Wonder if Krivit sent the email to Rossi, Focardi, Celani, Levi and
Piantelli?
AG
Jan. 15, 2012
*
*LENR and Cold Fusion Theory Index *
*I continue to receive mixed responses about the media attention I give
to the Widom-Larsen theory of LENRs.
if shielded in his lead replaceable cartridge,
would that make it acceptable to UL, etc? There is some radiation from smoke
detectors now.
Smoke detectors don't work with gamma radiation, afaik. And shielding would
take a lot more than the wall of a small cartridge for 512 keV gamma. The dose
In Aussie Guy's summary of
the key points of the show he stated "Heating is via low energy
Gammas hitting the lead shielding." I must of missed that in the
interview and will have another listen when I get time.
This sounds to me that the heat used to heat
To each other. The total momentum is 0.
2012/1/16 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
Aussie Guy summarizing Rossi's interview...
512 keV 180 deg Gammas have been detected
180 degs relative to what?
-Mark
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Does anyone know, are the energy levels of atoms effected at all by the number
of neutrons? Is there a reference?
Frank Znidarsic
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=42#comment-170607
*
Andrea Rossi
January 16th, 2012 at 7:09 AM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=42#comment-170607
Dear Roger:
Another “rumorist” has written somewhere that our Customer has given
us
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/15/rick-santorum-on-fox-news_n_1207478.html
Maybe on hyperfine corrections or isotope effect on lighter atoms, but
that's when it comes to binding or material properties.
2012/1/16 fznidar...@aol.com
Does anyone know, are the energy levels of atoms effected at all by the
number of neutrons? Is there a reference?
Frank Znidarsic
Can't this type of gamma rays be shielded (I think he meant 511 keV
gammas)? Using google I found, e.g., the following (although I don't
know how well the shielding works):
http://www.corning.com/specialtymaterials/products_capabilities/radiation_shielding_glass/Med_Pet.aspx
Further here
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=42#comment-170607
*
Andrea Rossi
January 16th, 2012 at 7:09 AM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=42#comment-170607
Dear
send it to:
vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com
T
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Randall Fink randylf...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
By the way: I tried to ask Rossi about this on his journal. Seems as if he
didn't like the question...
Although they don't get along, this is a common trait between the Ing
and the Snake. They only post questions and
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Although they don't get along, this is a common trait between the Ing
and the Snake.
The Ing and the Snake. . . . It took me a while to decode that. It sounds
like a 1990s cartoon show, like Pinky and the Brain.
I have ceased to read both blogs.
In Aussie Guy's summary of the key points of the show he stated Heating is
via low energy Gammas hitting the lead shielding.
In that case we'd be talking about liquid lead shielding. 3 cm would reduce 511
keV gamma by about 99%. Still - the equivalent of 10 kW x .01 would escape and
Rossi
Isn't that 1st costomer that is helping him build the small e-cats? I
remember that by the end of last december, Rossi said he had a great
breakthrough due to the collaboration with the customer.
2012/1/16 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Another rumorist has written somewhere that our Customer has given
us back the 1 MW E-Cat: this is another stupidity, totally false.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rossi sometimes plays word games. Jones did not claim that it was
given back.
Jones Beene wrote:
But even if he can do this with better controls, and proves himself to be
close to the great inventor he imagines himself to be, he is still a liar.
Many great inventors were accomplished liars. See Edison's quote about
batteries: When a man gets on to accumulators
By the way, this quiescence problem does not exist as far as I know.
Reliable people have observed Rossi's devices run continuously for days,
and the one at the factory did run for months, as claimed.
Rossi gives the appearance of lying more than he actually lies. He has
difficulty telling
I am not sure if the point being made is that there can't be gamma
radiation or else Rossi would be dead, or that there is gamma radiation
and so it will never be a home appliance.
The indications so far are that radiation levels are small, but not
zero. This may well allow for home usage
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
Rossi gives the appearance of lying more than he actually lies.
LOL ! That is about the lamest defense of AR I have heard. Hilarious really,
this makes my day.
He has difficulty telling the truth in a way that does not make it look
like a lie.
I've limited my skeptical Rossi criticisms awaiting a new test or any sort of
verifiable information.
I commend maryyugo for pulling back (a bit) on her repeated arm waving of
proof and independent testing, when no new information has been revealed.
