lisa simpson wrote:
The point of posting the robin williams fluff piece
was not to extoll it's questionable 'validity' [notice
I never said anything to support it] but rather to
illustrate the shallow pointlessness of the incessant
'Merican bashing which seems to characterize
'political
Lisa
--- Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Lisa
Lets avoid the personal attacks and stick to a
discussion of the facts.
ls
Todd discussed the facts and you're trying to squirm
out from under.
Now stop it and give him an honest response.
The nationmaster link states that 10
Lisa
The point of posting the robin williams fluff piece
was not to extoll it's questionable 'validity' [notice
I never said anything to support it] but rather to
illustrate the shallow pointlessness of the incessant
'Merican bashing which seems to characterize
'political correctness' among the
More answers:
Even as we speak the green house effect
will cause seriuos climate changes. It does not matter whether the carbon
dioxide is generated from fossile oil, fossile gas or coal. As long as we
maintain our dependence on fossile energy this development will
proceed.
Concerning the
Keep in mind that acceptable risk is not a matter of how many in one
million contract a malady,
I do not know if it is the same in the US or OZ but we have an epidemic
of thyroid problems in the UK. In the 50/60s young people with thyroid
disease was extremely rare now I find my local chemist
Greetings Keith,
Unfortunately, many North Americans will buy the line:
Its feeble defence is they are doing it in deference to Chinese
culture ...
The Iron Chef, cooking show made such things popular and have leant their
credence to such ideas.
Bright Blessings,
Kim
At 05:53 AM
Ms. Simpson,
To summarize: my argument is against the hype,
not the relative toxicity of plutonium.
If your argument was against hype as you claim, you'd take notice of the
disproportional hype relative to oral ingestion and the charades of the likes of Cohen and you
wouldn't have leant to
Ms. Simpson,
These are your original words that you coupled with the fake Robin
Williams text:
Lisa Simpson wrote:
You gotta love Robin Williams... Leave it to Robin
Williams to come up with the perfect plan .. what we
need now is for our UN Ambassador to stand up and
repeat this
Hello Balaji, Hello Bill,
in spite of having a large supply of natural gas in
Argentina, and cheap, there are still many places where thereare no
distribution lines. In our case at the North West of the country there is a
large availability of biomass, which we would like to consider for
I could give you the benefit of the doubt, that it was meant sarcastically. It's the rhetoric that followed that has my attention.
MikeAppal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ms. Simpson,These are your original words that you coupled with the fake Robin Williams text:Lisa Simpson wrote: You gotta
Check out this interesting article on a New Green Diesel process
announced Saturday by the University of Wisconsin. Not too many
details but very intriguing - I thought at least.
http://www.physorg.com/news4392.html
-Matt
___
Biofuel mailing list
That'swhat's so great about these forums.Responsesoften includepreviouscontributions, so that there is little ambiguity about context and little opportunity formisrepresentation.
It's all here Terry -- especially theremarks aboutyour hope that thosedrug dealers and thieves becomeconvinced to
Hi Robert
Keith Addison wrote:
Could the resulting, simpler sugars also be worked on by yeast to
produce fuel ethanol?
Yes. That was, in fact, the intent of the research. I
believe I may have left out a step, as enzymatic treatment appears
necessary. (I shouldn't be quoting without
A question for all you well-washed biodiesel homebrewers...
Regardless of your particular washing methods, when all
is said and done, how much total fresh water have you
used for washing, per liter of fully washed biodiesel?
FWIW, my ratio is about 1.3 water:biodiesel. Is that
high, low,
Todd,
Interesting.
It does not seam to be anymore than the white washing that was done several
years ago, just more along the lines of a few recruiters, being more
extreme.
OTOH, I didn't hear of any reciting problems while I was in the service.
I was a bit of a problem for my recruiter, having
Ken Provost wrote:
A question for all you well-washed biodiesel homebrewers...
Regardless of your particular washing methods, when all
is said and done, how much total fresh water have you
used for washing, per liter of fully washed biodiesel?
FWIW, my ratio is about 1.3 water:biodiesel. Is
No, up till 9/11 most people entered the
military for one of two reasons.
The first and most popular reason is
Education.
They think that it will be an easy way the
get an education, without having to work hard to get a scholarship or the need
for a loan.
The second reason, is that they
It's true, if you have the qualification
for it and get a MOS guarantee.
It's simple you get the guarantee and you
read the fine print, before you sign on the dotted line.
Greg H.
- Original Message -
From:
Hans Reuchlin
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent:
Check out the UCMJ ( Uniform Code of
Military Justice ).
Then follow that up with Geneva Convention
and Hague Convention, and that will give you a good idea of what illegal is to
the military.
Greg H.
- Original Message -
From:
Michael Redler
To:
A question for all you well-washed biodiesel homebrewers...
Regardless of your particular washing methods, when all
is said and done, how much total fresh water have you
used for washing, per liter of fully washed biodiesel?
FWIW, my ratio is about 1.3 water:biodiesel. Is that
high, low,
Greg,
*The military is just like any other company trying to
get you to join, in that it is going to push the fun exciting
stuff, while under emphasizing the bad.
