Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-13 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
+1 On Aug 13, 2016 10:18 AM, "gil portenseigne" wrote: > Yes i like this plan :) > > Gil > > Le 12/08/2016 à 13:26, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >> Yes, and I believe, when we will have worked out Gradle stuff (at least: >> finishing it, adding plugins, correctly

Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-13 Thread gil portenseigne
Yes i like this plan :) Gil Le 12/08/2016 à 13:26, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Yes, and I believe, when we will have worked out Gradle stuff (at least: finishing it, adding plugins, correctly documenting the whole) we should gather to work on this and slowly replace/improve the old good

Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-13 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > +1 > > I think Jacopo has more to say about that :) > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Groovy+ > DSL+for+OFBiz+business+logic > > Jacques > > Agreed. We could improve the ideas outlined

Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Yes, and I believe, when we will have worked out Gradle stuff (at least: finishing it, adding plugins, correctly documenting the whole) we should gather to work on this and slowly replace/improve the old good Minilang Could be the R17 main task? Jacques Le 12/08/2016 à 12:34, gil

Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-12 Thread gil portenseigne
+1 Indeed, and moreover in the wiki page you link, there is autocompletion configuration in IDE Integration part. Thanks Gil Le 12/08/2016 à 12:13, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : +1 I think Jacopo has more to say about that :)

Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
+1 I think Jacopo has more to say about that :) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Groovy+DSL+for+OFBiz+business+logic Jacques Le 09/08/2016 à 19:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : I would like to add to what Scott already mentioned that minilang is not only difficult to debug but

RE: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-09 Thread Skip
... For both minilang and widgets the reason on our end is that neither technology is used anywhere outside of the ofbiz project and thus adds to the overall learning-curve for newcomers. We much rather rely on trusted alternatives that are easier to pick up for our project ;) Cheers, Paul I

Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-09 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
I would like to add to what Scott already mentioned that minilang is not only difficult to debug but also overly verbose. However, minilang exists and continues to be used I think because of the ctrl-space auto complete combined with XSD definitions for the statements. This makes it a DSL (not

Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-09 Thread Pranay Pandey
Very interesting discussion. What paul has mentioned is making perfect sense. Best regards, Pranay Pandey HotWax Systems http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Paul Piper wrote: > Skip, > > I fear that you may be right with regards to minilang and the

RE: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-09 Thread Scott Gray
I'm certainly no fan of minilang. I prefer something I can step through with a debugger. Regards Scott On 9/08/2016 20:55, "Paul Piper" wrote: > Skip, > > I fear that you may be right with regards to minilang and the community, > though luckily with your own projects you can

RE: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-09 Thread Paul Piper
Skip, I fear that you may be right with regards to minilang and the community, though luckily with your own projects you can set your own standards. I learned the hard way that minilang leads to more cluttered code and though there are some benefits (the automapping of service maps or entity-auto

RE: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-08 Thread Skip
Message- From: Paul Piper [mailto:p...@ilscipio.com] Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 1:53 AM To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Ofbiz Cookbook Hi Skip, thanks for sharing. I completely agree with you on your opinion about the books. We did a project together with Ruth before she left

Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-06 Thread Paul Piper
Hi Skip, thanks for sharing. I completely agree with you on your opinion about the books. We did a project together with Ruth before she left the community and I said before that I think it is a shame that the community wasn't able to value her contribution for what it is. Just like Rupert

RE: Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-06 Thread user
his > book, you are well prepared to write new applications assuming previous Java > experience. > > -Original Message- > From: Todd Thorner [mailto:tthor...@infotinuum.com] > Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 1:00 PM > To: user@ofbiz.apache.org > Subject: Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-05 Thread Todd Thorner
for hot-deploy. I think with this book, you are well prepared to write new applications assuming previous Java experience. -Original Message- From: Todd Thorner [mailto:tthor...@infotinuum.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 1:00 PM To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

RE: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-05 Thread Skip
@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Ofbiz Cookbook Thank you for the recommendation. I read Ms. Hoffman's "OFBiz Ecommerce Out-Of-The-Box" as a primer of sorts, and based on that positive experience will consider saving my pennies so I can purchase her OFBiz cookbook. Is there any reason to anticip

Re: Ofbiz Cookbook

2016-08-05 Thread Todd Thorner
Thank you for the recommendation. I read Ms. Hoffman's "OFBiz Ecommerce Out-Of-The-Box" as a primer of sorts, and based on that positive experience will consider saving my pennies so I can purchase her OFBiz cookbook. Is there any reason to anticipate a need for an updated edition? Have