But, I agree with her that some of the
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Rossi sometimes plays word games. Jones did not claim that it was
given back. His comment is more like it was returned for repairs.
That is correct. Not only that, Rossi has all the characteristics of a
pathological
From Aussie:
Wonder if Krivit sent the email to Rossi, Focardi, Celani, Levi and
Piantelli?
AG
Good question.
What IS the name of the theory Rossi's camp endorses these days?
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
I was referring to this statement:
In Aussie Guy's summary of the key points of the show he stated Heating is
via low energy Gammas hitting the lead shielding.
And as I read it, it would imply that the energetic equivalent of 10 kW (or
whatever an e-cat produces) would have to be
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately his expert opinion will be used to futher delay
investment in LENR research in favour of pouring more money into god
particles and
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:03 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
What IS the name of the theory Rossi's camp endorses these days?
Proton capture. See Summary of Invention, particularly para 26:
Ok. Yes it is true that DGT chose their name before Rossi failed the test,
as I have been reminded just now.
From previous post: When Rossi could not pass that test... [DGT] were all
smiles. It probably has something to do with why they chose the name
Defkalion.
For those who are not aware:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Rossi sometimes plays word games. Jones did not claim that it was
given back. His comment is more like it was returned for repairs.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not so much proven lies as it is constant inconsistencies, vagueness,
tangential answers to obviously relevant and harmless questions, spouting
off about snakes and clowns, and general avoidance of credible answers.
From: Mary Yugo
It's not so much proven lies as it is constant inconsistencies, vagueness,
tangential answers to obviously relevant and harmless questions, spouting
off about snakes and clowns, and general avoidance of credible answers.
Well, Mary - inconsistencies may be what it is about
Mr. Krivit recently posted over at NET:
LENR and Cold Fusion Theory Index
I continue to receive mixed responses about the media attention I give to
the Widom-Larsen theory of LENRs. Regardless, my confidence in that theory
has not
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Are you saying his denial of culpability in the sordid Petrodragon affair is
not a big lie? Or the money laundering - or the claim that he did not know
that he had a “mail order” degree? Or the many lies about the TEG
Good grief. What is it with the Windom-Larson crowd? I mean while I'm
skeptical that anyone has the theory to explain any of this yet, I will
admit that Windom-Larson may be right. But still, why the religious wars?
What's wrong with these people?
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Jones Beene
Jed and Terry sez:
Although they don't get along, this is a common trait between
the Ing and the Snake.
The Ing and the Snake. . . . It took me a while to decode that.
It sounds like a 1990s cartoon show, like Pinky and the Brain.
I have ceased to read both blogs.
People read them?
Having said all that - let me be clear that good evidence still indicates
Rossi has invented a robust energy anomaly.
That is where myself and Yugo part company. She believes that the dishonesty
extends to everything, but that is wrong. At the bottom of it all, there is
enough proof from other
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
LOL ! That is about the lamest defense of AR I have heard. Hilarious
really,
this makes my day.
I am not defending him. I am describing him.
He has difficulty telling the truth in a way that does not make it look
like a lie.
Now why would that
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Mary Yugo
It's not so much proven lies as it is constant inconsistencies,
vagueness, tangential answers to obviously relevant and harmless questions,
spouting off about snakes and clowns, and general
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
And, as to the factory being heated continuously, this is still only
his word for it, or visitors who saw it running when they were there
on occasion.
I have heard from reliable people who observed it operate
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
But, I agree with her that some of the fanbois need to pull back a little,
too. This is one of the funniest things I've seen posted in a while:
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:13:54 -0500
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
**
*Rossi gives the
Yamali Yamali yamaliyam...@yahoo.de mailto:yamaliyam...@yahoo.de wrote:
Smoke detectors don't work with gamma radiation, afaik.
Maybe with very VERY thick smoke?
Just imagine - two years after Fukujima a guy from Italy goes to
market with a device that emits detectable gamma
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I think the only way it could happen would be if government regulators
opposed to cold fusion refuse to admit the machine is real, and allow it
only because they claim it does not exist.
Nonsense. First, almost
Craig - Did you catch Rossi's interview Friday?
He said straight out: we are in mass production in Miami.
