- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's TBPDML
Okay, I give up. What's the T and the B?
Jostein
Thanks, Paul!
On second look, I agree with you completely.
Needed my home screen to see it though.
Jostein
(back in Oslo)
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Weeds of Denmark
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3479/display/3436741
Crop an inch off the top and I'll take it :-)
:-) I'll send you a print. Hope you find a new home with lotsa walls,
man!
Jostein
raw material for a PESO or two. Hopefully
there's at least something...
Thanks for the comment, Boris.
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Weeds of Denmark
It was too bad we crossed paths, Jens. It would have been great to see
you again. Hopefully next time!
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Weeds of Denmark
Beautiful
Thanks, Ken and Mike.
You guys are too kind.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Weeds of Denmark
Kenneth Waller wrote:
I'm not sure I'd have taken it myself
One
...:-)
Jostein
, Keith.
One thing is for sure, though. In Norway there's no range of weeds to
match the colour diversity in the acres of Denmark. Very photogenic,
agricultural aspects aside.
Cheers,
Jostein
of lines of HTML to cover your needs. :-)
IMHO, we may be the best free service around.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Recomendations on where to upload public images
for the competition. It also helps if you're
familiar with the infamous camera club aesthethics.
Hmmm. I see the last sentence is a good flame bait, but having seen to
your local camera club, I think you know what I mean...
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a matter of fact, I thought of going to the Freedom Island (is
that the correct name?) but the weather did not permit that...
What do you want to go to Guantanamo for?
Jostein
grinning, ducking and running like hell
Thanks Boris,
But don't you worry. I much prefer to look after myself in this
respect. Only take to sulking for attention's sake...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 6:57 AM
Subject: Re
stop overexposed.
*istD with FA-100/2.8 macro.
Most happy to read comments on this experiment.
Thanks for looking.
Jostein
with the *istD variant of
MultiExposure, but I may give it a shot. Or in this case at least
two... Thanks for the tip. :-) In the poppy-shot, the focal plane of
the OOF shot is closer to the camera, and thus did nothing to the
background.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
than
answers...:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
(holding tight on his FA*400/5.6)
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy
Hi!
Poppies are rare at home, so I made my best
Glad you liked it, Joe!
Btw,
Does anyone know if the multi-exposure thing with the *istD is unique
in the DSLR world?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 6:29 PM
Subject: PESO - double-exposed
.
Thanks for looking, Mike.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jorn Ostergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is PESO ?
What is GESO ?
Hei Jørn,
PESO : Picture Ever So Often
GESO : Gallery Ever So Often
They are acronyms for those of us who can't keep up with the
regularity of PAW (Picture A Week).
Jostein
controlled conditions now. From
the camera preview it seems to confirm my suspicion. I will carry on
my investigations tomorrow. Some guests just tumbled in...:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 03
Mike and Tim,
If we settle for FBPDML, I'm with you.
According to Slartibartfast, the Bits were not Twiddly, but
Fiddly...:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: PDML
the
rest of us sample the local production of cider and fruits. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
to control it in Photoshop after all...:-)
Jostein
with the poppy shot. For this little bugger, though, I was
working at close to 1:1, so the option wasn't there.
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
. :-)
Jostein
Quoting Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 01:48 PM 04/07/2005 , Jostein wrote:
This test is probably only scratching the surface of a big issue.
Maybe it's easier to control it in Photoshop after all...:-)
I don't get it. Other than the challenge what is the point of double
hate the eyepiece that keeps coming off, and a
couple of other minor design flaws. It's not really anything seriously wrong
with it, only those minor nuisances that excludes it from the inner circle.
Jostein
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Gang ...
Another Pentax list member and I
Lucas,
I have no batteries for my Z-1 at the moment, so I can't double-check.
What I do remember is metering a scene, turning on the multi-exposure,
and watch the exposure time go down.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
I've been nicking small black rubber bands from my kids' Lego sets
ever since MZ-S. Every time, the rubber band stays while the eyepiece
disappears. :-(
And every time it happens while using the MZ-S/*istD as walking
camera, so it's behaviour related, but still a nuisance.
