Re[2]: (no subject)

2006-10-11 Thread MikeD (2)
Hello Roelof, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 2:49:24 PM, you wrote: RO Hallo MikeD, RO On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:18:49 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 19:18 , where I RO live), you wrote: RO You're not able to connect, is that with pop3, smtp or both? M Both. When I try to receive or send email with TB, it

Re[2]: (no subject)

2006-10-11 Thread MikeD (2)
Hello Alexander, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 1:00:49 PM, you wrote: ASK Hello MikeD (2) everyone else, ASK on 10-Okt-2006 at 13:35 you (MikeD (2)) wrote: I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is, it is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a different 'domain' that is

Re[2]: (no subject)

2006-10-10 Thread MikeD (2)
Hello Roelof, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 8:36:41 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo MikeD, RO On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:35:52 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 13:35 , where I RO live), you wrote: MI have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect. MI suspect that the problem is that it is a

Re[2]: (no subject)

2006-10-10 Thread MikeD (2)
Hello Mary, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 7:58:44 AM, you wrote: MB Hello MikeD! MB On Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 6:35 AM, you wrote: OK ... this is related to this thread: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=2349 I have been through that one, but I am still not able to

Re[2]: (no subject)

2005-08-04 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Roelof. RO Hallo Chuck, RO On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:06:39 -0400GMT (4-8-2005, 19:06 +0200, where I RO live), you wrote: CS How do you get the uptime (i.e. [uptime :: 0d 8h 29m]) in your message templates? RO Maybe this helps? RO

Re[2]: (no subject)

2005-08-04 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Roelof. CS How do you get the uptime (i.e. [uptime :: 0d 8h 29m]) in your message templates? RO Maybe this helps? RO http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/management/uptime/default.asp VP :) There is macro plugin called uptime. I just formatted it's VP output... RO

Re[2]: (no subject)

2005-08-04 Thread Chuck Smith
Hello Roelof, Thursday, August 4, 2005, 4:54:35 PM, you wrote: That would be nice. VP Or I can mail it to you (~25 kb). Yep, but that wouldn't help Chuck, who started the thread. Vladimir e-mailed it to me direct. Works great as you can see and is easy to configure. -- Best regards,

Re[2]: (no subject)

2005-08-04 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Roelof. VP :) There is macro plugin called uptime. I just formatted it's VP output... RO And where would one find that plug-in? VP I have no www link, but I have a FIDO address of developer - VP 2:5054/66.29. His name Alexander Zykov. RO That's too late for me. I

Re[2]: Editing subject in stored email

2004-10-18 Thread admin
Hæ! Monday, October 18, 2004, 14:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: POPFile amedns the subject with a word such as [spam] prepended. Why not disable this option in Popfile and filter instead on X-Text-Classification: spam in the header? Yes I thought of that but the problem of later

Re[2]: Editing subject in stored email

2004-10-18 Thread TBUDL
Hi Monday, October 18, 2004, 2:41:05 PM, you wrote: On Mon 18 October 2004, 22:31:20 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to be able to edit the subject of the email to remove the [spam] prependation (ohh I like that word!). If I go to the mailbox and open it in a text editor I don'r

Re: [the_bat] Re[2]: Editing subject in stored email

2004-10-18 Thread Michael Acklin
Hello TBUDL, Just drag the message to the OUTBOX and then open the mail and edit it :-) Dang, that was too easy. Thanks for this tip, it works great. I had the same problem with PopFile and was watching this thread. After reading this solution, I find it the fastest and easiest way to change

Re[2]: (no subject)

2004-09-20 Thread Elena Mekhanoshina
Hello Zeynel, Monday, September 20, 2004, 5:31:18 PM, you wrote: ZAO Hello Elena, ZAO Monday, September 20, 2004, 4:22:15 PM, you wrote: EM I want to unsubscribe from here, how can I do this? ZAO While this message open (or any TBUDL message), go specials menu | ZAO mailing list |

Re[2]: (no subject)

2004-08-03 Thread pk roy
Hello Darrin, receiving is v2.12.0 Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 8:41:30 PM, you wrote: Hi pk, On 8/3/2004 7:59 AM my time, pk wrote: pr have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location pr using thebat v2.12, Is the receiving e-mail program V2.12 or just the one your sending

Re[2]: (no subject)

