Yes it can.
Works like this for a server:
; open the udp server port
my-udp: open/no-wait udp://:9090
; wait max 100ms for events on the port
datagram?: wait [ my-udp 100]
;if there is a datagram copy the data
if datagram? [ data: copy my-udp]
And a client:
my-udp: open
Hi,
One question: Can Rebol handle UDP packets? On those examples people are
allvays using TCP but we use UDP on our protocols to embedded systems.
Yes, but I haven't used it. I have on occassion seen scripts floating around
that use it.
Maybe someone else will point you to some examples.
About time I replied to this. (:
On 19-May-02, Joel Neely wrote:
I tried to make the same point of your comments above during a
previous thread about the threat of open source. The claim had
been made that opening the source of the REBOL interpreter was
likely to lead to forking of the
Dixit Carl Sassenrath (19.57 15.05.2002):
Dear REBOL List:
===Webby
===New REBOL Licensing
Now I registered and voted for Rebol as the best tech achievement. So when will
licencing be changed to free encap for noncommercial and small company clients?
make licence! $0.00
== :-)
~H
Prætera
Joel,
You couldn't have said it better!
Thanks!!
Ammon
A short time ago, Joel Neely, sent an email stating:
Hi, Carl,
Hi, Carl,
Carl Read wrote:
With free library access, I'd worry about a lot of online scripts
appearing that require you to have OS x,y, or z to work, (well,
of cross-platform compatibility. My response is that ANY access
to system-dependent features (especially such things as binary
libraries) will allow someone to write code that will run on only
a single platform.
As an aside, people seem to be quite successful in enabling
cross-platform
Hi, Carl,
Hi, Carl,
Carl Read wrote:
With free library access, I'd worry about a lot of online scripts
appearing that require you to have OS x,y, or z to work, (well, 90%
OS x, actually), thus breaking REBOL's cross-platform support.
Actually, OS X is quite nice. It's essentially a Mach
On 17-May-02, Ingo Hohmann wrote:
What
about View/Pro features? Would be great to free(only at the same
conditions you've written above) some (or even all?) of them...at
least sound and library access interface. I think this will help to
spread Rebol into wide area of applications and
===New REBOL Licensing
I think it's time to change the licensing for REBOL/Core
and REBOL/View. What do you think? Here's what I'm
thinking:
Core and View would be free for use and redistribution
for
commercial and noncommercial use; however, if more than
five
copies are in use at a
Hello Carl and All:
Core and View would be free for use and redistribution for
commercial and noncommercial use; however, if more than five
copies are in use at a single company, then purchasing would
be required. Exception would be the use of REBOL for any
educational purposes.
Carl,
Carl Sassenrath wrote:
Dear REBOL List:
I just wanted to drop by the list and say hi. I wish I had
more time to participate in the discussions here. So many
good ideas and questions! I would like to comment on every
message...
That's great :-)
===Webby
As you know, REBOL was recently
Hello Carl,
===Bio Update
For those of you in the CZ Republic, I've added a more
detailed history/bio on myself and put a few photos along
with it (including nice Amiga team photo). You can find
it at:
http://www.rebol.com/bio-carl.html
Really nice reading ;-)
===New REBOL Licensing
On 16-May-02, Carl Sassenrath wrote:
===New REBOL Licensing
I think it's time to change the licensing for REBOL/Core
and REBOL/View. What do you think? Here's what I'm thinking:
Core and View would be free for use and redistribution for
commercial and noncommercial use; however, if more
On 16-May-02, Tim Johnson wrote:
Hi Tim,
I'm confused. I just downloaded the /Core distro for linux.
It shows the exact size, date, as my current version.
I didn't untar it, but it looks like the same version too..
Did I miss something?
It would seem so - new betas of Core and View
Hi Carl,
I voted for Rebol!
--Alessandro--
Dear REBOL List:
I just wanted to drop by the list and say hi. I wish I had
more time to participate in the discussions here. So many
good ideas and questions! I would like to comment on every
message...
===Webby
As you know, REBOL was
I second Petrs proposition to move at least the Library component in Core.
That really adds value for the (commercial) rebolopers.
--Maarten
Carl Sassenrath wrote:
Dear REBOL List:
I just wanted to drop by the list and say hi. I wish I had
more time to participate in the discussions
I also think it is only to REBOL's benefit to free up
pro features in view.
rishi
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with
I think it's time to change the licensing for REBOL/Core
and REBOL/View. What do you think? Here's what I'm thinking:
Sounds not only reasonable, but outright generous!
I think you're on the very right track.
Best regards,
-- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
Cyphre wrote:
...
Core and View would be free for use and redistribution for
commercial and noncommercial use; however, if more than five
copies are in use at a single company, then purchasing would
be required. Exception would be the use of REBOL for any
educational purposes.
This mean you can
Hi Graham
For IOS to be successful, RT needs a large pool of
developers. To attract developers for IOS, you need to free
up Command and Pro for developers, and try licensing for
commercial use.
I agree: to make Pro and Command free only for personal and non-commercial use
should give to
Hi Carl
I just wanted to drop by the list and say hi. I wish I had
more time to participate in the discussions here. So many
good ideas and questions! I would like to comment on every
message...
It's nice to hear from you! I voted. [And posted a review]
===New REBOL Licensing
Thanks.
Hi Carl,
On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 7:57:00 PM, you wrote:
CS I think it's time to change the licensing for REBOL/Core
CS and REBOL/View. What do you think? Here's what I'm thinking:
This looks like what we were discussing some time ago. :) It would
be great, since I'm still waiting for the
* Carl Read [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020516 05:42]:
On 16-May-02, Tim Johnson wrote:
Hi Tim,
I'm confused. I just downloaded the /Core distro for linux.
It shows the exact size, date, as my current version.
I didn't untar it, but it looks like the same version too..
Did I miss
I think it's time to change the licensing for REBOL/Core
and REBOL/View. What do you think? Here's what I'm thinking:
Core and View would be free for use and redistribution for
commercial and noncommercial use; however, if more than five
copies are in use at a single company, then purchasing
Hi,
Ah, that is simply cool. Why Czech Republic specific? :-) I hope others
can read it too, as the page is simply cool and reminds me there is not
only product, but also some community around it. What about Guru
meditation executive update on the website? :-) Maybe it could be
called
GurMan
Hi Carl,
I like your suggestions for a new licensing model. For a small user like
myself who writes a few scripts they would like to distribute with an
executable to a rather small audience, this is a very important change. I
hope it becomes a reality.
Cheers
-Larry
===New REBOL Licensing
I
Hi Carl,
I think it's time to change the licensing for REBOL/Core
and REBOL/View. What do you think? Here's what I'm thinking:
I think the change would be very welcome and would encourage exploration
REBOL based technologies. A great thing!
Brett.
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please
27 matches
Mail list logo