Jostein
Oh!
Sorry, Boris! I misunderstood you. I tought you meant *literally* that few
people approved of pentax optics.
Good thing the wind blows in the opposite direction...
Jostein
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
In the local club (which you visited) there are few folks
achievement if they actually managed to make
*one* body that would become the instant favourite of all...
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Hmmm...
My memory must be getting rusty. :-(
Jostein
Quoting Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have no batteries for my Z-1 at the moment, so I can't double-check.
What I do remember is metering a scene,turning on the multi-exposure,
and watch the exposure time go down.
Hello
All comments appreciated.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3522/display/3475699
Thanks for looking.
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
landing on it. Maybe Cotty's suggestion would have
solved the issue, but I suppose it requires the mud to be hard enough for
walking on...:-)
Jostein
Quoting Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another shot from the Southern Utah trip. Being a very wet spring in
Utah, washes and ponds, haven't dried out
to be called Lågendalen. Further
up, the valley has a different name (Valdres). I can't recall at the moment
where one becomes the other, though...
Jostein
Quoting Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A strong image!
You must have cheated/tweaked a bit with the colours, there is no lake
that blue
take off, but it seems unlikely that we'll reach Heathrow in time.
To complicate matters, this applies to so many people that virtually all hotels
are full for the coming night too.
We will try to reach Heathrow anyway.
In good faith,
Jostein
...
Jostein
Quoting Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cotty? you ok?
ann
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
of responsibly, btw, I must say Londoners in general showed
an impressive calm about the incidents. People were shaking heads not
fists.
Cheers, and good night,
Jostein
You know, Mike,
Quite frequently, the most wonderfully blurred image is projected
behind the lens...
Depends on what you're drinking, of course.
Jostein
colon, dash, end-parenthesis.
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday
. It only reports the wrong aperture when used with a
TC.
First time I read about Sigma reverse-engineering the mounts was
around 1998, on this list. :-)
Jostein
right about the background, btw. Worthy of envy.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 4:46 AM
Subject: PESO: Blue Dragon
I was walking in a wooded area this afternoon hoping to shoot some
birds
Btw, I've posted my pic before.
It's here:
http://www.oksne.net/pdml2004/images/th_IMGP3074.html
But the backround is not as nice as yours, Paul.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 9:44 AM
Subject: Re
Gotta love it, man!
Great shot.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 11:32 PM
Subject: PESO: Red Dragon
Here's another shot from yesterday's walk in the woods. Again this
is with the A 400/5.6
should train that nose better.
That makes sense:
http://www.geocities.com/naylord02/mr-bean-vote-bean-4001131.jpeg
Jostein
works with a reversed 50mm on a bellows if you don't stop down beyond
5.6.
HTH,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: What's your preferred focus mode for macro work
after the old one. The new box is exactly 2mm too
wide. :-(
/Sulking mode
Jostein
another beer
mind the gap.
/another beer
lineup that beats
that?
Jostein
google.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:31 AM
Subject: Recovering Files
This may be of interest:
A chap on another mailing list inadvertently formatted an SD card in
a
camera
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no precogs. :-)
I knew you were going to say that.
Uhoh...
Jostein
Brain fart...
Last sentence should read:
..., but of course more time-consuming than a software tool for
general stitching.
Time to sleep.
Hopes for colder weather in Oslo tomorrow. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent
Is this situation similar to the real world, when the SO lingers, and
you're just about to get married if you manage to wash your own
winsocks?
Jostein,
just wondering...:-)
- Original Message -
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, July 14
directions are more challenging to photograph than
even, directional falls.
well, those are my experiences, at least...
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 2:54 PM
Subject
, the highlights become specular and burned out.
Using a miniature softbox lessen the problem, but it's not all gone.
Does anyone know a good way to handle this without resorting to ring
flashes?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know a good way to handle this [specular highlights]
without resorting to ring flashes?
Matte spray.
LOL.
and maybe half a body in one frame, flash or
not...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Herding Livestock
Why do you need flash?
Shel
Jostein wrote:
http
that pole to the right of the shag.
