-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Letin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
:-)
[uri:*]
alias=localhost
debug=10
[uri:www.i-com.com:80]
debug=10
If the 80 is default server port then you have to ommit it
Simply use the
[uri:www.i-com.com]
The port directive is used for non
OK will make the uri parser on my own. Not such a big deal.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
As I mentioned, I prefer doing this _after_ jk2.0 ( i.e. the first
milestone), possibly in a branch.
MT
--
To unsubscribe,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sounds helpful, thanks Amy, but introduces some issues.
In the last few weeks we developed three connectors and it will
be more in future.
1. My main question is, why isn't mbeans-descriptors.xml part of
the configuration directory?
2. For me it looks like i have to rebuild tomcat to get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds helpful, thanks Amy, but introduces some issues.
In the last few weeks we developed three connectors and it will
be more in future.
1. My main question is, why isn't mbeans-descriptors.xml part of
the configuration directory?
2. For me it looks like
mturk 2002/09/24 00:52:09
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c
Log:
Enable compiling withouth APR.
Revision ChangesPath
1.29 +31 -26jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_uriEnv.c
Index: jk_uriEnv.c
mturk 2002/09/24 00:58:22
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c
Log:
Should be #ifdef HAS_APR not #if HAS_APR
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_uriEnv.c
Index: jk_uriEnv.c
remm2002/09/24 01:32:43
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Tag: tomcat_40_branch
Globals.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets Tag:
tomcat_40_branch InvokerServlet.java
Again, the first error message I get is:
configure: error: can't locate /usr/src/apache/apache_1.3.26/
Incidentally, I tried the native (not native2) and it works fine.
I'm sure JF will fix it quickly.
I'm using DSO (--with-apxs) and never tried static build ;[
--
To unsubscribe,
remm2002/09/24 01:34:40
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Tag: tomcat_40_branch
Globals.java
Log:
- Revert version number.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
remm2002/09/24 01:35:10
Modified:webapps/ROOT Tag: tomcat_40_branch index.html
Log:
- Revert version number.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.29.2.24 +1 -1
remm2002/09/24 01:35:49
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Log:
- Update release notes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +29 -4 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hi Henri,
I would prefer to minimize the impact of upgrading from
3.3.1 to 3.3.2. I agree with Costin that using 4 with
documentation on the steps to enable the MxInterceptor
would be a resonable way to implement this.
So I'll have to take a look at MxInterceptor to
mturk 2002/09/24 02:05:50
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel_socket.c
Log:
Resolve (I hope) the WIN32 reported bug 12346. Caused by the
connection refusing on TC side during high load. If the TC refuses
connection keep trying instead of returng error.
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12947.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hgomez 2002/09/24 03:23:51
Modified:jk/xdocs faq.xml
Log:
Add information about MMNB (Magic Module Number bump) of Apache 2.0
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/faq.xml
Index: faq.xml
hgomez 2002/09/24 03:49:03
Modified:jk/xdocs/jk aphowto.xml
Log:
Use MOD_JK SVRPGM as mod_jk module for iSeries when
rebuilding it from Apache sources (IBM use QZTCJK).
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk/aphowto.xml
JTC will be tagged JK_1_2_0 by 17h CET.
Regards
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Since there is no major showstoppers and
a) The vhosts should work now
b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved
Here is the release plan:
1. 09/25/2002 - Freeze the further development.
2. 09/26/2002 - If there is no major bugs tag the release as JK2_2_0_0
3. 09/26/2002 - Prepare the source
Hi,
Can someone tell me how many committers there are on:
- Tomcat 3.x
- Tomcat 4.x
- Tomcat 5.x
Thanks
-Vincent
Note: I have not found a way to access the CVS avail file in /home/cvs
(it seems I don't have the rights).
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
A security vulnerability has been confirmed to exist in all Apache
Tomcat 4.x releases (including Tomcat 4.0.4 and Tomcat 4.1.10), which
allows to use a specially crafted URL to return the unprocessed source
of a JSP page, or, under special circumstances, a static resource which
would
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12952.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2002/09/24 05:12:22
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs jndi-datasource-examples-howto.xml
Log:
- Fix incorrect XML.
- Submitted by matt at raibledesigns.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +1 -1
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Since there is no major showstoppers and
a) The vhosts should work now
b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved
Here is the release plan:
1. 09/25/2002 - Freeze the further development.
