Peter Bieringer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I got a ICMPv6 ping echo reply flood from that host to my tunnel:
Who the hell is using an IPv6 address out of my space as source
address?
Looks like IPv6 gateways need anti spoofing filters!
Ofcourse it needs it
15:10:17.567312 128.176.191.66
Itojun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the node (3ffe:3200:f:f::2) is still sending bogus http requests
(over IPv6) to multiple servers we have. it could be web
crawler of
some sort that went mad, but anyway, it is too annoying.
again, please stop it.
whoever you
We are proud to present :
Quake2 II IPv4 *AND* IPv6 capable server
running at game-2.concepts.nl
Thanks to Concepts ICT (www.concepts.nl) for the hosting,
and Viagenie (www.viagenie.gc.ca / www.freenet6.net) for the patching of
Quake2 to support IPv6 and even implementing a very nice use of
Michael Kjorling wrote:
SNIP
Speaking of 6to4... I got into a discussion with a guy in Australia
who is setting up 6to4 on a bunch of systems (he has an IPv4 /24) and
after a while I got to wonder... I seem to recall that the 6to4 IPv6
prefix was created by taking 2002:, appending the IPv4
Daniel Delaney wrote:
Does anyone have any resources describing how to build IPv6 into the
Darwin kernel.
The following things:
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2000/march/21wwdc.html
http://www.opensource.apple.com/projects/darwin/1.3/release.html
And some betters:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the forward/reverse zones on a 6to4 setup, should I have
nanguo IN A203.1.96.5
nanguo-v6 IN 2002:cb01:6005:2::1
or
nanguo IN A203.1.96.5
nanguo IN 2002:cb01:6005:2::1
When
Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
SNIP
I have Win 2K, Advanced Server, SP2, and the Install wininet.dll wont
install because it is looking for SP1.
The wininet.dll that came in the package msripv6-bin-1.4.exe is not
suitable
for IE-6, or anything on W2K-AS as it states in it's
Harald Koch wrote:
and does IE understand IPV6? good question ? It's version 6, on W2K
- but
that doesn't mean a lot.
You have to re-install the IPv6 kit every time you upgrade (and
sometimes patch) Internet Explorer, to get the IPv6 enabled version of
wininet.dll.
Not entirely true;
Nathan Lutchansky wrote:
Hi all,
I hate to send software announcements like this, but I need testers
and I
don't know of a better place to find them than here. :-)
I've released an IPv6 patch for Samba 2.2.3a that enables SMB over
IPv6.
Neato ;)
I'll be testing this out when I get
Nathan Lutchansky wrote:
on the Making Windows work with SMB-over-IPv6 as stated
on your site;
Windows.Net does support samba over IPv6, and almost any protocol
(HTTP/SMTP/...).
XP does RPC over IPv6 btw. I really need to get my hands on a
Windows.Net developer beta ;)
I wasn't
Pim van Pelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Pekka mostly. Having the same IN A/ RRs for the
hostnames in your zonefile can make for awkward situations.
One example might be the NL-BIT6 deployment. We have a C3640 with a
10 mbps port acting as vlan router for
soon(tm):
8--
* IPv6 patch 5 (25 April 2002) Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* - patch against CVS of yesterday, submitted as a 'cvs diff -u'.
* - removed some 'old' debug statements.
* - commented away ':' removal in window.c, which breaks direct IPv6
(eg 3ffe:8114::1
Nathan Lutchansky wrote:
I've started a service that lets sites put a web bug on the webpages
on
their IPv4-only site to figure out how many of their site visitors are
IPv6-enabled.
SNIP
Check http://6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/ipv6/stats/stats.php3
Daniele Nicolucci (Jollino) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sabato, luglio 27, 2002, alle 04:53 , Mark Liu ha scritto:
[...]
Yes, this is also a good idea.
[...]
I think that the real problem is when will we able to really
use ipv6?.
