Keith Addison wrote:
Both are carbohydrates.
Cellulose is a carbohydrate too, but separating it from its lignin
binder is not an easy task. Acid hydrolysis is the most common method
at this point, but I have papers buried in my files concerning an
ammonia / pressure process that broke
Hi John and all
It's crap anyway, Robin Williams didn't write it:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/williams.asp
Urban Legends Reference Pages: Politics (Robin Williams)
False.
It's not even new, it's been doing the rounds for two years.
Best wishes
Keith
lisa simpson wrote:
5.) No
In a message dated 6/3/05 12:45:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree that a military recruiter will paint as rosey a picture of
service as possible, but no one has to volunteer.
sorry, larry, but many, many, many enlisted men sign up because from their
perspective, at the time they put
Hi Kim
Greetings,
While the Disney company has never been lily white in their
treatment of animals, [do you remember the lemmings committing
suicide?], this is beyond the point that I ever thought they would
go.
Put Disney and some aspects of Hong Kong together and it's no big surprise.
Hi Robert
Keith Addison wrote:
Both are carbohydrates.
Cellulose is a carbohydrate too, but separating it from its
lignin binder is not an easy task. Acid hydrolysis is the most
common method at this point, but I have papers buried in my files
concerning an ammonia / pressure process
lisa simpson wrote:
5.) No foreign students over age 21. The older ones
are the bombers. If they don't attend classes, they
get a D and it's back home baby.
Clearly this author has never stepped foot on a modern American
engineering quad. If you get rid of the foreign-born engineering
What a load of bull.
I sincerely doubt that the Robin Williams
was the author of the xenophobic rant below.
tallex
---Original Message---
From: Jerry Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Robin's solution... was: DA Drops...
Sent: 05 Jun 2005 03:42:17
AMEN
more on transparent solar cells
regards
tallex
The novel photochromic system reacts to the
lighting conditions. The glass panes automatically
colour when they are illuminated, and bleach in the dark.
The particular advantage of the new development, in
comparison to previous photochromic
Hello Bill.
If the purpose of gasification is
only providing thermal energy for the chicken house with the disposal of chicken
manure (and glycerine) as added bonus, the biomass couldbe
gasifiedwith a simple updraftgasifier, This will certainly produce
more tarsbut these can be burnt in
"the military is keenly aware that the socio-economic realities of our country do most of the recruiting for them"
Absolutely!
Although the behavior of many recruitershas beenan embarrassment to the uniform, they are only part of the problem.There is the new draft happening under our
How about it's a good place to get a start in a career field,learn useful skills,be exposed to other people from other backgrounds,get to travel and see places that they would never normally get to see? Opportunity is opportunity no matter where you find it. Dangerous? So is waking up and walking
Or that the real Lisa Simpson is forwarding it? Sounds like some merry prankster stuff.
Terry"Alt.EnergyNetwork" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What a load of bull.I sincerely doubt that "the Robin Williams"was the author of the xenophobic rant below.tallex---Original Message--- From: "Jerry
Doesn't make a damn to me who said itits just plain good ole advise.
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: Alt.EnergyNetwork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 12:42 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Re: was Robin's solution... was: DA Drops...
What a
...and while we're debunking popular myths lets nail
this one too.
Plutonium, the most significant element in nuclear
waste, is so carcinogenic that hypothetically half a
kilo evenly distributed could cause cancer in everyone
on Earth.
By Dr. Helen Caldicott
It is worth a look here for a
No it isn't. It's naive isolationist biggoted xenophobic crap.
jh
Jerry Turner wrote:
Doesn't make a damn to me who said itits just plain good ole advise.
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: Alt.EnergyNetwork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, June
Lisa,
You're not debunking any myth. What you're doing is sidetracking the
truth through an act of omission. Plutonium when ingested is essentially
regarded as relatively harmless (not entirely, but relatively) as it's
biological residence time is so short. In fact, notorious nuclear zealot
Terry,
You forgot to include with your military sales pitch/brochure travel to
exotic places, meet interesting people and then kill them.