2. 09/26/2002 - If there is no major bugs tag the release as JK2_2_0_0
3.
remm2002/09/24 05:13:17
Modified:webapps/docs jndi-datasource-examples-howto.xml
Log:
- Fix incorrect XML.
- Submitted by matt at raibledesigns.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/jndi-datasource-examples-howto.xml
Can someone tell me why System.out.println() calls in the init methods
of servlets do not make it out to the console at all. They will make it
into a log file but never print to the console itself.
System.out.println() calls in the doGet and doPost print out to the
console as expected.
Thanks,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12953.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Would the following be vulnerable?
1) Use Jk only
2) do NOT use -- JkMount /servlet/* loadbalancer
3) But the invoker mapping is enabled
Would they be vulnerable? I personally don't see a security flaw in this
config. But does Jk also look for the text jsessionid being passed in
the URL and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12953.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Comments intermixed below.
Costin Manolache wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Tomcat SecurityManager XML Policy configuration
---
I have finished implementing support within Tomcat for using XML based
security policy
files. This was proposed and
Costin Manolache wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
ballot
[ ] commit XML Policy source to jakarta-tomcat-4.0 HEAD
and include it in future release of Tomcat 4.1.x
[X] commit to CVS but don't add to the next release
[ ] create a Tomcat 4.2 development branch and commit there (Ugh!)
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
ballot
[ ] commit XML Policy source to jakarta-tomcat-4.0 HEAD
and include it in future release of Tomcat 4.1.x
[X] commit to CVS but don't add to the next release
[ ] create a Tomcat 4.2 development branch
Evil question: does this vulnerability exist in Tomcat 3.2.3?
Mitchell Evan Marx[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATT IP Network Configuration Provisioning Development
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 7:59 AM
To: Tomcat
Tim Funk wrote:
Would the following be vulnerable?
1) Use Jk only
2) do NOT use -- JkMount /servlet/* loadbalancer
3) But the invoker mapping is enabled
Would they be vulnerable? I personally don't see a security flaw in this
config. But does Jk also look for the text jsessionid being
remm2002/09/24 06:15:08
Modified:docs index.html
xdocsindex.xml
Log:
- Update numbers.
Revision ChangesPath
1.28 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/index.html
Index: index.html
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
Would the following be vulnerable?
1) Use Jk only
2) do NOT use -- JkMount /servlet/* loadbalancer
3) But the invoker mapping is enabled
Would they be vulnerable? I personally don't see a security flaw in
this config. But does Jk also look for the
Marx, Mitchell E (Mitch), ALCNS wrote:
Evil question: does this vulnerability exist in Tomcat 3.2.3?
No. At worst it would be vulnerable to a distant cousin of the exploit.
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mturk 2002/09/24 06:22:14
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.dsp
Log:
Use MT DLL for debug build.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.dsp
Index: mod_jk2.dsp
mturk 2002/09/24 06:27:03
Added: jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.dsp
Log:
Add mod_jk2.dsp to the repository
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache13/mod_jk2.dsp
Index: mod_jk2.dsp
+1 and thanks for steping up :-)
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Since there is no major showstoppers and
a) The vhosts should work now
b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved
Here is the release plan:
1. 09/25/2002 - Freeze the further development.
2. 09/26/2002 - If there is no major bugs tag
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Comments intermixed below.
Costin Manolache wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Tomcat SecurityManager XML Policy configuration
---
I have finished implementing support within Tomcat for using XML based
security policy
Contin wrote:
Let's call this a 'milestone' or 'build', as is done in 4.x
and apache.
So JK2_0_BETA as tag name and jk2.0-beta as build name, but
I would reather prefer only numbers an just said OK jk-2.0.0 is Beta
version.
MT.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hola Mladen, there are already some problems with port based VS hosting,
in httpd.conf you have: ( i use apache2 for testing IIS vhost support,
blame on w2kp :(, dont point me the JkUriSet method for config vhosts in
apache, please :)
Listen 8081
NameVirtualHost *:8081
VirtualHost *:8081
De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 24 de septiembre de 2002 13:28
Hi,
Since there is no major showstoppers and
a) The vhosts should work now
b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved
Thanks for volunteer, and thanks for the fixes..
