Even better than that with my 1920 x 1200 :)
On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:08 PM, Tony Firshman wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 01:50:03, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 01:14 22/11/2004 +, you wrote:
1680 wide screen.
Must be a wet dream for many
and it is often on my lap (8-)#
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 11:49:39, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
TF 1640 x 1050 screen
Even better than that with my 1920 x 1200 :)
Sounds like boasting in the showers (8-)#
... but this is on my laptop.
Nasta made a lovely comment once.
I said he ought to keep his emails to one
On 21 Nov 2004 at 4:30, Tony Firshman wrote:
I think after his comments, I really don't feel like putting myself out
at all.
Tony (and David!) as I said in an earlier email, don't punish this
community in its entirety because of one (or several) disparaging comments
made on/off this list.
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 10:02:50, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 21 Nov 2004 at 4:30, Tony Firshman wrote:
I think after his comments, I really don't feel like putting myself out
at all.
Tony (and David!) as I said in an earlier email, don't punish this
community in its
At 04:30 21/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Tony wrote
The -whole- point of doing the on-line survey was to get someone on the
Quanta committee to say they would like to use the form.
A forlorn hope I am sure.
But I see no need for Qanta to be involved, the results of a survey (if
any) would be of
On 21 Nov 2004 at 14:09, David Tubbs wrote:
But I see no need for Qanta to be involved, the results of a survey (if
any) would be of general interest to many and surely particularly so for
traders.
Yes of course, why didn't I think of that? Why don't you, Tony, make this
available on your
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:18:38, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 21 Nov 2004 at 14:09, David Tubbs wrote:
But I see no need for Qanta to be involved, the results of a survey (if
any) would be of general interest to many and surely particularly so for
traders.
Yes of
Either this email is intended to make us all feel really good about how
our day is going or to show that you always have backup plans (won't
even ask about the spare rear doors :) ).
Cheers,
jim
On Nov 21, 2004, at 12:23 PM, Tony Firshman wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 14:09:20, David Tubbs
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 12:27:49, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Either this email is intended to make us all feel really good about how
our day is going or to show that you always have backup plans (won't
even ask about the spare rear doors :) ).
Not just rear doors (8-)#
Mind
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 00:23:42, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
comments to present survey version:-
Section 2, I suggest that use for faxing might be in a section on how
electronic communication is achieved - QL modem or other means.
Also what other computer system might be in use
At 01:14 22/11/2004 +, you wrote:
1680 wide screen.
Must be a wet dream for many
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Mike MacNamara
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: David Tubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 3:42 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership Survey
At 01:10 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Nice one Tony. Action better than words
At 09:39 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
There was another mainboard by a guy in Sawston Cambs ?
Other add ons - Eprom Progger, A/D Converter
Nome brewed stuff
I thought drunk Nomes sat in gardens (8-)#
Tony
Such a dismissive response !
I do beg your pardon, never mind, run the whole thing for a
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 18:12:10, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 09:39 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
There was another mainboard by a guy in Sawston Cambs ?
Other add ons - Eprom Progger, A/D Converter
Nome brewed stuff
I thought drunk Nomes sat in gardens (8-)#
Tony
Such a
At 18:24 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
You are touchy David. Maybe too much Nome brew (8-)#
I was joking about your mistyping only.
OK, a typo - big deal ! Surely the Tinkerers have been adding bits of their
own making ?
I thought only to make an intelligent contribution, but evidently I don't
At 21:59 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
I thought only to make an intelligent contribution, but evidently I
don't matter.
Who said that? I certainly didn't.
Tony
OH YES YOU DID !
I still have nothing from the people that matter
Added to which both my considered responses merited no comment at all.
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 23:53:47, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 21:59 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
I thought only to make an intelligent contribution, but evidently I
don't matter.
Who said that? I certainly didn't.
Tony
OH YES YOU DID !
I still have nothing from the
17 matches
Mail list logo
