The case tou are lookin for is lamont imnvolving forein aid channeled througjh
churcjh groups
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Thu Feb 21 18:19:06 2008
Subject: Establishment Clause
I too participated in the debates over California's RFRA. As I recall,
the issue which killed the RFRA bill was civil rights, especially as it
affected gays..Zoning was also an important objection.
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
rejected this submission, on the ground that
Lukumi held that a statue was neutral and generally applicable so long as religion
was not the only non-exempt category. Is that right? The Third Circuit apparently
disagreed in the Newark Police cases.
Marc Stern
urged exactly his position
to gain access to public places and to justify public funding of religious enterprises.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E. Guinn
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006
12:30 PM
To: Law Religion issues for
Law Academics
regular worship service (i.e. a Latin or vernacular mass. In the
entire dispute over the Air Force guidelines, no one has contended- or at least
no one serious has contended that the ban on praying in Jesus name,
for example, applies to weekly services.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
think both are wrong.
When we drafted the Joint Guidelines which
have been quoted on this thread no agreement could be reached on the question
of teacher participation in meet me at the pole events.
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Brayton
decisions on proper are seconded exclusively to ADF, I am uncertain
what the basis of the broad criticism of the ACLU is.
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary McCaleb
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006
4:32 PM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law
Jacob had four wives. And see Exodus 21:10; Deut 21:15 all of which
assume polygamy.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 12:07 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject
Sorry, some of us do not read the Bible in that way.
Marc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 12:52 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Recommendation...
Not talking
, the governmentgranted many groups access to a forum, making the forum indeedopen, and then denied access to a similarly situated group
solely on the basis of its religious perspective.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006
I would add that an early Establishment Clause challenge to RLUIPA's
land use provisions seems likely, as does renewed litigation about
charitable choice-i.e., the Iowa prison litigation. Perhaps too the
Court will look at the growing split about the ministerial exception to
Title VII.
Marc Stern
because the Court views this area as peculiarly its own
or because it finds the subject interesting or a different dynamic I cannot
say.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:51
PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
lawyering. Congratulations on a job well done..
AJCongress will of course be interested in
filing an amicus brief at the appropriate time. Let me know how we can best be
of service.
Marc
Stern
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw
compulsion of law, but noting the employers' own belief that
discrimination of some sort is morally just and the law unjust?
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tushnet
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 8:38 PM
To: Law Religion issues
to sponsor
religious speech.
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sisk, Gregory C.
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006
6:02 PM
To: 'Law
Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: HR 2679: Fee-Shifting
in Constitutional Cases
While I certainly
in school speech cases without
such a showing..
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Duncan
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:49
PM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Bullying of Christian
Students in Public Schools
Did someone
For a case reaching a similar conclusion,
I think, see Bollard v. California Province, Society of Jesus.,196 F.3d 940
(1999)
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 4:33
PM
To: Law
Religion issues
in the American courts.
Marc
Stern
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent
does not survive RFRA.HE reasoned
(as some did on a thread about Hankins) that RFRA applies only to
official enforcement actions and that in any event Congress did not pass
RFRA to provide churches less protection than they previously enjoyed.
Marc Stern
Aren't they on Westlaw?
Marc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Wyatt
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 1:04 PM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: Where to find cert petitions
While a lawyer might be able to point
context.
.
Marc Stern
f
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 8:25
PM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Catholic Charities
Issue
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Newsom
For a case passing on similar issues in
the context of an agency that would only place children for adoption with Christians
see Scott v. Family Ministries, 65 Cal
app.3d 492,135 Cal Rptr 430(1976)
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
Mark:
I would add something about gay rights and probably something about prayer-even
Cvhritisn prayer in public spaces including public schools.
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mark Tushnet
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 9:27
AM
Did anybody else notice that the Chief Justice
in Gonzales acknowledged that Smith overturned Sherbert, notwithstanding
Justice Scalias claim in Smith that the court had never held that
burdens on religious practice need compelling justification?
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL
Avitzur v. Avitzur, 58 NY2d 108.I have a
vague recollection of a Moslem marriage cases from somewhere but no longer remember
the details. Ontario
just this week barred religious arbitration of matrimonial disputes.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
A state statute immunizes the photographer from what would otherwise be
a common-law right. Why is not that state action?
