Re: Repository scanning problem in 1.0?

Brett Porter wrote: On 30/11/2007, ArneD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you think the repository scanning problem as such, as described in my original mail, should be filed as a second issue? Yes, it looks that way. - Brett I filed http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-612 In my

Re: Repository scanning problem in 1.0?

| at edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: 690) jvm 1| at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:801) ArneD wrote: Hi all, first of all, congratulations to all Archiva developers for releasing the 1.0 version! I started playing

Re: Repository scanning problem in 1.0?

Wendy Smoak-3 wrote: On Nov 29, 2007 6:07 AM, ArneD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After starting up a fresh instance with default configuration, I copied parts of my existing repository to Archiva's default internal repository. Then I used the Scan Repository Now button on the repository

Repository scanning problem in 1.0?

Hi all, first of all, congratulations to all Archiva developers for releasing the 1.0 version! I started playing around with it a little bit, and ran into the following problem: After starting up a fresh instance with default configuration, I copied parts of my existing repository to Archiva's

Re: Building project root as recursive build

Emmanuel Venisse wrote: ArneD a écrit : I noticed two problems with building the root of a projcet as a recursive build. I'm still on 1.1-beta-3, but at least from the release notes I could not see anything that this has been changed for 1.1-beta-4 or the 1.1 RC. First of all, when

Building project root as recursive build

I noticed two problems with building the root of a projcet as a recursive build. I'm still on 1.1-beta-3, but at least from the release notes I could not see anything that this has been changed for 1.1-beta-4 or the 1.1 RC. First of all, when adding a Maven 2.0+ project using a POM url, with the

Re: Rights management for Proxy Connectors

Brett Porter wrote: I like this idea - can you file a feature request? I filed http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-579 Cheers - Arne -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Rights-management-for-Proxy-Connectors-tf4752902.html#a13602241 Sent from the archiva-users mailing

Rights management for Proxy Connectors

Hello all, is it possible to configure Archiva in a way, that access to repo1 through a proxy connector is available only for a few super users (= repository managers)? In my scenario, normal users should only be able to access the artifacts available in the internal repository. In case they

Continuum 1.1 release?

Hi Emmanuel and others, now that Maven 2.0.5 has been released, any chances that we see a Continuum 1.1 release soon? That would be great. Thanks - Arne -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Continuum-1.1-release--tf3238534.html#a9001442 Sent from the Continuum - Users

Download artifacts from one repo and upload to another

I'm looking for an easy way to download an artifact from one repository and deploy it to another, including all transitive dependencies. Ideally in just one step. Mirroring the whole repository is not a solution. How would you do it? Any hints what to look at? Thanks - Arne -- View this

Re: Lib dependencies in .war artifact

Morgovsky, Alexander (US - Glen Mills) wrote: Hi. I need some .jar's for compilation of a .war artifact, but I want to only include a subset of these in the WEB-INF/lib. If I set the subset of the ones for inclusion with the scope of runtime for each, they will not be used for

Re: Occassional NPEs while checking out through scm-local in scheduled b

Hello Emmanuel, I've found another NPE bug in DefaultContinuumScm which is easy to fix: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-937 Regards, Arne Emmanuel Venisse wrote: I've seen that you closed issue CONTINUUM-780 in the meanwhile. Are there chances to replace just one module in my

Re: Occassional NPEs while checking out through scm-local in scheduled b

? Regards, Arne ArneD wrote: Hello Emmanuel, i added a comment to the existing issue at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-780 because it's the same stacktrace. Regards, Arne Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Can you file an issue? Emmanuel ArneD a écrit : It's Continuum 1.0.3

Re: [m2] Include project version into generated site

Alan Mosely wrote: Hi, On a related note I would like to have the version included in the url for further transparency. Any ideas? We use the following distributionManagement entry in the project's pom.xml: distributionManagement site idmy-site/id