In all three shots it shows that the film is pushed one stop, but it's
only the last shot that suffers from it, imo.
Jostein
PS. I just feel like being harsh because I'm envious...:-)
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oksne.net/paw/herdingants.html
[...]
Most impresssive shot, Jostein, Sir!
You're fortunate the aphids are pretty slow movers, or you'd have a
heck of a time of it!
Thanks, Keith.
hehe... You're right. That would
in the nineties?
Jostein
setting on the primary lens.
So for a reasonably flexible solution, I think I will look for a bowl
that protrudes about 30mm from the lens.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: PESO
LOL, yes, I'll try that. One technique that sometimes work well is to
do two raw conversions, one optimalised, and one that's two stops
underexposed. Then copy the highlights from the underexposed one into
the optimalised one, with a suitable degree of feathering.
Jostein
- Original
Thanks, Markus.
Now that you've said it, I might pester the list with a few more as
summer passes...:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 7:40 AM
Subject: RE: PESO - Herding Livestock
.
On NASAs photo, the flows from the volcano covers almost a third of
the island, but I don't know how old the image is. It must have taken
NASA some years to collect enough detail shots to display the whole
globe without obstructive clouds.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jostein,
I've been thinking about the actual requirements for using a bowl.
You'll have to do something to keep the bowl from flopping around.
My guess is that you'll need to glue a couple blocks of something
(styrofoam
Apparently, the Montserrat volcano is still very active. Last eruption
was just a fortnight ago:
http://www.mvo.ms/chronology.htm#2005
Now imagine the photos one could get there...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent
exactly the same thing, only that it spreads the light much broader
than a ring flash. The chance of illuminating some near background is
larger.
Besides, I don't have a ring flash, and fear the enablement powers of
this forum...:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Daniel
Thanks, Tom.
That, too.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Herding Livestock
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
What is wrong with ring flash for this type of shot?
You get
- Original Message -
From: E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So THAT's what Ivan and Jeanne and Dennis and Emily and all their
siblings are so busy working on over there!
Or maybe the volcano is the reason why they're desperate to reach you
in such a hurry? :-)
Jostein
I've been wondering about the same, Bill. Haven't really pursued the
matter, but I suspect that there must be some software designed for
astrophoto that can do it.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent
to investigate the possibilities.
The astrophoto people have been using digital since the first webcams
came around. They certainly had to do their own dark-frames.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saving a dark frame together with actual exposure and processing
Peter,
You're so predictable...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Herding Livestock
You know you want one.
Jostein wrote:
Dan,
I think the Pentax (for example
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note to self:
Gotta go to Negev. Gotta visit Mitzpe Ramon...
Damn, you're good :-).
Aha! Desert enablement! :-) :-) :-)
Enjoy yourself, man!
Jostein
at them just because they're pioneers or early adopters is
almost obscene, IMHO. Certainly below the usual standards of the
poster in question.
YMMV, of course.
Jostein
ps. posts with Masked F***-letter Words will be filtered. :-)
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED
... *sigh*
You have my full sympathy.
Very interesting shot... Though I wish I was there with my 50 mm
lens, to do what you know I like doing :-)...
Glad you liked it. I'm also glad you weren't there with your 50mm. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oksne.net/paw/herdingants.html
Pretty darn good for hand holding Jostein.
I like the cripsness of the ants and the eriee science fiction movie
feel to it.
Thanks Dave.
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
All very well considered and well said, Jostein!
Thanks for speaking your thoughts and sharing them.
Probably a little for everyone, there! g
keith
Thanks, Keith.
Myself included, even if I managed to stay out
Um...
Just a very basic question...
Has KonicaMinolta released any digital-only lenses, or is their
lineup strictly 35mm still?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 7:24 PM
Subject: In-Body
Thanks Herb,
That's interesting. I imagined that for the in-camera stabilisation to
work properly, the lenses would have to have a larger-than-sensor
image circle. Maybe that's a wrong assumption?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss
Boris,
What's the root of the word in Russian?
Råd means council in Norwegian.