2003-12-15 Thread The.Limit
Monday, December 15, 2003, 11:05:21 AM, you wrote: RO Folder template? Following unsub instructions ... sigh I wonder if it worked??? lol! Lynn -- TheBat 2.02.3 CE Win2kPro SP2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2

Re[2]: (no subject) - unsub

2003-12-15 Thread The.Limit
Monday, December 15, 2003, 12:12:20 PM, you wrote: RO Depends on your folder template. RO If it contains %to=[EMAIL PROTECTED] it will work, if it RO contains %to=%to=[EMAIL PROTECTED] it won't. There's no template involved ... I just sent a *bare* mail, apart from the commands ... but I

Re[2]: (no subject)

2003-12-15 Thread Lynn
Monday, December 15, 2003, 3:52:56 PM, you wrote: MDP Doubtful. The listserver doesn't read commands sent to the MDP list. You MDP have to send them not to TBUDL@ but to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems to have worked ... messages are no longer coming to the other address. It didn't come out quite

Re[2]: (no subject)

2002-12-08 Thread Michael S. Hyatt
I must be dense. I've been searching on Google for about 20 minutes. I haven't come up with one file yet! On Sunday, December 8, 2002 at 1:57:39 PM you wrote: DG Sun, 8 Dec 2002 10:23:42 [GMT -0600] (11:23 AM EST here) Michael S. DG Hyatt wrote: Where can I download cookie files? DG See DG

Re[2]: (no subject)

2002-12-08 Thread Michael S. Hyatt
Marck: That did it. Thanks. I'm new to this list. What is top posting? Did I do something wrong? Thanks, Michael S. Hyatt On Sunday, December 8, 2002 at 2:38:11 PM you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michael, @8-Dec-2002, 14:16 -0600 (20:16 UK time) Michael S.

Re[2]: (no subject)

2002-12-08 Thread Michael S. Hyatt
On Sunday, December 8, 2002 at 4:42:55 PM you wrote: MSH What is top posting? Did I do something wrong? ACM ACM Ooops! Yes, you did. ;) Okay, is that better? ;-) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:

Re[2]: (no subject)

2002-10-03 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Ladies and Gents, On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, at 15:44:27 [GMT +0200] (which was 14:44 in my TimeZone) you wrote: MO On Thursday, October 3, 2002, 15:07, Michael Thompson wrote: I have just noticed that the new virus, BugBear looks into *.tbb for email addresses. Am I correct or is the

Re[2]: (no subject)

2002-10-03 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Ladies and Gents, On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, at 21:23:15 [GMT +0200] (which was 20:23 in my TimeZone) you wrote: DH Hello wenewcomb! DH On Thursday, October 3, 2002 at 6:46:00 PM you wrote: I mean this is an AVG function. I find no option in the FREE version either to enable or to

Re[2]: (no subject)

2002-09-29 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Paula, Since I would much prefer to consolidate email and newsgroups in a single client, I doubt I would be using the TB if not for its folder templates. I use TB for both e-mail and newsgroups. If you are interested in knowing how, look for subject Newsgroups with The Bat! and

Re[2]: (no subject)

2002-09-11 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Marck, On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, at 16:48:57 [GMT +0100] (which was 16:48 in my TimeZone) you wrote: MDP Hi Michael, MDP @11-Sep-2002, 14:16 Michael Thompson [MT] in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MT Hey People, why did my copy of the Bat! just try to connect to MT

Re[2]: (no subject)

2002-09-11 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Thomas, On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, at 23:46:10 [GMT +0700] (which was 17:46 in my TimeZone) you wrote: TF Wild guess: a trojan disguises itself as The Bat!, and maybe it's part TF of a DDoS attack on the windowsupdate site. TF Does Outpost use MD5 verification for the apps? Yes it does, and

Re[2]: (no subject)

2002-09-11 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Thomas, On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, at 23:46:10 [GMT +0700] (which was 17:46 in my TimeZone) you wrote: TF Does Outpost use MD5 verification for the apps? It appears to be this message in tbbeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every time I open it it trys to connect...any one know why??? -- Best

Re[2]: (no subject)

2002-09-11 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Thomas, On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, at 00:50:05 [GMT +0700] (which was 18:50 in my TimeZone) you wrote: TF Now I'm baffled. Let's think of a scenario: Because you don't have the TF root certificate in your AB, TB tries to connect and download it (I TF don't think TB does that, but let's humour

