Sorry to do this to everyone, but I'll be travelling and out of contact
for the next two weeks, returning on 7/17. I'll try to respond to
everything when I get back.
-- Sam Clippinger
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http
I'm working to integrate GNU autoconf into the next version, hopefully
that will fix issues like this.
-- Sam Clippinger
CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
Hi!
In trying to build SpamDyke for FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE, I encountered the
following issues.
I had to modify cflags
(Sorry for not responding faster; I've been out of town for almost 2 weeks.)
True, though it will likely appear in the version-after-next (3.1). The
next version is focused on the big configuration overhaul.
-- Sam Clippinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:00 AM 8/2/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED
problems) than not.
-- Sam Clippinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:00 AM 8/9/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're hitting two different problems. First, remove the trailing dot
from the keyword in the file. spamdyke already ensures any keywords it
finds are surrounded by non-alphanumeric
Correct. spamdyke will only use the filters you enable and everything
else will be passed through to qmail, exactly as it was before spamdyke
was installed.
-- Sam Clippinger
davide bozzelli wrote:
Hi
If i would use spamdyke as graylist only solution does this means i
could continue
the script that starts the listener, you
should be able to modify it to start spamdyke instead of qmail-smtpd.
Without more information about your setup, that's all I can tell you.
Sorry.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
I don't know how it was installed.
Thanks anyway
Nightduke
I honestly have no idea. Without knowing how your qmail was installed,
the commands could be anywhere. I'm hesitant to blindly give advice
lest you accidentally break your server.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
I saw at /etc/init.d a few commands of qmail starting.
It's there were i
increase the timeout limit with -T. If
that doesn't work, I recommend enabling full logging with -L to see
exactly what's happening during the connections where the data is being
lost.
-- Sam Clippinger
yusuf özbilgin wrote:
Hi I have installed spamdyke 2.6.3
my /var/qmail
The -x flag is for blacklists, not for the access file. Use the
--access-file flag instead.
Also, spamdyke cannot read CDB files. Just use the plain text version:
/etc/tcp.smtp
-- Sam Clippinger
Raj wrote:
hi
i followed your suggestions but i am facing problems
if i put line -x
: This version is not completely backwards compatible with version
2.x.x. Please read the UPGRADING.txt file for details.
-- Sam Clippinger
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke
, then proceed as normal.
I'll add that to the next version.
-- Sam Clippinger
Ulrich Eckardt wrote:
Good morning all,
good morning Sam
I have installed spamdyke on our mailservers. The breaking up of the first
connection leads to the senders trying to deliver to the secondary
mailserver. So I have
dnsbl.sorbs.net -x cbl.abuseat.org -x
sbl.spamhaus.org /var/qmail/bin/relaylock /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
/var/qmail/bin/smtp_auth /var/qmail/bin/true /var/qmail/bin/cmd5checkpw
/var/qmail/bin/true
-- Sam Clippinger
Hikmet Gümüş wrote:
I use Plesk and QMAIL. Plesk's qmail has an SMTP AUTH
The easiest solution is to give bcltest.dotio.com an IP address (an A
record). When spamdyke finds that, the filter will pass.
The other option, of course, is to disable the sender MX filter.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
Sep 26 15:35:33 bcl041 spamdyke[20723]: DENIED_SENDER_NO_MX from
can't do that, I
increment the major version number (e.g. 2.6.3 become 3.0.0) to indicate
a significant change.
If anyone can't figure out what the log messages mean, I'm afraid
they'll just have to consult the documentation.
-- Sam Clippinger
BC wrote:
On 9/27/2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I've never tried to compile spamdyke on Solaris, so the configure script
isn't written to detect it. I'll try to get a copy of OpenSolaris
installed in VMWare and do some testing.
-- Sam Clippinger
Limperis Antonis wrote:
I try to compile spamdyke 3.0.1 in solaris 8 machine
Thanks for the offer, let me see if I can find a VMWare appliance first.
That way I can use it to test future releases too -- I already test
Linux, Mac OS X, NetBSD and OpenBSD, what's one more? :)
-- Sam Clippinger
davide bozzelli wrote:
Sam Clippinger ha scritto:
I've never tried
.
$
.
This is the expected behavior.