The military does far more than just push the fun exciting stuff... to
net recruits.
I guess you didn't read the references
"...when they are told that they can not get out when the going gets rough, they cry"Not fair!"
How about...
...when they are told that they can not get out when the president:
1.) abuses the war powers act
2.) provokes attacksto manufacture an excuse for war months before any security council
Check out the UCMJ ( Uniform Code of Military Justice ).
Then follow that up with Geneva Convention and Hague Convention, and
that will give you a good idea of what illegal is to the military.
Greg H.
The US military honours the Geneva Convention? When they feel like it maybe...
it's a liquid you add to boiler fuel to make it more efficient and
burn cleaner. I'm trying to find a more detailed chemical description
of it, but for now, if anybody out there is using it, or uses it on
anything else, it would be nice to start a conversation
On 6/3/05, ron [EMAIL
Greg,
Well said!
Larry
On 6/6/05, Greg Harbican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, up till 9/11 most people entered the military for one of two reasons.
The first and most popular reason is Education.
They think that it will be an easy way the get an education, without having
to work
Thanks Greg.
That's kinda what I was getting at.
MikeGreg Harbican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out the UCMJ ( Uniform Code of Military Justice ).
Then follow that up with Geneva Convention and Hague Convention, and that will give you a good idea of what illegal is to the military.
Greg
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:24 AM, Keith Addison wrote:
Same with us Ken, about 1:3 water:biodiesel. Three washes, with
1/3rd water v/v biodiesel, and the washwater reused in the next
batch of biodiesel, so each batch of washwater is used three times.
I realized after sending the post that my
Hello Marcelino,
- Original Message -
From:
Quimica Nova SA
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Glycerine as
fuel
Hello Balaji, Hello Bill,
in spite of having a large supply of natural gas
in
sorry terry, but no. you are not addressing my observations in good faith.
As you imply,there are those who would make it in or out.
this is your one comment which is relatively faithful to my meaning. only,
it seeks to downplay the fact that *most* who enlist make it through the
military,
no, greg, the military is not just any other company. although it is sort
of like some companies, except that those mercenaries are *extremely* well
compensated and, at least in practice, pretty much outside the law, military or
civil.
the armed forces are an organ of the government charged
Keith Addison wrote:
Thankyou. Interesting. It uses a lot of ammonia. Do you get it back for
re-use?
Yes. Once the ball valve opens, the vaporized ammonia flashes into
another container where it is condensed for re-use.
It doesn't say anything about pressure, only heat. That's
Dear All,
I read the owner's manual of
my car whose engine is a Direct Injection Intercooled Turbo Diesel and found out
that biodiesel fuel made of rapeseed is not allowed to be used. Does anybody
knows the reason?
Regards,
Purbo J.
W.
___
The best way to reduce pressures in the reboilers and degasser is to use
sulfuric acid.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of robert luis
rabello
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 7:59 PM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bug
robert luis rabello wrote:
Keith Addison wrote:
snip
There was an ammonia based refrigeration unit powered by an off axis
solar tracker in Home Power magazine many years ago. It produced
pressure in excess of 100 psi (I think. . . Oh, where ARE those brain
cells???) during its
des wrote:
I've found that page in the past, and saved a pdf file of it. Uploaded
it to:
http://databrook.com/users/dcs3400/solarice.pdf
I believe it is what you are referring to.
Yes, that's the ammonia absorption ice making unit. Thanks!
robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Hi All, I'm new to the group and have really enjoyed reading
the postings. I have been taking everything that had a little biodiesel in
it and pouring it into a 55 gallon drum. All those little odds and ends of
biodiesel and water/soap and mini batches are starting to add up. I have
roughly
I could use some design photos and diagrams. I am trying to set up a
fuel plant that will make 1000 gal per day from saw dust. How about the
grant? How does that work? Any input much needed. Thanks, ron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ron, I built a 10 inch stripper column in 1990 I then moved a
Keith Addison wrote:
Thankyou. Interesting. It uses a lot of ammonia. Do you get it back
for re-use?
Yes. Once the ball valve opens, the vaporized ammonia
flashes into another container where it is condensed for re-use.
Does that mean you could just pee in it? LOL! Well, at least it's a
Hello Chris
sorry terry, but no. you are not addressing my observations in good faith.
As you imply,there are those who would make it in or out.
this is your one comment which is relatively faithful to my meaning. only,
it seeks to downplay the fact that *most* who enlist make it through
Keith Addison wrote:
Does that mean you could just pee in it? LOL!
Perhaps we could develop a urine distillation unit to remove
nitrogen and make our own NH3 with the help of a small scale
electrolyzer. . . The barn litter I use for my garden off gases a
LOT of ammonia when it's fresh.
greetings, keith.
you were right there with the appropriate citations to the subject at hand.
it's beginning to look like that is as per usual. i don't know how you do
it.
In a message dated 6/6/05 10:31:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The share of the nation's income earned by those in
41 matches
Mail list logo
