Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Fabrizio Diversi
Marcel, please don't do it, your name is always a clear sign of quality software ! Making the Server (Fserve) external to the rom is a suitable solution, if possible. Fabrizio On 31/03/2017 17:13, Marcel Kilgus wrote: Peter Graf wrote: It's fairly easy to built new versions, so nobody is

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Dave Park
Marcel, Please, carry on! There are always people who lack appreciation for what you're trying to do. As the changes are more than cosmetic, I do think you should change the name to TK3 or something. People have a long history and set of expectations from TK2. Your changes are very worthwhile. O

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Peter Graf
Am 31.03.2017 um 17:13 schrieb Marcel Kilgus: > Peter Graf wrote: >>> It's fairly easy to built new versions, so nobody is stopping anybody >>> to make different releases. I do this for my own amusement, mostly. >> If mostly for your amusement, one more reason to give your stuff a >> different name

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Peter Graf wrote: >> It's fairly easy to built new versions, so nobody is stopping anybody >> to make different releases. I do this for my own amusement, mostly. > If mostly for your amusement, one more reason to give your stuff a > different name. Not the traditional TK2 ROM, where major QL featur

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread p...@zx81.de
Yes networking is QLs every day work. > Am 31.03.2017 um 16:55 schrieb Peter Graf : > > Marcel Kilgus wrote: >> pg...@q40.de wrote: >>> The network code is an essential of the ROM version. If removed, I >>> would not call the result TK2 ROM anymore. >> >> Well, I do ;-) >> [Snip] >> >> It's fa

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Peter Graf
Marcel Kilgus wrote: > pg...@q40.de wrote: >> The network code is an essential of the ROM version. If removed, I >> would not call the result TK2 ROM anymore. > > Well, I do ;-) > [Snip] > > It's fairly easy to built new versions, so nobody is stopping anybody > to make different releases. I do th

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Jiri Dolezal
Thanks for the feedback. Are there people badly missing the network code in the new TK2, i.e. is this still a thing? Very. That's why I didn't try the new TK2. I use networking often. On the other hand, I have Minerva ROM, and trying to avoid using of mdv_'s at all, so I don't need the extend

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Tobias Fröschle
I would rather chain-load some other, non-critical commands from disk than refraining from the network server and client in ROM. But just my 2 cents. No worries. Tobias > Am 31.03.2017 um 14:03 schrieb Marcel Kilgus : > > pg...@q40.de wrote: >>> Thanks for the feedback. Are there people badly

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Marcel Kilgus
pg...@q40.de wrote: >> Thanks for the feedback. Are there people badly missing the network >> code in the new TK2, i.e. is this still a thing? > > Depends on ROM or RAM. > > The network code is an essential of the ROM version. If removed, I > would not call the result TK2 ROM anymore. Well, I do ;

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Rich Mellor
On 31/03/2017 12:22, pg...@q40.de wrote: On 31 Mar 2017 at 12:12, Marcel Kilgus wrote: Fabrizio Diversi wrote: if someone is wondering, Tk2 2.31 is perfectly working also in Mist (at least as far as I can see:-)) Thanks for the feedback. Are there people badly missing the network code in the

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread pgraf
On 31 Mar 2017 at 12:12, Marcel Kilgus wrote: > Fabrizio Diversi wrote: > > if someone is wondering, Tk2 2.31 is perfectly working also in Mist (at > > least as far as I can see:-)) > > Thanks for the feedback. Are there people badly missing the network > code in the new TK2, i.e. is this still a

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Tobias Fröschle
Here. The one single reason why I would not use your new TK2 over the traditional one. My QLs and QXLs are all networked, one of them is diskless and thus depends on the network. Otherwise: very good job bringing TK2 and SMSQ/E to the same code base! Tobias > Am 31.03.2017 um 12:12 schrieb M

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-31 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Fabrizio Diversi wrote: > if someone is wondering, Tk2 2.31 is perfectly working also in Mist (at > least as far as I can see:-)) Thanks for the feedback. Are there people badly missing the network code in the new TK2, i.e. is this still a thing? Cheers, Marcel __

Re: [Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-29 Thread Fabrizio Diversi
Ciao, if someone is wondering, Tk2 2.31 is perfectly working also in Mist (at least as far as I can see:-)) Fabrizio On 27/03/2017 00:31, Marcel Kilgus wrote: I just uploaded a version with the fix for the CDEC$ bug. Also I noticed that the sources were not complete, this is fixed, too, alon

[Ql-Users] Toolkit II v2.31

2017-03-26 Thread Marcel Kilgus
I just uploaded a version with the fix for the CDEC$ bug. Also I noticed that the sources were not complete, this is fixed, too, along with including Jan's conditional assembly trick to get both versions without altering the source code. https://www.kilgus.net/2017/03/19/toolkit-ii-the-sequel/ Ch