-- Sam Clippinger
davide bozzelli wrote:
Hi
Here is my conf:
log-level=2
ip-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/control/nospamdykeip
sender-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/control/nospamdykefrom
recipient-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/control/nospamdyketo
local
) Configure spamdyke to use the folder by updating the configuration
file with: graylist-dir=/var/qmail/graylisting
4) Done.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
If i don't add the domanin manually it's a problem to me.
Can not be automactly added?
Thanks
Nightduke
*/davide bozzelli
Are you using spamdyke version 3.0.1? Previous versions had some issues
with Nagios and Windows but I thought I had fixed them.
-- Sam Clippinger
dnk wrote:
Hi there, I was wondering if anyone is using nagios to monitor any of
their machines that have spamdyke running on it?
I had
, having a cache won't matter much.
For the two things you mentioned, DNS RBL and rDNS lookups, try
installing a caching DNS server on the mail server. You can configure
it (or use iptables) to only allow queries from the local machine. I
think you'll be surprised how much it helps.
-- Sam
Plesk changes /etc/syslog.conf to move the mail logs to a different
location. Check /usr/local/psa/var/log/maillog.
-- Sam Clippinger
Yasin inat wrote:
Hi all,
i ve just discovered spamdyke. its exactly amazing.
my domains users are all in turkey. i dont have too big spam problem.
all
,
you should see an IP address. NOTE: somehost's IP address does not
have to be zzz.yyy.xxx.www (the same as the IP address for the PTR
record). It just has to have _any_ IP address.
-- Sam Clippinger
Hartmut Wernisch wrote:
Hello!
I seems that spamdyke has a problem resolving PTR records
That'll probably do it.
-- Sam Clippinger
Steve Cole wrote:
I have spamdyke working properly with SMTP-AUTH and TLS as far as I can
tell. Spamdyke authenticates me and allows me to write to accounts on the
system, but when i try to relay to another system (any other system) it
denies me even
message, I think something else on your system must be unsetting the
RELAYCLIENT environment variable before qmail-smtpd runs.
Can you send your entire qmail command line? Also, how did you install
qmail? What patches are applied?
-- Sam Clippinger
Steve Cole wrote:
On Friday 26 October 2007
, the equals sign _is_ required
in a configuration file. By using the config-file directive, one
configuration file can reference another. In that case, your
spamdyke.conf file might contain a line like this:
config-file=/etc/spamdyke.secondary.conf
-- Sam Clippinger
Raj wrote:
hi
is configured to send them. Check /etc/syslog.conf. The
upcoming version includes an option to send messages to stderr instead
of syslogd so they'll be caught by the multilog process along with the
qmail log messages.
-- Sam Clippinger
Raj wrote:
hello
what should be permissions
as regexps. That's where my thinking ended and I went with the
current solution.
What do you think? I'm open to suggestions.
-- Sam Clippinger
Marc Van Houwelingen wrote:
Thanks for adding the recipient-whitelist-file feature. I have a quick
question: Is starting a line with @ the only wildcard
expressions and wildcards. That way, nearly everyone would
continue using the existing system but if someone needed more
flexibility they could create a second file and use the new flag. Or
does that sound too complicated?
-- Sam Clippinger
Marc Van Houwelingen wrote:
I'm pretty sure that square
OK, I'll add that to my TODO list. I guess I need to figure out how to
parse regexps. :)
-- Sam Clippinger
Marc Van Houwelingen wrote:
I was looking here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address, which does
not list the brackets.
Either way, the regexp flag sounds perfect. It may
.
-- Sam Clippinger
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
=
Thanks in advance.
Best regards
Walter
Sam Clippinger wrote:
If you can provide a few more details, I may be able to help. What do
your spamdyke configuration file and command line look like? What is
in your /etc/tcp.smtp file? What is in your
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
Excellent! I'm glad you got it working.
-- Sam Clippinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sam,
i find where is the problem. i have changed spamdyke.conf and
/service/qmail-smtpd/run. I have deleted line
access-file=/home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp in spamdyke.conf and
--smtp-auth-command
-relayclient_envvar.patch
make
That should do it. Copy the new spamdyke binary into place.
-- Sam Clippinger
Steve Cole wrote:
I need to offer SMTP-Auth on one server which was previously using
POP-before-SMTP and the issue I am running into is this: I'd like to give
them 90 days to get
3.1.1 is backwards-compatible with version 3.1.0; simply
replacing the old binary with the new one should be safe.
-- Sam Clippinger
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
believe this is why DJB didn't use it for qmail.
