Hi Dave,
Some people have found more luck getting a GPS signal in the carriage ends
(I believe they're called the vestibules?) - however it's a pretty
uncomfortable journey stood their the entire time.
Otherwise, it simply depends on the type of train (some are more shielded
than others), and, I
On 25 Sep 2009, at 09:04, Frankie Roberto wrote:
Hi Dave,
Some people have found more luck getting a GPS signal in the
carriage ends (I believe they're called the vestibules?) - however
it's a pretty uncomfortable journey stood their the entire time.
Yes it called a vestibule.
UK railway term for the three letter code (eg EUS for Euston) is (wait for
it): tlc
(most railway locations also have a 5-digit stanox, a 4-digit national
location code (nlc), a tiploc and several more, but for stations, the tlc is
the nearest to a meaningful short code)
I'd suggest something
I've been starting to do this, using ref= on the station relations (eg see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/255163).
You can get a full list of the station codes (and the official names) from
http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/codes/
Can I invite anyone mapping UK railway
Hi Frankie
Where are you mapping? Most of the UK train lines should already be fairly well
mapped.
In my area they are mapped, but definitely not well.
The line traces are so zig-zaggy instead of curves, that on a couple of
occasions they've clashed with roads rivers.
I shall try in the
Dražen Odobašić dodoba...@... writes:
Savjetujem da provjerite koji vam je 'Downloader' postavljen u 'WMS Plugin
Preferences', ja imam
postavljeno gnome-web-photo --mode=photo --format=png {0} /dev/stdout,
doduše istog sam
buildao iz sourcea...
Radi mi Yahoo, i landsat, ostale nisam
Too busy on the dates below? :(
Please suggest new dates then. :)
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:33 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
October weekends
4
11
18
25
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:20 PM, ian lopez ian_lopez_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
The roads in Ortigas Center core
I'm good with Oct 10, 17 and 24. I prefer Saturdays. :-)
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:33 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:
October weekends
4
11
18
25
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
I also prefer saturdays.
From: Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
To: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Cc: OSM-PH talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:56:20 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Time for another mapping party?
I'm good
I'm not available on October 10 (since I have a commitment on that date), 24
and 25 (another commitment).
Suggestions for mapping: We could join a Carlos Celdran tour, or map one or two
cemeteries within Metro Manila that are known for the sites where some notable
people are/were buried.
Just
So the best is October 17
Will attend
seav
ianlopez
maning
neilnacario (san ka? davao or metro manila)
Several suggestions for place
Metro Manila
Somewhere CAMANAVA
Ortigas Home Depot and Metro Walk.
McKinley Hills in Taguig (near Bonifacio Global City).
Mandaluyong around Shaw
We are not sure if we can conduct a mapping party here in Davao on the
Oct 17 simultaneous to Metro Manila since most of the mappers here are
from the academe and October 17 is the last day of the exam week for
most schools we cannot do some preparations because we are preparing for
the exams.
In the uk they do - visible on the driver location signs - seams to be
a bit random as to which road gets them though - at the a50/a500
junction the latter gets all of them iirc
Can't remember seeing them at the later a500/m6 junction though or the
m6/m65 one
On 9/25/09, Cartinus
Cartinus wrote:
We (should) map what is there. So the real question is: Do sliproads between
trunk roads actually have a ref in the real world?
If I'm not mistaken, then they don't have one around here (the Netherlands).
They do, at least between motorways. They are usually numbered the
2009/9/24 Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com
wrote:
Take a look at http://milliams.com/verticalitymetre/,
http://milliams.com/verticalitymetre/stats.php and
I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great help in the
3D
navigation stuff I'm working on.
I think most people who map the countryside do map gates and stiles
btw.
Nick
We do,
I know, because I'm one of them ;-)
but sometimes that's not quite enough. I had a path that
On 22/09/2009, at 10:57 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/9/22 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
It is possible to represent different surfaces and different
maxspeeds
without using more than one way. maxspeed:lane=130;110;
surface:lane=asphalt;concrete. That's not necessarily the best
Thanks to all for your replies.