Re[2]: Reply Subject

2002-03-02 Thread Hans Henrik Scheel
Hello Ottar, Saturday, March 02, 2002, 4:22:47 PM, you wrote: CC I put %SINGLERE on the first line of all my reply templates on CC it's own. OG But this will create an empty line in the start of the massage. I OG prefere to put it in the bottom. Put %- at the end of %SINGLERE. See 'Full

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2001-05-04 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Friday, May 04, 2001, 3:56:54 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MEM The Bat seems determined to reload most of these messages from MEM the server so obviously they are not being deleted. I don't know why that would happen. I have always found the leave on server option works fine. Out of

Fwd: Re[2]: (No Subject)

2001-05-04 Thread Mark E. Mark
This is a forwarded message From: Mark E. Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marck D. Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, May 04, 2001, 3:52:09 PM Subject: (No Subject) ===8==Original message text=== Marck, Right. I do that. Thanks. Mark MDP In that case, you'd do

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2001-05-04 Thread Mark E. Mark
Hello Marck, Friday, May 04, 2001, 1:56:54 PM, you wrote: MDP You have to use the Account specific network settings in each of the MDP Account .. Properties .. Network configuration screens to separate the MDP way each account operates. Doesn't work. MEM I get mail from both accounts

Re[2]: Replacing subject of incoming mail

2001-04-28 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Urban On 28 April 2001 at 04:22:58 +0200 (which was 03:22 where I live) Urban wrote Now it's only the part of finding out some way to do this automatically remaining. I seam to remember that Dirk Heiser wrote something called [cut] which

Re[2]: Replacing subject of incoming mail

2001-04-27 Thread Bernhard Kohl
Hallo Syafril, Mitteilung vom Freitag, 27. April 2001, 06:20:02: SH Hello Bernhard Kohl, BK is there a way to filter incoming messages so that a subject BK AW: x is replaced with Re: x? SH I thought this already covers on FAQ (Regex), see at SH

Re[2]:  Replacing subject of incoming mail

2001-04-27 Thread ANT-ilic
Hi David van Zuijlekom, On the Friday, April 27, 2001, U wrote: DvZ So you want to alter the subject line from incoming messages. I dont' DvZ think this can be done automatically. I think you have to do it DvZ manually. Move the message to the Outbox and alter the subject. But DvZ if you do

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2001-01-21 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Jonas, On Sunday, January 21, 2001 15:59:28 [GMT +0100], you wrote the following in regards to '(No Subject)': Jonas Centuries ago Nostradamus foresaw [...] Do you think Nostradamus foresaw a subject for this thread just forgot to put it in his journals? ;-) -- Jan Rifkinson

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-12-18 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Allie, On Monday, December 18, 2000 @ 07:16:46 -0500 you wrote the following in regards to (No Subject): Allie [...] I have personally not disabled TB!'s warning messages Allie except for those file types which I know are safe. I'd rather deal with Allie the pop-up [...] Where/what

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-12-16 Thread Beat Strasser
Hi Curt Headers below. Anyone on top of this? The message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] was automatically generated by the infected winsock.dll. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is informed about the infection. So let's ignore this thread now. So short, Beat -- Using The Bat! 1.48d under Windows 95 4.0

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-12-14 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello A., Thursday, December 14, 2000, 3:15:38 PM, you wrote: GFS Is there a way to modify/Add X-Headers in The Bat! ACM You could add it as a comment. ACM %Comment="X-Header here" Were would this go? In a template or.? -- Best regards, Georgemailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-12-10 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Manfred, Sunday, December 10, 2000, 12:44:16 PM, you wrote: ME On 10-12-2000 at 12:33:55GMT -0800 (which was 20:33 where I live) ME George F. Schoelles wrote regarding the subject of "(No Subject)" George I'm trying to run BattleMail Kung-Fu and am receiving an ME Hello George F., ME

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-12-10 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Januk, Sunday, December 10, 2000, 1:08:31 PM, you wrote: JA Hello George, JA On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 at 12:33:55 GMT -0800 (which was 12:33 PM JA where I live) witnesses say George F. Schoelles typed: I'm trying to run BattleMail Kung-Fu and am receiving an smapi logon error (won't

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-09-19 Thread Deryk Lister
Actually, no, removing myself from both lists and forgetting about the folder's addressing override. Not to worry. Gone now. :-) (or very shortly, anyway) That's a shame. Bye then! -- Deryk Lister || ICQ 25869912 || www.deryk.co.uk "That's gonna take some SERIOUS software." -- Avery