Many OSes support IPv6,
Daniele Nicolucci (Jollino) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Sabato, luglio 27, 2002, alle 10:49 , Jeroen Massar ha scritto:
http://www.trumpet.com.au/winsock/winsoc5.html
Trumpet Winsock v5.0 is a fully-featured 32-bit dialler used with
Windows 95/98 and Windows NT and comrising
Danny Terweij wrote:
SNIP
Same here, but from XP and Win2k Server i got an Timed out
message from ping6.
I am playing with routes but it seems that radvd is not routing at
all?
radvd stands for Router ADVertisement Daemon. It doesn't route, it
_advertises_ them.
Ofcourse only if properly
Bruce Campbell [mailto:bruce.campbell;ripe.net] wrote:
Sent: Thursday, 31 October 2002 20:43
To: Jeroen Massar
Cc: 'Mark Leary'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IPv6 with Windows-XP/2K
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Jeroen Massar wrote:
If you found the whitepapers why didn't you find
Tony Langdon [mailto:tlangdon;atctraining.com.au] wrote:
Also the official MS IPv6 FAQ notes how to do this.
Only difference is I also hexedited the wininet.dll so that it works
with IE6 :)
Cool! Do I have to reinstall IPv6 with your version to
install this DLL, or
can I simply
Tony Langdon [mailto:tlangdon;atctraining.com.au] wrote:
Simply run the hotfix.ini like before and it will be automatically
replaced.
run a .ini file?
Never done a rightmouse on a ini file and found out that it had a
Install option? :)
Hitting the hotfix.exe will do the job too though.
Steven F Siirila wrote:
I am interested in setting up IPv6 in a Solaris environment.
I attempted
to go to just that link (shown at http://www.ipv6.org/howtos.html) and
found that it does not exist. The broken link is:
http://www.ipv6.org/solaris-quick.html
Can anyone point me in
Marcelo Taube wrote:
h, i guess IPv6 developers prefer system with unix/linux
installed but unfortunatelly this is not me!!
I'm developing a programm which will run in Win32 using WinSocks.
I want to make it foward-comàtible so i want it to work in IPv6 nets.
In order to test the
Danny Terweij wrote:
The dutch provider www.xs4all.nl gives a /64 space to a user
that wants IPv6.
Currently you even get 2 /48's, one from 6bone space, which
you should not be using any more (it's going out), and one
block out of RIPE space (2001:888::/32) 'production quality' ;)
Every
6to4 Problem wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to connect to many ipv6 sites from a 6to4 only
site (via relay router). Many of the destinations are not
responding, and no ICMPv6 message is coming back.
Somebody knows what could be the problem?
One of the sites we tried is www.6bone.net, and
Michel Py wrote:
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Actually with IPv6 it's currently easier to use an ALLOW
and not a deny section, they also are a bit shorter :)
This is a very valid point but it does present challenges with route
servers. Could you come up with a route-map valid for ALLOW routes
Peter Bieringer wrote:
sorry for requesting help here, but hopefully there are some
people on the
list who can check this world-wide (and perhaps the problem
and a solution)
Me and some others to here in Germany have much troubles connecting to
www.deepspace6.net with 6to4 address as
Mauro Tortonesi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Peter Bieringer wrote:
sorry for requesting help here, but hopefully there are some
people on the list who can check this world-wide (and perhaps
the problem and a solution)
Me and some others to here
-compliant.
Greets,
Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iQA/AwUBPzJr4ymqKFIzPnwjEQImhACgot+GUAdoWTMHL1QKzPoKCpxuk4EAn2rr
vBA+dVdvzloeNgHqq8TQIG5T
=UnnP
-END PGP SIGNATURE
be a customer of itself and will always
be native for itself. And if you have a l2 colo facility
having one router enabled makes everything native too.