OTOH, it gives a nice spin to the animal's latin name Rattus
norwegicus. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005
Moreover, following the same logic, the names of the Pentax' digital
SLRs are actually unsuited for the sensitive photographer. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 1:12 PM
Subject
much
light. All my exposures have been at least two stops over. Much to my
disappointment, because it was my macro flash of choice for use with
Z-1 and LX. :-(
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 2
Personally, I think you should stop shaking *ists at each other. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cotty pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Definitions
So, are you suggesting that the ability to use foul language
a greater part. If the metering is still done
off the medium, it has to cope with a CCD that has different
reflective properties than has film.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:53 PM
Subject
Congrats, Boris.
Wear them gracefully. :-)
Jostein
PS. My 31 is not for sale...
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 8:58 PM
Subject: Major Enablement :-)
Hi!
It arrived, finally!
Now I am happy
use of distance information in calculating
flash exposure when the FTZ flashes were introduced. It certainly
applies to the LX, but I think also for the Z-1.
IIRC, the *istD manual claims that both flashes are useable, but
without specific mention of macro.
Jostein
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What distances are you working from?
Anything from 40 cm and downwards.
My recent pic of ants and aphids, for example, was taken at 3-4 cm working
distance for focus. Flash to subject distance ca. 5 cm.
Jostein
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PS. My 31 is not for sale...
A-ha... Do I sense some fear in the steady tone of mighty Norwegian? ;-)
hehe. No fear. Just fierce protectionism.
Btw, where the heck did you get mighty from?!?
:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
my theory was on the far side. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
between my toes while holding a camera.
I can live with that...LOL
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Quoting mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyone who can fit a washing machine into a hole that is too small has got to
be at least mighty.
:-)
Thanks Mike.
I can't spoil it by disclosing how I solved it now, can I.
Jostein
the secretive
Thanks for commenting, Tim.
I agree with you that Tom's solution probably is the right way to go. The light
diffusion will largely be determined by the translucence of the plastic.
Jostein
Quoting Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been reading the whole thread, and one thing strikes me. What
this until a couple of colleagues owned up and confessed
having switched the labels on two keys on his keyboard. When the guy was
standing up, he was looking at the keys while typing the password with one
finger. When he sat down, he used Touch typing...
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3407/display/3555157
ROTFL!
Unfortunately, I can't show this to Vera until Sunday. Link stored!
Has the English wife acknowledged this? :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H... there is still big Fuji with their own CCD technology.
Fuji already produce dSLRs for the Nikon mount.
Jostein
Don't worry, Boris. I have plenty to retaliate with already.
But I'll save it for later... snigger
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 6:35 AM
Subject: Re: Major Enablement :-)
Hi!
I heard
.
This is a typical situation where using spot metering would give you much more
consistent results.
Jostein
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/2up.jpg
Just nine seconds separate these two pics. They are almost identical
shots. Both were made with the istDs, both
of a
shot-saver than a perfect tool. At least to the exposure connoiseur. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I saw that and thought that might have something to do with it. But look
at the left side of the subject where the lower shot has a much larger
bright area
Both images usable is a truth that probably only holds for posting on the web.
Remember that the shots are made at ISO3200. High ISO images from digital tend
to show a lot of colour noise when the shadows are lifted by post-processing,
so getting exposure the way you want it is important.
Jostein
the main
problem is to shoot after moving target? :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
with the MZ-D.
Jostein
Quoting Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pål Jensen wrote:
Tom wrote:
In any case, we all have the choice to acquire information and decide
whether what we think we're hearing is BS and ignore it, or find it to be
plausible and use it in futher decisions
just change owners. What makes the 645D less interesting
for the buyers?
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
appear as a pink tornado to the interviewers.
As I've said before;
Beware of pink! :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
LOL.
Woe the ones to Manor Born.
Btw, anyone remember the TV series with Penelope Keith?
Jostein
Quoting Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
as one of a civilized gentiles (ie, goyim), i protest against
abusing language in this manor. and highly recommend a spell-checker
to a pissed native speakers
601 - 700 of 3695 matches
Mail list logo