Problem is, efforts have been ongoing for some time to locate any factory
with the proper permits from OSHA or other agencies, anywhere in Florida -
and there are none that come up. You
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Also see my questions to Defkalion and the COMPLETELY NONRESPONSIVE
EVASIVE REPLY here:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23t=865p=5389#p5389
LOL. I got this response from Defkalion:
You have been
He has always said that there are gamma rays. He shields them with
lead. There are no gamma rays leaving the device. This is all
consistent.
Actually no. It is impossible. You can't shield gamma rays completely. You
could shield them enough to be so few that they would be undetectable. But if
Ok, thanks! I'm just so busy that I don't have time to listen or read all
that is going in with LENR. Which is one of the reasons I monitor Vortex...
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat [mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:59 PM
To:
Yamali is exactly right.
You simply CANNOT shield this kind of gamma radiation well with lead. Some
always escapes.
There is essentially ZERO chance of selling this kind of reactor in the USA
without NRC permit.
EEC would be similar.
From: Yamali Yamali
He has
The links are here:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/Theories/TheoryIndex.shtml
Krivit wrote:
I continue to receive mixed responses about the media attention I give to
the Widom-Larsen theory of LENRs. Regardless, my confidence in that theory
has not changed.
In my opinion, Krivit is not
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
You simply CANNOT shield this kind of gamma radiation well with lead. Some
always escapes.
That is what experts in radiation say.
Actually, you could stop them with enough lead. I believe it takes ~10 cm.
If you had 1 m there would be no measurable
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hey look, you may want Rossi the man to be real, instead of just the
technology - but please do not be so gullible as to overlook a mountain of
contrary evidence.
What does this mean? How could he be fake, and yet the technology is real?
Are you
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I cannot understand why Rossi's personality, his problems,
and alleged problems are an issue here in this forum. Why do you -- Jones
-- have such difficulty separating the person from the claim!?? Why do you
have this
Jed sez:
...
I know I would fail such a test. My knowledge of nuclear physics
ended with undergraduate physics and books such as Teller and Latter,
Our Nuclear Future (1958) which I recommend, and Asimov, The Atom
(1991). See:
That depends on how many gamma rays you're dealing with. Its just stochastics.
A certain fraction will allways get through. All the shielding does is to
reduce the likelihood for each one. So even 1 m solid lead won't reduce
radiation to unmeasurable levels if there's enough of it inside.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, Rossi he discovered this method of doing cold fusion.
I would urge everyone to go back and take a look at an earlier thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg60606.html
Which shows
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/01/120116112608.htm
ScienceDaily (2012-01-16) -- Researchers have devised a proposal for the
first conclusive experimental test of a phenomenon known as 'Bell's
nonlocality.' This test is designed to reveal correlations that are
stronger than any
Defective analogy. The cars for sale are real and functional, aren't they?
Even if the business is dishonest.
From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 4:09 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi comments on the It
Yamali Yamali yamaliyam...@yahoo.de wrote:
All the shielding does is to reduce the likelihood for each one. So even 1
m solid lead won't reduce radiation to unmeasurable levels if there's
enough of it inside.
I meant the most you can get with a 10 kW hot fusion reaction. A few might
get
I really don't think there is any direct connection between precious metals and
modern currencies.
Last I heard: Today's Currencies are based on the price of oil in $USD since a
large part of the World's Oil Supply is only traded in terms of $USD aka the
Petrodollar
Has anything definitively
On 12-01-16 04:15 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Jed Rothwelljedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, Rossi he discovered this method of doing cold fusion.
I would urge everyone to go back and take a look at an earlier thread:
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, Rossi he discovered this method of doing cold fusion.
I would urge everyone to go back and take a look at an earlier thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg60606.html
Which shows that 1 g atomic hydrogen can
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Zell, Chris chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
**
Defective analogy. The cars for sale are real and functional, aren't
they? Even if the business is dishonest.
Sorry, I miss your point. I was noting that Jed would likely not buy from
someone convicted multiple
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Tests on his device. Despite the handwaving and nonsense published here
by Yugo and others, these tests are irrefutable. There is not slightest
chance of fraud.
I refuse to rehash that with you. If you believe
The calculation in the link below appears to be in large error because the
conversion from kWH to MeV is wrong by 1E19 (1 kWH = 2.25E19 MeV). What I
get is that the association energy of 1g of H to 1g of H2 would be 60 wH
(0.06 kWH), which would be way lower than the magnitude of energy reported
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, Rossi he discovered this method of doing cold fusion.