With the latest version of spamdyke, you can use the log-target
directive to make spamdyke avoid syslog. Its messages will appear in
the same files as your qmail logs. I'd be very interested to know if
that solves the problem.
-- Sam CLippinger
Seb
(but not much more), see DJB's site:
http://cr.yp.to/checkpwd/interface.html
-- Sam Clippinger
Grimmi Meloni wrote:
Hi,
I've been using spamdyke for about 2 weeks now, and I'm quite satisfied
with the results. Thanks for this great tool.
As the subject states, I'm running a Plesk 8.1 based
Can you send more information about your setup? Could you send the
contents of your /etc/xinetd.d/smtp_psa file and your spamdyke
configuration file (if you have one)?
-- Sam Clippinger
david boh wrote:
I would like to report that v3.1.0 also suffer from the same issue as
described below
to spamdyke?
-- Sam Clippinger
Seb wrote:
What version of spamdyke are you using? Older versions didn't log
every message, especially if the connection was whitelisted. Newer
versions should log everything.
3.1.1 installed this morning in place of 3.1.0
Also, how busy is your
/var/qmail/bin/cmd5checkpw
/var/qmail/bin/true
spamdyke 3.1.1+TLS (C)2007 Sam Clippinger, samc (at) silence (dot) org
http://www.spamdyke.org/
Use -h for an option summary or see README.html for complete option details.
Testing configuration...
WARNING: Running tests as superuser root (0
/spamdyke.conf /var/qmail/bin/relaylock
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /var/qmail/bin/smtp_auth /var/qmail/bin/true
/var/qmail/bin/cmd5checkpw /var/qmail/bin/true
I need to update the documentation to include this.
-- Sam Clippinger
david boh wrote:
Sure my friend.
Both server has the same smtp_psa
. Lastly, you could remove spamdyke entirely to
see if the errors stop.
-- Sam Clippinger
Joe Nelson wrote:
I've had an interesting issue recently where I've been unable to
receive emails from a particular email server. Unfortunately it's a
state email server that many of my users receive
This is very strange. When the messages remain in the queue, are you
seeing any errors in the qmail logs? Can you enable spamdyke's full
logging on the receiving server and send me a log of a failed delivery?
-- Sam Clippinger
david boh wrote:
Hi Sam,
Test Step:
1. Re-install spamdyke
Yes. I'm already planning to make the DNS behavior completely
configurable in the next version, so this would be an easy thing to add.
I'll put it on the list.
-- Sam Clippinger
Steve Cole wrote:
For those of us not using any of the DNS/reverse DNS features of spamdyke, is
it possible
by turning down your
log-level to 2 or less.
-- Sam Clippinger
George Zica wrote:
Hello ,
I have spamdyke installed on a server with a huge number of spams per
day . Since I've installed spamdyke (96 hours) i have a number of 16859
emails blocked ( until now, when i'm writing) . The problem i
Personally, I recommend upgrading to 3.1.1. It's completely
backwards-compatible with 3.0.1, so you should just be able to compile
it and copy the new binary over the old one.
See the Changelog for details of what changed.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
Currently i have installed
Clippinger
Davide Bozzelli wrote:
Sam Clippinger ha scritto:
If there are any domains you don't want graylisted, just list them in a
file and use the never-graylist-rdns-file option.
I'm confused about this option.
If i put for example in the file something like domain.com
And you say
.
After that, there is no delay. If the initial delay is a problem, you
should just disable graylisting.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
Ok pardon me, but the idea is if the server is correctly configured from
where i want to receive will retry again to send then will be granted to
send
spamdyke doesn't have the ability to reject email for nonexistent
recipients. I intend to add that feature in a future version.
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/FAQ.html#SUGGESTION4
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
Also i wish to comment with if i don't have an email like
Plesk already supports SMTP AUTH. spamdyke will automatically disable
its filters when authentication is successful; no additional
configuration is necessary.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
Hi i want to enable spamdyke with smtp auth.
But i don't have vpopmail,i don't have
Your SSL certificate may be damaged. Please post the output from
running config-test.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
Now appears an error...
Nov 20 13:52:42 00641 spamdyke[14687]: ERROR: unable to start SSL/TLS
connection: The operation failed due to an I/O error, Unexpected EOF
compiled spamdyke without tls
spamdyke 3.1.1 (C)2007 Sam Clippinger, samc (at) silence (dot) org
http://www.spamdyke.org/
How can i send email with spamdyke and with smtpauth? if i try to send
email it gives me an error telling to me my ip it's listed on a rbl list...
