On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 01:05:51AM +0200, Marc_marc wrote:
> I have learn about this area and it seem that the Gulf of Ob is an area
> affected by tiles.
> so the coastline should follow the Gulf as before and not stop somewhere
> inside the Gulf it-self
>
> I have reverted the coastline change
Hello,
Le 15.09.22 à 01:05, Marc_marc a écrit :
I hope this allow the export to resume this night.
unfortunately not
I guess the blocking factor now is the change around
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087702973
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lTm
Hello,
I have learn about this area and it seem that the Gulf of Ob is an area
affected by tiles.
so the coastline should follow the Gulf as before and not stop somewhere
inside the Gulf it-self
I have reverted the coastline change in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126200089
talk
Hi!
the OSM extracts formerly at openstreetmapdata.com are moving to their
new home at https://osmdata.openstreetmap.de/ . If you are using the
coastlines or icesheet downloads switch to that site now!
If you are using generalized datasets, contact me. These datasets are
not available on the new
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:24:46PM -0800, Paul Norman wrote:
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:13 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline
Hi,
I think we have to face it: The approach of allowing the user to add
anything to the map and later fix it has failed. I strongly believed in
it for the longest time. But I don't any more. We have to have stronger
guarantees in the data structures and more checks in editors and in
the
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 1:51 AM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:24:46PM -0800, Paul Norman wrote:
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent
On Friday 22 November 2013, Paul Norman wrote:
A particular square (400x400 mercator km, I think) containing
coastline can be evaluated without considering the rest of the
continent thanks to the directionality of coastline ways mattering.
You'd periodically get squares that would end up
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:49:36PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
BTW it seems that the inspector doesn't show icons on errors in the
lowest zoomlevel (experienced with Firefox and Opera).
Works for me. What you are seeing might be due to a different known bug
with OSMI: If the 180° line is in
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:13 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline updates
through. The problem is that every day there is something broken
Jochen Topf wrote:
I have now changed the coastline update process from once a day to
once every 4 hours. This means updates show up quicker in the OSM
Inspector at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline .
Some mappers still break the coastlines faster than you check them. I
looked at a
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 06:53:15PM +0100, malenki wrote:
Jochen Topf wrote:
I have now changed the coastline update process from once a day to
once every 4 hours. This means updates show up quicker in the OSM
Inspector at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline .
Some mappers
Hi!
For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline updates through.
The problem is that every day there is something broken somewhere with the
coastline. Often problems get fixed the same day, but new problems show up
the next.
I have now changed the coastline update process from
On Monday 18 November 2013, Jochen Topf wrote:
Hi!
For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline updates
through. The problem is that every day there is something broken
somewhere with the coastline. Often problems get fixed the same day,
but new problems show up the next.
I
AM UTC.
-Original Message-
From: Simone Cortesi [mailto:sim...@cortesi.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:34 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: osm-talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
Paul,
are you still running it 3 times a day?
It seems to be in a frozen state since
...@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:55 PM
To: 'osm-talk'
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
I have resumed my daily generation of coastline files. These are
generated with the coastcheck program[1] from my jxapi database starting
at 5 AM pacific time. They take 3-4 hours
Whoops - looks like I had disabled the cron job. Files should start
uploading at about 2-3 AM UTC.
-Original Message-
From: Simone Cortesi [mailto:sim...@cortesi.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:34 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: osm-talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation
in a while.
David
- Original Message -
From: Paul Norman
To: 'osm-talk'
Cc: David Groom
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:42 AM
Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
Minor update: I am now running three times a day. Exact upload times depend
on runtime
though I know when my runs finish.
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:55 PM
To: 'osm-talk'
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
I have resumed my daily generation of coastline files. These are
generated with the coastcheck program[1] from
I have resumed my daily generation of coastline files. These are generated
with the coastcheck program[1] from my jxapi database starting at 5 AM
pacific time. They take 3-4 hours to generate and upload, depending on my
internet speed at the time.
