Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?

At 01:57 AM 3/26/2004, you wrote: I once noticed that transferring data through TCP/IP is NOT error-free, if the connection is very slow. At least not if it is going through Microsoft's software (Windows). Me 2. One possibility that has been suggested is that we could gzip these files. That

Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?

Thanks for the insight. You're also sharing a maxed out T1 so I'm not sure how to interpret that data - I suppose that 10K isn't awful if 10 other systems are hitting it at once. I have to stop my testing now. I've got Sprint queued up to do some intrusive testing so I have to bring the line

RE: [sniffer] Spam storm?

At 03:39 AM 3/26/2004, you wrote: -Original Message- From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Since we're both up at this insane hour. Would you mind making a test? I've just shut down the Sprint line - so we're running through Savvis exclusively. If I'm right about the connectivity

Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?

At 07:42 AM 3/26/04 -0500, Russ Uhte (Lists) wrote: Pete, Just wanted to interject a couple observations. I'm connected to the Internet through a 15Mb frac ds/3 from ATT and a T1 from Sprint. I of course of no way of telling which pipe our automated downloads are coming from. However, I too

Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?

At 07:42 AM 3/26/2004, you wrote: Pete, Just wanted to interject a couple observations. I'm connected to the Internet through a 15Mb frac ds/3 from ATT and a T1 from Sprint. I of course of no way of telling which pipe our automated downloads are coming from. However, I too have noticed

RE: [sniffer] Spam storm?

Have you considered isolating this by type of mail server? We run MDaemon and no error_bad_matrix in our log files over the past week. We use wget on Win2000 server over a Verizon network. Just a thought. Paul Roulier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [sniffer] Error_Bad_Matrix

At 09:10 AM 3/26/2004, you wrote: On Mar 25, 2004, at 8:10 PM, Pete McNeil wrote: ERROR_BAD_MATRIX is definitely a corrupted rulebase file. A manual download should solve the problem. Should not snf2check.exe detect this? If the sniffer can detect it, it seems that the checker should too.

RE: [sniffer] Spam storm?

We have also seen some slow downloads here, but we are currently on a 256k connection from CoreComm/Voyager, but we are updating to a full T1 in the next couple of weeks thru someone different. 03/26/04 10:20:37 Fast traceroute sortmonster.com Trace sortmonster.com (216.88.37.62) ... 1

Re: [sniffer] Error_Bad_Matrix

That's one option we're considering. _M At 10:34 AM 3/26/2004, you wrote: Maybe it is time to look at a new snf2check.exe. One that has some checksum ability. Say you download two files not one. One with the rules and the other a checksum file. Just a thought on how to keep corrupt rules from

Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?

It's starting to come together now. Wget on windows + errors on the Sprint line since the move = corrupted downloads for folks who end up routing through sprint along the way? Could be. We use Windows 2k, Wget and have our connection at our end from Sprint... Sheldon Sheldon Koehler,

[sniffer] Application popup error smtp32.exe imail1.exe

I've been getting the error message below for the past two weeks. I get it for both smtp32.exe and imail1.exe Application popup: smtp32.exe - Application Error : The application failed to initialize properly (0xc142). Click on OK to terminate the application. I did a search on ipswith's

Re: [sniffer] Help

This seems like a rulebase thing. We spoke on the phone. If the problem isn't solved by getting a fresh rulebase then we should go hunting for a rule. Send a note to yourself with sniffer on, then grab the sniffer log entries for the captured message and send them to us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll

Re: [sniffer] Application popup error smtp32.exe imail1.exe

At 02:26 PM 3/26/2004, you wrote: I've been getting the error message below for the past two weeks. I get it for both smtp32.exe and imail1.exe Application popup: smtp32.exe - Application Error : The application failed to initialize properly (0xc142). Click on OK to terminate the application.

[sniffer] Sprint T1 problem - reduced production rate.

Hello folks, We have traced the source of the corrupted rulebase problem to our Sprint T1 line. This line has been shutdown until the problem can be resolved. This has reduced our available bandwidth but should prevent further corrupted downloads. In order to reduce traffic and improve

[sniffer] Sprint T1 - back to normal.

Hello folks, I have just finished work with Sprint Verizon on the T1 and we now have a clean circuit. I have opened it up for traffic and all appears to be back to normal. Please let me know if there are any lingering symptoms. I will restore the second rulebase compiler to active duty