How can i do config
The file used with rdns-whitelist-file can only contain the reverse
DNS names of remote servers, not email addresses. See the online
documentation for full details:
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README_rdns_file_format.html
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
Hi i wish
invalid recipients later.
I'll get this one added eventually, probably by allowing spamdyke to run
an external program that can check the recipient. That way it could be
configured to work with any qmail setup.
-- Sam Clippinger
Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
I've been reading SUGGESTION4 and thinking
If you want to create graphs from spamdyke's logs, take a look at the
Munin plugin created by Sebastien Guilbaud:
http://muninexchange.projects.linpro.no/?searchcid=21pid=171
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
It's possible to make stats of spam with maillog.
It's easy to do
stop it.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
So if i want to receive from a domain i will add
thatdomain.com
and if i want to receive from gw.otherdomain.com
Both of them are correctly added.
And also i can add emails there like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
user
information in a CDB file. Plesk uses a database. See how quickly this
becomes complicated?
-- Sam Clippinger
Davide Bozzelli wrote:
Sam Clippinger ha scritto:
Actually, spamdyke already does this. If qmail rejects the recipient,
spamdyke logs the rejection as DENIED_OTHER
Some spam will inevitably get through the graylist filter. It's not a
perfect solution but it does stop a lot of spam. As spammers adopt
better methods, graylisting will eventually become useless.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
Well for a strange reason a few emails from spammers
If messages from the other machines are being blocked by spamdyke, add
them to the rdns-whitelist-file. If they aren't being blocked, you
don't need to do anything.
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
Ok but where i must add a localname of a machine from where i want to
receive emails from
Are you looking in the correct file? Plesk moves the maillog messages
to /usr/local/psa/var/log/maillog.
If that doesn't help, are you seeing any errors logged anywhere? What
do you see if you telnet to your server's SMTP port? Is any mail being
delivered at all?
-- Sam Clippinger
night
I'm confused. If mail is being delivered and the spamdyke binary is in
use, why do you think it isn't running? You should be able to see it in
a process list.
Is your log-level set to at least 2? Is your log-target set to 1?
-- Sam Clippinger
night duke wrote:
Yes i'm looking at
/usr
on this machine -- what does it do
(or fail to do)?
-- Sam Clippinger
Ken Schweigert wrote:
I'm trying to get Spamdyke-3.1.1 to install on another mailserver.
I've successfully got it to install on three other boxes but am having
trouble with this one.
The box I'm trying to install
Thanks for the tip! I'll add REMOTE_HOST to the list of environment
variables spamdyke searches.
-- Sam Clippinger
Venkat Iyer wrote:
We were trying to run spamdyke on an older linux box and it always
showed the origin_ip as 0.0.0.0
[xxx]# uname -a
Linux xxx.com 2.4.2-2 #1 Sun Apr 8 20
not be what you
want. Unfortunately, disabling graylisting for specific senders or
recipients is not possible at this time. I'm working on it though.
-- Sam Clippinger
Marc Stiebich wrote:
Hi Ton,
Using this option the rdns-entry for the sending mailserver is
checked... - thats what i want.
All
have been running as an open relay.
-- Sam Clippinger
Ernesto Vega wrote:
Hi Everyone. I have a working qmail server and i decided to stop the
spam and also to implement SMTP AUTH.
So i installed spamdyke version 3.1.1. And I´ve had some problens:
1.- SMTP AUTH only starts on localhost
Excellent! Good work!
-- Sam Clippinger
Peter Kieser wrote:
Should have a FreeBSD port for spamdyke soon!
-Peter
Subject:
Re: ports/119579: New port: mail/spamdyke A filter for monitoring and
intercepting SMTP
Adding the address to the recipient whitelist file is the correct way to
disable spamdyke for that user.
However, I don't see any difference between the two logs you sent.
spamdyke isn't filtering the email when the user isn't in the whitelist
file.
-- Sam Clippinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a feature to the next version of spamdyke to disable
SMTP AUTH entirely -- even patched qmail installations will can be
blocked from authenticating.
-- Sam Clippinger
Alexander Ilichev wrote:
How can i disable smtp auth in Spamdyke?