Greets,
Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Antonio Querubin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut off long list of people, except ml's]
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Jeroen Massar wrote:
2002:c058:6301::/48 192.88.99.1/32 AS786
192.88.99.1/32 is *THE* anycast address, it is *NOT* routable
-peering.txt
Greets,
Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iQA/AwUBP2G0kSmqKFIzPnwjEQJi4wCgkfxKSBKl/zzvPBGyFTQp3Bjx9CIAoJAO
caSxGRfOBcF0VQ1G15QvNjaP
=kO2/
-END PGP SIGNATURE
everybody except the ml's and bcc'd them now.
Which I should have done in the first place actually...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iQA/AwUBP2HWnymqKFIzPnwjEQKHqACfUihmEs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Antonio Querubin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut off long list of people, except ml's]
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Jeroen Massar wrote:
2002:c058:6301::/48 192.88.99.1
around that presentation and hint your tutors
to get some good IPv6 books and teach a lot more
about router internals, processing etc...
Greets,
Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iQA
:2bff:fee5:4ef7
inet6 3ffe:1200:4110:1:a00:2bff:fee5:4ef7
Is there also a switch which allows to assign the EUI-64 part?
Which could be very handy for servers and the likes.
Greets,
Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / [EMAIL
the ip6.int part to ip6.arpa ofcourse ;)
Greets,
Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iQA/AwUBP4uunSmqKFIzPnwjEQIbWACfZxOle3DbRxwG9VIiIeqqO/w6otsAnRCT
oxc0vdygET2lP7j5Kyw9iUa7
=tIj1
.
Have fun ;)
Greets,
Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iQA/AwUBP43ScSmqKFIzPnwjEQKOYACeP6DZqD+ndtG9K7ggyJV4WwhnlO8AoKvx
eOWUwLi2DdIDoPtcj5In3Oac
=ioNG
-END PGP SIGNATURE
their helpdesk, they will prolly tell you the same thing.
Greets,
Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iQA/AwUBP6RPxCmqKFIzPnwjEQKCCwCgpzQBGSxaxZ53zTgGY3mxVx0WdaAAnibF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeroen Massar wrote:
mark wrote:
You are pinging the otherside of the world with a load of
crappy routers between them.
True that, but fact is my client ping timeouts while my server
keeps receiving pings back
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 21:44, Antnio Amaral wrote:
Dear All,
I am using IPv6 Windows XP stack and I have two questions:
1. Why it is created two IPv6 addresses on the Ethernet Interface? It
should be created only one base on EUI-64, right? Next I show my
interface output
SNIP
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 08:49, Philippe Bogaerts wrote:
Hallo,
I was reading the
http://www.ipv6style.jp/en/tryout/20040428/index.shtml.
Has somebody got this working? I also tried the microsoft server
teredo server, but no luck.
Ethereal shows that it is not encapsulating, It only see
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 16:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all, I have been playing with ipv6 for a while now (mostly on
Linux and osX) and I have started to turn my thoughts to networking and
servers.
The easy one I guess is servers. Presumably a static ipaddress is best to
use because
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 21:02 -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
Hello.
New to ipv6, have read a lot, still confused...
SNIP
Should the /48 block actually be a 2002: block to be a compatible 6to4
address? If so, why would Hurricane Electric give me a 2001: prefix
unstead of a 2002?
Check this picture:
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 17:45 -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
Things are even clearer now
But.
I am running radvd on the firewall, and I have it advertising a /48 to
You should announce a /64. A /48 contains 65535 /64's and afaik there
are no OS's that configure themselves when they receive a
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 10:29 -0500, Bellino, Phil wrote:
Hello,
We are in the beginning stages of providing IPv6 support for our company and
our products.
For IPv4, our company has an assigned range of IP addresses.
Can someone point me to the best source for acquiring a range of IPv6
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 11:03 +0800, PM WONG wrote:
SNIP
What does this indicate ?
What's the best way to test out the dns ipv6 hosts query?
Use 'dig +trace www.6bone.net' to find out what goes wrong where.