Lennard wrote:
Personally, I don't think these should be rendered on the main maps,
osmarender:renderRef is a tag to prevent rendering.
and they should not be made up by us if there is no real ref on the ground.
Would they not be essential for routing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
I am quite new here.
I made a mistake while uploading my changes onto the server. grrr
How can I undo these changes?
I am using josm.
Thanks
colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Dave F. wrote:
Would they not be essential for routing software?
Routing software by its nature will preprocess the OSM data: you'd be insane
to route over raw OSM data (though I'm sure someone's doing it). Gosmore,
for example, preprocesses it into .pak files.
As part of that, the routing
Dave F. wrote:
Personally, I don't think these should be rendered on the main maps,
osmarender:renderRef is a tag to prevent rendering.
I said 'maps', plural. One renderer's trick of not showing certain
features is certainly the wrong approach to this.
and they should not be made up by us
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
Personally, I don't think these should be rendered on the main maps,
osmarender:renderRef is a tag to prevent rendering.
I said 'maps', plural. One renderer's trick of not showing certain
features is certainly
This is a continuation of the thread [OSM-talk] Field boundaries,
specifically the message on the 25th at 10:42
I started a new one because it would stray from the original topic.
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Just to check, and apologies if I'm telling you the complete obvious: make
sure that the OS
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great help in the
3D
navigation stuff I'm working on.
I think most people who map the countryside do map gates and stiles
btw.
Nick
We do,
I know, because I'm one
2009/9/25 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Is this a breach of copyright?
I've already been in a similar discussion about using google maps to
plan routes, some suggest this is breach of copyright, but then anyone
using a map for any reason would be in breach of copyright so I doubt
this is
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:02 AM, Rob r...@coolbegin.com wrote:
2009/9/24 Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com
wrote:
Take a look at
On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated that the data relating to public rights of way,
and its associated copyright, would belong to the Local Council. When
they make a legal order to record a public right of
John McKerrell wrote:
On 23 Sep 2009, at 20:16, malenki wrote:
John McKerrell wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009, at 17:44, malenki wrote:
| There was an error saving your changes
Odd, I'll take a look, can you paste the URL to the thumbnail to
help me identify it?
Impossible at the moment, OSV
Usually there will be ~100mtres for this where you can
change at any time, but in OSM you have to decide on one merging
point.
I haven't seen a proposed scheme yet that really deals with this
properly, they pretty much all pretend that a lane starts at a point.
Personally I don't think
On 25 Sep 2009, at 13:58, malenki wrote:
You are right (except that I have uploaded ~2k pictures. Meanwhile 376
seem to exist for the counter :) )
I wonder how I cam to Moderating loggin in before, since there is no
hint how to get there now. After all, I took the URL from the history
of th
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated that the data relating to public rights of way,
and its associated copyright, would belong to the Local Council. When
they make a legal order to record
On 25/09/09 14:30, Dave F. wrote:
The map he sent is titled as a Definitive Map. It has an OS underlay,
but the information laid on top is compiled from Council gathered info.
eg GPS survey equipment from an independent company employed to produce
the definitive maps.
Do you know for
colliar wrote:
I am quite new here.
I made a mistake while uploading my changes onto the server. grrr
How can I undo these changes?
I am using josm.
The wiki sometimes is helpful.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Undo
BTW: If there are users who can run undo-scripts (or something like
that)
Dave F. wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated that the data relating to public rights of way,
and its associated copyright, would belong to the Local Council. When
they
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 14:30, Dave F. wrote:
The map he sent is titled as a Definitive Map. It has an OS underlay,
but the information laid on top is compiled from Council gathered info.
eg GPS survey equipment from an independent company employed to produce
the definitive maps.
Do
Chris Hill wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated that the data relating to public rights of way,
and its associated copyright, would
You bring up a point that I think needs expanding on for clarification.
I decide where I'm going to go for a walk by looking at a combination of
my OS and OSM maps.