Here is the release plan:
+1 for the
Mladen Turk wrote:
Contin wrote:
Let's call this a 'milestone' or 'build', as is done in 4.x
and apache.
So JK2_0_BETA as tag name and jk2.0-beta as build name, but
I would reather prefer only numbers an just said OK jk-2.0.0 is Beta
version.
I think the way it works ( for 4.0 and
Glenn,
As a new feature, you need a majority of votes and at least 3 +1.
My vote is -1 ( but is not a veto ). Only commits can be vetoed,
and I'll probably do so if castor is used - all tomcat is using
digester style for xml processing, and we have a proposal to
use JNDI to abstract XML
I do not know what is wrong, but I just updated the jk subdirectory
from the CVS, built mod_jk2.so by running make in jk/native2, installed
it to apache2/conf and tried different combinations of workers2.properties:
START OF workers2.properties
[logger]
level=DEBUG
[shm]
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
ServerName www.hippo.com:8081
This is the problem (I forgot that the server name can have a port)
and a wk2.p file with only
[uri:www.hippo.com:8081/examples/*]
will not work, to solve it we need
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
The JVM itself anticipated a need for alternative application specific
Policy
implementations and has the hooks for doing it.
Are you aware of anyone working on a new standard? Is there a JSR?
[FYI]
JSR 115
It would require a bit of integration, due to the fact that Tomcat 4.1
changed how it was doing it's XML parsing. Excuse me if I get the
details wrong, I haven't looked at this for a few months, but it seems
that Tomcat 4.0 used its own XML parser (digester??), then moved to
using the commons
De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 24 de septiembre de 2002 16:31
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
and a wk2.p file with only
[uri:www.hippo.com:8081/examples/*]
will not work, to solve it we need to revert the correctHosts
function
From Dmitry Letin
And I do not see messages like this in error log:
[Sat Sep 21 18:09:40 2002] (debug ) [jk_uriMap.c (371)]
uriMap.init() loaded host www.i-com.com
Try setting LogLevel to debug in the httpd.conf
Post the ServerName, Listen and VirtualHost from your httpd.conf
And
Costin Manolache wrote:
Glenn,
As a new feature, you need a majority of votes and at least 3 +1.
My vote is -1 ( but is not a veto ). Only commits can be vetoed,
and I'll probably do so if castor is used - all tomcat is using
digester style for xml processing, and we have a proposal to
[uri:www.hippo.com:8081/examples/*]
And where is your context :)
This is app.
[uri:www.hippo.com:8081/examples/*]
context=/examples
It works (just checked the same config)
Do you have Host in the server.xml?
Touche!! :))
I dont think i ever tested contexts so may be you are
De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 24 de septiembre de 2002 17:03
[uri:www.i-com.com:8019]
[uri:www.i-com.com:8019/examples/*]
context=/examples
Should work.
This is exactly what correctHost did :)), to obviate the need to declare
hosts in wk2.p file :)), so
I have IP-based virtual host, not name-based
###
### http.conf
###
...
Listen www.i-com.com:8019
LogLevel debug
...
VirtualHost www.i-com.com:8019
ServerName www.i-com.com:8019
...
/VirtualHost
###
### workers2.properties
###
[logger]
level=DEBUG
[shm]
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
This is exactly what correctHost did :)), to obviate the need
to declare hosts in wk2.p file :)), so this is the problem we
are having, mistery resolved.. ;)
But now i know i'm totally -1 about to delete
jfarcand2002/09/24 08:52:39
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/util
SecurityUtil.java LocalStrings.properties
Log:
Change the logging level and use a more appropriate error message.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +4 -2
I tried to build jk with latest cygwin :
- automake used in buildconf.sh didn't support -i
I removed it and make configure, make but it failed :
$ make
Making all in common
make[1]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/d/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/com
mon'
/usr/bin/libtool --mode=compile
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
This code only does validation when the container is started or
when a web application context is reloaded. The current implementation
using the standard policy file does the same thing only not with XML.
???
Doing XML schema validation on each server start and webapp
mturk 2002/09/24 09:54:31
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriMap.c
Log:
Create the missing vhosts.
Fix the hostname resolution already containing colon and port.
Revision ChangesPath
1.42 +22 -6 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_uriMap.c
mturk 2002/09/24 10:07:14
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriMap.c
Log:
Create the missing vhosts.
