ns that have, more or less, been construed to
>incorporate Sherbert/Yoder? I know that many are compiled in Chris's 2010
>article. Anything more recent?
>
>Thanks in advance.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie
al options
>> to address these material alterations.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> To post, send message to conlawp...@lists.ucla.edu
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
>> http://lists.ucla.edu/
cense application presents uncertainties about
>eligibility (proof of age, question of consanguinity, validity of prior
>divorce, etc.) Deputy must now check with the other County, where protocols
>may be different, access to Clerk not immediate, etc. I take this to be the
>least
gt;beliefs preclude the Rowan County Clerk's Office's from authorizing same-sex
>marriages, regardless of whether there is a way to deliver Jefferson County
>licenses to Rowan County residents with no additional delay.
>
>- Jim
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>__
ot)? Yes. But there
>is also what I hope is an attempt to reach a principled position. I certainly
>wouldn't encourage anyone to become a member of the Santeria Church or to
>drink hoasca tea as part of a religious ritual, but I support the Court's
>decision in both cases.
>
&g
as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people
can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward
the messages to others.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie
of
Souter's position -- that this was unconstitutional no matter how the
government went about it -- than of O'Connor's distinction between per
capita distribution and true private choice.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie
. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
by proponents
of the exemptions.
- Jim
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
should be rejected, as they have
been at the appellate level.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post, send message
/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people
can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward
the messages to others.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott
that state RFRAs
are important to that goal. That’s precisely why sports leagues,
pharmaceutical companies, technology companies, and even certain houses of
worship are reacting so strongly to the Indiana RFRA.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law
. I know that is
true of some of the ACLU lawyers who have brought RFRA claims for clients;
I obviously have no way to know, but it may well be
true of Hillary Clinton.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
the main Utah bill, SB 296.
http://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/after-gop-legislature-passes-s.b.-296-governor-to-sign-key-protections-for
http://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/a-night-to-celebrate-in-utah
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Douglas Laycock dlayc...@virginia.edu
wrote:
The demand for a total carve
the finding of most
political scientists, i.e., that legislators care far, far more about being
re-elected and remaining in good graces with their political party than with
what courts might say several years down the pike.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
states require vaccinations
simplicitur?
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw
not exclude
peyote claims from RFRA. Neither did it explicitly include them. The whole
theory of RFRA was to enact a single standard that would apply equally to all
claims.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville
(and in other places)
included any participants from the NAC.
Bill
W. A. Wildhack III
PCUSA minister, Florida lawyer, Navy Chaplain
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Douglas Laycock dlayc...@virginia.edu wrote:
Not the presidential candidate, but the lead plaintiff in Employment
Division v. Smith.
http
. But thats a different issue.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Levinson
.
And then RFRA’s text says that the statute’s purpose is to restore the
compelling interest test as set forth in Sherbert and Yoder, and no one claims
it was watered down there.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie
it.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Ira Lupu
Sent
allusions; I couldn’t find his
first one, looking quickly at counsel table. Alito made fun of the switched
identity argument too.,
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
of Law
Hamline University School of Law
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104 U.S.A.
651.523.2124 (work phone)
651.523.2236 (work fax)
mfailin...@hamline.edumailto:mfailin...@hamline.edu (email)
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580
The government links may be overloaded. The Amazon links below worked for
me.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
Interim Final Rule for Non-profits
their insurance plans, pay the
fines, an give their employees a pay increase to cover the cost of insurance on
the exchanges? Or is it something different?
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people
can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward
the messages to others.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott
be an exemption issue for a corporation
From: Douglas Laycock dlayc...@virginia.edu
To: Paul Finkelman paul.finkel...@yahoo.com; Law Religion issues for Law
Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu; Scarberry, Mark
mark.scarbe...@pepperdine.edu
Sent: Sunday, July 6, 2014 11
Will do. I think overblown rhetoric from both sides was to be expected.
It was not my case; I just filed an amicus brief.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: Daniel J. Greenwood [mailto:daniel.greenw...@hofstra.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 4:55 PM
To: Douglas Laycock; Law
or not, and however modified by Federal limitations on
the rights of employers – could be a Free Exercise right, and or limiting it a
burden on Free Exercise.