I look for /indications /of rights of way on my OS map. Initially this
is the only evidence I have.
If I see it's not indicated in
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com wrote:
Map Warper
http://warper.geothings.net/
open source, and uses OpenStreetMap for setting of control points.
And then take the geotiffs that come out of it and use mapnik's
rastersymbolizer with generate_tiles.py to make
On 25 Sep 2009, at 15:27, Dave F. wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated that the data relating to public rights of
way,
and its associated
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 14:30, Dave F. wrote:
The map he sent is titled as a Definitive Map. It has an OS underlay,
but the information laid on top is compiled from Council gathered info.
eg GPS survey equipment from an independent company employed to produce
the definitive maps.
On 25/09/2009 14:30, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated that the data relating to public rights of way,
and its associated copyright, would belong to the Local Council. When
they make a legal order to record a public right of
Dave F. wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated that the data relating to public rights of
Chris Hill wrote:
Sent: 25 September 2009 3:08 PM
To: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?
Dave F. wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated that the data relating to
It does seem that what is needed here is not the definitive map but rather
the survey data the two surveyors gathered. As others have said if that data
has been overlain onto an OS map there is no way of knowing what is derived
and what is not. Not unless the bod from the council is prepared to
Chris Hill wrote:
Sent: 25 September 2009 4:02 PM
To: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?
Dave F. wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
Dear list,
A bot running under the user name BugBuster is currently modifying
many closed ways and remove nodes listed twice, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/31604969/history
Is it not normal that a closed way has the same node twice in the list ?
regards
Pieren
Another bad thing about that bot is that it is producing a changeset
for each edit, with nearly 10 changesets per minute.
On 25 Sep 2009, at 16:49, Pieren wrote:
Dear list,
A bot running under the user name BugBuster is currently modifying
many closed ways and remove nodes listed twice,
Pieren wrote:
Dear list,
A bot running under the user name BugBuster is currently modifying
many closed ways and remove nodes listed twice, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/31604969/history
Is it not normal that a closed way has the same node twice in the list?
regards
Pieren
in a closed way the first and the last node must be the same your
example is an error.
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 17:49 +0200, Pieren wrote:
Dear list,
A bot running under the user name BugBuster is currently modifying
many closed ways and remove nodes listed twice, e.g.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Gary68 g...@gary68.de wrote:
in a closed way the first and the last node must be the same your
example is an error.
Yes, it seems it is only touching buildings, maybe created by a
previous import because they contain a tag ID. The original way has
the same node
Pieren wrote:
and the fix is also wrong...
Pieren
What am I not understanding?
It's a rectangle which has four points. The way lists five nodes, the
first last the values of which are the same therefore making it closed.
___
talk mailing
... At least I don't spend all my time on OSM - sometimes I'm one of those
guys who puts the waymarks in place (sometimes after walking down the wrong
side of the hedge because the by OS 1:25k has a registration error (or
is just plain wrong!). I do always try to orient the waymark with enough
I do not work FOR a Highway Authority but I do work very closely WITH one.
My HA's view is much as Dave F reports - there is no copyright for the
rights of way (we the great unwashed public own them) and the data on
definitive maps and their electronic equivalents held or published by the HA
is
If your HA supplies you with a copy of e.g. the definitive map (physical or
electronic) you will almost certainly find that it is watermarked with their
logo (and possibly with an OS licence statement). So I don't think we can
use the base mapping but we can use the information about the rights of
Dave
I don't think you can transfer the paths from the definitive map - they
get there by being a GIS layer superimposed on and rectified to the OS base
mapping even though they may have been separately surveyed (which I rather
doubt). The dates of most original definitive maps are such that GPS
There may be a misunderstanding here - the Definitive Map is a legal
document and was (in almost all cases produced a long time ago - interesting
thought in passing - if it is 50 years old would it be out of copyright! The
initiating legislation is the National Parks and Access to the Countryside
Here is a quick report from the License Working Group as we have been rather
quiet.