The completed files are uploaded to
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
There is a visualization of errors at http://www.wightpaths.co.uk/coast/
Many of the errors appear to be short errors between ways that became
disconnected. More complicated errors are often best fixed by deleting the
bad
On the talk-ca list there have been a few discussion about problems
with flooded areas in southern Quebec. The conclusion seems to be
that the problems are due to the rendering of the coastline which only
gets updated every once in a while. The two cases are:
*
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 20:41 +0100, OJ W wrote:
Is there some problem with the coastline at Doha airport? The new
coastline (changed since February) doesn't yet appear in rendered
maps, but looks reasonable in the Edit view:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=25.24915lon=51.61024zoom=15layers=M
Hi Paul,
do you plan another update?
Regards
Thomas
Paul Norman wrote
I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
version respects odbl=clean.
The shapefiles are in their normal place at
http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/coastlines/
Included is a .osm
of their locations
-Original Message-
From: ThomasB [mailto:toba0...@yahoo.de]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:01 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
Hi Paul,
do you plan another update?
Regards
Thomas
Paul Norman wrote
I have completed another
On 1-4-2012 3:40, Paul Norman wrote:
Just be careful to not accidentally upload the .osm that indicate the
problems.
You should modify it to have upload='false' in there. Then JOSM will
discourage you from uploading that file.
osm version='0.6' upload='false'
See
- Original Message -
From: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
To: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:58 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote
Paul Norman wrote
http://suncobalt.homeip.net:82/coastline.php are two visualizations of
errors but neither has yet updated to the new data.
It updated now. Thanks for providing the data.
--
View this message in context:
-talk] Coastline Update
I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
version respects odbl=clean.
The shapefiles are in their normal place at
http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/coastlines/
Included is a .osm file with all the error points.
An overview can be found
Toby wrote:
Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually
from 12:30 AM CST last night when I started the jxapi query before
going to bed.
Also, it looks like http://www.wightpaths.co.uk/coast/CT-only.php
has
been updated with your new files since you sent your email.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk
To: 'Toby Murray' toby.mur...@gmail.com; talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
Toby wrote:
Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually
Toby wrote:
Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually
from 12:30 AM CST last night when I started the jxapi query before
going to bed.
Also, it looks like http://www.wightpaths.co.uk/coast/CT-only.php
has
been updated with your new files since you sent
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
There are no significant multi-square flooded or dry areas. The following
areas have significant number of error points:
Pudget Sound in Washington State
The mouth of the Columbia river in Washington
The Eastern Australia
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
version respects odbl=clean.
The shapefiles are in their normal place at
http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/coastlines/
Included is a .osm file
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:31:53 Clifford Snow wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
version respects odbl=clean.
The shapefiles are in their normal place at
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Errington [mailto:a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:01 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:31:53 Clifford Snow wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Paul Norman
I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
version respects odbl=clean.
The shapefiles are in their normal place at
http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/coastlines/
Included is a .osm file with all the error points.
An overview can be found at
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
The data is from 7 AM PST and the ODbL status is slightly more recent.
Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually
from 12:30 AM CST last night when I started the jxapi query before
going to bed.
Also,
Is there any way we can get a coastline rerender some time soon? It's been
broken (but fixed in the data) around inverness for nearly a month now.
Thanks
Tom Davie
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://metro.teczno.com/#coastline - someone?
On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Thomas Davie wrote:
Is there any way we can get a coastline rerender some time soon? It's been
broken (but fixed in the data) around inverness for nearly a month now.
Thanks
Tom Davie
- Original Message -
From: Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com
To: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Argh, Canvec imports
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:40, Michal Migurski
Hi everyone,
I've updated my metro extracts with some new cities and individual extracts of
the coastline shapefiles for each area:
http://metro.teczno.com/
I've been slowly adding cities, but I'm being somewhat U.S.-centric in my
choices. If you have something you'd like to see in the
From: Michal Migurski [mailto:m...@stamen.com]
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline extracts now added to metropolitan area
extracts
Hi everyone,
I've updated my metro extracts with some new cities and individual
extracts of the coastline shapefiles for each area:
http://metro.teczno.com
On Oct 9, 2011, at 7:06 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
I've been slowly adding cities, but I'm being somewhat U.S.-centric in
my choices. If you have something you'd like to see in the list don't
hesitate to contact me. It's just a simple matter of appending a line of
text to a file! (and waiting).
Dear experts,
I rendered some area by mapnik from France and Germany derived from
Europe.osm.bz2.