From: Douglas Laycock [mailto:dlayc...@virginia.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 5:09 PM
To: Daniel J. Greenwood; 'Law Religion issues for Law
to others.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change
.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Hillel Y. Levin
Sent: Monday, June
.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options
Professor
University of Georgia
School of Law
120 Herty Dr.
Athens, GA 30602
(678) 641-7452
hle...@uga.edumailto:hle...@uga.edu
hillelle...@gmail.commailto:hillelle...@gmail.com
SSRN Author Page:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=466645
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott
. This is not something that can be delegated to a clerk or a
store manager in an individual store somewhere; this is a decision the owners
must make themselves.
I have a brief due next week and will likely not respond to further comments.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor
of
the Catholic ceremony in North Carolina.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
The principal source of ambiguity is that §51-7 goes on to provide an
exception for couples who are married by a judge and later have a religious
ceremony as well. Hard to see why that exception was needed if no one
thought the law reached purely religious ceremonies.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E
with
testimony I gave at the time. Just in case anyone cares, I have responded to
the claim of inconsistency here:
http://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/content/articles/2014/03/Laycock_Response
.pdf
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law
, and it
is a view with enormous moral weight. I really don't think that their
objection is so mysterious or difficult to understand.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From
up in the Supreme Court, which is far from assured, there is little
reason to think they would be replicated in other contexts.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
to use it, and the government didn't try to make the Church or
those who followed its teaching have anything to do with it. The litigation
arose when the second half of that implicit agreement broke down.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law
interest to courts
because legislatures are incapable of anticipating or resolving conflicts
between law and religion on a case by case basis. The cases are too diverse.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
.
Athens, GA 30602
(678) 641-7452
hle...@uga.edu
hillelle...@gmail.com
SSRN Author Page:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=466645
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243
or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
attention yourselves. Whether or not you had a duty to disclose it (in
light of your postings on the subject), norms of professional courtesy and
candor certainly pointed that way. I'm disappointed that you failed to do
so.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University
, it may have a RFRA or
free exercise defense, depending on what you are suing about. If a rule of law
substantially burdens the synagogue’s exercise of religion, it is not just you
who imposes the burden; it is the rule of law.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
conservatives. Hardly any political actors appear to be interested
in protecting the liberty of both sides.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw
is seriously
evil.
They don’t want personal services from that guy anyway. They want that guy to
change his religious views or to go out of business.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA
, or runs a drug den or a house of prostitution, the property is at risk
and the landlord is on the hook in many states. It is not so odd for these
small landlords to feel morally responsible for what they allow on their
property.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
the wedding planners in a community refuse to do gay weddings, then all of
them lose their exemption.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun
Glad to hear it. One more inaccurate fact from the press coverage here.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
I think I got confused by Marci's pronouns and misunderstood. Please delete the
post below.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:18:59 -0500
Douglas Laycock dlayc...@virginia.edu wrote:
Now New York Times is not a speech case. Will wonders never cease.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:51:14 -0500
Marci Hamilton
have to
show that they are developing the property for the purpose of religious
exercise and that they use or intend to use the property for religious
exercise.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
is the testimony supporting RLPA in 98 and 99. I'll put that in a
separate post.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw
was
thinking about, or predicting judicial reaction to, a case like this.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw
, be willing to share your Mandate teaching
materials? I can promise my immense gratitude and a packet of Australian
cookies in the mail as thanks!
Best,
Zoe
Zoe Robinson
Associate Professor of Law
DePaul University College of Law
25 E. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
Ph - 312-362-8541
Douglas
,
and the persons subject to that potential coercion , both for-profit and
not-for-profit, are given a right to refuse to participate on grounds of
conscience.
And if anyone was unable to find Ore. Rev. Stat. 127885, put a decimal point
after 127. It will work much better.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E
. It is not the same issue as
whether we have ever recognized for-profit conscience.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
Fair enough. But they have been protected by statute.
If your original question went more to compelling interest than to
for-profit conscience, then I may have misunderstood the question.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
Marci A. Hamilton
Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Yeshiva University
55 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
(212) 790-0215
http://sol-reform.com
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie
On Feb 16, 2014, at 3:45 PM, Douglas Laycock
dlayc...@virginia.edumailto:dlayc...@virginia.edu wrote:
No doubt the Board and senior administration speaks for Notre Dame. But on
faith and morals, they may (and may be expected to or required to) take their
guidance from the bishops. There is no doubt
on that issue, but they are not entitled to judicial abdication. They
have rarely gotten the abdication that Notre Dame seeks, and very often, they
have gotten skepticism bordering on hostility instead of deference.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University
for lawyers is to play by the usual rules. But if you
think you can create an exception, you have to know what judge you are
talking to.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243
Footnote 2 of the government's brief appears to disclaim, and rebut, the
view that large employers are free to drop health insurance and pay the
taxes.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA
Aah! I think that's right.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf
applies Lawrence v. Texas to
cohabitation with multiple partners.