Since the proposal we made to the OSMF board in August and at SOTM 2009, we
have been working on a number of small issues raised but now getting on
track to make our final formal license change proposal to OSMF
Nope. That way is not closed. A closed way is a way has the *same* starting
and ending nodes, not a starting and an ending node that happen to have
identical coordinates. So the way is still broken, but the bot's fix
(duplicated nodes) is correct for the particular bug the bot is fixing.
On Sat,
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Nope. That way is not closed. A closed way is a way has the *same*
starting and ending nodes, not a starting and an ending node that
happen to have identical coordinates. So the way is still broken, but
the bot's fix (duplicated nodes) is correct for the
+1
The 'definitive statement' is the only thing from the local authority that we
can really use, but that is surprisingly detailed. Here's an example of a path
modification in Cambridgeshire
The above Order made on 30 May 2006, if confirmed as made, will modify the
Definitive Map and Statement
Mike Harris wrote:
There may be a misunderstanding here - the Definitive Map is a legal
document and was (in almost all cases produced a long time ago -
interesting thought in passing - if it is 50 years old would it be out
of copyright! The initiating legislation is the National Parks and
Jon makes a good point about the Definitive Statement - at least in
principle - indeed it is the process I described in an earlier message to
this thread describing how the Definitive Maps were originally created.
There is a big 'but' though - from my own experience the Definitive
Statements are
Lucky you - I have never seen a Definitive Statement that is that detailed -
in fact it is not a Definitive Statement (upon which the original Definitive
Map will have been based)! It is the text of a Definitive Map Modification
Order making a specific amendment to a specific path or paths (in
Still the Council's budget though - so don't hold your breath - my lot can
only afford a couple of cheap units although they are trying to get the
funds for a top-of-the-range ±1m jobby!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
Sent: 25 September
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Mike Harris wrote:
The second issue is that the text uses OS GRs throughout - so what is the
status as a derivative work?
it mentions grid references but gives enough detail from the road names,
places of gates and number of metres to be walked that you could find that
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Mike Harris wrote:
Statements are almost or completely empty for hundreds of paths - sometimes
not a single path in a parish has a meaningful Definitive Statement! This
is an illegal state of affairs but that is simply the case and cannot now
be changed (other than by a
walking-papers.org is dead?
some time ago I can not upload sanners,
anyone know anything about this?
salu2
Humano
--
http://GaleNUx.com es el sistema de información para la salud
--///--
Teléfono USA: (347) 688-4473
Sybren A. Stüvel wrote:
Dit is alleen relevant als zowel de even als de oneven nummers aan
dezelfde kant van de straat zitten. Bij addr:interpolation=even zit er
dus zowiezo geen 3 tussen. Hoe gaat die tool om met
addr:interpolation=all versus addr:interpolation=even?
dat kun je toch zien
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 09:49 +0200, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
persoonlijk vind ik alleen de nummers interessant dus die voer ik ook
alleen in. als een blok van 2a tot 4c loopt vul ik 2-4 in. dat is voor
mij
meer dan genoeg informatie.
Ha! Wat als nou een blok 1 t/m 7a heeft (inclusief even
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:24:49 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Something else worth noting, as I've been doing postcode boundaries
I've noticed some people have wiped some of the ABS tags so they could
do their roads or what not. I've added them back in as it's only fair
to
2009/9/25 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:24:49 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Something else worth noting, as I've been doing postcode boundaries
I've noticed some people have wiped some of the ABS tags so they could
do their roads or what not.
On 24/09/2009, at 9:51 PM, John Smith wrote:
They didn't seem to have a link to download it and even if they did I
only know a limited number of computer languages, I don't know perl or
ruby or python which are common languages for stuff done for OSM
I know some Python if you need a hand.
On 25/09/2009, at 6:44 AM, Liz wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Mark Pulley wrote:
(I should be able to complete the Antarctica highway system
on the trip :-P )
Now to be able to say that I have completed the entire highway for a
continent
singlehanded surely is better than North Star for
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:58:14 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/25 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:24:49 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Something else worth noting, as I've been doing postcode boundaries
I've noticed some
2009/9/25 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
There is no guarantee that the ABS boundary still runs along any road.