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-07-27 Thread Jamie Dainton [Work]
Hello Tom, Thursday, July 27, 2000, 10:38:40 AM, you wrote: JDW Hello Rasyad, JDW Thursday, July 27, 2000, 1:02:19 AM, you wrote: R unsubscribe JDW not again JDW ==message to moderators JDW I've resisted the temptation this time. TP Is it really that hard to

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-07-01 Thread Dean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gerd, Saturday, July 01, 2000, 3:19:28 AM, you wrote: GE -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- GE Hash: SHA1 GE Hello Dean, GE Saturday, July 01, 2000, 9:24:38 AM, you wrote: *** PGP Signature Status: good *** Signer: Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings John! First I had to TRACK DOWN "(No Subject)" and which technically *IS* a subject. If it really was NO SUBJECT then there would be Subject="" Which still isn't the case. Which is why Okay man, I got 5:870 messages with "(No Subject) in TBUDL. That's FIVE out of EIGHTHUNDRED

Re[2]: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings Jast! On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 07:13:04 GMT +0200 (which was 10:13 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: J Morning John De Hoog, Ordinary users don't oppose it. Ritlabs needs to listen to ordinary users, else it will find itself with a shrinking piece of a

Re[2]: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings John! Well the Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval, does not set the internet Standards, the RFC's do. Which if you look up RFC 822, you see that the Subject is treated as a TEXT STRING. And to FORCE your BS on my MESSAGE is not what the RFC's SAY. The GNKSA is the BS-DOO-DOO-GNKSA as

Re[2]: No Subject warning

2000-05-16 Thread phil
Greetings Marck! On Tuesday, May 16, 2000 at 09:27:13 GMT +0100 (which was 1:27 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MDP Hi phil, MDP On 16 May 2000 at 00:57:31 GMT -0700 (which was 08:57 where I MDP live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject MDP of

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-05-16 Thread Julio Cesar da Costa
Hello Januk, On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 23:31:35, you wrote: ... JA All you need to do is delete the appropriate value from your registry JA and TB will automatically import your old message bases. The JA appropriate registry setting is under, JA HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-05-13 Thread Nick Andriash
On Friday, May 12, 2000, 6:13:33 PM, Steve Lamb wrote: which you could then save with the message if you so desired. What happens when the message is changed? :) Nothing actually... you just have a visual record that you've verified the signature of that particular message. Nick --

Re[2]: TIA: Subject field empty notify - plus MicroSpell hot key problem.

2000-01-31 Thread Oleg Zalyalov
Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Tuesday, February 01, 2000, Januk Aggarwal wrote to Thomas Fernandez on TBUDL about TIA: Subject field empty notify - plus MicroSpell hot key problem.: was dicussed on TBUDL, most people were against a "warning message" JA ^^^ JA

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-01-09 Thread Juergen Frisch
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 22:21, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: CJT Isn't this something to be taken care of by the server? I CJT mean that when the massage is send to TBUDL.UNSUB CJT address, it shouldn't be sent to TBUDL/TBBETA even if lists' CJT addresses are in To: (the massage should

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-01-05 Thread Carsten Dreesbach
Hello Tim, Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 2:28:42 AM, you wrote: Note: I'm a new user too and I just went through this. It's really not that hard if you can export them all at once and as long as they contain all of the headers in each text message. TF I can export all the messages in one

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-01-05 Thread Carsten Dreesbach
Hello Allie, Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 1:42:16 PM, you wrote: TF I can export all the messages in one textfile, or each message TF individually. However, I can't export all the messages TF individually, at the same time. Does that make sense? Have you tried exporting into one file

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-01-05 Thread Travisimo!
Tuesday, January 04, 2000, 7:28:42 PM, Tim Fountain wrote: I can export all the messages in one textfile, or each message individually. However, I can't export all the messages individually, at the same time. Does that make sense? You can export messages to individual files if you setup a

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-01-05 Thread Carsten Dreesbach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey Tim, Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 6:06:59 PM, you wrote: Can you tell us which e-mail client you've been using so far? TF Pluto. Maybe someone else here has had some experience with it TF I think that's unlikely. Pluto is one of the

Re[2]: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-12-01 Thread Jast
Morning Steve Lamb, My reply to this is a little belated, I guess. I just remembered what I wanted to write ;-) Toggle macros are just like checkboxes. On, off. OTOH, they do take up space[*] unless you tack them onto the end of a line somewhere and then you can't see them. That's just

Re: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-23 Thread Steve Lamb
Monday, November 22, 1999, 6:47:19 PM, Thomas wrote: OK, so by default the cursor should always go into the header, even if there is data (TO/Subject/...) already. Unless there is a %SkipHeader macro. This defines the default as opposite to what I was thinking of, but I get your point.

