These two articles are suggestive when read in conjunction with one another:
http://phys.org/news/2012-07-synchrotrons-superconductors-cold.html
The team found the first experimental evidence that a so-called
'charge-density-wave instability' competes with superconductivity.
Part III:
now the conspiracy:
Thesis:
Rossi is actually an agent, to ultimately prove the ridiculousness of LENR.
Let us add some indications:
1.1) No coworkers of Rossi are known. Except his wife.
1.2) Rossi moves a lot, mainly from Italy to the US and back
1.3) his known facility is a big
There's only one hole with your conspiracy theory, and it's a hole you can
drive your Mack Truck thru:
That is, if Rossi is an agent to discredit LENR, whatever agency, entity,
person or company using Rossi should be immediately removed with extreme
prejudice from the human gene pool.
Why?
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
It was in light of this kind of traffic in heavier metropolitan areas that
we wondered whether there was a carefully-worded safety filter applied to
the algorithm which would cause the Google car to adjust to the traffic
around it. Apparently not.
Jojo,
pretending, mimikry and (self-) decepiton are part of the gene-pool, developed
for wahtever reason by evolution.
As conscious beings we have to fight this.
Sure, any trickster gets a lot of attention. Even Uri Geller got the attention
of Richard Feynman.
...
Because a good magician can
This is a big deal.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Jul 14, 2012 2:01 am
Subject: [Vo]:superconductors and laser light
These two articles are suggestive when read in conjunction with one another:
From Gunter:
.
now the conspiracy:
Thesis:
Rossi is actually an agent, to ultimately prove the ridiculousness of
LENR.
.
It seems to me that Rossi is doing what Rossi has always been doing -
drumming up the necessary capital he needs in order to complete the
commercial
The papers are also relevant to the Letts/Cravens effect (improvement in
LENR due to laser irradiation)... as are the Boris Ivlev papers mention by
Mark recently ...
From: fznidar...@aol.com
This is a big deal.
Maybe this problem could be by-passed either by disabling the GPS, or by
applying some type of material to obstruct the speed-sensor. Should the
vehicle be designed with a no-tampering mechanism, then, don't buy it. Another
solution to this problem would be to build a vehicle that has no
On Jul 14, 2012, at 7:07, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely this feature could be added if the cars prove hazardous. This sounds
like a minor improvement compared to the overall project.
I agree. It wasn't intended to be a quip; more a musing on the possible legal
At times I thought so.
Actually it seems like child's play with MIT, Pirelli-high-school and such.
To assemble some experiment on high-school level seems to be standard procedure
nowadays, still largely ignored by the mainstream of scientists. To their own
detriment and ultimate blame.
Being a naive American, I'm given to baseless theorizing and am willing to
believe anything my government tells me. So I appreciate random speculation.
But when we're talking about people, especially living ones, we should ground
any discussion in solid, demonstrable facts, and avoid
Yes, Steven, You never know.
the net makes us paranoid, even to the extent that even I myself do not know
anymore if I myself am my worst enemy.
I prefer company which stays away from the net, just to have some contact to
'the real world'.
At times I think:
They are clever enough to operate an
I can see Jed now, zooming down Peachtree Industrial Blvd on his way
to work. I wonder if it has AC?
http://www.gizmag.com/eggasus-electric-vehicle/23159/
T
(I wonder if it comes in egg shell white?)
I have been attempting to improve my understanding of nuclear reactions and
have reached some interesting conclusions. It has been known for many decades
that the motion of a charged particle such as an electron or proton results in
the emission of electromagnetic radiation. The smooth non
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see Jed now, zooming down Peachtree Industrial Blvd on his way
to work.
I would do it, too! I have ridden many improbable vehicles around here.
The top speed is 25 mph. Not fast enough for Atlanta urban driving, which
maxes at 45 mph. The NHK
The speeding problem will be solved by increased enforcement of traffic
laws and special lanes for cars that want to drive faster.
Automated enforcement will be trivial as new technologies such as toll
collection transponders become mandatory. Of course, there may be some
reluctance to embrace
Eric, at the risk of deviating from the issue, here is one prominent example of
an INDIVIDUAL named Richard Kaplan, author of An Empire Wilderness: Travels
into America’s Future (1998), deconstructed by JM Greer, who shoud be termed a
national treasure of american thought.
See:
SVJ wrote:
While I'm at it, I think Gunter might turn out to be an agent too - with
his own personal agenda. I base this suspicion of mine on the fact that
whenever I hit the reply button from one of Gunter's vortex-l posts my
replies are automatically sent to Gunter's personal email address, not
The Bumpy Road.
The binding energy contained inside the nucleus is an uncertain thing; it
goes up and down at the whim of quantum mechanics; it varies with the
uncertainty principle. This energy is comprised of two parts: a real energy
and a virtual energy. It is this virtual energy that can
Illuminating discussion of quantum tunneling. This is a very mysterious
subject.
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that no radioactive isotopes are found in the ash of the cold
fusion reaction is unequivocal proof that LENR is caused by the
But many isotopes are stable and in LENR all resultant isotopes are always
stable; They are never radioactive. The Bumpy road holds still.
Even if the nucleus is completely rearranged with various particles and/or
clusters of particles are coming and going into and out of the nucleus,
when the
FYI See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_isotope
Stable isotope
Axil
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
But many isotopes are stable and in LENR all resultant isotopes are always
stable; They are never radioactive. The Bumpy road holds still.