I wonder if there would be benefit in moving the ABS boundary to
match, ideally we'd love for the ABS to use us for data in and out,
not just in
2009/9/26 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
I don't think that the ABS boundaries change if the roads change.
It'd be worth investigating, especially if other govt bodies can
benefit from it and as a result we end up with more data.
It's probably worth while whoever originally contacted the ABS
Found this by accident:
http://downloads.cloudmade.com/oceania/australia#breadcrumbs
It has Australian OSM data in various formats.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Eu estava pensando nisso tb no caso de mapeamento de favelas. O último zoom não
seria muito adequado pra diferençar as vielas/becos que se entrecruzam em
algumas delas...
_
From: talk-br-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-br-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Bráulio Bezerra
Sim, com o JOSM podemos editar sem limite de zoom,
Mas estamos falando da renderização default do mapa no site. O ultimo nivel
atualmente é o 17. O Google vai até o 19 - O problema é que cada nível a
mais consome 4x mais espaço e processamento que o nível anterior para ser
gerado.
[]s
olá,
olhem só que ferramenta interessante para gerar mapas com grids:
http://maposmatic.org/
pena que por enquanto só está disponível para frança.
abs
vitor
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
Por enquanto o problema é mais teórico, Ricardo.
Mas vc pode olhar as fotos de satelite de alguns morros com favela no Rio pra
imaginar que o nível de detalhe pode ser alto.
[]s
-Original Message-
From: talk-br-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-br-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On
Moin !
wenn ich mir POI-Icons erstelle um gleich die Firma zu erkennen verstoße
ich damit gegen das Markenrecht oder vergleichbares oder muss ich
dem richtigen möglichst nahe kommen ??
z.b ein Gelbes M
gruß Jan :-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
hallo
Frederik Ramm wrote:
[...]
Ich fliege da morgen vorbei und koennte ein paar gescheite Luftbilder
machen, aber ich habe keine Zeit, mich dann um die Weiterverarbeitung
(georeferenzieren, orthorektifizieren) zu kuemmern. Haette jemand daran
Interesse?
[...]
du wirst ja wahrscheinlich
Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
wenn ich mir POI-Icons erstelle um gleich die Firma zu erkennen verstoße
ich damit gegen das Markenrecht oder vergleichbares
oder muss ich dem richtigen möglichst nahe kommen ??
Da noch niemand geantwortet hat, mein Rat als Nicht-Jurist:
Siemlich sicher ja, wenn du
Moin!
Ich bin leider nicht der Rechtsexperte, könnte mir aber vorstellen, dass
das die Firmen ohne vorherige Einwilligung nicht so gern sehen.
Daher würde ich dazu raten, für jeden Einzelfall die Einwilligung der
Firma einzuholen. Vielleicht haben die ja sogar schon eine SVG-Version
ihres
Andre Hinrichs schrieb:
Moin!
Ich bin leider nicht der Rechtsexperte, könnte mir aber vorstellen, dass
das die Firmen ohne vorherige Einwilligung nicht so gern sehen.
Daher würde ich dazu raten, für jeden Einzelfall die Einwilligung der
Firma einzuholen. Vielleicht haben die ja sogar schon
Moin,
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
SCHWERWIEGEND (RoadNetwork):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.18733lon=-3.60873zoom=17
SCHWERWIEGEND (RoadNetwork): Road unclassified (OSM id 8313795) contains
zero length arc
Die Fehlermeldung kommt daher, dass mkgmap standardmäßig versucht sehr
eng
Hi,
ekkeh...@gmx.de schrieb:
allerdings nicht virulent, sie sagt nichts aus über die weitere
Nutzung durch Dritte, die es von Dir kostenlos erhalten haben.
Na das würde ich jetzt nicht auf die juristische Waage legen wollen.
Wird echt mal Zeit für die neue Lizenz.