Re: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-23 Thread Steve Lamb
Monday, November 22, 1999, 7:26:01 PM, Paula wrote: I would say that if the user has put a %SkipHeader macro in the template, then TB shouldn't worry about whether or not there is anything entered in the header, unless the intent is to allow the %SkipHeader only if the TO is filled in. I

Re[2]: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-23 Thread Jast
Morning Steve Lamb, That it would. I like the idea of a template definition, just not sure if I want to fully endorse another template macro which is nothing more than a toggle that is better served, IMHO, by checkboxes on the templates. I prefer template macros. They are more versatile

Re: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-23 Thread Steve Lamb
Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 2:03:17 PM, Jast wrote: I prefer template macros. They are more versatile (in regard to usability - you never know what functionality you could add to a macro) and don't take up window space if you don't use it. Really, I don't like long option lists. Of

Re[3]: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Jast, on Wednesday, November 24, 1999, 6:03:17 AM GMT+0800, Jast wrote: That it would. I like the idea of a template definition, just not sure if I want to fully endorse another template macro which is nothing more than a toggle that is better served, IMHO, by checkboxes on the

Re: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Oleg, On Monday, November 22, 1999, 8:57:38 PM (GMT+0800), Oleg Zalyalov wrote: It has nothing to do with %cursor macro, while is reasonable wish. But I'm afraid it is hardly implementable, while it does work so when you hit reply. PF Well, it would seem that it is

Re[2]: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Steve, on Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 2:33:19 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote: SL Monday, November 22, 1999, 6:15:22 AM, Thomas wrote: You mean a switch like a %SkipHeader macro? SL That would work. I'd actually like to see the current behavior of the SL reply template changed so that

Re: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-22 Thread Paula Ford
On Monday, November 22, 1999, Thomas Fernandez wrote: OK, so by default the cursor should always go into the header, even if there is data (TO/Subject/...) already. Unless there is a %SkipHeader macro. This defines the default as opposite to what I was thinking of, but I get your point.

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-21 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 21, 1999 Hello Ali, Sunday, Sunday, November 21, 1999, you wrote: Ali Hi all, Ali tracer wrote: Now what do YOU say about the 10th patient who comes sneezing in your office on a day... Ali You really didn't need to use my profession to get your point across. I already

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-21 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 21, 1999 Hello Steve, Sunday, Sunday, November 21, 1999, you wrote: Steve Saturday, November 20, 1999, 3:11:27 PM, Ali wrote: explanation of the findings and the implications etc. They expect it then and there. See what I'm getting at? I have to do that, explaining the same

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-21 Thread Kevin Boylan
Given the two choices of bosses, I'd rather take the one who knows what he is doing and is a little rough around the edges than the one who doesn't know what he is doing, makes my life and job hell, but, damn, can he state it politely. I wouldn't prefer either boss if the one who knows what

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-21 Thread Pasquale J. Festa Sr.
Hello Alexander, Sunday, November 21, 1999, 4:12:02 PM, you wrote: AVK Hi there! AVK On 21 Nov 99, at 9:53, Steve Lamb wrote AVK about "Re: (No Subject)": Sunday, November 21, 1999, 6:36:55 AM, Alexander wrote: *many* people on this list *do not* understand your American slang

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-21 Thread Watcher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Saturday, November 20, 1999, 7:18:59 AM, Ali wrote: Hi all, Steve Lamb wrote: Friday, November 19, 1999, 11:10:13 PM, tracer wrote: But the people who are in need of that filter probably donot know how to make one. Maybe steve can post one

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-21 Thread Watcher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sunday, November 21, 1999, 8:00:11 AM, Steve wrote: Sunday, November 21, 1999, 4:07:05 AM, Ali wrote: M$ comparison snipped Personally, I think politeness at the expense of accuracy of thought and communication is a detriment. It throws up

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-20 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 21, 1999 Hello Steve, Saturday, Saturday, November 20, 1999, you wrote: Steve Friday, November 19, 1999, 11:10:13 PM, tracer wrote: But the people who are in need of that filter probably donot know how to make one. Maybe steve can post one (g) Steve Filter / Incoming mail /