Greets,
Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 00:22 -0700, Mike Warren wrote:
I'm looking for an application that will open a listening v6 socket
and open a v4 socket to a pre-defined remote host/port. The
application would pass all input data from the v6 client through to
the v4 socket and vice versa.
Does
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 12:33 -0400, Bellino, Phil wrote:
Hello,
I have a 2.6.5 Linux running router radvd.
I also have 2.6.5 clients(and a 2.4.20 client) that accept the router
advertisements from the router and acquire a Link-Global address and also
autoconfigures their Link-Local
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 08:14 -0400, Bellino, Phil wrote:
Hello,
Running 2.6.11 kernel.
I set up a tunnel with the following commands:
ip tunnel add tun6to4 mode sit ttl 255 remote any local 140.175.165.63
ip link set dev tun6to4 up
ip -6 addr add 2002:8caf:a53f::1/16 dev tun6to4
This all
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 08:29 -0400, Bellino, Phil wrote:
Hello,
I am running 2.6.11 linux and have IPv6 addresses on eth0, eth1, tun6to4,
etc.
I am looking for a tool that my applcation can use that will give me back
all of the IPv6 addresses that are on a specified interface.
I am trying
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 18:10 +1000, Carl Brewer wrote:
Jeroen Massar wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 13:18 -0400, Alex Kirk wrote:
Hello All,
I'm trying to set up an OpenBSD 3.5 box to work with broker.freenet6.net,
and
I've run into a *massive* shortage of documentation on the subject
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 09:39 -0400, Alex Kirk wrote:
Google(openbsd ipv6) first hit:
http://rollcage.bl.echidna.id.au/IPv6/openbsd.html
heh, I wrote that -years- ago, it's probably completely out of
date and wrong now!
Ding! We have a winner! :-)
Seriously, I ran across
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:22 -0400, Alex Kirk wrote:
SNIP
Internet6:
Destination GatewayFlags
default ::1UG
default ::1UG
SNIP
Further attempts at route deletion result in:
schnarff.com:~$ sudo route delete -inet6 default
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:01 -0400, mclellan, dave wrote:
Hi everyone: I'm kind of new to IPv6, and I'm enhancing a client/server
application to support it. It's a simple application from the addressing
point of view, but running the server in a dual stack environment adds some
complexity.
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 00:43 +0200, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
Hi List!
Does anyone know what the current plans are to get DNS working through
stateless autoconfiguration? I'm thinking that there should an anycast
address or something that denotes the closest DNS server or similarly,
but I haven't
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 13:45 +0200, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 12:28 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 00:43 +0200, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
Does anyone know what the current plans are to get DNS working through
stateless autoconfiguration? I'm thinking
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 14:19 +0200, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 14:01 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 13:45 +0200, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 12:28 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
- it also has a _service. domain for autoconfiguration
Steven Latre wrote:
Hi again,
Sorry that I'm asking two questions at a time. It's just that I'm trying all
possibilities. In my script I'm using tcpdump to get some information from the
network configuration.
Try 'tethereal', which is the console/text-only version of the extremely
cool
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 00:59 +0200, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
Hi List!
I'm wondering if someone knows a good source of documentation on IPv6
multicast routing on Linux. What I'm wondering, more specifically, is
how I define on what interfaces packets with certain multicast scopes
are to be routed
mclellan, dave wrote:
Hi everyone: I know you're mostly not z/OS (AKA MVS) technicians. I
apologize for the corner case posting.
We are researching testing options for testing IPv6 on z/OS which has been
implemented in Communications Server subsystem for a couple of releases. Is
there
Sylvia SCHUH wrote:
Hi
I want to do some bandwidth, etc. measuring to see how this has changed
after migrating a whole network in comparison to ipv4.
i used iperf and i found documentation that iperf is ipv6 enabled
(2.0.2) but it doesnt work
i start the server with iperg -s -V
i start the
Jason Gauthier wrote:
When I capture packets on Windows XP and that I've set up an IPv6
address with a DHCP server, the capture says the request is from the
default address that we can't delete on Windows XP.