Even
The Kiplinger Letter (July 13, 2012) had the following to say about the
future of automotive technology:
***
As automotive technology races ahead. The impact will ripple through the
economy.
Advances will build on steps already taken:
Onboard
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
But many isotopes are stable and in LENR all resultant isotopes are always
stable; They are never radioactive. The Bumpy road holds still.
Tritium is radioactive. But I think Robin speculated that that might be
due to a
As I have posted before in the thread “Variability in cold fusion”, we are
not dealing with a black or white condition; no, it is more likely a gray
situation with many gradations in shade.
The weaker, the cold fusion reaction is; the weaker that the coulomb
barrier lowering is; the greater
I don't know if Guenter Wildgruber is *his* real
name, but Mark_-ZeroPoint most certainly is not a
real name. But I'll happily apologize if it is.
Mark, here, speculates on something, along with
SVJ, about Guenter's mail, that makes some crazy assumptions.
If you hit a reply to an actual
At 02:15 PM 7/14/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
The fact that no radioactive isotopes are found in the ash of the
cold fusion reaction is unequivocal proof that LENR is caused by the
lowering of the coulomb barrier and NOT a fusion process.
Sorry, not so.
It is proof that the mechanism, whatever it
At 02:25 PM 7/14/2012, Eric Walker wrote:
Illuminating discussion of quantum tunneling. Â
This is a very mysterious subject.
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Axil Axil
mailto:janap...@gmail.comjanap...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that no radioactive isotopes are found
in the ash of the
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
I prefer to avoid much speculation about other environments, such as NiH,
and consider that care should be used to not assume that all LENRs are the
same reaction or reaction mechanism. Maybe they are, but this is
Eric,
This may not be directly relevant, but I just found this interesting book
chapter and I do not want to start a new thread on superconductivity -
Novel Magnetic and Electrical Properties
of Carbon Nanotubes: Consistent with
Ultrahigh Temperature Superconductivity
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:15:00 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I want to put in my 2 cents worth concerning repulsion between neutrons. If
two neutrons meet in free space I would think that they would be attracted
together by the strong force. The reason that this
ABD,
The scenarios aren't even in the same league... there are so many variables
with Rossi's situation compared to my simple one. There are just as many
facts re: Rossi that one can weave together to support any of several
different scenarios (legit, fraud, misinformation, etc.). As I said,
If two neutrons were capable of binding, then one might expect them to
occasionally do so with the aid of a third particle with which momentum could be
shared resulting in an energetic third particle and an energetic di-neutron.
Hence one would expect to occasionally detect di-neutrons. AFAIK
Re: 'charge-density-wave instability'
What does this mean, in simple speaking?
Electrons pair up into cooper pairs because these electrons have lost their
charge; these free electrons don’t have charge repulsion around anymore to
gum up their party.
Their charge is masked out of existence
From Abd
Embarrassing, messages like this, assuming a nefarious reason
for something quite ordinary, don't you think?
FYI, I was deliberately trying to torment Guenter. Mark understood that and
went along for the ride... I suspect Guenter also understood the fact that I
was trying to
Cadillac Super Cruise available in 2015:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksl-Fbmvxj4
T
I appreciate Eric's response. My focus is only my
focus; I am generally encouraging closer
exploration of trhe Fleischmann-Pons Heat Effect,
which has been the subject of thousands of efforts, and there is a lot of data.
Often, I find, the data is nevertheless
inadequate for use to
Abd ul,
I am posting here with my real name, but who knows if that is true?
The liar's paradox, which became a serious problem with the net.
Who is who and who is telling the 'truth'?
Only personal acquaintance or a serious, consistent dedication to a topic can
tell.
eg I have now doubt that
I would think GW would associate Cohen's Everybody Knows with Rossi and LENR:
Everybody Knows
Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows that the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight was fixed
The poor
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1106.4323.pdf
This is an open access paper on the subject.
Cheers: Axil
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 5:53 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Eric,
This may not be directly relevant, but I just found this interesting book
chapter and I do not want to start a new thread on
Of course, maybe I'm the one to be embarrassed, by taking parody for
serious complaint
So what, I don't care. I just write what I think, plus what I dig up
as research.
Mostly I'm ignoring this list, I've gotten Awfully Busy elsewhere. I
don't need the latest crumbs from the Rossi
At 06:13 PM 7/14/2012, Guenter Wildgruber wrote:
Abd ul,
I am posting here with my real name, but who knows if that is true?
The liar's paradox, which became a serious problem with the net.
Who is who and who is telling the 'truth'?
Only personal acquaintance or a serious, consistent dedication
At 06:39 PM 7/14/2012, you wrote:
I would think GW would associate Cohen's Everybody Knows with
Rossi and LENR:
Geez, is a real conversation starting up here on Vortex? Who would've thunk it?
Axil,
That's true - I posted that arxiv.org reference a while back, but the
book chapter was also open access a couple of hours ago. I downloaded it.
Strange that it was sealed off so quickly.
Same lead author.
Contents are a bit different and more current for those who don't mind the
Re: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1106.4323.pdf
I scanned through it fast. It was surprising.
The bottom line to what this author is saying is as follows:
These experimental data cannot be explained by ballistic transport but are
consistent with phase-incoherent ultrahigh temperature (1050 K or 776 C)
46 matches
Mail list logo