I would urge everyone to go back and take a look at an earlier thread:
Even if it is assembled from stolen parts, or has excess miles or has a salvage
title ( I've restored seven salvage cars to legal, functional status in NYS),
or whatever, we're still dealing with a real, functional car. It exists. I
think there is a remarkable real effect underlying all this
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Say what? Where's all that atomic hydrogen coming from?
Are we back to splitting molecules using ZPE, or is there some other energy
source breaking the bond?
Geeze, Stephen, don't you pay attention? Molecular
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
The calculation in the link below appears to be in large error because the
conversion from kWH to MeV is wrong by 1E19 (1 kWH = 2.25E19 MeV). What I
get is that the association energy of 1g of H to 1g of H2 would be
On 12-01-16 04:55 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Stephen A. Lawrencesa...@pobox.com wrote:
Say what? Where's all that atomic hydrogen coming from?
Are we back to splitting molecules using ZPE, or is there some other energy
source breaking the bond?
Geeze,
Edison was a greedy liar and cheat who was cruel to animals. Schrodinger was a
bigamist. MLK and possibly Einstein were plagiarists. Werner Von Braun was a
Nazi and may have held rank in the SS. Tesla was a OCD-laden nutball.
I'm not sure I'd buy a used car from any of them. OTOH, I still
This is very good, because it is clear effort to ease the tax burden of middle
class families. An as we have vertical farming in our hands, we really have no
problems with overpopulation, because humans consume only about 1.5 % of
Earth's resources if horizontal Agriculture is removed from
Zell, Chris chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
Edison was a greedy liar and cheat who was cruel to animals. Schrodinger
was a bigamist. MLK and possibly Einstein were plagiarists. Werner Von
Braun was a Nazi and may have held rank in the SS. Tesla was a OCD-laden
nutball.
I'm not sure I'd buy a
Jones,
So you are OK with DFG taking Rossi's invention and in effect stealing
it from him? You do admit it worked. But not for long enough. So what?
IT WORKED. What part of IT WORKED don't you understand?
And now your saying DFG will eat the lunch Rossi prepared and you think
they are OK in
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Zell, Chris chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
Edison was a greedy liar and cheat who was cruel to animals. Schrodinger
was a bigamist. MLK and possibly Einstein were plagiarists. Werner Von
Braun was a Nazi and may have held rank in the SS. Tesla was a OCD-laden
On 12-01-16 05:11 PM, Zell, Chris wrote:
Edison was a greedy liar and cheat who was cruel to animals. Schrodinger was a
bigamist. MLK and possibly Einstein were plagiarists.
I've read Poincare's papers Einstein supposedly plagiarized.
In a word ... he didn't. Poincare had a lot of the
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Jones,
So you are OK with DFG taking Rossi's invention and in effect stealing it
from him? You do admit it worked.
How can we possibly know that anything from Defkalion ever worked? They've
never shown any
His name was Thales of Miletus. g
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:25:53 -0500
From: sa...@pobox.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi comments on the It was sent back statement
On 12-01-16 05:11 PM, Zell, Chris wrote:
Edison was a greedy liar and cheat who was cruel to
Mary,
My statement was directed to Beene and not you. It was based on that of
Beene, who claimed Rossi's reactor WORKED during the DFG tests but not
for the required 48 hours.
My statement to you is:
So was Beene lying about the IT WORKED statement? If so then he may
also be lying about the
Edison cheated Tesla on a flimsy pretext ('just joking') and 'repeatedly lied'
about DC vs AC. Tesla was vindicated, not Edison. Edison didn't even invent
the electric lightbulb ( OK, he made it last longer).
Testing without cost or risk? Not in any way that I would risk, if I was him.
He has missed the boat.
Frank Z
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Zell, Chris chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
**
Testing without cost or risk? Not in any way that I would risk, if I was
him.
What is the risk beyond any risk Rossi already assumed when he did some 8
or 10 public demonstrations already? And he still gives
Yes AG I am completely OK with DGT's strategy because essentially Thermacore
invented the device, Mills explained some of it, Rossi improved it but
failed to get a usable patent for what he added. Rossi wrote the contract
and could have claimed the benefits but only if he could deliver what the
Yamali Yamali yamaliyam...@yahoo.de wrote: And as I read it, it would
imply that the energetic equivalent of 10 kW (or whatever an e-cat produces)
would have to be thermalized in the lead shielding from gamma rays. So if the
shield is 3 cm, the equivalent of about 10 kW x .01 or about 100 W
Mary I'm a little confused. Perhaps you can clarify ?