And come on. On a per capita basis no more military personel than
civilians die each day from walking out the front door of their
domiciles. It's what
yes, I've noticed that most of the criticism is the
shoot the messenger variety. I'd prefer to discuss
content, and comments like xenophobic rant and load
of bull are not discussion.
ls
--- Jerry Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't make a damn to me who said itits just
plain good ole
Lets avoid the personal attacks and stick to a
discussion of the facts.
ls
Or, you can continue to assess the truth as myth and
lend yourself to
the continued dis-informing, mis-informing and
propagandizing of others.
Todd Swearingen
__
Do
Hello Jerry
Doesn't make a damn to me who said itits just plain good ole advise.
Is it really. Unless you can tell them why it ain't so, that makes
you a xenophobe, in the expressed view of several American list
members. That's okay by you too?
Let's have a look. It starts like this:
Hello Lisa
Lets avoid the personal attacks and stick to a
discussion of the facts.
ls
Todd discussed the facts and you're trying to squirm out from under.
Now stop it and give him an honest response.
Whether you see it a personal attack or not, you are most certainly
propagandizing here.
comments like xenophobic rant and load
of bull are not discussion.
And you may notice Ms. Simpson, neither are comments such as it's just
plain good ole advise.
Presuming that you are a resident of a democracy with an equal
protection under the law clause in its constitution, you might
Seems to me I did exactly that about 2 posts back and you've completely
ignored them, but I'll recapitulate them here.
Regarding ANWR, at peak production in 2025, it will only reduce US
foreign oil consumption by 3 to 6%. Conversely, raising the CAFE
standards could do at least twice that,
Ms. Simpson,
Go back and read what was written. It was an option that you could
exercise, whether knowingly or not. It was far from a personal attack.
You'll know a personal attack beyond any shadow of a doubt should
there ever be cause for one to occur.
So as you suggested, let's stick to
In a message dated 6/5/05 5:05:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They could be in your neighborhood selling drugs,robbing and stealing,that
would be much easier than making a commitment to improving their lives.
oh my, terry. enough with the ad hominim. the fact that these individuals
Nope, sorry. Never voted for Bill Clinton.
I've been on the GOP voter rolls my entire adult life. I was even a get
out the vote election night phone bank volunteer on a Republican
Congressional campaign. In 1992, in fact.
But, frankly, I fail to see how whether or not I voted for Clinton has
sorry, ls, it is *you* who is attacking, by playing the victim. todd's
comment was not an attack as you well know. he was criticising *your* failure
to
examine the facts adequately, and challenging you to do so. your selective
quote intended to misrepresent his meaning amounts to nothing
Awww, that's okay capt3d,
I've been slobbered, drooled on and thoroughly drenched by enough
infants in my day as to not much worry about it anymore and tend to
treat it all as part of normal fare.
Slurring is righ up there with involuntary actions for some. So I
shouldn't be overly dismayed
"If your going to sling red herring and strawmen, at least aim for the fireplace where they can both be appropriately toasted." OK -- that was pretty cool Todd.Somebody wrote: "They could be in your neighborhood selling drugs,robbing and stealing,that would be much easier than making a
Keith Addison wrote:
Could the resulting, simpler sugars also be worked on by yeast to
produce fuel ethanol?
Yes. That was, in fact, the intent of the research. I believe I may
have left out a step, as enzymatic treatment appears necessary. (I
shouldn't be quoting without verifying
--- Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Lisa
Lets avoid the personal attacks and stick to a
discussion of the facts.
ls
Todd discussed the facts and you're trying to squirm
out from under.
Now stop it and give him an honest response.
The nationmaster link states that 10
What you say has validity,could go either way. But since this is all hypothetical in that we're not talking about a certain individual,we're both speculating. Many individuals wash out of the military at some point due to drugs or some type of mental instability (not percentage wise,but many).
i prefer to think you know better. so give us
something real. come on,
we're dying here.
-chris
the point is not the relative toxicity of plutonium,
of course it's nasty stuff. The point is that media
hype, attributed to a medical professional who should
know better, i.e. that half a
Not exactly sure what you're trying to read into this or where you're trying to take it,but if this is the way you feel,this is the way you feel.
Regards,
TerryMichael Redler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"If your going to sling red herring and strawmen, at least aim for the fireplace where they
The point of posting the robin williams fluff piece
was not to extoll it's questionable 'validity' [notice
I never said anything to support it] but rather to
illustrate the shallow pointlessness of the incessant
'Merican bashing which seems to characterize
'political correctness' among the
35 matches
Mail list logo