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samuel V
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:37 AM
To: Law Religion issues
to assume the value
of secular first amendment rights and gives no thought (at least according to the
law journal summary) to religious first amendment rights .The court did express
some sympathy for plaintiff but not at the level of law.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
religion and the organization
does not relieve the state of any burden it would otherwise bear. By the
time I was asked about the matter the time to appeal had run.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Tuesday
.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Treene
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 9:48 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Ban on library employees wearing religious or
politicalornaments(including cross
Oops. This was supposed to be a private message to Eric Treene.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Stern
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 4:06 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Ban on library employees
to count for something. And while it is common ground that Washington did
not need to enforce a no theology major rule as a matter of federal constitutional
law , the question is may it have such a rule as a matter of state constitutional
law if there is no perfect way of enforcing it.
Marc Stern
Remember your second grade teacher you
thought was a witch..?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vance R. Koven
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006
12:22 PM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Home Schooling and
Real Covenants
than even handed. Unless of course, Jim intends that the careful
and sensitive judge can never challenge what a school board does-but the ACLJ
asks judges to override school official judgments all the time. Are judges who
uphold ACLJ claims insensitive and biasaed?
Marc Stern
From
.A fortiori former members should lack standing, unless
,perhaps they were sued in an individual capacity and held for damages.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005
3:27 PM
To: Law
Religion issues
My computer tells me the attachment is unavailable. Any idea of why?
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lupu
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 6:14 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
Attached is the decision invalidating Indianas legislative
prayer on the ground that it was too sectarian.
Marc Stern
Title: U.S. District Court - Southern District of Indiana
!-- saved from url=(0029)http://www.insd.uscourts.gov/ --
FRAMESET border=0
frameSpacing=0
have evidence rules in U.S. courts.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Stern
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005
10:47 AM
To: Law Religion issues for
Law Academics
Subject: indana legislative prayer
Attached is the decision invalidating Indianas
as something of a pejorative term .Criticism of the book is
surely in place; name calling is unnecessary and just adds to the bad feelings
about every effort to deal with religion in the schools.
Marc Stern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Brayton
Sent: Wednesday
.
Supporters of ID are claiming
victory; and Americans United is complaining that the wall of separation is falling.
I feel stupid because I see nothing of ID in this description, merely factual
descriptions of peoples beliefs. What am I missing that the activists
see?
Marc Stern
Yahoo!
Music
in Hernandez v.Commr ,490 US 680, refused to reach the issue because
it had not been raised below. The scientologists were litigating in tax court on
this theoryand probably were going to win- when Congress rewrote 501c3
to moot the lawsuit.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
It was plaintiff's motion that was granted. The opinion is posted on the
southern district website.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gene Summerlin
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:35 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law
Funny thing. I am listed as one of the
content contributors to the text and it has been some while since I was last
described as a fundamentalist Christian. This is best understood as ADL trying
to be more Catholic than the Pope.
Marc
Stern
American Jewish Congress
From
is rather harsh regarding the nurse.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005
10:17 AM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: FYI: An Interesting
See You at the Pole Case
Michael
treatment approach to speech/establishment Clause issues endorsed
for example by Justice Scalia for a plurality In Capitol Square review
board.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lupu
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 10:40 AM
To: Law
helped write
the school boards brief in Mergens
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005
6:40 PM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Air Force sued over
religious intolerance
recognition of the
VaticanIf memory serves, AU went to court but was thrown out
(predictably) on standing grounds.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Graber
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:58 AM
To: religionlaw
Apparently academics are not the only ones whose surroundings blind them
to understand just how harshly their efforts to vindicate their
perception of the Establishment Clause has on others. Jim seems not to
understand at all the objection and offense felt by person entitled to
attend the
the same.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005
2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: Floodwaters and
Undermined Walls
In a message dated 9/1/05 1:48:47 PM, [EMAIL
to hold the society together?(I
recognize that without vouchers only the well off can take advantage of
provide education,a point against the current system)
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Berg, Thomas C.
