http://homepages.uni-regensburg.de/~eng14891/qcdB_workshop/pdf/QCDB_Mueller.pdf
When QED meets QCD
Is slide 21 what happens in LENR?
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does a strong magnetic field disrupt the nucleus?
The quarks cannot be magnetic
I am not sure that a translation would be of much help. With LeClair I
think you need to try and separate out the hypothesies as to the
mechanism from the observations of what happened. Too often LeClair
confuses the two. There is a lot to be said for the
'Method/Results/Discussion' format
Which aspects of the 'results' do you think are true and why?
[m]
On Saturday, November 9, 2013, Nigel Dyer wrote:
I am not sure that a translation would be of much help. With LeClair I
think you need to try and separate out the hypothesies as to the mechanism
from the observations of
Looks like they can't reproduce:
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/general-updates/348-the-hug-quest-for-gammas-and-more
Suspect cosmic / background radiation.
Interesting how Jean-Paul Biberian replicated it.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
The foreign policy journal has a piece by Dr. Stoyan Sarg
Cold Fusion Energy: What to Expect and How Close We Are
He speculates Rossi's E-Cats need a beta emitter, while Defkalion
doesn't because they use an arc discharge.
My friend Stoyan has published this idea on my blog too
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/10/about-secret-catalyzer-used-by-andrea.html
Therefore yesterday I have asked him if he knows about
some researchers who have tested the idea; unfortunately
he does not know- yet.
Peter
On Sat, Nov 9,
I just pulled this very book out of a box yesterday, and wondered to
myself, hmm, why do I have this book?
There are no coincidences. always a reason.
-mark
From: Ruby [mailto:r...@hush.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 1:15 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Quote from Guy
Harry,
A reasonable analogy.
Surprising that such energy/momentum foci occur in such fields.
It would be interesting to know if materials can be engineered to create
them near, or between, surfaces.
-- Lou Pagnucco
H Veeder wrote:
Like a twig whipping around an eddy in a stream?
Harry
On
It’s a matter of simple proportions. A one nanometer nanoparticle that
bends a infrared light wave whose wavelength is 1 mm into a spherical
soliton would pack the optical energy of that infrared wave into that small
soliton at an amplification of 1,000,000 times.
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM,
By the way, that nanoparticle would convert that infrared wave into an
x-ray.
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It’s a matter of simple proportions. A one nanometer nanoparticle that
bends a infrared light wave whose wavelength is 1 mm into a spherical
The bits of the results that I think are true are that he has managed to
get fairly spectacular damage using cavitation bubbles and that there
was something more interesting going on than just bubble collapse. The
answer to why comes from having spent something like four hours with
Mark
LeClair’s experimental descriptions mostly rings true with my understanding
of LENR in cavatation.
The *Key* to LENR is optical vortexes (AKA solitons). Nanoplasmonics
mechanisms load light into nano-sized optical resonators in unlimited
amounts. These solitons produce hugely powerful tightly
When I had a look at the tracks that were present on the samples that
Mark showed us, I was left with the clear impression that what was going
on was not simply ballistic. It did not look as if the cavitation
bubble shot out a lump of something that gouged its way along the
surface of the
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:59 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
GR says it is because time itself slows down as gravity intensifies
Is it gravity that causes time to slow down in the reference frame, or
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/nov/01/uncertainty-reigns-over-heisenbergs-measurement-analogy
Nov.1, 2013
A row has broken out among physicists over an analogy used by Werner
Heisenberg in 1927 to make sense of his famous uncertainty principle. The
analogy was largely forgotten
15 matches
Mail list logo
