On 2015.04.15. 18:14, Brice MALLET wrote:
Jean-Marc : tu indiquais essayer de voir avec un contact chez
Wikimedia-fr pour récupérer leur dossier.
Cette piste a t'elle débouchée ?
Malheureusement, je me suis heurté à un refus.
Jean-Marc
___
Talk-fr
Je vais essayer de voir avec un contact chez Wikimedia-fr pour récupérer leur
dossier.
Jean-Marc Gailis
Le 10 février 2015 à 15:19, Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr a écrit
:
A première vue, ça me semble une bonne idée.
Vincent et/ou Brice, vous voulez dégrossir le sujet ?
Le
On 15/09/2014 22:30, François Lacombe wrote:
Bonsoir,
Hello!
La nouvelle loi de programmation militaire, son volet anti-terroriste ainsi
que leurs nombreux amendements sont en cours d'étude au parlement (si ils
n'ont pas déjà été votés).
Sans en connaitre le contenu, j’imagine que des
Bonjour,
Pour ceux qui en ont marre de recevoir ces messages, je conseille
comme solution **provisoire** de filtrer les messages de
Jean-François, pour les envoyer dans la corbeille.
Testé avec Thunderbird, ça marche très bien.
Librement,
--
Jean-Marc Gailis
Président de ViaNET
Les Voies de
Essaye http://umap.openstreetmap.fr
--
Jean-Marc Gailis
0xB76A9DF4.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
On 19/03/2012 12:40, John Sturdy wrote:
I started to work on Hampshire, but got the following request from a decliner:
I was wondering if you would mind refraining from 're-mapping' my contributions
for the time being? I'm still in discussions with the OSMF regarding
re-licensing some of my
It is difficult to chase tainted junctions though.
--
Andrew
I've knocked something together as a trial for tainted junctions. My
scripts extract the nodes at the start and end of a given set of ways
and pass them through quick history to check the licence state.
So far I've done
Does your CSV list take into account ways tagged with ODbL=clean? If
not (and assuming the rebuild process will honour such tagging) would
it be possible for such objects to be excluded from your list?
Thanks,
Robert.
Good spot.
No my list didn't allow for odbl=clean. However, the
Do you know
if/when that file will be updated as ways are re-mapped?
I've done an update and put some info on a wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:MarkS/Remapping
The page has the latest counts (down to 1889 currently expected to be
deleted). It also has a link to a CSV
There are lots of patches of detail in London that are still at risk:
http://cleanmap.poole.ch/?zoom=13lat=51.51807lon=-0.1225layers=00B%0D%0A
http://cleanmap.poole.ch/?zoom=13lat=51.51807lon=-0.1225layers=00B%0D%0A
My worry in Central London is the large number of traffic lights that
On 06/03/2012 14:31, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
Excellent -- thanks to both of you for getting this done. Do you know
if/when that file will be updated as ways are re-mapped?
I was playing around tonight with a combination of the Quick History
Service and Overpass to requery the
I agree that we want to try and have a complete main road network network.
Whilst longish stretches of road are easy to spot there are a lot of
other small sections (eg. bridges) which are harder to see on cleanmap
(unless the rest of the area is clean).
We also have the issue of nodes going
the changeset that created it was
by a non-accepting user).
This page (which shows how OSMI gets its colours) also suggets it will
be deleted: http://wtfe.gryph.de/report/way/41220492
MarkS
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
This is the way to go.
I download the UK from download.geofabrik.de once a week or so. Then use
osmosis to divide the UK extract up into the smaller regions as required.
In my case I use poly files (derived from the UK region boundary
relations) to tell osmosis which regions I want.
Mark S
Looking at the wiki (route=road) it seems to suggest a relation can be
used here.
However, it stikes me that the relation should be more than just the
roads without a role. The wiki suggests the road itself would have a
forward/backward role, and that link roads should be in the relation
Maybe the wiki should be updated ?
However, I think route relations are quite extensive across the UK. I
first came across them on the A1 but I'm fairly confident lots of other
roads have them on. I'm a fan of consistency so if we remove the M5 one
then we should remove the others as well.
Sometimes though the reference is in general use even if it isn't
signposted. In this case having it on the renderers might be useful.
For example: we have a C road near us. On the ground the road looks like
a single road, but in reality it is made up of series of roads with
around 6
On 04/05/2011 14:13, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Hello Peter,
I would say the most important thing with official rights of way is to
tag them with designation=public_footpath, public_bridleway,
public_byway or restricted_byway (as appropriate). The designation tag
is AFAIK generally regarded these
On 16/03/2011 19:31, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Richard Bullock wrote:
Do we *really* need to be tagging national speed limits on individual
ways?
E.g. the vast majority of roads ought to be one of;
*residential roads subject to 30mph
*rural roads subject to NSL
Perhaps we could tag the ones that
James Davis wrote:
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
We may be underestimating the intertwined nature of the definitive map
/statement and OS data.
Here in Hampshire the council are actually quite good. The definitive
maps are all online (and clearly say OS copyright on them). In addition
the
John Smith wrote:
--- On Tue, 28/7/09, Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
Admin boundaries are the new way of doing this. The is_in
tag was the early way of trying to show a hierarchy of admin
areas.
Ok, so is_in is redundant.
There was talk on the dev list about
John Smith wrote:
--- On Tue, 28/7/09, MarkS o...@redcake.co.uk wrote:
We need to be careful about removing tags because it could
cause
renderers to fail (or at least not work as expected). For
example, I
think the is_in tag is added after the place name in mkgmap
when
creating the city
22 matches
Mail list logo