My users authenticate without SMTP AUTH. Can i still use spamdyke
(reported by Pablo González on 1/11). I haven't
been able to reproduce it yet, despite trying a number of different
things. There are still more ideas to try. Hopefully Real Life(tm)
will slow down this week and I'll have more time for spamdyke.
-- Sam Clippinger
Davide Bozzelli wrote
Yes, the 100% CPU bug seems to be TLS-related but it is separate from
the bug with TLS passthrough. The two functions use different portions
of the code, so fixing one will not necessarily fix the other. By
disabling TLS, you've simply switched bugs. Sorry about that. :(
-- Sam Clippinger
Yes, you can install spamdyke with no options in its configuration file.
It will silently fix the bare LFs for you without filtering any
connections.
-- Sam Clippinger
J-P Raymond wrote:
Hi,
I've just discover this program yesterday ! I have a question
I've a qmail server and stray
.
-- Sam Clippinger
J-P Raymond wrote:
I think I found my answer : spamdyke.h
#define REJECTION_DATA_SENDER_NO_MX { REJECT_SEVERITY_TEMPORARY,
ERROR_SENDER_NO_MX, STRLEN(ERROR_SENDER_NO_MX), DENIED_SENDER_NO_MX }
REJECT_SEVERITY_TEMPORARY
Why temporary because DNS could failed
Yes, that would be very easy to add. I'll put it in the next version.
Thanks for the suggestion!
-- Sam Clippinger
Andreas Galatis wrote:
Hello,
I am using spamdyke on several servers and think it is a great tool to battle
against spam.
I am just missing one thing in spamdyke
You probably just need to whitelist your localhost IP address. Use the
ip-whitelist-file option and list 127.0.0.1 in the file.
-- Sam Clippinger
Ben Mills wrote:
Hardly anybody uses webmail on the two domains I host, so this problem
went unnoticed until a fellow, who was vacationing in FL
Technically it's possible, yes. However, I don't agree that spammers
don't use ESMTP. I think this feature would not have the effect you want.
Also, qmail does support ESMTP, even without patches.
-- Sam Clippinger
J-P Raymond wrote:
Question,
Would it be difficult/possible to add
That should be pretty easy to do. I'll add it to my list for the next
version.
I think I'm adding items to the TODO list faster than I can remove them
these days... :)
-- Sam Clippinger
Davide Bozzelli wrote:
I see now is it possisibile to log on syslog OR stderr.
Would be useful if i
(and consume server resources). In your case, you won't see an error
message until after the recipient is specified because spamdyke has to
check the recipient whitelist file before it rejects the message.
-- Sam Clippinger
Davide Bozzelli wrote:
Davide Bozzelli ha scritto:
First config
delayed? A full log would be perfect.
-- Sam Clippinger
Davide Bozzelli wrote:
Sam Clippinger ha scritto:
If you're right about this, it's a bug. I'll work on reproducing it.
As for the blocking, the delay is supposed to end as soon as the first
characters are sent. This is by design
? Can you send a full log of a message that causes this
behavior? Can you send your spamdyke configuration file?
-- Sam Clippinger
N.Novozhilov wrote:
From yesterday I discover very strange behavior of spamdyke, all time
before all was good:
First running copy stay resident and listen
this by looking at the man page for
getprotobyname() on your system). In that file, look for a line like this:
udp 17 UDP
If you're getting this error, I'd be amazed if any UDP-based services
work correctly on your server (including DNS resolutions).
-- Sam Clippinger
Stefan
a way to reproduce it, so I may need you to (privately)
send me a few full logs along with details of your spamdyke configuration.
-- Sam Clippinger
Chris Robinson wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I run mail servers for about 30 companies (qmail /spamdyke 3.1.0 / Fedora
2.4.21) and started experiencing
already behaved this way, though I didn't test it.
If that assumption is wrong and this is causing problems, I can easily
change it.
-- Sam Clippinger
Chris Robinson wrote:
Thanks Hartmut,
I think you may be right about the sendrecv changes, specially if the
child process somehow
tested either of those
things.
-- Sam Clippinger
Chris Robinson wrote:
OK that explains everything.
I honestly admire spamdyke enormously; for its clean, readable and
efficient code, and for the way it turned my servers into racehorses
rather than donkeys labouring under a load average
Yes. If your server uses 127.0.0.1 as its primary name server, you have
(at least) a caching name server installed. It can also do other
things, such as hosting domains, but what's important is that spamdyke's
queries don't have to travel across the network.