The opinion is here:
https://ecf.utd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?211cv0652-78
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
and a Speech Clause violation. It becomes permissible only if
it is government speech -- and then only if government is permitted to
endorse the truth claims of a particular faith. These are two different
issues.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia
to save it
under Lynch. Of course the three-plastic-reindeer rule is dubious. But treating
this as government speech doesn’t seem dubious at all.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
observed that truth wins a fair fight - which is why we have
evidence rules in U.S. courts.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Levinson, Sanford V
Sent
attitude, the presence or absence of substantial makes the
difference. I don't think there are many.
Michael Masinter's example is clearly not such a case; more on that
shortly,.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie
that in order to state a claim
that the government has infringed upon the free exercise of religion, a
plaintiff must only establish that the government has placed a substantial
burden on a practice motivated by a sincere religious belief.
887 So.2d at 1031-32 (emphasis in original).
Douglas Laycock
Professor of Law Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314
Nova Southeastern University 954.262.6151 (voice)
masin...@nova.edu954.262.3835 (fax)
Quoting Douglas Laycock dlayc...@virginia.edu:
Michael cites Warner v. Boca Raton, 887 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 2004
an Establishment Clause violation, on the grounds that it
imposes an excessive burden on Barbara? And if it isn't, then why would the
application of the hypothetical exemption from the employer mandate an
Establishment Clause violation in Anita's case?
Eugene
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished
with that suggestion, but I don't know that, because they were not
asked to sign the second letter.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: hamilto...@aol.com
against government interest; Chris Lund's recent post better documents that
explanation.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: hamilto...@aol.com mailto:hamilto
Thanks. A more informed version of what I said in the second letter to the TX
legislature.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun
from n over however many million in the denominator to n
+ 1 over that denominator. Considered at that stage, the increase was
infinitesimal. Somewhere there was a guy who got drafted who otherwise would
not have been, but it was impossible to identify that person.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E
the number of
conscientious objectors and Mormon missionaries. Only the latter could be
attacked with Establishment Clause arguments.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
be in the same proportion as the number of
all the other classes ahead of Mark and behind Mark.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun
to others.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe
that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
They are not.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
-Original Message-
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf
the Pill and these are devout Catholics.
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
Yeshiva University
@Marci_Hamilton
On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Douglas Laycock dlayc...@virginia.edu wrote:
They are not.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott
put it in as the date of the
law.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf
-4
Len Zanger
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Laycock dlayc...@virginia.edu
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 5:39:11 PM
Subject: RE: 1764 Rhode Island incest law exemption for uncle-niece marriages
among Jews
, at 1:51 AM, Douglas Laycock dlayc...@virginia.edu wrote:
Still on the books today, after the 2013 same-sex marriage legislation.
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:03:04 + (UTC)
Len campquest...@comcast.net wrote:
This. Evidently the law is still on the books as of 2009.
http://www.lawserver.com
Some solicitor has run amuck.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf
that a general right to exemptions was
not a significant issue for them; it is a mistake to read them as talking
about that issue when they do not do so explicitly.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA
with the realities or expectations of middle
class life, and I think a few states have changed it by statute. But that's
the background law that underlies this discussion.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA
developing
country. When I'm exposed in the press and subjected to intense public
criticism, I just say: It's not me. It's a corporation.
I don't think my critics would be the least bit mollified. They would still
view me as morally responsible, as well they should.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E
in the
middle is a fairly detailed analysis of the recently published Final Rules on
the contraception mandate, which also “tries to speak sanely.”
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA
.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of James Oleske
Sent: Thursday
Sorry. The first sentence below was supposed to say there were cases that
the religious objectors deserved to win.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From
/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E
to the public without charge.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe
, Jr., (1964, on accepting the Nobel Peace Prize)
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw
them I would ask around.
Nominations invited; self nominations included.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post
I would too, and I'll give them those names. But I don't think they want a
plaintiffs' lawyer.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun
1 - 100 of 532 matches
Mail list logo
