Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-16 Thread Simon Laws
-- From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:16 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3? I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain modules from the runtime, tests and samples

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-15 Thread Simon Nash
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3? I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-14 Thread Simon Laws
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3? I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-13 Thread Mike Edwards
Simon Laws wrote: Hi Luciano I'd like to keep a pretty close watch on how we change the branch this time so I would like all changes to be backed up with a JIRA even for committers. As for what changes we allow. I think we'll assume we are functionally complete when we cut the branch and

Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-13 Thread Simon Laws
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning on doing this first thing tomorrow morning UK time. Can you let me know if there

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-13 Thread Luciano Resende
I'm looking into a JSR-250 issue, but changes should be minimal and localized. On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-13 Thread Dan Becker
Simon Laws wrote: I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning on doing this first thing tomorrow morning UK time. Can you

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-13 Thread Raymond Feng
Subject: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3? I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning on doing this first

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-13 Thread Simon Laws
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Laws wrote: I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch.

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-13 Thread Simon Laws
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:16 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3? I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with things

Re: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-13 Thread Luciano Resende
clean build. Now I will stay away from the code :-). Thanks, Raymond -- From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:16 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3? I'm

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Edwards wrote: Simon Laws wrote: It's been a little while now

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-12 Thread Raymond Feng
+1 to cut 1.3 branch. Raymond -- From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Release 1.3? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-12 Thread Luciano Resende
-- From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Release 1.3? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-12 Thread Simon Laws
1.3 branch. Raymond -- From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Release 1.3? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-11 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Edwards wrote: Simon Laws wrote: It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then there has been lots of activity

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-10 Thread Simon Nash
Mike Edwards wrote: Simon Laws wrote: It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then there has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like the right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the last couple of months there are

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-10 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Edwards wrote: Simon Laws wrote: It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then there has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like the right time to do a 1.3

RE: Release 1.3?

2008-06-09 Thread Mark Combellack
Hi Simon, In your original comments, you mentioned that you wanted to remove the old domain modules that we are no longer using. I was interested as to whether you had a provisional list of modules that you were going to remove. I've not seen a follow-up email on this subject. Thanks, Mark

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-09 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Simon, In your original comments, you mentioned that you wanted to remove the old domain modules that we are no longer using. I was interested as to whether you had a provisional list of modules that you were going

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-09 Thread Luciano Resende
+1 for 1.3 release. BTW, Are you volunteering for Release Manager Simon ? Otherwise I could help with that. On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Simon, In your original comments, you

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-08 Thread Mike Edwards
Simon Laws wrote: It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then there has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like the right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the last couple of months there are quite a few candidates

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-06 Thread ant elder
+1 from me. Incidentally I've spent a bit of time over the last couple of days trying all the various samples and demos etc with the latest trunk code and its all looking in quite good shape so it does seem like a fine time to be taking a release branch. ...ant On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:21 AM,

Re: Release 1.3?

2008-06-06 Thread Dan Becker
ant elder wrote: +1 from me. +1 from me also. Seems like a good time. -- Thanks, Dan Becker