-- Sam Clippinger
BC wrote
that's used by the spamdyke testing scripts.
Sorry for the misstatement.
-- Sam Clippinger
Sam Clippinger wrote:
Since I've received several complaints about the . insertion when
timeouts occur, I'll remove it. It was an error on my part.
As for inserting carriage returns, I stand by what I
indicates no response was received at all, most likely
because the query packets were dropped.
-- Sam Clippinger
Ulrich Eckardt wrote:
Just for statistical reasons, if it might interest.
:/var/log# cat /var/log/mail.log.0 | grep DENIED | wc
1225875 19624962 233116876
:/var/log
their help with troubleshooting this one.
Version 3.1.6 is backwards-compatible with version 3.1.5; simply
replacing the old binary with the new one should be safe.
-- Sam Clippinger
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http
Yes. local-domains-file can be used multiple times, for exactly this
reason.
I can't answer your other question about simscan, sorry -- I don't use it.
-- Sam Clippinger
Thiago Cesar wrote:
I have two files one rcpthosts with 50 domains and another file is more
rcpthosts with more 200
, if spamdyke is compiled without TLS
support it will ignore the TLS options.
-- Sam Clippinger
Ken Schweigert wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. Well, it looks like the spamdyke process you attached to isn't
running the binary with the debugging
quit
221 iconoclast.silence.org
Connection closed by foreign host.
$
The 250 AUTH line indicates that my server will allow SMTP AUTH. The
250-STARTTLS line indicates TLS is supported.
-- Sam Clippinger
David Stiller wrote:
Hi Chris,
Port 587 ist the Port using TLS
/awk/sed/cut and the verbose labels make it easy to read. I'm
not sure there's much to gain by cutting out a few dozen characters.
Thanks again for all of the suggestions!
-- Sam Clippinger
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
3.1.6; simply
replacing the old binary with the new one should be safe.
-- Sam Clippinger
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
It looks like you're missing a header file named krb5.h. On my Fedora
system, that file is part of the krb5-devel package. Is that package
installed on your server?
-- Sam Clippinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 9) and
unpacked
an SMTP server long enough to reject the connection. When
I wrote that code, I judged it was more important to close qmail than to
prevent DNS queries. Because so many spamdyke installations are using
sender/recipient whitelists and SMTP AUTH, this logic has become outdated.
-- Sam Clippinger
a second recipient that is not blacklisted. spamdyke must
allow the message to pass through because the second recipient is
legitimate. However, because the first recipient was already sent to
qmail, that recipient will also receive the message.
-- Sam Clippinger
Andras Korn wrote:
Hi,
since
The next version of spamdyke already includes this feature.
-- Sam Clippinger
Paolo wrote:
Hi,
sorry I was not clear.
I mean to enable reject-empty-rdns only for some recipients domains .
Thank you
Ciao
Paolo
Il giorno 14 apr 2008, alle ore 10:30, Andras Korn ha scritto:
On Mon
Andras Korn wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:55:16PM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote:
Most qmail servers run a stock version of qmail-smtpd, which will only
reject recipients for relaying.
They shouldn't, as stock qmail is liable to causing backscatter. No
self-respecting admin should run
-matched ones first, the next
version of spamdyke will make that less necessary. By default, it will
query all RBLs simultaneously, regardless of their order. (That
behavior can be prevented with a new flag -- ordering would be important
in that case.)
-- Sam Clippinger
Michael Colvin wrote
trouble, spamdyke can be made less demanding.
-- Sam Clippinger
Michael Colvin wrote:
Great! Of course, this feature could also be used to determine if a
specific RBL is causing to many false-positives too...
Running all the checks simultaneously certainly will negate the need to
order them
statistics.
-- Sam Clippinger
Eric Shubert wrote:
I like having specific RBLs logged. I just installed spamdyke on a few
qmail-toasters yesterday (replacing rblsmtpd), and was going to as about
this. Michael beat me to it! ;)
If simultaneous queries are being done, can all RBLs that match
validation. Checking an LDAP directory is probably not going
to be possible in my first attempt, however.
-- Sam Clippinger
Bruce Schreiber wrote:
I am receiving complaints about backscatter spam from my mail service.
I would like to add a filter to block mail addressed to users
1 - 100 of 626 matches
Mail list logo
