So, if I have to buy some new lenses (I like wides),
then why buy Pentax. It seems to me, that
A multicoated filter does not reduce flare other than produced by the filter itself.
Multicoated lenses are usually wholly multicoated so that also the internal surfaces
are multicoated - but all surfaces may not have the same number or similar types of
coatings. Actually the internal
Wasn't there a time when Pentax actually cared about
being a leader? Are they now content with always
following (more and more distantly), at best offering
products close to the others and cheaper? This would
be sad. If they simply don't have the might to
compete against N and C*
The price tag would be high. Could I afford one? Good question. I, too,
would be somewhat concerned with low light performance. The real
disappointment is not just that it is delayed, but I keep seeing a pattern.
Rather than driving the market, Pentax is only responding to market changes.
Mike wrote...
snip
P.S. I have to say that I'm totally NOT sold on the idea that a
full-size
sensor (meaning 35mm size, 24mm x 36mm) is a good idea. I'm really not
sure
it is. A smaller sensor size is really a great advantage: it means lenses
can be significantly smaller and lighter and
Ah... that's what I thought.
only the central portion of that image
falls on the digital sensor. The effect is exactly the same
as taking the central portion of a 35mm negative and using that
to produce a standard print.
Tom C.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Evan Hanson wrote:
Funny you should mention it. I was just reading an interview
with Annie Leibovitz (http://fototapeta.art.pl/fti-ale.html)
in which she mentions a bonus of motor drives that had never
occured to me. If your left eyed; like I am, you dont have
to move your face away
In mid September a Pentax rep here in California said the AF360 would be released in
November.
Ken
David Hatfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
If you can cancel your order with Ritz you might want to check the following
address http://www.netphotostore.com/index.php?expand=2256
Ritz's
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:43:35 -0700, tom wrote:
This is all true...however, Canon and Nikon user have been happy to buy
up D30's and D1's, so I guess Pentax believes the same of Pentax users.
Apparently the smaller frame size sells ok, and I guess Pentax thinks
they can make some cash.
I like
Mike wrote:
All this smacks of great good sense to me. What they're going to do is
release a smaller-CCD-size, LOWER COST, 3-5-mp digital SLR ASAP, and put
off MR-42 until both the market and the technology are more stable.
I like the idea. What it means for the Pentax loyalist is that we will
Your order for the ditched 6MB or for the new one with the smaller CCD?
I am not sure how to take this news. Perhaps it means the camera is more
affordable?
If the one that we already saw is upgradable, would it be possible it would
hit the market with a smaller CCD to begin with? That might be
Mike Y,
How is your French? What do you know about the French culture?
I wish you good luck in your assignment, both of you. From personal
experience I know that the first few months can be very hard to adjust, but
after that you get to really enjoy it and might find that 2 years is a bit
short.
Quite possible it's the problem of the MX. Often repaired Pentax 35mm SLR
cameras had missing washers (between the body and the mirror assembly) or
inaccurate screens.
1) If the number of washers is not correct, the lens-to-film distance would
be altered. This is a very common problem when
I am new to PDML. I own a Pentax K1000. Besides being able to use a
release cord for long exposures, what other accessories are available for
use with this type of camera. I enjoy very much your postings to PDML. I
hope I can contribute my share too but I am limited to only topics
ME: Does mounting a multicoated filter actually reduce lens flare?
SHEL: No.
ME: D'oh!
It seemed too easy. I didn't realize that in SMC lenses all or many glass
surfaces were coated. Thanks for the info, Shel. And thanks to the others
who have responded.
Rob
Bruce Dayton wrote:
The price tag would be high. Could I afford one? Good question. I, too,
would be somewhat concerned with low light performance. The real
disappointment is not just that it is delayed, but I keep seeing a pattern.
Rather than driving the market, Pentax is only
We all have our preferences, and for some they are strong preferences
(which
is perfectly legitimate) but any photographer should be able to adapt to
either manual film advance or motorized film advance. It just takes a while
to get used to it. But we are capable of adapting.
I actually quite
Rob ...
Being an eternal optimist, I asked the same question when I joined the
list.
Robert Wetmore wrote:
ME: Does mounting a multicoated filter actually reduce lens flare?
SHEL: No.
ME: D'oh!
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Someone said they wanted an MX (GREAT camera BTW ;-) black? Here's one,
mint. UK dealer.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1288350413
Cheers,
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to
Jan van Wijk wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:43:35 -0700, tom wrote:
This is all true...however, Canon and Nikon user have been happy to buy
up D30's and D1's, so I guess Pentax believes the same of Pentax users.
Apparently the smaller frame size sells ok, and I guess Pentax thinks
they
That's a good idea.
Keeps them from cross-breeding.
Collin
---
jeepgirl
p.s. It's not cheating if they are in different zip codes right? So the
bronica's stay at mom and dad's and the Pentax's are all at my place.
Different towns.
-
This message is
Does mounting a multicoated filter actually reduce lens flare,
No.
or does it
just minimize the flare that would have been added by the filter itself?
Yes.
In
other words, would adding an SMC filter improve performance on non-SMC
lenses in regard to flare?