Re: [M2] Problem with surefire report

Luis Perea wrote: The surefire's report show me the same details for each diferent Test in my proyect, I've allready looked out the *.txt and *.xml files generated by surefire and the *.txt seems correct (shows the correct log for the TestCase executed) but the *.xml files has the same

Re: Occassional NPEs while checking out through scm-local in scheduled build

Hello Emmanuel, i added a comment to the existing issue at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-780 because it's the same stacktrace. Regards, Arne Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Can you file an issue? Emmanuel ArneD a écrit : It's Continuum 1.0.3, but I've updated maven-scm-api

Occassional NPEs while checking out through scm-local in scheduled build

Hi, occasionally some of our builds are failing during scheduled builds. Forced builds are working fine. I see the following stacktrace: org.apache.maven.continuum.scm.ContinuumScmException: Cannot checkout sources. at

Re: Occassional NPEs while checking out through scm-local in scheduled build

It's Continuum 1.0.3, but I've updated maven-scm-api and maven-scm-provider-local (snapshot version maven-scm-provider-local-1.0-20060616.154545-4.jar). Arne Emmanuel Venisse wrote: What is your continuum version and your scm? Emmanuel ArneD a écrit : Hi, occasionally some

[m2] Include project version into generated site

Hi, I would like to have the project version included into the generated site, e.g. into the title, to make this information transparent to the user directly on the welcome page. I tried to use ${project.version} in the site.xml descriptor, but this is not replaced. Only ${project.name} seems

Re: Update over scm-local does not delete files removed from source dir

Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Do you think the suggested enhancement for scm-local would be useful and make sense? Not only in combination with ClearCase dynamic views but for other usage as well, e.g. testing. yes. Do you want to implement it? Yes, I can try to do so and then provide a

Re: Update over scm-local does not delete files removed from source dir

Thanks for your answer, David. continuum-3 wrote: my Continuum installation is accessing a file system directory using scm-local provider to get sources (BTW, the directory is on a ClearCase dynamic view). Updates are working fine as long as files are only changed or added. But when

Re: Update over scm-local does not delete files removed from source dir

Emmanuel Venisse wrote: thanks a lot for your answer. A ClearCase dynamic view looks like a normal filesystem, so I think scm-local in principle is a fine solution. I think there wouldn't be much what a dedicated dynamic-view support in the Clearcase SCM provider could add. Maybe it

Re: Update over scm-local does not delete files removed from source dir

Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Are you sure it isn't possible to checkout sources in a specific folder with cleartool? It is possible with snapshot views. My ClearCase know-how is limited, but I am quite sure it is not possible with dynamic views. Do you think the suggested enhancement for

Update over scm-local does not delete files removed from source dir

Hello everybody, my Continuum installation is accessing a file system directory using scm-local provider to get sources (BTW, the directory is on a ClearCase dynamic view). Updates are working fine as long as files are only changed or added. But when files are removed from the source directory,

Re: Update over scm-local does not delete files removed from source dir

Emmanuel Venisse wrote: scm-local was developped for tests and it's used in some case when a scm provider isn't available like dynamic-view support for Clearcase. It's a very simple provider that copy file from sources directory, but it can't know if some files are deleted because it

Re: [POLL] Why switch to Maven?

Eric Redmond wrote: Any more reasons? Care to expand these ideas? Hi Eric, for corporate users, I believe there are some additional issues to the ones already named. Especially in large companies, it is often unacceptable to let users download artefacts directly from an Internet

Re: [POLL] Why switch to Maven?

Eric Redmond wrote: Especially in large companies, it is often unacceptable to let users download artefacts directly from an Internet repository, even not through a proxy. Companies need to have full control over all artifacts used in theirE build processes, that means that only

Re: [POLL] Why switch to Maven?

cstamas wrote: Right. Take Proximity for example, since it is not JUST proxy. If you visit the demo site, you will see that proximity is able to PROXY repositories but also to HOST them only. Furthermore, you can just take offline (offline == do not touch remote peer!) or take

Re: [POLL] Why switch to Maven?

