On 11/05/15 02:07, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I expect to see Xxzme back under a different username soon.
This is the real problem.
While it is now common for people to hide behind anonymous nicknames on
the internet, it is certainly not courteous these days since it does
prevent proper interaction on
Hi,
On 05/11/2015 03:07 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Of the dozens of people interacting with Xxzme, none had the authority
or position to issue such a *recent, clear and unequivocal warning*.
What exactly constitutes a warning matching these three adjectives, or
whether a warning needs to match
On 11/05/15 09:39, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
On 2015-05-11 at 08:41:48 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
On 11/05/15 02:07, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I expect to see Xxzme back under a different username soon.
This is the real problem.
While it is now common for people to hide behind anonymous
On 2015-05-11 at 08:41:48 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
On 11/05/15 02:07, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I expect to see Xxzme back under a different username soon.
This is the real problem.
While it is now common for people to hide behind anonymous nicknames on
the internet, it is certainly not
Andy Mabbett wrote:
In the absence of blatant vandalism or base abuse, I would
have expected, first, a recent, clear and unequivocal warning on
the user's talk page
No. Please remember that the primary means of discussion and consensus in
OSM is mailing lists, even when the subject is the
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla''
elena.valha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-05-11 at 08:41:48 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
On 11/05/15 02:07, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I expect to see Xxzme back under a different username soon.
This is the real problem.
While it is now
rich...@systemed.net
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, 11 May 2015, 10:08
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Please ban Xxzme in wiki
Andy Mabbett wrote:
In the absence of blatant vandalism or base abuse, I would
have expected, first, a recent, clear and unequivocal warning on
the user's talk
On 11 May 2015 at 17:39, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 11 May 2015 at 10:08, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Andy Mabbett wrote:
In the absence of blatant vandalism or base abuse, I would
have expected, first, a recent, clear and unequivocal warning on
On 11 May 2015 at 15:13, Harry Wood m...@harrywood.co.uk wrote:
I have now written some justification for the ban, as I see it, on his talk
page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Xxzme#Blocked_for_3_months
Thank you. I've replied there, since my reply is addressed as much to
On 11 May 2015 at 10:08, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Andy Mabbett wrote:
In the absence of blatant vandalism or base abuse, I would
have expected, first, a recent, clear and unequivocal warning on
the user's talk page
No. Please remember that the primary means of discussion
That's the closest that I found right now:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Xxzmediff=prevoldid=1160164
I don't know what falls unders base abuse, but although Xxzme didn't
directly insult anyone since the last ban, he still wrote false or
misleading statements in edit
On 10 May 2015 at 23:15, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
In the absence of blatant vandalism or base abuse, I would have
expected, first, a recent, clear and unequivocal warning on the user's
talk page, with a suitably direct subject heading (Warning: you may
be blocked from
Congratulations, Andy.
On 11/05/2015 1:11 AM, Grant Slater wrote:
Hi Andy,
I no longer have sufficient time to administer the wiki and to review
cases thoroughly. User:Lyx has done a great job in my absence, but he
could use additional help. I am going to focus my available time on
OSM
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
On 10 May 2015 at 23:15, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
Xxzme had plenty of warning.
I see no *recent, clear and unequivocal warning*; perhaps you could
point me to it; bearing in mind my comment:
It
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
On 10 May 2015 at 11:40, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Consulting with a few other users, I have gone ahead and blocked the
user.
On 10 May 2015 at 11:40, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Consulting with a few other users, I have gone ahead and blocked the user.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:BlockList?wpTarget=Xxzme
In the absence of blatant vandalism or base abuse, I would have
expected,
Ilya Zverev wrote:
Who banned Xxzme in wiki a while ago? Please do it again.
Seconded.
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Please-ban-Xxzme-in-wiki-tp5843984p5843986.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Ilya,
Consulting with a few other users, I have gone ahead and blocked the user.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:BlockList?wpTarget=Xxzme
His last block was for a month. I have given him a 3 month block this time.
Kind regards,
Grant
On 10 May 2015 at 11:14, Ilya Zverev
Hi,
Who banned Xxzme in wiki a while ago? Please do it again. Not only he
abuses mappers, in part by deleting parts of their pages in private
namespaces, he also renames and/or modifies in a bad way wiki pages that
many mappers link to. E.g. there is no How we map page now.
This is not his
Hi Andy,
I no longer have sufficient time to administer the wiki and to review
cases thoroughly. User:Lyx has done a great job in my absence, but he
could use additional help. I am going to focus my available time on
OSM hardware other operational work.
Andy, I have now made you an
Hi,
On 05/10/2015 02:47 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Finally since the current bock includes email disabled, cannot edit
own talk page (were either of those privileges ever abused? If not,
that part of the block should be rescinded ASAP.), it does not seem
possible for Xxzme to discuss how they
On Sunday 10 May 2015, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In the absence of blatant vandalism or base abuse, I would have
expected, first, a recent, clear and unequivocal warning on the
user's talk page, with a suitably direct subject heading (Warning:
you may be blocked from editing, or suchlike), and a
22 matches
Mail list logo