But some part of them are blue. is it some problem with small coast line in
this case? or no, that is because of some thing else?
please see the attachment.
Thank you in advance,
Saphy
Pierre asked:
Can someone help me to fix this.
Yes. Just wait. Mapnik coastlines are updated at long intervals
(wiki says every few weeks). Looks OK to me on the Osmarender layer.
Ed
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Can someone help me to fix this.
Yes. Just wait. Mapnik coastlines are updated at long intervals
(wiki says every few weeks). Looks OK to me on the Osmarender layer.
OK i just say this, thanks.
I seems that the river bank removal has been updated (in
On 14/06/11 12:07, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
OK i just say this, thanks.
I seems that the river bank removal has been updated (in mapnik render)
but not the new coastline... Just wait ;-)
The coastline data will be updated in a few weeks, but the mapnik layer
won't notice this. It will only
I made a modification in my country coastline (France).
I added a coastline for the Estuaire de la Gironde (estuary) that was
previously build on river banks (but it was incorrect, it was not a
river).
So i split the riverbank and made it natural=coastline.
But since (2 days) the rendering is bad
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and coastline
share the same location in the data but show up differently on the map.)
The coastline error checker says:
Last update of coastline errors: Wed Apr
- Original Message -
From: Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org
To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy
- Original Message -
From: Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org
To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:39:46 -, David Groom wrote:
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and coastline
share the same location in the data but show up differently on the map.)
Can you gave an
Is there any reason to still have the NPE layer accessible from the editors.
It was useful in the pre-OS/Bing days but seems like a liability now?
Kevin
On 25 February 2011 17:47, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are
still
not
- Original Message -
From: David Paleino da...@debian.org
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
David
the way you refer to was last edited on 1 Feb 2011, I would not necessarily
expect to see the results
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:35:41 -, David Groom wrote:
David
the way you refer to was last edited on 1 Feb 2011, [..]
You probably haven't read my whole message :)
The last changes are just added nodes, there is no change in the shape of the
coastline. The last changes in shape happened in
] Coastline updates
- Original Message - From: Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org
To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 20:01 +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
Hi!
Falmouth:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.15364lon=-5.0639zoom=17layers=M
Looks ok now in this zoom level. Still some errors if you zoom in.
I had a look at it again and marked some tile manually as dirty and I
get the
On 25-2-2011 17:03, Jochen Topf wrote:
The coastline error checker says:
Last update of coastline errors: Wed Apr 14 13:19:17 UTC 2010
It also says it needs new hosting. I guess thats the problem.
The osm.org tile server generates its own coastline shapefiles. It
doesn't use the ones from
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Lennard wrote:
Can we get this going again? What exactly is needed?
A server with sufficient storage and bandwidth to process a weekly
planet, daily diffs, and many hours of single task processing per
coastline run.
We have a server that has planet
On 25-2-2011 22:02, Jochen Topf wrote:
We have a server that has planet file kept current each day for Taginfo.
Maybe it can do the coastline check, too. It only has PBF files, though
which the coastline checker doesn't understand. But we could work around
that or change it. Storage should also
A stupid but working workaround is to go through the .osm file with sed or
something and rename coastline to something else before running osm2pgsql.
And the more logical solution would be to find the single line in the
osm2pgsql code that drops natural=coastline, adapt that, and
On Nov 9, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Lennard wrote:
A stupid but working workaround is to go through the .osm file with sed or
something and rename coastline to something else before running osm2pgsql.
And the more logical solution would be to find the single line in the
osm2pgsql code that drops
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 23:29 -0800, Michal Migurski wrote:
I think we went back to some older shapefiles after reports of a
significant problem with one of more recent updates. I just updated
the
files with coastlines generated from the planet file this week.
Thank you Jon!