Fix the hostname resolution already containing colon and port.
Revision ChangesPath
1.43 +13 -14jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_uriMap.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12755.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
See the subject :-)
I'm talking about jasper2/lib/jsp2el.jar - it contains
org.apache.jasper.runtime.el classes. There is no reason to check in the
binary and not the sources !
--
Costin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11849.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Attached is a patch to bring the other Servlet 2.4 XSD files up to date
with the JSP patch I submitted on September 19.
Files modified:
- jsr154/src/share/dtd/j2ee_1_4.xsd
- jsr154/src/share/dtd/web-app_2_4.xsd
- jsr154/src/share/dtd/xml.xsd
--
Mark Roth, Java Software
JSP 2.0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12968.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12755.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12657.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12755.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12755.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12926.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9936.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
nacho 2002/09/24 13:15:07
Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c
Log:
Add a test for 443 as default port
Revision ChangesPath
1.48 +3 -3
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/jk_isapi_plugin.c
Index: jk_isapi_plugin.c
Hello everybody!
I have installed Tomcat as plug-in of Internet Information Server (IIS) to
support JSP/Servlet, using the ISAPI filter.
So I can support ASP pages thanks to IIS and Servlets/JSP-pages thanks to
Tomcat.
All works well if I don't use sessions. In fact if I create an user-session
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hi Henri,
I would prefer to minimize the impact of upgrading from
3.3.1
I think this also applies to 1.3. It's just that MMN in it hasn't been
changed for a while.
Bojan
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 20:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hgomez 2002/09/24 03:23:51
Modified:jk/xdocs faq.xml
Log:
Add information about MMNB (Magic Module Number bump) of Apache
Hi Luca,
ASP and JSP (IIS, Tomcat) are too separate server side
languages and runtimes, hence there is no way to have
them talk to each other via a Session Object since
they each store sessions in a different manner.
You may pass variables back and forth between them via
a normal HTML manner
luehe 2002/09/24 14:24:58
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java
ScriptingVariabler.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources
messages.properties messages_es.properties
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12657.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This may be true (though I have never tested it).
What's easier though? Upgrading a Tomcat server with a
patch or re-architecting your whole site to accomodate
for Velocity??
;-)
-Matt
--- Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2002/9/24 4:59 AM, Remy Maucherat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12719.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
on 2002/9/24 4:59 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A security vulnerability has been confirmed to exist in all Apache
Tomcat 4.x releases (including Tomcat 4.0.4 and Tomcat 4.1.10), which
allows to use a specially crafted URL to return the unprocessed source
of a JSP page, or,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12978.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12978.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hi Henri,
I would prefer to minimize the impact of
hgomez 2002/09/24 15:34:08
Modified:jk/native/common jk_global.h
Log:
no socketvars.h on CYGWIN
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_global.h
Index: jk_global.h
hgomez 2002/09/24 15:36:28
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel_socket.c
Log:
AS/400 back port from 1.2.0.
notice here that we should use gethostbyname_r for multi-thread support
Revision ChangesPath
1.40 +17 -1
hgomez 2002/09/24 15:37:13
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_config_file.c jk_logger_file.c
Log:
AS/400 back port from 1.2.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +11 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_config_file.c
Index: jk_config_file.c
hgomez 2002/09/24 15:39:21
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_msg_ajp.c
Log:
AS/400 / BS2000 back port from 1.2.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +22 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_msg_ajp.c
Index: jk_msg_ajp.c
hgomez 2002/09/24 15:40:02
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_pool.c
Log:
AS/400 back port from 1.2.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +10 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_pool.c
Index: jk_pool.c
hgomez 2002/09/24 15:40:38
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_requtil.c
Log:
AS/400 back port from 1.2.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +8 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_requtil.c
Index: jk_requtil.c
hgomez 2002/09/24 15:41:48
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_shm.c
Log:
AS/400 back port from 1.2.0.
BTW, the AS/400 code should be checked later, since we should know if
we have to convert from EBCDIC to ASCII here...
Revision ChangesPath
1.29 +13 -1
hgomez 2002/09/24 15:45:18
Modified:jk/native2/include jk_msg.h jk_global.h
Log:
AS/400 back port from 1.2.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/include/jk_msg.h
Index: jk_msg.h
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
