From: Ron Kita
Greetings Vortex,
I wasn t aware of Naudin s Patent Application:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=%2F
But what are you talking about here?? :) What virus? What book? How was it
eaten? Which person are you referring to?
these books
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooksfield-keywords=frank+znidarsic+science+books
Something went wrong with Java and my files were
fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Something went wrong with Java and my files were temporally lost.
The problem was on your computer, not Amazon's. If Amazon goes down it will
be a national calamity since they supply data processing services to many
others, such as Netflix.
Things often go wrong
I feel really good about what I have done. The peer reviewed article forced me
to be logically consistent. I then
applied this consistency to my book. The result is simple.
I refactored Coulombs equation into the form of an elastic constant and a wave
number. Using these terms I produced the
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Something went wrong with Java and my files were temporally lost.
The problem was on your computer, not Amazon's. If Amazon goes down it will
be a national calamity since they supply data
Things learned recently. I had this number rp. I thought it was the protons
radius. That was wrong. It
was the electrons wave number. With that my calculations fit into standard
forms. I had this other number 1.36 fermis.
I found it in the literature with a negative one exponent. Lane
“Centering” has profound implications in many fields. Never mind that this
Sunday, at least in the USA, most males are thinking only about it only in
the context of the sport of football. Yawn.
It is almost a primal duality in perception to contrast an uncentered
(uniform) system vs a centered
Is it the wind?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoCBORXzOqU
Thank you Jed for all that you have done. Here are all the number you need.
1.409 fermis , The electronic wave number
1.36 fermis, the nuclear wave number
29.05 / r, the electrons elastic constant
The numbers emerged from cold fusion experiments.
They are not much but the change the
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 13 Jan 2013 14:35:01 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Is it the wind?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoCBORXzOqU
I doubt it. The speed is fairly constant irrespective of orientation. The
voltage from the coil on the meter is 5.92 volts, which seems to match the
Oh, by the way, here are the numbers you no longer need.
Planck's constant
The Compton frequency
The deBroglie wavelength
An adHoc Schrodinger wave equation
The principle of quantum correspondence
Start with the 3 New numbers and you can produce all of the above.
Frank Z
Frank Znidarsic
Original Message
Subject: Re: I feel really good about what I have done
From: Frank Znidarsic fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
CC:
Oh, by the way, here are the numbers you no longer need.
Planck's constant
The Compton frequency
The deBroglie wavelength
An adHoc
Almost forgot. No longer needed.
Coulombs equation
3 New factors do it all.
Original Message
Subject: Re: I feel really good about what I have done
From: Frank Znidarsic fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
CC:
Oh, by the way, here are the numbers you no longer need.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:00 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
The whole thing is reminiscent of the Avramenko Plug. One or more solder
joints
may function as a diode.
Yes, he gave the coordinates (53.322062,6.206194) and I had a look but
saw no obvious large towers within a mile or so. I
A battery inside of the motor case and multimeter.
Here is a video rebuttal describing the scam and some choice (NSFW)
commentary.
https://www.youtube.com//watch?v=mv713TggGT8
- Brad
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:00 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 13
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:00 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
The whole thing is reminiscent of the Avramenko Plug. One or more solder
joints
may function as a diode.
Yes, he gave the coordinates (53.322062,6.206194)
Hi Frank
Oh, by the way, here are the numbers you no longer need... Planck's constant,
the Compton frequency, the DeBroglie wavelength, etc
Start with the 3 New numbers and you can produce all of the above.
OK, no problem with that - but if you start with the better-known numbers, you
As some of you know, a number of us have started a newVortex
mailing list. This is a moderated list, but, routinely, new
subscribers, on showing that they aren't spammers by submitting a
coherent, on-topic post, will be taken off of moderation. The list,
as a yahoogroup, has other associated
At 03:42 PM 1/12/2013, Alex wrote:
This second link says much about the possibilty of this microwave motor.
But in the end I am not really able to try it, because once they
were speaking about electrolysis from water into hydrogen then about
splitting water with microwaves and then about
This document by Bill Beaty is well worth reviewing, if the reader is
not familiar with it.
http://amasci.com/freenrg/rules1.html
This doesn't just apply to inventors. Similar phenomena happen with
pseudoskeptics, and *who isn't pseudoskeptical* on occasion, at
least? A genuine skeptic does
So-called confirmation bias must have had some adaptive value. I wonder
what it was or perhaps even is?
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
This document by Bill Beaty is well worth reviewing, if the reader is not
familiar with it.
I would guess that there is some form of RF coupling to the coil or antenna
from a nearby powerful source. This can be rectified to generate the DC
voltage that he is using to drive the motor.