Can I
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Jon Burgess wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 23:29 -0800, Michal Migurski wrote:
I think we went back to some older shapefiles after reports of a
significant problem with one of more recent updates. I just updated
the
files with coastlines generated from the planet
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 01:05 +0100, Vladimir Vyskocil wrote:
I checked the shoreline last modification date with : wget --server-response
--spider http://tile.openstreetmap.org/shoreline_300.tar.bz2
and the answer show :
Last-Modified: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:44:09 GMT
It's about 1 month
On Nov 7, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Jon Burgess wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 01:05 +0100, Vladimir Vyskocil wrote:
I checked the shoreline last modification date with : wget --server-response
--spider http://tile.openstreetmap.org/shoreline_300.tar.bz2
and the answer show :
Last-Modified: Fri, 24
I checked the shoreline last modification date with : wget --server-response
--spider http://tile.openstreetmap.org/shoreline_300.tar.bz2
and the answer show :
Last-Modified: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:44:09 GMT
It's about 1 month and half ago !! Is this process broken ?
Vlad.
On 5 nov. 2010, at
I'm waiting for my last week's coastline changes to become visible on
the main site's mapnik layer:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-0.7596lon=-47.049zoom=12layers=M
I tried to avoid caching problems, and I triggered re-rendering of the
affected tiles by tagging them as dirty ... Osmarender
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Ulf Mehlig ulf.meh...@gmx.net wrote:
I'm waiting for my last week's coastline changes to become visible on
the main site's mapnik layer:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-0.7596lon=-47.049zoom=12layers=M
I tried to avoid caching problems, and I triggered
the coastline during your
editing session. After all, there are likely to be some people who want to
render the coastline, and they won't be able to do so if you have deleted the
data.
---Original Email---
Subject :[OSM-talk] Coastline missing in Lake Superior - in case
anyonenotices...
From
Short answer yes, I'm taking responsibility! I've put in a temporary join on
on the US side so it's a complete object while I fix up the Canadian side. At
the rate I'm going I should be tomorrow.
As for same level of accuracy... that's why I'm deleting it. ;) The
coastline data is
I'm perfectly fine killing the coastal tag from the Canadian side on
all fresh water lakes... makes more sense to me. Plus it doesn't
import very well into my Garmin GPS anyways... you end up pulling half
the globe just to get the connecting lines, since it's not a single
object.
Michael
As Quick Draw McGraw would say, Whoa! Hold on there Pardners!
Please don't just delete and replace a large international body of
water without TONS of discussion with the affected community first.
There is a very high likelihood that editing an object this large will
break in the middle due to
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 14:42 -0300, Ulf Mehlig wrote:
I've the impression that the coastline error checker is not working at
the moment (last updated: 14th of April); coastline changes I've made
some weeks ago in northern Brazil have not yet been applied to the
openstreetmap.org mapnik layer.
Am Samstag 05. Juni 2010 11:15:16 schrieb Jon Burgess:
Can you provide a map link to the exact area you modified?
Some weeks ago I fixed this coastline
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?way=12193534 but is only in zoom level 14 right
rendered, all other levels show the old version...
Greetings,
Carsten Gerlach wrote:
Am Samstag 05. Juni 2010 11:15:16 schrieb Jon Burgess:
Can you provide a map link to the exact area you modified?
Some weeks ago I fixed this coastline
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?way=12193534 but is only in zoom level 14 right
rendered, all other levels
On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 20:30 +0100, Chris Hill wrote:
Carsten Gerlach wrote:
Am Samstag 05. Juni 2010 11:15:16 schrieb Jon Burgess:
Can you provide a map link to the exact area you modified?
Some weeks ago I fixed this coastline
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?way=12193534 but
I've the impression that the coastline error checker is not working at
the moment (last updated: 14th of April); coastline changes I've made
some weeks ago in northern Brazil have not yet been applied to the
openstreetmap.org mapnik layer. Is there anything one can do?
Thanks, Ulf
--
Ulf
2010/3/6 osm easingwold osm.easingw...@hotmail.co.uk:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-36.90445lon=174.85045zoom=16layers=B000FTF
The renderer is confused by having a park overlapping the sea and it's
obviously getting the ordering wrong.