No, if you mean flare control.
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Cotty wrote:
Someone said they wanted an MX (GREAT camera BTW ;-) black? Here's one,
mint. UK dealer.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1288350413
Yes, I saw it, it had a BIN but someone had bid on it before I got
there. Now I'll have to wait for
:
A few months ago Phototechnique or 35mm Photo ( one of those magazines)
listed their version of the top 25 cameras of all time. Included in the 25
was the Pentax Spotmatic. Why you may ask did they include it. Because,
they said, it was the life support system for those marvelous
Jan van Wijk remarked:
I like the idea too, I'd rather have a 4MP K-mount digital
SLR for $2000 to $3000 in a few months
(or, more realistically, in probably around a year)
than the 6MP full-frame for maybe $7000 now ...
That's pretty much what I've been saying for the last six months,
P.P.S. I've requested a sample Optio 330/430 from Pentax for a review
(through a friend who works for Pentax), and if I end up getting one I'll
post ongoing updates of my findings here in advance of the published
review.
My brother bought one and he let me play with it last Friday for about 30
When it is said that a lens has a certain angle of view, where is point
from which the angle is measured - film plane, somewhere inside the
lens, front element?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Sure, Pentax was a leader (hand-in-hand) with Nikon in the 60s. People seemed to like
Nikon's bayonet mount but Pentax' lenses (from conversations I've had with a handful
of oldtimers).
But the technology era that began around 1980 is different than what happened earlier.
Today, one-year
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, John Francis wrote:
Longer, effectively. The lens produces an image of exactly
the same size, but only the central portion of that image
falls on the digital sensor. The effect is exactly the same
as taking the central portion of a 35mm negative and using that
to
Mark Roberts fumed:
I certainly hope you're correct. Right now I'm still
*furious* at this latest development. I spent several
thousand dollars on equipment this year, largely based
on the confidence that the digital SLR was coming and
what I bought would be compatible.
Gambling on just
I do quite a bit of copy work with molights in the
studio, and I find it a real handicap if the LX winder
is not working. The less you touch the camera,
especially when taking multiple slides, the less
chance there is of screwing up the alignment.
That's the only time I use a winder, if I'm not
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
When it is said that a lens has a certain angle of view, where is point
from which the angle is measured - film plane, somewhere inside the
lens, front element?
Somewhere inside the lens. I don't remember how that point is called,
but suppose you
Hi, Christian,
I may have told you this already, but I just bought a Minolta 16II on eBay
(it's been three weeks now, and the thing still hasn't arrived yet...).
I expect to have problems finding film - I don't even know if it has a cassette
in it (probably not). If you ever find film or
No, I don't think so. It'll be at least a 4MP, and probably a
5MP camera.
It's really too late already for anything as small as 3MP.
Len
---
Oh, this is very bad news. Pentax is again playing catch-up on
last
year's technology. They could have been ahead of the pack with
the
digital MZ-S.
Welcome to the list.As a K1000 owner myself,one word.
Keep the K1000,its a camera you can always go back
to.I love mine and its my main go to camera for now
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Francis Alviar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 Oct 2001 07:38:34 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Francis wrote:
That's the primary reason why I have winders for my M-bodies;
not only am I left-eyed, I also wear glasses, making it even
more difficult to advance the film manually.
Ditto. I shot without winders for many years, using my right eye to
focus. But as I aged, my right
A couple of months ago I decided to subscribe to Practical Photography.
Partly because I was buying it every month anyway and it was quite late
getting into the shops and partly because whenever I go to the book store,
I spend too much anyway. Another reason was the nice crumpler bag they were
Bought one used, a few years ago from B+H, in as new condition, with
original sales box, case rubber eye piece and instructions for $275. I
believe they were then going for around $325 to $350US.
Ken Waller
- Original Message -
From: Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Mustarde mentioned:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:18:49 -0700, you wrote:
What I'd like to do, and my script is pretty close to doing,
is read a
directory of jpegs, create an index page of thumbnails, and an
individual html page from a template for each one. Can excel
do that?
In the FWIW Dept, I'm a left eye shooter and a wearer of eye glasses. I
figured out a way to manually advance the film without removing my eye
from the finder. On cameras where the film advance lever ratchets (MX,
LX, Spotmatics,and others I'm sure)) I just push the lever as far out as
possible
Hi,
I have a crumpler bag with a camera bag insert and its great. I have the
Weenie bag which i'm selling as i'm going to change to the wonder weenie.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Wendy Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:32 AM
Subject: Re:
The angle of view indicates the area that will be included within the film
frame when the lens is focused to infinity. The standard practice is to
give the angle of view based on the diagonal of the film format. Since most
subjects are either horizontal or vertical, angles of view for these are
Hey Cory, are you a little anxious??? ;-) This is your fifth mail with the same
question. :-)
And I don't know the answer to your question.
Martin
PD Should I reply 5 times? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Cory or Brenda Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Rob Studdert wrote:
But at least a flat-bed or film scanner scans the three primary
colours for each absolute pixel whereas in a digital camera the
CCD is masked by a matrix of colour filters ie for every cluster
of four pixels there are a red, blue and two green
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