I would include a zener type diode to limit the voltage and make it look
constant. This design is
This is an easy fake to do. There are 2 hidden small power sources. The
sources have equally same potential by means of Zener diode for example.
Small batteries are enough for the test with take 10 minutes to be
completed.
One source is placed inside the voltmeter in series with the (+) input.
This is a dreadful story. See:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/01/13/brilliant_life_and_tragic_death_of_aaron_swartz.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/01/13/aaron_swartz_s_suicide_may_make_the_open_access_movement_mainstream.html
It gives me the willies because it is
Subject: Re: I feel really good about what I have done
Can you use them to make a useful prediction in LENR?
(this is not a criticism, just an obvious question which you must have seen
before, so you probably have an obvious answer)
Jones
Thank you Jones, that is a good question.
I suspect that you are correct with what you are saying. The helical large
wire would act as a highly conductive current pass from one end to the other.
I was hoping for a at least an attempt to make free energy as opposed to
conducting a pure scam.
This type of non sense makes me ill. Why
At 05:18 PM 1/13/2013, James Bowery wrote:
So-called confirmation bias must have had some adaptive value. I
wonder what it was or perhaps even is?
Okay, let me guess. We are good at guessing. We might occasionally
even get it right.
Much human behavior is learned. We need to be able to
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 3:22:49 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Tragic death of Aaron Swartz and the open source science
movement
It gives me the willies because it is somewhat similar to what I do at
LENR-CANR.org.
Just as well nobody cares about
At 06:22 PM 1/13/2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
This is a dreadful story. See:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/01/13/brilliant_life_and_tragic_death_of_aaron_swartz.htmlhttp://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/01/13/brilliant_life_and_tragic_death_of_aaron_swartz.html
Martin Fleischmann expressed a view that you might say is the opposite of
this. He said when you find an anomaly, it is the easiest thing in the
world to convince yourself it isn't real. Your first instinct is to
dismiss it. I think he meant that was the first instinct of a trained
scientist such
My theory predicts that many rainbows create their own clouds and
thunderstorms through atmospheric collapse and condensing in their vicinity
and the energetic particle orbiting through the elliptical arc of the
rainbow can weigh millions of tons (if you could weigh it). The rainbow
itself is the
In behavioral psych, the term is variable ratio reinforcement for the
kind of reinforcement schedule, your refer to, that produces
long-persisting behaviors/models/beliefs. Pseudoskeptics would,
undoubtedly, like to point to that as an explanation for why cold fusion
researchers are irrational.
He might have given back the original, but he made a copy. The JSTOR
archive was finally uploaded to piratebay today.
2013/1/13 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Aaron returned the data he had in his possession and JSTOR settled any
civil claims we might have had against him in June 2011.
I'm sorry. These files, uploaded, were already there. They were just re
uploaded.
2013/1/13 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
He might have given back the original, but he made a copy. The JSTOR
archive was finally uploaded to piratebay today.
2013/1/13 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
At 07:43 PM 1/13/2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Martin Fleischmann expressed a view that you might say is the
opposite of this. He said when you find an anomaly, it is the
easiest thing in the world to convince yourself it isn't real. Your
first instinct is to dismiss it. I think he meant that was
At 07:55 PM 1/13/2013, James Bowery wrote:
In behavioral psych, the term is variable ratio reinforcement for
the kind of reinforcement schedule, your refer to, that produces
long-persisting behaviors/models/beliefs. Pseudoskeptics would,
undoubtedly, like to point to that as an explanation
All subscriptions blocked until further notice.
(( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur
Hello everybody remembering me,
I had difficulty to join Vortex List by a possible reason of
http://www.mail-archive.com is possibly being filtered here. Terry
helped me.
I would like to ask your opinions about suppression (trends) after 2000
where global CO2 emissions is widely considered a
At 10:21 PM 1/13/2013, William Beaty wrote:
Very weird. Bcc'ing this to newvor...@yahoogroups.com, just in case.
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:21:47 -0800 (PST)
From: William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Abd Lowmax no longer welcome on vortex
All subscriptions blocked until further
From: Frank Z
It predicts that if you can induce a wave motion in the
dissolved hydrogen or deuterium with a velocity of one mega meter per
second cold fusion will progress. Normal sound velocity in a solid is 2
kilo meters per second. Now we
Thank you Jones. I believe you understand. Take the sea for an example. The
speed sound is fixed at 2 kilo meters per second or so. Waves on the surface
can go slower or faster. Tidal waves can exceed the speed of sound in water.
That the concept that I want to apply. Instead of using
Jones asks what does it have to do with the fine structure constant. That a
very good question.
Take the simplest case, the ground state electron in hydrogen. Its velocity is
2 million meters per second. Its a traveling wave and expresses itself at one
wavelength. That is what traveling
42 matches
Mail list logo