Yes. And therefore the problem lies in the
On 6 March 2010 16:01, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
landuse? no, i didn't use that. i used leisure=park
sure. ahh… our messy key,tag combinations for areas natural, landuse,
leisure …
and it's not a national park, only local council
we still use it for parks if it's
On 7 March 2010 13:55, Erik Johansson e...@kth.se wrote:
Whoa, had a bad day? When things doesn't doesn't work like you want
them to, it's not because the world is a horrible mess.
no, not a bad day. previous bad experiences on osm around tagging:
everyone's so concentrated on their own small
On 5 March 2010 20:35, simon msr...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case your park have to follow the coastline with the tham node
(I have correct it to show you)
unfortunately the water is part of the park
If it was a park with water in the midle you have to use multipolygone
relation
On 5 March 2010 20:40, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't use coastline but tag the basin with natural water or any other water
type tags
like riverbank …
hmm, well if we can ignore for a moment the abomination of
inconsistency that is water tagging in general and
On 5 March 2010 20:39, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 March 2010 17:17, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com wrote:
i've recently mapped a park which contains a basin. when the tiles
render, the whole area, including the water, renders green. how would
i tag this so the
2010/3/5 Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com:
they'd already rendered, but now someone else has drawn it
incorrectly. i'll revert, use a polygon relation, and re-render
haven't you stated above that the water is part of the park? The
multipolygon-relation will exclude the inner from the
this out.
Ed Hillsman
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:41:57 +0100
From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] coastline within a park
To: Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com
Cc: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID:
7acdb3651003050441y1a38e833nffead252ca2a4
Hillsman, Edward hills...@cutr.usf.edu writes:
I have a related question, which I've let sit for several months
hoping to find an answer for. There is a park here
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=27.8394lon=-82.5924zoom=14layers=B000FTF
that includes wetland islands, wetland mainland, and
mailing list
Subject: [OSM-talk] coastline within a park
Sent: Mar 5, 2010 1:17 AM
i'm after some advice. i know this is potentially tagging for the
renderer, but still
i've recently mapped a park which contains a basin. when the tiles
render, the whole area, including the water, renders green. how
John F. Eldredge wrote:
On a related issue, since a way that forms a closed loop is interpreted as
the boundary of an area rather than as a way, how does one map a road or
trail that forms a closed loop?
It depends on the context. A closed loop tagged with a highway tag is
just a
On 5 Mar 2010, at 24:29 , Robin Paulson wrote:
On 5 March 2010 20:40, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't use coastline but tag the basin with natural water or any other water
type tags
like riverbank …
hmm, well if we can ignore for a moment the abomination of
On 6 March 2010 01:41, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
haven't you stated above that the water is part of the park? The
multipolygon-relation will exclude the inner from the outer, so IMHO
this is not your desired solution...
ah, yes. good point.
i hadn't understood it
On 6 March 2010 06:23, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
Didn't see when zoomed in to your view. clear now from low zoom.
you can hack it but that is dirty tagging for the renderer.
it is indeed. i'll leave it as is, and come up with some bullshit for
when a casual map user asks why
On 5 Mar 2010, at 13:41 , Robin Paulson wrote:
landuse? no, i didn't use that. i used leisure=park
sure. ahh… our messy key,tag combinations for areas natural, landuse, leisure
…
and it's not a national park, only local council
we still use it for parks if it's the type of parks
i'm after some advice. i know this is potentially tagging for the
renderer, but still
i've recently mapped a park which contains a basin. when the tiles
render, the whole area, including the water, renders green. how would
i tag this so the renderer understands the water bit should be treated
as
On 5 March 2010 17:17, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com wrote:
i've recently mapped a park which contains a basin. when the tiles
render, the whole area, including the water, renders green. how would
i tag this so the renderer understands the water bit should be treated
as water, and
Don't use coastline but tag the basin with natural water or any other water
type tags like riverbank …
coastline is also sensitive to direction while water has to be a closed polygon
only, direction doesn't matter
On 4 Mar 2010, at 23:17 , Robin Paulson wrote:
i'm after some advice. i know
Interesting, hadn't noticed. I'll see if I can work out what's happening.
Have a nice day,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
David Groom wrote:
The date of the last update of the coastline error checker is shown as 27
Dec 2009.
That was what I found when
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Interesting, hadn't noticed. I'll see if I can work out what's happening.
Increase 600M to 700M and you're set for another few months.
Also, the MAX_NODES_PER_WAY can now be dropped from 12000 to 2000, now
that no 2000+ node ways are left in OSM, and none can be
Hmm, ok. I've done than we'll see if it helps.
Thanks,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Interesting, hadn't noticed. I'll see if I can work out what's happening.
Increase 600M to 700M and you're set for another few months.
Also,
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
