On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 at 22:45:55, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Qliberator was another story but Ian Stewart, who was my only contact,
had only a small part in writing it. The other author, whose name
escapes me,
Adrian Soundy
had long since disappeared and the sources were not
Does this fall into the parameters of what you were looking for
Geoff - the possibility of paying someone to extend the SDUMP
system.
Of course, a small(ish) job, but one that could be incoporated into
a lot of
programs. Perhaps we should start thinking of what sort of routines
we would
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 at 23:37:39, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 at 20:00:03, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 at 12:28:33, Jérôme Grimbert wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Only option so far is to be picky when buying the printer, checking
that there is at least a parallel port (and one that does not need
ECP/EPP, but plain good old parallel port, mono-directional... and no
fancy
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
The 1430 is particularly good value from www.novatech.co.uk at £118 or
so including VAT.
It is 117.30 at Novatech
and at
www.hamiltone.co.uk
it is 113.50
Really, Tony, you not always sling money at these big
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 at 20:00:03, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
The 1430 is particularly good value from www.novatech.co.uk at £118 or
so including VAT.
It is 117.30 at Novatech
and at
www.hamiltone.co.uk
it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 at 20:00:03, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
The 1430 is particularly good value from www.novatech.co.uk at £118 or
so
My brother in law works for lexmark (senior sales director) and I asked
him why Parallel has become extinct on cheap inkjets - he said ( as far
as he knows) it is because the Parallel interface is copyrighted and owned
by centronics, and royalties must be paid, whereas USB can be adopted
Prove me wrong but most of the documents would be a listing here and
a small letter there. These can be printed without a problem using the
small driver utilities we have for HP and Epson.
Sorry - they cannot be printed with the small driver utilities which we
have, unless you have
] cc:
Sent by: Subject: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re:
[ql-users] RE:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend
SMSQ - Jochen Merz wrote:
Prove me wrong but most of the documents would be a listing here
and
a small letter there. These can be printed without a problem using
the
small driver utilities we have for HP and Epson.
Sorry - they cannot be printed with the small driver utilities
Hi Jérôme,
Side-question: is the text87 patch available for Q40 ? (I read about it
for QPC). I'm lacking text87 in 1024x512 so far...
(And at which price... )
I don't know how many inquiries have been passed on to Marcel
and at which level he decides to invest more time...
I guess that non-QPC
Sorry - they cannot be printed with the small driver utilities which we
have, unless you have specific printers - most modern, low cost printers
(eg 99% of the EPSON range) will only print graphics !! They do not
recognise a
string of plain ASCII text sent to them - this is why we are faced
OK, I don't know much about Epson printers, I admit, but as to HP
printers, they
all _still_ understand direct (HPPCL-) commands and you can print plain
text to
them without a problem from the QL.
I just checked the (German) HP homepage. I have not found
a single printer where the technical
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
My brother in law works for lexmark (senior sales director) and I asked
him why Parallel has become extinct on cheap inkjets - he said ( as far
as he knows) it is because the Parallel interface is copyrighted and owned
by centronics, and
This is only part of the story. There is also a general move by the
computer industry to have fewer interfaces and, by extension, fewer
drivers on a system. USB II is much faster than Parallel - actually even
USB 1.1 was. They also want to lose the PS/2 ports and use USB for
keyboard and
16 matches
Mail list logo