Any idea how I could delete it or change the default address to use?
With
Jason Gauthier wrote:
That's what I did, but I'll try it again. Yeah I'm using dibbler now :)
For the privacy setting to take real effect you have to
disablere-enable the interface or reboot.
Greets,
Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Evelyne wrote:
Hi,
I have a freeBSD box on my LAN with two NICs and is running on
Quagga.The box already has IPv6 connectivity via a tunnel broker.I want
to configure it internally (using private IP addresses) so that the rest
of the clients in my LAN can receive IPv6 packets.
Why private
Stig Venaas wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:42:05AM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:28:14 -0500,
Roy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there a standard API for getting the prefix given an address and a
prefix length? I.e., I've got
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
We are considering four possible implementations:
1. try only ip6.arpa
This is the only one that should exist in current and new implementations.
For deployed stacks, the ones people don't want/forget to upgrade there
is a very simple solution to all of this: DNAME
Srikanth Rao wrote:
Hi,
Is there any free source code available in netBSD
or other OS for MLD (Multicast Listener Discovery
protocol - an equivalent of IGMP in ipV4).
Of course, just look in the source of your favourite 'free/opensource'
kernel. Also see http://www.kame.net for the base
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Monday, January 02, 2006 4:02 AM +0800 Lawrence Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most client computers (DNS resolvers) that support IPv6 will (and should)
use the IPv6 addresses preferentially over IPv4 when both are returned
from the DNS.
With most ISP's not
Jun Yin wrote:
HI,
I'm a newbian in ipv6, I just installed fedora core4 and tested ipv6
address, it works.
next step I hope I can access some public ipv6 resource through ipv6
network, How can I do it?
my PC is behind a nat device and using a private IPv4 address, can i
access public ipv6
Jun Yin wrote:
Hi,
now it seems the tspc works and tunnel was established, what's the next step?
I got the ipv6 routing table:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tspc]# route -A inet6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop
Flags Metric
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 11:15 +0100, Steven LatrŽe wrote:
Jeroen Massar schreef:
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 16:07 +0100, Steven LatrŽe wrote:
[..]
Which Debian? Or more to the point which exact kernel version?
[..]
I'm using kernel version 2.4.31
There have been a *lot* of fixes
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 00:14 -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote:
Anybody know whether 2003::/16 is a valid prefix? I'm seeing traceroutes
to www.iptel.org terminate in an unusual address when done from a 6to4
host:
traceroute6 to fox.iptel.org (2001:638:806:2001:202:b3ff:fe38:c1cc) from
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 01:44 -0400, Stephen Fulton wrote:
Hi all,
I want to set up IPv6 on my home network, and before I do so, I was
wondering if I could solicit recommendations on an inexpensive hub or
switch that would work for that purpose? I've got a router, so that's
covered.
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 18:36 +0530, Dhiren Chandvania wrote:
Configuration details:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:6E:38:EA:EF
[..]
inet6 addr: fe80::230:6eff:fe38:eaef/64 Scope:Link
[..]
sigfs Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4
inet6 addr: fe80::c0a8:1df/128
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iHUEARECADUFAkcWc5ouFIAAFQAQcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JnamVy
b2VuQHVuZml4Lm9yZwAKCRApqihSMz58I2eyAJ9HIvxXvGZoCiaZGKidSedYcCpg
0QCeOpQ1+XT1j5PvO220tHhsoy1pLlw=
=Qynp
-END PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[re-send as this list doesn't like pgp sigs]
Graham Beneke wrote:
Hi All
Are there any freely available/open source IPv6 tunnel broker daemons
available?
CSELT used to have one. Do note that most IPv6 Tunnel Brokers don't
follow RFC3053 that
75 matches
Mail list logo