Sent: Thursday, August
LAW SCHOOL IS JUST NOT WHAT IT USED TO BE. We never got to watch movies in
class!
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Duncan
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 1:05
PM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: FW: Feature
The selective service conscientious
objector provisions were read more broadly than their language indicated to
avoid a constitutional problem of favoring theistic faiths over non-theistic
ones.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas
it recognizes are not
subject to judicial acknowledgement. Or just that abortion is not one of those
rights reserved to the people?
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Duncan
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 11:20
PM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law
I look forward to a brief by Jim calling on
the Court to restore the scope of 11th Amendment to the narrow
limit imposed by its original text.
Marc
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:44
AM
To:
the ERA also opposed the motion to
recuse.)
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Horwitz
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 1:22 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: The Faith Of John Roberts
I agree with Stuart's general
What is the name of the book? Barnes and Noble has nothing by Tanhanaha.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Levinson
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject
Rick runs together different ideas and
political causes and uses a highly technical definition of theocracy to avoid grappling
with difficult issues. Doing so makes it harder to identify areas of agreement and
disagreement.
1.I dont know of anyone of
consequence who says that religious
. And of course, the current debate
about displays is not about purely private displays but official ones. That is
not a question of cleansing the public square of religion as I understand that phrase.
The options before us are not official endorsement or confinement to the closet.
Marc Stern
Do you have an electronic copy of the Salvation Army brief filed by the
government?
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Treene
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:59 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Locke v
Sorry. This was sent to the group by mistake.
Marc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Stern
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 2:49 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Locke v. Davey follow-up
Do you have an electronic
that the doctor father who quits medicine to become a
pastor?(except of course tat in Chen the father made sufficient money
so that he could easily afford the costs of child support)
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
, or for that matter the administrative costs of complying with
RLUIPA, which Ohio thought caused the statue to amount to an establishment of
religion?
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Garnett
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:29
PM
To: Law
Religion issues
.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005
2:28 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Nullifying RLUIPA
In response to Marci's query whethere
there is some limit on what prisons must do
There is an ALR 3 or 4 annotation collecting child custody case where
religion is at issue. All, or almost all, run the way you need them to
run.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Brayton
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 9:58 AM
the experts report
on the children, modesty and prudence dictate that no one reach
absolutely firm conclusions about what the judge did here.
Marc Stern
he-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 12:45 PM
To: Law
I too would be happy to look over the table of contents.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ann Althouse
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 6:17 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Request for advice
I'll do
Yes. Community group claims are always based
on the Constitution. The ninth Circuit has applied constitutional analysis to
student claims not governed by the Equal Access Act as in the case of access to
a forum during the school day.
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
so, see 18 V.S.A. § 5161, contravenedtheir sincerely held religious beliefs, in violation of their right to thefree exercise of religion under Chapter I, Article 3 of the VermontConstitution.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent
of fiduciary duty claim was the functional equivalent of a
claim for clergy malpractice which it had already rejected. There was a dissent
which notes the split of authority on the subject.
Marc Stern
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
The leading case is Florey v. Sioux Falls School District, 619 F2d
1311(10th Cir.(1981).
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:25 AM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re
Steve
Could you resend your Orden Brief?
How is life in Oregon?
Marc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Green
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 3:38 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: charitable choice
pointing
out some of the differences and Professor Lubet had a similar piece in constitutional
commentaries a few years ago.
All of this says nothing of the rights of
atheists or non-Judeo _Christian faiths.
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
rejection of the totality of the law.
Marc stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004
10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Steven Williams case
and the Ten Commandments cases
In a message dated 12/16
inescapably casts the commandments amounts to a repudiation of Jewish
teaching. And, of course, the focus on the commandments as such is rooted in a
Christian rejection of the totality of the law.
Marc stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
remains true.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Newsom Michael
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004
3:37 PM
To: Law Religion issues for
Law Academics
Subject: RE: Steven Williams Case
- more factual information
Could you explain why liberals are wrong
from denial of cert in City of Elkhart v. Book,532 u.s.
1059
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Brayton
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:38 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Steven Williams case
and constitutional
way. And it is a scary portend of what The Alliance Defense Fund thinks the law
is that it pursues this case.