After all, if can't trust your team to stick to approved versions of artifacts how can you trust them to write your precious business code? I think it's not a question of mistrusting people, but a question of how can you help people to avoid mistakes. Even if they use a Maven-based build

maven-dependency-plugin - (Beta-)Release planned?

Are there plans for releasing maven-dependency-plugin? The last snapshot version is from April: http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/2.0-SNAPSHOT/ If 2.0 is not yet ready, a beta release would be great. Thank you, Arne -- View

maven-dependency-plugin - Why is scope parameter read-only?

I am trying to use maven-dependency-plugin (latest snapshot version) using the following configuration: plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-dependency-plugin/artifactId version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version executions execution

[M2] maven-clean-plugin and multi-module build

I have a multi-module build. In one of the sub-modules I use the maven-clean-plugin in the pom.xml as follows: plugin artifactIdmaven-clean-plugin/artifactId configuration filesets fileset directoryWebContent/WEB-INF/lib/directory

RE: [m2] Updates of transitive dependencies not working?

Jörg Schaible wrote: ArneD wrote on Thursday, August 24, 2006 2:43 PM: I defined two repositories in the settings.xml, both with updatePolicy set to always. My project A has a dependency to version 5.0-SNAPSHOT of a JAR B. That JAR B has a dependency to version 1.6 of another JAR C

RE: [m2] Updates of transitive dependencies not working?

Thank you, Jörg. I filed issue MNG-2528. Arne -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-m2--Updates-of-transitive-dependencies-not-working--tf2158398.html#a5964861 Sent from the Maven - Users forum at Nabble.com.

Maven 2 and JUnit-Tests for Eclipse Plugins

Has anybody set up Maven 2 builds for Eclipse (PDE) plugin projects and has managed to integrate JUnit in-container tests for Eclipse-Plugins into the Maven build lifecycle? I would be very much interested in some best practices. Thank you! Arne -- View this message in context:

Re: ClearCase SCM and Continuum

Wim Deblauwe wrote: I found another workaround by building the super-module recursively: Delete all sub-modules. Change the super module definition and remove the --non-recursive option from the build targets. Maybe we need an option in Continuum so the user can select if he

Re: ClearCase SCM and Continuum

Thank you, Wim! Wim Deblauwe wrote: 1) This is the way that ClearCase works, there is nothing I know we can do about it. Maybe something could be changed in Continuum and the POM schema, so that the POM location relative to the SCM checkout directory could be specified within the POM.

Automatically deploy snapshot bulds to remote repo

Hi, is there a way of telling Continuum to make nightly builds only for snapshot versions? Particularly, I want to have the nightly snapshot builds automatically deployed to the snapshot repository. This is why I would change the build goals from clean install to clean deploy. Projects that

Re: Automatically deploy snapshot bulds to remote repo

Thank you, Emmanuel. Emmanuel Venisse wrote: yes, goals to use is clean deploy, but continuum don't know what is a project in dev and a released project. Generally, when we release a project, the code is tagged and the code in trunk is updated to an incremented snapshot version.

Maven 2 and RAD 6

I am trying to integrate my Mavenized web projects with RAD6. Even though I was searching the list archives up and down, I still find this difficult, because the information on the list is very fragmented and partly outdated. I believe a kind of How-To documentation would be very helpful. I

Internal plugin repository - how to populate?

In many corporate environments it is unacceptable to let users download Maven plugins automatically and directly from the Internet (even not through a proxy). Therefore, it is necessary to set up an internal plugin repository. Question: Is there an easy way how to initially populate the

[2.0.4] Bug? Profile not used when running outside a Maven project

I want to roll out Maven in a corporate environment with an internal plugin repository. My approach is to define and activate a profile in the global settings.xml, which normally works fine. Problem: When running Maven in a directory that does not contain a pom.xml, the profile from