I know that you have stated it many times but is your position still that
Rossi's first customer is a fictional one made up by him to give him
credibility ? If this is the case then this fictional customer seems to
have had fictional problems
A longer exposition at
http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/WL/media-3rd-party/Widom-LarsenChemForumsLetter.shtml
Question 3 and in a separate paper (which I hadn't looked at before) :
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0509/0509269v1.pdf By Widom and Larsen:
Finally, Widom and Larsen
Hallo,
If you need help, I can do database stuff with php and MySql. However, I am
lousy webdesigner, so I will not build you modern looking tempelate from
scratch.
However, there are ready made templates and I can modify one for the needs
of your site. So if you can find a web a html+css
WL also predict an increase in surface conductivity (decrease in resistance) :
The number density of heavy electrons on a metallic hydride surface is of the
order of the number density of surface hydrogen atoms when there is a proton or
deuteron flux moving through the surface and LENR are being
Gold cannot be made from lead though fusion, it would require fission.
There isn't much point making gold from platinum, I presume.
To make Cu out of Ni though the Rossi claimed scheme it would release
3.4 GWh of heat per produced kg of Copper, that's an entirely new form
of climate pollution!
The story of the customer having returned the 1 MW unit originated from a post
here on Vortex claiming inside knowledge. Rossi has subsequently denied it was
returned by the customer. Rossi does say that he is working with National
Instruments and the customer in order to optimize it.
Date:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Craig - Did you catch Rossi's interview Friday?
He said straight out: we are in mass production in Miami.
I thought he said 'Florida', but it doesn't matter. When I heard this,
my initial thought was that he is planning
I'm away from my desk, and composing on a zimbra web interface. It looks fine
in my mailer.
When I look at the vortex web archive most of my line-feeds are stripped away.
I think it isn't remembering my directive to format in text, not HTML.
Bob,
An error you seem to be making, leading to your conclusion of way lower
than the magnitude of energy reported by Rossi is an underlying assumption.
You assume a symmetrical, chemical, or one-way reaction. What is not being
factored into the equation, nor do we know, is the most
A longer exposition at
http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/WL/media-3rd-party/Widom-LarsenChemForumsLetter.shtml
Question 3
and in a separate paper (which I hadn't looked at before) :
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0509/0509269v1.pdf
By Widom and Larsen:
Finally, Widom and
WL also predict an increase in surface conductivity (decrease in resistance) :
The number density of heavy electrons on a metallic hydride surface is
of the order of the number density of surface hydrogen atoms when
there is a proton or deuteron flux moving through the surface and LENR
are
I see Zawadny as taking a principled, high risk position, saying
exactly what he thinks -- I'm impressed, and would be interested to
know what evidence he finds most convincing.
The frontier of physics-math-technology is a fractal surface in
eternal exponential expansion -- no way to know what
If this theory is really functional, how does it explain that after the
experiment there isn't strong emission of gamma rays since all is generated
by beta decay, a good share of which has a half life of days or weeks? It's
in WL tables of decays.
How does it explain the formation of Lithium and
For those not following LENR for more than about the last year, the name
Bockris might be new. He did a considerable amount of excellent LENR
research in the 90s, and eventually faced several 'official' inquiries at
the insistence of colleagues. none of which found any wrong-doing or bad
science.
I also recommend Drupal, Wordpress, or Joomla
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
Hallo,
If you need help, I can do database stuff with php and MySql. However, I
am lousy webdesigner, so I will not build you modern looking tempelate from
scratch.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Michael Butcher thebend...@gmail.comwrote:
Mary I'm a little confused. Perhaps you can clarify ?
I know that you have stated it many times but is your position still that
Rossi's first customer is a fictional one made up by him to give him
credibility ? If
All,
In reading the CELANI presentation what is striking to me and probably
hardest for everyone, including me to accept even more then the technology
is that between 1995 and 2011 all of those PHDs from all of those
prestigious universities with all that research grant money were only able
to
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
With an 8 million times chemical
potential I think we should all agree and rename the technology Low
Efficiency Nuclear Reaction...
Just having fun, don't flame me...
Or possibly IENR for a reaction which requires
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