Some cases are simply silly, even if they might in some way touch on serious issues.
This is one of them.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
.:.
I haven't read the opinion yet, but it
sounds like a tacit judgment on the sincerity of the belief. Church of Body Modification, please.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Marc Stern
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004
9:25 AM
To: Law
am not certain is a valid line in any event-shrinks to the point of
nothingness.
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004
10:06 AM
To: Law Religion issues for
Law Academics
Subject: Church of Body
in theory, though not necessarily in practice.) Whatever the legal answer,
this point could be a real political hot potato. It will be interesting to see
the Bush Administration-which ahs hardly been enthusiastic about international
law- deal with it.
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
If no lawyer would let his client mention
it, why worry about it for Establishment Clause purposes as you did in your first
post?
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004
11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL
lay down don't work, and we need something else. But I have not
got a clue what that better thing might be--and I am certain that there is
no social consensus on what that something might be.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh
Unfortunately as a factual mater there is no necessary relationship between
church (= house of worship) attendance and probity.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL
.
Is that permissible? Desirable? Subject the school to suit?
Marc Stern
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Graber
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004
8:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pamphlets in schools
Apologize for sending
what I thought
Title: Re: State RFRAs question .:.
California has had several proposals, but I
dont know the status of the bills.
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Menard, Richard H.
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004
3:28 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED
became moot as a result of the 1964 civil rights act.
Marc Stern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004
5:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lesser protection for
religious advocacy
In a message dated
Anonymous students left pamphlets calling on students to accept Jesus on the
desks of Jewish public high school students and no other students. I have
been asked whether a school could ban religiously targeted distribution of
any pamphlet. Any responses?
Marc Stern
of
the cases you cite go to that question.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gene Summerlin
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 11:44 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: Pamphlets at School
While the school could
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of marc stern
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 9:58 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: (no subject)
Anonymous students left pamphlets calling on students to accept Jesus on
the
desks of Jewish public
I will ask to see them. My contact described them in terms to general to be
helpful.
Marc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lupu
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pamphlets at school
In answering the
In New
York all not for profits need to secure the approval of
a Supreme Court justice for the sale of real estate at least if it is a
major asset. For reasons that are now obscure, New York allows religious corporations to incorporate
either under the religious corporation law or the
Marty:
Are
you allowed to participate, given youre your service in the Justice Department
in drafting RLUIPA?
Marc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004
8:30 AM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law
-
From: marc stern
To: 'Law
Religion issues for Law Academics'
Sent: Wednesday, October
13, 2004 1:38 PM
Subject: RE: Cert granted
in Cutter
Marty:
Are you allowed to participate, given youre your service in the
Justice Department in drafting RLUIPA
Doug
Some while ago you asked about literature
about responses to the Courts prayer decisions.
See WK Muir, Law and attitude change: Prayer
in the Public Schools (University of Chicago 1973).I have a copy.
Marc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
But what could Jefferson have meant by denying he sought a government
without religion? How would he have allowed religion to manifest itself in
government?
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Gey
Sent: Monday, September 20
Lipp v. Morris, 579 F.2d 834 (3d Cir.1978) holds students cannot be made to
stand during the pledge.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ann Althouse
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 10:24 AM
To: conlawprof; Law Religion issues
the Firth or Eleventh circuits (I forget which)
recently called school officials on just this point.
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ann Althouse
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 1:48 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject
and
memories are not fresh?
Marc Stern
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 1:08 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Right to participate in a marriage ceremony
Let me
-Original Message-
The Fourth Circuit has just released the aove captioned opinion holding that
a town council may not begin its sessions with a Christian prayer. It held
Marsh was limited (as Allegheny County v. ACLU interpreted it) to
non-sectarian prayers.
Marc Stern
Mr. Koven's analysis is plausible. ButWhich court determines whether a
fraud was perpetrated? Is it the bankruptcy court? And the standard of good
moral character is supplied by cannon law? State law? Common law fiduciary
responsibilities?
Marc Stern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
to be a vehicle for finally deciding how
much is left of Lemon. Of course,
who knows what the Supreme Court will look like when this case gets there.
Marc Stern
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Garnett
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:57 AM
101 - 200 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