Für cgpsmapper
Hallo,
am 25.09.2009 09:02 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Moin !
wenn ich mir POI-Icons erstelle um gleich die Firma zu erkennen verstoße
ich damit gegen das Markenrecht oder vergleichbares oder muss ich
dem richtigen möglichst nahe kommen ??
z.b ein Gelbes M
Wie macht es denn der
Schön zu sehen, dass wieder einmal osm zum Einsatz kommen könnte.
Auch schön, dass man hier nicht nur in eine Richtung denkt (wie kann ich
die Daten nutzen?) sondern auch, wie OSM profitieren könnte.
Sehr interessant wäre natürlich, wenn die Luftbilder nicht nur als
Hintergrund für LandMap genutzt
Am 25. September 2009 09:57 schrieb Andre Hinrichs andre.hinri...@gmx.de:
Moin!
Ich bin leider nicht der Rechtsexperte, könnte mir aber vorstellen, dass
das die Firmen ohne vorherige Einwilligung nicht so gern sehen.
Daher würde ich dazu raten, für jeden Einzelfall die Einwilligung der
Firma
+1. ich würde auch anfragen. Am Besten generell für OSM
Ohne Anfrage kann es möglicherweise tatsächlich zu Problemen kommen, auch
wenn das eigentlich Werbung wäre.
Ich kenne das nur aus folgender Situation. Für Simulationen brauchten wir
immer wieder massenhaft Objekte, Objekte die auch im
Am 23. September 2009 15:48 schrieb Robert Becker
rbecker2...@googlemail.com:
Hallo,
Ist es möglich einen Kartenausschnitt aufzurufen wenn ich die adresse zb an
die URL mit ?query= übergebe?
Gruß Robert
___
Talk-de mailing list
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:12:37AM +0200, Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
dann frage ich mich nur wie einige tankstellen auf
http://gpsdrive.de/development/map-icons/overview.en.shtml kommen !
weil die da wohl jemand hochgeladen hat... ;-)
mit gesundem menschenverstand betrachtet, gibt es nichts
Am 25. September 2009 14:56 schrieb Robert Becker rbecker2...@googlemail.com:
Am 23. September 2009 15:48 schrieb Robert Becker
rbecker2...@googlemail.com:
Hallo,
Ist es möglich einen Kartenausschnitt aufzurufen wenn ich die adresse zb
an die URL mit ?query= übergebe?
1. Kartenausschnitt
Robert Becker schrieb:
Ist es möglich einen Kartenausschnitt aufzurufen wenn ich die
adresse zb an die URL mit ?query= übergebe?
Man kann den Ausschnitt so angeben:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.0lon=7.0zoom=12
Eine Adresse kannst Du dort nicht verwenden.
Grüße
Chris
Am 25. September 2009 15:52 schrieb Chris-Hein Lunkhusen chris66...@gmx.de:
Robert Becker schrieb:
Ist es möglich einen Kartenausschnitt aufzurufen wenn ich die
adresse zb an die URL mit ?query= übergebe?
Man kann den Ausschnitt so angeben:
Hallo Chris,
Eine Adresse kannst Du dort nicht verwenden.
Wäre aber nützlich und menschenlesbarer:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?land=DEplz=#ort=*strasse=*zoom=12
:-)
Gruss, Markus
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Johann H. Addicks addi...@gmx.net writes:
Es sollte dann z.B. ein filter draufgesetzt werden, dass in OSM nur die
Daten landen mit Fahrgeschwindigkeit 15km/h. (anpassbar vom Hochlader)
Dann hat man mit Sicherheit nicht mehr das drin was in den Ackergängen
gefahren wird.
Mich interessiert
Hallo Community,
ich habe einen kleinen Reverse-Geocoder gebastelt, der bald
die Daten für mein neues Hausnummerntool liefern soll.
http://81.89.102.117/openstreetmap/reverse-geocoder/index.html
Das Tool wirft die Straßen im Umkreis von 50 Metern um die
angeklickte Koordinate aus. Ich habe
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