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-20 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 21, 1999 Hello Ali, Saturday, Saturday, November 20, 1999, you wrote: Ali Hi all, Ali Steve Lamb wrote: Friday, November 19, 1999, 11:10:13 PM, tracer wrote: But the people who are in need of that filter probably donot know how to make one. Maybe steve can post one (g)

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Nick Danger
In Reference to "(No Subject)" From Steve Lamb: SL Friday, October 22, 1999, 2:25:49 AM, Marck wrote: Message times are internationally corrected and usually work fine for sorting. Individual PC system clocks, however, are a law unto themselves ;-). SL geek SL Always good to

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 22 October 1999 at 16:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: SL geek SL Always good to have a tool to reset your PC's clock to one of the tier 2 SL servers. Personally I have my server syncing with 3-4 tier 2 servers and all SL my other machines sync off it. I generally don't see more

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-17 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Paula, on Saturday, November 20, 1999, 8:38:11 AM GMT+0800, Paula Ford wrote: It has nothing to do with %cursor macro, while is reasonable wish. But I'm afraid it is hardly implementable, while it does work so when you hit reply. PF Well, it would seem that it is

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-16 Thread Ian Gore
On Thursday, November 18, 1999, 3:25:58 AM, Jast wrote: This template has 2 problems, one is that the cursor is in the to field instead of at the %Cursor position, This is normal for new messages... Problem is it's also normal when creating a message by clicking on an e-mail address. Why

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-16 Thread Bernhard Kaiser
Hello Steve, Your message from Thursday, November 18, 1999, 17:22 : "(No Subject)" SL Thursday, November 18, 1999, 7:56:24 AM, Ali wrote: Steve, please don't call peoples suggestions idiotic especially when it's not necessary. SL It was. An understanding of basic UI at the level of

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-16 Thread Pasquale J. Festa Sr.
Hello Steve, Thursday, November 18, 1999, 6:41:24 PM, you wrote: SL Thursday, November 18, 1999, 2:08:06 PM, Ali wrote: No, it is the point. People should learn to use the program, not the program to babysit the user. So you consider it babysitting. H. Oh boy. :) SL Yes, I do.

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-16 Thread Kevin Boylan
Beginners shouldn't really be making suggestions. Furthermore everyone is a beginner exactly once. I don't like things that are geared for beginners at the exclusion of those who aren't because of that. I was waiting for this. So now you get your way around here only due to seniority.

DEAD HORSE (was Re[2]: (No Subject))

1999-01-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 21 November 1999 at 21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: AVK Hi there! Hi Alex - nice to see you back on the list proper! :-) AVK On 18 Nov 99, at 22:20, Bernhard Kaiser wrote AVK about "Re[2]: (No Subject)": People like Steve Lamb make it so hard for beginne

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-16 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Steve, Time for a Steve Lamb kill filter. SL Love you too. I've gotta admit: I just love the sarcasm :-) -- Der Immer Jodelende

Re: DEAD HORSE (was Re[2]: (No Subject))

1999-01-16 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: snip People like Steve Lamb make it so hard for beginners to stay in this list. This is the main point of the objections to the style of Steve Lamb's postings. As a matter of fact, although I misunderstood his writing style myself when he

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Steve, on Friday, November 19, 1999, 12:22:22 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote: Steve, please don't call peoples suggestions idiotic especially when it's not necessary. SL It was. An understanding of basic UI at the level of around an AOL user SL would be all that is required to deduce

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Steve, on Friday, November 19, 1999, 1:58:33 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote: Simple : Not everyone has this allegedly logical stepwise approach. I tend to prefer this stepwise approach and this is why I have no need for no subject error messages or reminders to enter an address, but this

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Steve, on Friday, November 19, 1999, 5:58:21 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote: People like Steve Lamb make it so hard for beginners to stay in this list. SL Beginners shouldn't really be making suggestions. Pu-leaze, Steve. And by the way, with 21 years of computer programming, I don't

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-16 Thread Oleg Zalyalov
Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Friday, November 19, 1999, Paula Ford wrote about (No Subject): PF You're talking about a case, however, where the user has consciously PF requested that the cursor be put in a specific position. Why not honor PF that request? %cursor macro means that cursor

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-01-15 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Watchert, I also have one suggestion, I would like to be able to quickly and easily add a cookie to my list of random quotes (cookie list).